| < October 24 | October 26 > |
|---|
The result was Userfy with no mainspace redirect — Caknuck 01:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find any real notability here. Most Google hits are credits or trivial references. Article created by Killius himself. Crazysuit 23:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 01:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nom; I've just declined a ((db-web)) on this as it (vaguely) asserts notability, but as it stands it seems unsourced and very spammy & I can't see any way to clean it up to something valid. However, it's about as far from my area of expertise as it's possible to get — someone might be able to build something valid out of this. — iridescent 23:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep - no consensus to delete. JodyB Roll, Tide, Roll 12:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the fact that this is just a list, and a lot of the links are to external sources and not even to articles on Wikipedia, we don't do articles on individual school leagues. Corvus cornix 23:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Merge was not viable as there is nothing sourced in the article. GRBerry
We don't do articles on individual school leagues. Corvus cornix 23:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per consensus of established editors. Also, several of the keep arguments are from the same user. --Coredesat 00:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article is about a Neologism, as evidenced by a Google Scholar search on the topic, which yields only four results using the actual term that was apparently coined on usenet. Only two of the four results are in peer-reviewed journals, neither of which give a definition. -- Craigtalbert 23:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect some research (going beyond just Googling!) can find several more academic references. The article is clearly not OR, though like a few other articles it might be improved with some more citations over time. The term is (from the published sources) about 20 years old, from before the internet became popular, though its usage only became widespread 15 years ago, so it's not as recent a neologism as Polyamory or many other terms retained on Wikipedia. The above references to popularity in FAQs, web sites, and discussion groups is not relevant as reliable sources for defining the term, but they are relevant to whether the term is "notable" within the culture. Zeph99 23:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Being a bishop is not inherently notable. If he had done something notable on his own, then I could see keeping this. Corvus cornix 23:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Being a bishop is not inherently notable. If he had done something notable on his own, then I could see keeping this. Corvus cornix 23:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as a hoax. No real need for AFD on obvious stuff like this. Friday (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's a silly hoax. Though I hear that since their listing on Wikipedia, the number of Shpigs has tripled... Moyabrit 23:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Being a bishop is not inherently notable. If he has done something on his own to be notable, then I could see keeping this. Corvus cornix 23:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:Pedro declined db-spam, but suggested to AFD Chealer 21:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The possible merge target was deleted by AFD, making merge non-viable. GRBerry 14:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Character from non-notable fantasy trilogy. See alsoWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Frenalose Galaxy Collection Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 21:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable trilogy published by vanity publisher. No GHits for reviews from reputable sources. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 21:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. There is a good case for merge here, but consensus for such a move should be sought through the usual discussions. Since there are reliable sources for the term (NSW Police and the Sydney Morning Herald), there really isn't any case for deletion at all. At least it should be a redirect. --Tony Sidaway 00:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced article about a police squad. Each squad of police that focus on a particular set of crimes - or here - just a few statutes are not notable. Are we going to have New York Police Department's missing person task force, California Highway Patrol's seatbelt enforcement squad, Texas Rangers' homicide division and 10's of thousands of others getting articles? No. Put this info in the police force's article and redirect perhaps, otherwise delete. Carlossuarez46 21:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A7. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability criteria, sounds like an advertisement Pilotbob 21:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable event that gets four Google hits, none of them in independent media. Originally written as an advertisement, I pared it back to the basic facts. Acroterion (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. This is an exceptionally poorly written article on a controversial subject, but the source material is there and we don't delete articles if it's possible to write a good encyclopedia article on the subject. Let's be patient with this subject. --Tony Sidaway 00:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ashkenazi intelligence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Per request, this AfD is split off from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race and intelligence (history). See reasoning for deletion there. I was not the original nominator, but I split this off per request. All comments below were specific for this article and have been moved from the original page. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 21:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One more? Ashkenazi intelligence
I'm adding this article as well, since I missed it in the first pass, and everything I said in my rationale for the others applies to this as well. – ornis⚙ 13:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments (moved)
Sadly, Jon513 either misses or ignores the central point. There is NO article called Aryan intelligence and that is very much the point. Claims by one group or another (or a non-scientist and panderer like Charles Murray) that one group or another is superior to another is always suspect, and without foundation. This article cites Murray who is an authority on nothing but his ideologically based opinion pushing.Skywriter 21:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There should be no further votes on Ashkenazi intelligence as it must be a separate vote according to the criteria noted by Od Mishehu (it was not listed correctly). IZAK is correct that there needs to be a distinct vote, away from this mess. A Sniper —Preceding comment was added at 20:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]
Keep per above. Well sourced, useful, and valid research. Modernist 21:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 01:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was deleted via WP:PROD with the concern being that the article is a hoax. I am inclined to agree, there are no decent hits on google and as the prod nominator noted, no such player currently plays for Freiburg or has ever played for DC United. Hiding Talk 21:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An article originally written in very promotional terms, since improved, but notability concerns have never been addressed. No third-party references. Acroterion (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Local swim club, fails notability guideline Pilotbob 21:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Article has been improved and nom also appears to be withdrawn.Kubigula (talk) 03:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not assert notability, though I am lenient on high schools. What pushed me to AfD it is that it is written like a directory, and ends up holding no encyclopedic value as a result. Wizardman 21:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Looks better now. Wizardman 18:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alansohn 20:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as vandalism. Sandahl 21:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising. NawlinWiki 20:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable dance studio. Fails the notability policy and does not cite reliable sources. STORMTRACKER 94 20:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was dewiite. krimpet⟲ 00:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is trivial information that only a select few people care about. I also believe it falls under game guide material, as it explains many features for the games. This exists on the gamer wiki already, which is the suitable place for an article like this. RobJ1981 20:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete due to lack of demonstrated real-world notability and reliable secondary sources. MaxSem 19:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From the views of a non-reader, a list of unnotable characters from a game has little to no relevence to the real world, failing notability.
Also, out of the only four sources on the page, three of them came from the same source (ArenaNet). The last one as far as I know is even more irrelevant, being about the music of the game.
Basically, this is gamecruft, something Wikipedia is not. IAmSasori 20:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A plain mess of unnotable material.
This article also appeared to have an entire year to gather sources but failed to attain even one, making it lean more towards original research.
As mentioned before, this page have failed notability, as anyone that does not play the Warcraft games would be interested in reading this article.
This is pretty much gamecruft for the Warcraft series. IAmSasori 20:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Kill with fire. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely unnotable; even more unnotable than List of Warcraft races.
Wikipedia is not a game guide. People who do not play the Warcraft series will have no interest in these lists.
Along with that, it is not cited at all. It has failed notability and can easily be deemed as gamecruft. IAmSasori 20:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, per WP:NOT. End of story. Stifle (talk) 11:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While this was proposed for merge with the World of Warcraft article, it just seems to contain too much gamecruft to make it into the main article.
The article speaks in the 2nd person amongst opinionation, failing point of view easily.
Finally, it is not notable. There are no sources on this article, and it is probably better to delete rather than merge cruft into the main article. IAmSasori 20:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The title isn't even spelled correctly. It's Divine. Haha.81.158.211.115 21:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus — I can't close a discussion as "weak delete", but I would note that this totally fails notability guidelines. The most compelling argument on the "Keep" side is the assertion that it can be cleaned up. I would strongly suggest that users work on this aspect, and pronto, because articles cannot persist indefinitely on such a basis. In addition arguments like "gamecruft", "lots of things link to this" and "but this article is the same as it too" are not compelling, and add nothing. Clean it up, or I reckon the next discussion will be a delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haemo (talk • contribs) 01:08, 4 November 2007
While the reference template have been recently added, it still appears as if it is cruft. Even if the template has been placed recently, it has still failed notability, as only players and readers of the series would be interested.
While the books do exist in hard copy, there are no references to justify keeping the article for it.
Seeing as how the article is very large in the first place also (127 KB) and its contents, it can be assumed that it is not notable to the real world. IAmSasori 20:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Kill with more fire. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wnsourced, unnotable gamecruft.
Going over each, this page only has one source, one that isn't considered in the real world.
The article has little to no interest to non-players, as it is unnotable to them.
Finally, it appears to be cruft as it is very descriptive about an in-game location. IAmSasori 20:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Guantanamo detainee, abundant available sources (including Amnesty, which can hardly be described as a primary source in this matter). This does not prejudice the possibility of merging the information to a more comprehensive article about captives held without trial at Guantanamo. It would be odd if we didn't record information of such significance. --Tony Sidaway 02:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not express how/why this person is notable or meets WP:BIO. May possibly be a WP:COATRACK to express protests at Guantanamo Bay detainment camp, on which I make no opinion. Stifle (talk) 20:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 10:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nom - non-notable academic biography. Only claim to notability is a non-notable set of business texts. Rklawton 20:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete ^demon[omg plz] 16:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this is a hoax. I could not find any references on the web to confirm the existence of the subject yet the article claims "José was knighted from his royal and lordly ties. His exploits were fairly known and made him a hero to the Portuguese". NeilN 20:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prodded with a concern of lack of notability and conflict of interest but I thought it would be better off here instead. No vote. See also Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 December 24. Hut 8.5 20:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 01:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, prod remove by author. Claim of notability made, cannot be verified Wildthing61476 19:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Orlino swing is a slang term that is gaining popularity. I dont see why you would delete cool new phrases before they become universal. I am an equity trader in North Carolina and the term is frequently used.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.117.232.130 (talk • contribs)
KeepI trade for a living and I have Orlino Swings almost daily, it is a very common term in day trading.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.117.232.130 (talk • contribs)
Keep This is in fact a term used in day trading although it is not written about due to the fact it is slang, but non the less a term used with an increasing amount of regularity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NYdaytrader77 (talk • contribs)
The result was Speedy keep as per WP:SNOW.Capitalistroadster 02:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weakly Fails WP:BIO, google search only came up with 87 sources, most not related to topic. Tiptoety 19:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Tiptoety 00:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. GRBerry 14:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced one-line biography; I guess being an Emir in the sense of king is notable, but it's unsourced and no indication that the position held is in the nature of a king rather than as a priestly title and most preachers aren't notable without more coverage in 3rd party RSes Carlossuarez46 19:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Carlossuarez46 19:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Throw it in the vault. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete some say films cannot be speedy deleted, so this unsourced one-liner about a nn film released or to be released this year is for the community to decide. Carlossuarez46 19:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another unsourced article about a film with no indication as to notability. Carlossuarez46 19:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was splat! Let's pretend 9 November is here already; speedily deleted as a context-free NN bio. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article should be deleted, for there are not articles for each individual professional irish dancer; only the main dancers have articles on Wikipedia. --Breadsticks.rock 19:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete. CSD A7. — Scientizzle 21:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this person passes the notability criteria. -- Prince Kassad 18:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was closed. DS 01:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article created by a user with links to the hoaxish House of Camino. I can find no Google hits for "Rodrigo Sanchez de Veloso" and no reliable sources for a "Count of Veloso" or a "Conde de Veloso" or "Conte de Veloso". Corvus cornix 18:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --John 19:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced listcruft, almost entirely red-linked, and unlikely to become anything else. ^demon[omg plz] 18:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was transwiki and delete. Now it's available at b:Fortran/Fortran examples. MaxSem 19:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to be a list of unrelated examples of Fortran code, Delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. --Hq3473 18:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as non-notable constructed language, lacking any reliable sources at all. Bearian 16:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recently constructed language being promoted by its creator. No evidence of notability. From the comments on the talk page, an appropriate treatment might be to redirect to Modern Indo-European and mention it briefly there. -- RHaworth 17:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This individual fails to meet the WP:BIO notability criteria. The article's main claim to notability is that the subject's theories have gotten a lot of notice on a forum, and the article goes on to explicitly state that his work has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. There are no sources listed, and I couldn't find any reliable sources online either. Karanacs 16:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Has been speedied twice, and the author complained. Rschen7754 (T C) 16:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete. Hut 8.5 17:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Non-notable album by a non-notable artist, whose own article is tagged for speedy. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete all --Haemo 01:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article and some related pages were nominated for deletion in September 2006, with no consensus reached. All seem to relate to Chika Sylva-Olejeme, a Nigerian man of questionable notability. His chief claim to fame seems to be an "appointment" as an "ambassador of peace" by the Universal Peace Federation, run by Sun Myung Moon, but our article on the Universal Peace Federation says these "ambassadors" are volunteers, not appointed diplomats.
These articles all seem to reference each other – Sylva-Olejeme developed Post Philosophy, whose branch is Christian Post Philosophy, which led to the International Peace Institute, which developed the Peace Conservation System, which obeys the Universal Peace Protocol, which backs the peace creed, which is based on Post Philosophy. It's a maze of pseudo-notability. There are about four ELs, used by almost all of these articles, to pages at UNESCO – but two are '404 Not Found' (dead), one is to a kids art program, and one is a proposal to have a project of some sort that either hasn't happened or won't happen.
This is a textbook example of using Wikipedia to establish credibility where little exists. They are mostly unreferenced, except to each other, and the third-party references are of questionable quality and relevance. Begone with them. KrakatoaKatie 16:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Included with this nomination are:
[11] [12] [13] these information are not posted on the Internet and are not meant to be. Motegole 19:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
my emphasis is that a talk page is already running since 10 October 2006.
before i forget try to consider notability as worthy of notice WP:BIO [15] "Within Wikipedia, notability is an article inclusion criterion based on encyclopedic suitability. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice". This concept is distinct from "fame", "importance", or "popularity"." Motegole 11:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — fails WP:CORP --Haemo 01:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about a small chain of jewelry stores in Texas. The article primarily traces the history of the chain's expansion, but there is no claim of notability, no reliable sources are cited, and I haven't been able to find any sources beyond directory listings and an obituary for one of the founders. I think this fails WP:NOTABILITY. Karanacs 16:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The page DOES NOT FAIL. It is a narrative about a little recorded industry, ethnic group, and period of rapid economic development of a largely frontier part of the US. The style needs cleaning the firm is notable for it size, evolution, and age. Lastly it is the ONLY catalog showroom company to successfully convert from a catalog show room format [thing Best Products, Service Merchandise] into a guild jewelry & fine gift store in the nation. Brendall's tried and went out of business, so did Luria's and many others. In the jewelry industry to survival of Houston Jewelry has been noted many times in the trades as unique experience. See this article http://66.201.106.163/portal_FullMazalUbracha.asp?id=25332 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex495 (talk • contribs)
Note Information from Reference USA in NOT always accurate, neither is Dun & Brandstreet, however county court records, census records, and secretary of state records as well as original records are VERY accurate. Rex495 06:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)KeepRex495rex495[reply]
The result was Bust a cap in it. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Future album with no sources verifying its existence. One IP even claimed it was a hoax. Prod removed without explanation. Spellcast 16:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--JForget 01:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As much as I would love Blur to release an eighth album, the facts (and the media) stand that Blur is currently not planning to do so. Thus, this article is pure crystalballing taken to its logical extreme. TheLetterM 16:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Scientology controversy#Allegations of mistreatment of members. --bainer (talk) 06:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person committed non-notable suicide. Article is inherently POV as his only mention in media is as a take-off point for a POV piece attacking Scientology and, IMO, is more of a journalist styling than any inherent notability for Lottick. Note that the basis of notability mentioned in the article is "controversy" but there was no actual (notable) controversy over the suicide; no charges filed, etc. Please do not be impressed by the number of references as there is a degree of duplication, triviality, and inclusion of non-related notable issues such as the fight between the Church of Scientology and Time Magazine. Note also that the large number of links to the article is due to inclusion in the Scientology template, a very questionable inclusion given the total lack of relative importance. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a Scientologist but I rarely nominate articles for deletion and only those few that really, IMO, do not belong here. Thank you for your time. Justanother 15:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ρх₥α 01:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Track listing of as yet unreleased album DVD. Move information to Cowboy Mouth discography which contains track listings of albums by same band. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 15:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. CitiCat ♫ 01:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Brian0324 15:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. CitiCat ♫ 01:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thia article is almost an exact replica of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Punjabi_Muslim_tribes_from_Hindu_Lineage. That article was deleted for being an "indiscriminate collection of unsourced information". This article has some sources, but they are for material which is off topic. Delete for violating WP:OR, and WP:NOT. IP198 15:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The sources in the article are directly related to the topic .
There is no original research as there are citations from standard secondary sources .
Intothefire 17:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Snowball keep - not a "small village" but a mid-sized city, which are notable by extensive precedent. --Haemo 17:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable small village in Sri Lanka. Cyclopediafixer 15:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Category:Vegetarians and List of vegans where the people are already notable. Spellcast 15:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ρх₥α 01:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable Sound Track for one game DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 15:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. As no assertion of notability.CitiCat ♫ 01:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
. Indeed, for his supposedly only role in a "big" film, Mr. Bean, the IMDB says he's uncredited (i.e. at best he acted a waiter in a half-scene, I can't tell), while UniFrance lists only 2 additional films, for which he's credited... last on the list, if that's the measure of importance. Can't find any independent reviews other than miscellaneous film databases. Actually, his home page at http://pbv.free.fr/ has several more roles from 2006/2007, but can't tell about their significance. Duja► 14:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]"The same page has been deleted from the French version of Wikipedia, as Pierre-Benoist Varoclier didn't fulfil the required criterias (Varoclier appears in many movies, which explains why he has a page on IMDB, but never played any significant part and therefore can be considered not notable). He also was suspected of having created the page himself for autopromotion."
The result was delete. There's nothing except birth date and death date that's not already in History of the Brenham Jewish Community. - KrakatoaKatie 08:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This person does not meet WP:BIO notability criteria. The notability assertions in the article include the fact that he helped found a small synagogue in Brenham, Texas and that he was an investor in a railroad. Three of the four sources do not meet WP:RS, and the other mentions the subject only in passing. I was unable to find further sources on Google. Karanacs 14:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been around for a while - but that has only shown that it is unsalvageably an essay on an unencyclopedic subject. It consists solely of a whole screed of Bible passages, and utterly unreferenced, nonacademic opinionated commentary about whether they may be compatible with reincarnation. There is no evidence of citable secondary literature discussing the subject - and the references are just a concocted reading list. I've no doubt an proper essay on Christian views of reincarnation or Jewish views of Reincarnation could be written - which could include any discussion of the hermeneutics of the Bible in any academic debates on the matter (if there indeed are any). But this essay is just the assertions of wikipedians and should be deleted. We've waited long enough for a clean-up, and it obviously ain't gonna happen.. -Docg 14:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This biography has been created, possibly by the individual concerned, for promotion. My expertise is in Aramaic and Syriac (currently at Oxford): Lataster has never published in a peer-reviewed journal, nor has he any qualification in the field. Thus, any claim to have broken through academic consensus is impossible to evaluate, and is likely bunk. As for the financial advice, I'm not sure it is sufficiently notable to warrant an article. — Gareth Hughes 14:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. GRBerry 14:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article was originally (and properly) deleted as a CSD A7 DRV restored on the basis of a new assertion (not yet verified) that the band's recordings were published under the Warner Brothers label. Still, delete, given notability concerns. Xoloz 14:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete unleass warner automaticaly conveys notability. I see no assertion of meeting notability, and the allmusic page does not mention any awards. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 19:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — if you want a copy of the deleted article to merge content from, request one. --Haemo 01:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This individual does not meet notability criteria; the only claims the article makes are that he operated nine stores in Texas and donated money to a few local organizations. He is of no more than local interest, if that, and does not appear to be the subject of any reliable sources. The creator has asserted on the talk page that he is important to Jewish Texan history, but there is no claim for that in the article. Karanacs 14:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page is just one giant ad. The phrasing tone is very ad oriented ("No minimum monthly fees, no long-term commitment", "Find and view album art for all your music"), most of these products are also NN - A google search for Jungle Disk for Windows Home Server brings back little to do with Jungle disk after page 2, A search for HomeBase only brings up, rather random, results, searches for KeepVault and LobsterTunes bear only several results on the first page, a search Remote Notification simply brings up results for anything with "Remote Notification" in it. TV-VCR watch 13:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Claims of notability in article are a bit weak. First several pages of non-wiki ghits don't show any notability for this Joseph Renzi. Sources given in article either don't mention Joseph Renzi at all or are only passing mentions. Speedy has been contested, so I assume prod will be too. Fabrictramp 14:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was originally speedy-deleted under CSD A7. DRV overturned as books are not within the CSD. Still, Delete as advertorial, and a probable vanity-press work. Xoloz 13:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page:
More soundtracks...
The result was delete, without prejudice to recreation if the film actually gets produced.--Kubigula (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article's existence is not yet warranted per the notability guidelines for films. If the project enters production, the article can be recreated. As the article suggests, this project has likely been dumped. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 12:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
shows no reliable sources, either, with apparently only speculation in forums and blogs. If the project can be verified to enter production per WP:NF, then the article can be recreated. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And yet you guys used it in several Critical Response sections despite it not being verifiable? really, if it isn't verifiable, why would you source it in a critical response section of a Movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.252.186 (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are no reliable sources that establish notability or provide verifiable content for this purported project. It seems to constitute a hoax as there is a similar film article at AfD, Jujitsu Deer, that cannot be verified as an actual film in the making. The proponent of the unverifiable information on Wikipedia has been UserMarcoUser/GarryUser. Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was The article simply did not meet reliable sourcing or verifiability That however was not the causation for the deletion. There were biography of living persons issues in the mix. This article was not a good idea BLP wise from the start.. Mercury 22:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article was up for deletion back in april. The result was no consensus. Many of the keeps wanted to see improvement, as far as I can tell nothing has improved. And I would like to highlight this statement from the first debate "The info is already in the articles. If I want to look up Gerald Fords original name I'll just look in his article. "Wikipedia articles are not: 1. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics"". I personally think the is way to broad of an inclusion criteria and the subjects may be notable but the topic is not notable. Ridernyc 12:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete —Verrai 14:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable footballer; from what I gathered, he played only in a few Swedish 4-th or 5-th division clubs. 8 Google hits. Almost an CSD A7 candidate, but being a "hot name for big clubs" is an assertion of notability. Duja► 11:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to Windows Live Hotmail per WP:BLP1E. - KrakatoaKatie 12:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Had very minor press coverage for a single event (see WP:BLP1E), content should be merged into an article about passport.net. He is not notable for anything else. There is no way to support the article with anything about his life beyond this one event (for example his death would not be notable or in the papers). Was nominated for deletion more than a year ago with no consensus. debate is here. Jon513 11:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted. - Mailer Diablo 17:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced article and Failed to establish notability NAHID 17:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Author's other article "Ibrahim Falli" removed yesterday after db-person. Pishogue 20:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Software that shows no sign of being notable in any way Pak21 11:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prodecural nom; I've just declined a speedy-delete request on this as while the article is right on the margin of an A7, it appears to be potentially expandable and not a two-guys-with-a-myspace-page band. Despite the one album, I'm not convinced it passes WP:BAND, but am certainly willing to be convinced. Lots of hits but no reliable sources that I can find; however, since they're from pre-internet days it may be that the press exists but hasn't made it online. Bringing it over in case anyone can dig coverage out. BTW, ignore the deleted version in the log; that wasn't deleted on notability grounds, but was a totally different version deleted as a copyvio. I'm sitting on the fence regarding this one as I think it's very borderline, so I abstain. — iridescent 22:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Needs sources other than the band's own Myspace page. If the band were notable, there would be something to dig up. Mindraker 12:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete – no references, original research, fails WP:BIO. If the article's creator wanted something kept confidential, he shouldn't have put it on Wikipedia. - KrakatoaKatie 12:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. Rudget Contributions 12:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is the biography of someone who is not overly important - the only thing he really has is a website, which is run almost solely by himself. Thus, he does not really need an article. DarthSidious 08:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)DarthSidious[reply]
The result was keep. Carioca 01:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Auto-promotional article. Non notable community radio station in Quebec city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antaya (talk • contribs) 18:46, 25 October 2007
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article's existence is not yet warranted per the notability guidelines for films. If the project enters production, the article can be recreated. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 08:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete DS 16:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax article; there is no rugby league played in Hungary. See related hoax articles Magyar Posta Hungarian Rugby League Championship and Hungarian national rugby league team WWGB 07:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is essentially an incomplete "white pages" directory for fictional characters (incompleteness is not the reason for deletion, by the way). The ((prod)) tag was removed and this comment left on the talk page. – Black Falcon (Talk) 07:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DarthSidious 09:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)DarthSidious[reply]
The result was Delete --Haemo 01:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article's existence is not warranted per the notability guidelines for films. Anything could happen to prevent the start of filming this far from the projected date. The article can be recreated when/if the film enters production. Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 07:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 11:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. Article is nearly incohearent so it's hard to tell what is going on here. Law & Disorder 06:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted as A7/G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article is about a non-notable, single location gaming center. Extent of it's notability appears to be as a test business venture for a large corporation. JPG-GR 06:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is notable as it marks a movement in an American company away from traditional means of staying viable. The same lack of notability could be said for Ford's Quadricycle as a precursor to the model A. I believe the CyGamZ company information article should not be deleted simply because it is a test venture for a large, privately held corporation. With the dominance of businesses similar to this in Asia and the rapid growth of this industry in the states, this article is relevant to today's entertainment industry. Thank you for the consideration. 69.136.146.146 18:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC) — 69.136.146.146 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
lol, Dominos pizza started off small and now has it's own wikipedia page. The difference is that the Redstone family is in (or near) the top 10 wealthiest family in the US. With the Redstone's experimenting on a concept that is thriving in Europe and Asia here in the states is noteworthy. Whether the concept succeeds or fails, it is noteworthy enough to deserve it's company information with NAI.JetBlackDog75 16:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC) — JetBlackDog75 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
lol - There was a brief description at National Amusements, but you deleted it siting "spam link - this site is about the parent company, not any of its subsidiaries". It's funny that we are saying almost the same thing but have 2 totally different opinions of it. I've attended the facility as well as it's local competition and found it to be noteworthy. I am very new to this site and I'm learning alot from this experience. I respect your opinion and realize there is very little I can do to change your mind on the topic. If there is any assistance on what would be appropriate on the NAI wiki, I would value the input. JetBlackDog75 20:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That would seem logical if you didn't delete anything related to CyGamZ off of the National Amusements page over and over again. PeRshGo 04:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed the history of the NAI wiki an found where pershgo had sentence on the subject and sited his sources. In my revision, I listed the national amusements gaming website as cygamz.com. A simple whois of that site shows NAI to be the owner of cygamz. JPG-GR, you are being horribly inconsistent. Can we agree on either A) listing cygamz under the NAI wiki with sources sited or B) a separate wiki siting it's own sources and siting the NAI wiki. This topic has already received far more attention than is warranted to simply list company information. JetBlackDog75 17:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable junior ice hockey player. Has yet to advance to a professional league (see HockeyDB entry) and has not been drafted by a National Hockey League team Kaiser matias 06:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete, not notable neologism at best. Most likely complete hoax. Johntex\talk 06:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense phrase, not in any kind of wide spread use. Apparently a spawn of California wildfires of October 2007, I'm assuming originating on Wikipedia. Or in someone's imagination. Google search with non-reliable sources excluded has nothing. 12 hits are left over, and a few are Wikipedia mirrors, and apparently something to do with "children" and "softcore" which I don't wish to examine. A Google News all dates search has even less: 0 hits. Delete, don't redirect anywhere. Fake term. lilith-ezine.com is the only semi-legitimate reference to this word. • Lawrence Cohen 05:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 11:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, possible conflict of interest by original editor (who unilaterally removed a prod tag earlier.) Sapphic 05:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Entirely unsourced list based on apparent original research, ie someone listens to a song, hears what they think sounds like the break, then adds it to Wikipedia. Even if it were sourced, it would still be a directory of loosely associated songs, unless it can be shown that all of these songs are notable for featuring a 5-second drum sample. Masaruemoto 05:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedied, I don't care which category for speedy deletion this may or not meet, it's nonsense and not welcome on Wikipedia. --Stormie 05:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has written an ode to the history of their favourite personal smoking implement -- 100% original research, 100% non-notable. I couldn't think of how to speedy this but it seemed to warrant it. Accounting4Taste 05:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedied, patent nonsense. --Stormie 05:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and topic appears to be made up in school. Originally proposed for deletion, but tag was removed. slakr\ talk / 05:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 11:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable school. Also, this article includes extension (phone) numbers for the staff, and that makes it seem directory-like. Anyways, no assertion of notability, so before anybody asks why I didn't tag it for speedy, it is because in my experience, schools never get speedy'd as a lot of admins think schools are exempt from A7. Rjd0060 05:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete – redundant. KrakatoaKatie 11:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant to Category:Lists of artists by nationality. The usual reasons for keeping a list that duplicates a category don't apply here, as no redlinked lists can be added to a "list of lists", so this will only ever be a redundant copy of the category. Masaruemoto 04:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per below arguments adn original authors blanking. --Tikiwont 10:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Language learning method. Original research or close to it. No evidence of notability. -- RHaworth 04:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Avatar:The Last Airbender. None arguing to "keep and expand" have provided any hint of what out of universe source material may be available to expand from. Lacking out of universe material, it belongs on a fan wiki, not here. History will be left intact, feel free to change the redirect to a different target if desired or to utilize it to merge. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable fictional game. No sources attest to the notability of this game either within the series or in a real-world context and the article itself has WP:OR problems. Otto4711 04:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I like the article, but then again I'm hardly a fair and balanced observer (I'd like a scratched tin plate if it was packaged in a Avatar box). Without some kind of outside context, maybe a serious effort by some company to make a real-world version of the game, it really is an unimportant article with no relevance outside the show. However, instead of deleting it, I think we should merge it with another Avatar page, perhaps one explaining the culture of the world, since its information isn't inaccurate in and of itself, and the game is important within the show (Apparently more and more so as the series progresses). Now we just need to find some page that somehow pertains to Pai Sho that isn't fan-cruft in and of itself. JBK405 03:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's notability within the universe is provided by the show itself; it has been used several times as both a key and peripheral plot device (Specific episodes are The Waterbending Scroll, The Desert, and Sokka's Master). Notable to the real world...well, that's something else; like I said, it's really not notable at all outside of Avatar (Some people have actually tried to build three-dimensional chess based on Star Trek, and hologrphic chess based on Star Wars, but there's no third party real world Pai Sho). Hence why it should be merged into another article instead of being deleted; its info is relevent to the universe as a whole, and could be presented as part of a larger, source article that perhaps dealt with inspirations/references/developments in and about the Avatar universe. JBK405 04:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a directory. Just a list of non notable books, apparently just having been published is the only criterion, so this could potentially list thousands of titles related to Chicago. Masaruemoto 04:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. History is available if anyone cares to merge, but I don't see consensus for it below. GRBerry 14:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite surprised that this horribly written article has not been deleted or redirected to Son Gohan. Regardless of whether the character passes WP:N or not, we don't need an article on Gohan's teen years. Delete. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. KrakatoaKatie 10:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Recently speedied as spam, this website seems to be a version of the old Ponzi scheme -- all the references are self-generated or from blogs or other non-notable sites -- I don't want Wikipedia to lend this non-notable enterprise any credence. Accounting4Taste 04:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Given that gibLink is a relatively new phenomenon, providing a site description "...in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources since we can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known..." is rather difficult because the achievements, impact and historical significance at this point is somewhat unclear due to the relative recent appearance of the phenomenon. The community may benefit from a balanced presentation from knowledgeable persons (moreso than I). I think the ball is worth kicking about to see which direction of the field it winds up traveling to. Tosshoo 05:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced biographical stub, claims made but not backed - delete per WP:BIO Sfacets 03:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Black religious cults"displays a mere 20 google hits. It appears to be an OR juxtaposition of terms. Sfacets 03:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — a number of votes gave no rationale for their recommendation, so I cannot weight them. However, with that said, most of the "improve" comments showed no demonstration that it could be improved, and were countered by assertions that notable characters were already included elsewhere. --Haemo 01:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article that is one massive mess of unsourced, unexplained claims. Yes, DC and Marvel published some comics in which they merged their companies' characters. They did not publish enough issues for this many characters to have made appearances. Given that this article has almost no citations for which issue each appeared in, out of its hundreds of entries, it looks like people are adding fan fiction and bogus material, taking this article beyond the point at which it is useful in any shape, form, or fashion. The Amalgam Comics article already lists the relevant publications, which talk about the characters that matter. Otherwise, these names are not notable and often indistinguishable from hoaxes without a HUGE amount of research. Doczilla 03:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 00:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT#IINFO; too broad and all-inclusive to be of any encyclopedic value, including people like Prometheus, Ronnie Biggs, The Grinch, Ocean's Eleven, etc. Masaruemoto 02:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redlink farm, superceded by categories. east.718 at 02:53, 10/25/2007 02:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 16:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a hoax article. There is no such competition in Hungary WWGB 02:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted, blocked all involved sockpuppets. DS 16:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a hoax article. There is no rugby league organised competition in Hungary WWGB 02:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
after contacting the Hungarian Olympic committee (which has authority over all sports in Hungary) i found that Hungary in fact does have a national rugby league team with Australians of Hungarian origin playing for the side-this is not a hoax —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drenthe11 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus leaning towards deletion. Very enlightening afd I can recommend the The New Physician for an out look on student life, I view "Yeosamity Sam" and "Bon Jovi" in a completely different light after reading that. BTW after reading all the sources, the term Gunner in relation to students it would be appropriate for it to have a Wiktionary definition. The other sources are more first person accounts or incidental definitions, nothing of what I read could be considered reliable in depth coverage to sustain independent notability in the face of WP:NOT#DICT.
What wasnt covered in this discussion is the possibility of a merge to Student#Other terms, after what I read it would IMHO be the ideal option for the article content. Gnangarra 10:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not arguing the term doesn't exist, however, the citations are a blog post and a 600-member facebook group. Surely there are other sources, or even media mentions, if it's something worth keeping. Cantras 02:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to wiktionary--victor falk 09:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Two things are certain - this article is primarily OR, yet there are well-put arguments in its defense. Given the current discussion I cannot delete this article at this time, but if no one can (or will) demonstrate that a sourceable article exists behind this OR, a subsequent AFD might not bode well for the article. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 19:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR item about unsourced "Bambi effect". Most web pages I find that uses the phrase is talking about other things (including something sexual). This is insufficiently notable. And regardless of all that, we still have WP:NOT: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Doczilla 00:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Kwsn (Ni!) 17:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No notability declared whatsoever. Does not, and will never, contain more information than a couple of sentences. Man It's So Loud In Here 00:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Author was banned for repeated vandalism; admin saw fit to delete this page too. Non-admin-closure. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously hoaxy pseudo-scientific article. Its amusing in some regard, probably got some laughs among the gaming clan, but far from encyclopedic. Fully fails WP:V, and wastes everybody's time. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 00:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. KrakatoaKatie 10:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is obvious that Zendik Farm is using Wikipedia as a form of advertisement. Jyre, being an agent of Zendik Farm, has proven his bias from his first edits and will continue to find ways to present the ZF article favorably. I also was once a resident of Zendik Farm and attended meetings where such tactics have been discussed. KyroZendik 00:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It may be helpful to be able to read the Hip Forum discussion that past and present members of Zendik Farm participated in to get a grasp of WHY there is such heated debate over this subject. Also check out the history of edits on the Zendik Farm page where you'll see how other Zendiks edited it. here is the Hip Forum link: http://www.hipforums.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-4937-p-1.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyroZendik (talk • contribs) 03:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted ~ Riana ⁂ 03:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Originally prodded as a non notable biography, prod was removed by author without comment. The "revolt" utterly fails WP:V and any sort of notability standard you wish to apply to it, and its "leader" even less so. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 00:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as spam. --Coredesat 06:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about a non-notable Alberta Wrestling Federation in a small town and also, the article looks in part spammy. Although I could have deleted imediately the article, I prefer a vote at AFD but I suggest a delete per advertisement and non-notability JForget 00:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Buddy, you guys aren't nice. its jsut a small organization, i am working on it. soon i bettya this will be huge. it is almost like WWE wrestling so it wouldn't be in the Alberta Wrestling Federation, and give me a break, its me and some friends. We did this just to make us feel better. It is my first article i made. and it is not spammy. why don't you JForget and Starblind come and face all 12 of us, winner can do whatever the want with this page. that goes for everyone. User:DXhommie —Preceding comment was added at 01:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was speedy deleted then undeleted as writer requested more time to prove notability. Time has been given and notability still appears not to have been asserted as per WP:MUSIC. No significant record releases, and no significant media coverage. Mere mentions in the press, such as press releases or listings or notifications/adverts in local papers of gigs do not qualify as significant. Delete. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 00:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to mention that I have read the article "no one cares about your garage band" and none of those factors apply to Repeat Offender.Repeatoffender4031 23:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prodecural nom; I've just declined a speedy-delete request on this as while the article is right on the margin of an A7, it appears to be potentially expandable and not a two-guys-with-a-myspace-page band. Despite the one album, I'm not convinced it passes WP:BAND, but am certainly willing to be convinced. Lots of hits but no reliable sources that I can find; however, since they're from pre-internet days it may be that the press exists but hasn't made it online. Bringing it over in case anyone can dig coverage out. BTW, ignore the deleted version in the log; that wasn't deleted on notability grounds, but was a totally different version deleted as a copyvio. I'm sitting on the fence regarding this one as I think it's very borderline, so I abstain. — iridescent 22:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Needs sources other than the band's own Myspace page. If the band were notable, there would be something to dig up. Mindraker 12:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another unsourced article about nn dorms at Bryant U. Carlossuarez46 21:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 20:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO, non-notable local television personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 19:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 20:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notability. Had minor 13 week appearance on a soap opera after winning a reality show I Wanna Be a Soap Star. No other work of note. Does not meet notability criteria for having an article. Information also lacks sourcing. IrishLass0128 19:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 20:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO, the only notable thing about him is his role on Sightings, and that part can be merged there if valuable enough. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 19:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 20:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Despite the references on the talk page, this still seems like a nonnotable band to me. They've released just one EP and are "working on" a second album. The CBC listing appears to be directly copied from the band's MySpace page. NawlinWiki 18:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The band is currently playing the pop explosion in Halifax and have a full length album coming out before the end of the year for their winter tour in mid November. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carerejoe (talk • contribs) 19:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Sleepless Nights have released one full length record. One split 7inch record and one EP. The 4th release, a full length called "turn into vapour" will be released in January on Forward Music Group. (http://www.forwardmusicgroup.com) The Hang up EP has charted on numerous college radio stations, as well as the national earshot chart. Reaching number 1 at a few of the college level. http://65.61.201.48/charts/2007/July/top200.cfm (number 81) They are going to be heading out on their 4th tour this year at the start of November. Have shared the stage with such acts as Jon Rae & the river, the meligrove band(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Meligrove_Band), wintersleep(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wintersleep, In-flight safety(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Flight_Safety), Raising the fawn(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raising_the_Fawn), The Hylozolists(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hylozoists_%28band%29), Grand Theft bus(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Bus) & the juno award winning Wooden Stars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wooden_Stars)
Matt MacDonald of the band also plays in The Superfantastics, who have just finished a tour with Blue Heller. Which is Julie Doiron(polaris award nominee and performer) and Dick Morello(of shotgun and jaybird)
Recently have played the Halifax Pop Explosion and got national press on the show. http://chartattack.com/damn/2007/10/1803.cfm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.92.25 (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The band is also being showcased this year at the Nova Scotia Music Awards. http://www.musicnovascotia.ca/NSMW07/Showcases.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.92.25 (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, the sourcing concerns are not addressed by substantial sourcing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not finding the reliable sources to show that this is a notable band. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is the BBC a reliable source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.45.13 (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just opened the BBC link. All it states is this: John Peel Session: 09/06/1981 - Que Bono. Producer - Dale Griffin, Engineer - Mike Robinson, Studio - Langham 1. TRACKLIST Burton Wood, Houses, Twister, Siren's Scream. LINE UP: Pete Mulvihill (Drums), Jane Mulvihill (Vocals), Alan Maskell (Guitar) Simon Hall (Bass)Seahamlass 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seahamlass (talk • contribs)
KEEP: The band did indeed exist and are already listed elsewhere in Wikipedia for the entry for Town Hall Steps magazine. Articles on the band can be found at the Town Hall Steps website Town Hall Steps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcgibbons (talk • contribs) 22:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Found this as proposed deletion with the reason: "No sources cited, no assertion of notability". Now there are some claims and also some Portuguese references (as well as an entry on the Portuguese wiki), but their reliability is unclear. So brought here for wider discussion (and without recommendation.) Tikiwont 12:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lou72 14:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 21:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a small political association linked with the new Democratic Party (Italy), with no content, no sources and a short list of mostly redlinked politicians and activists claimed as "leading members" (not a NPOV sentence in its own). I also thought about merging its content within Democratic Party (Italy), however there is no source confirming it will actually be a significative wing within the party, jointly with a recent declaration by the new party leader claiming no political wings will be accepted within it (at least not officially). Have your say. Angelo 11:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fictional character from a soap opera. I can find no reliable out of universe reference material on this character, and do not believe that it is probably available at all. The article appears to be mainly unreferenced speculation regarding the show, and without source material, this problem is unfixable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable film minutiae. Neutralitytalk 06:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete contested prod; dormitories for a university, without any WP:RSes to show why there are notable. Carlossuarez46 04:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG; no evidence of non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. Largely a rehash of primary sources affiliated with the subject, combined with WP:COATRACK problems. Deleted as an expired prod (see page log), but then re-created by the now-banned User:Ombudsman with the edit summary "restore unscrupulously vandalized article" (!) MastCell Talk 04:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CORP Eeso 03:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I would have probably relisted this if it hadn't already been relisted, since it's very hard to ascertain consensus from such a low turnout when opinions are divided. Both sides deliver some valid opinions, while both sides also deliver some less valid ones (for example, poor style is not a reason to delete, but then, other stuff existing is not a reason to keep). So, in the end, I simply do not see any consensus here at all. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A noble cause, to be sure, but noble ≠ notable. This group is little different than the 1000s of little organizations striving to improve the lot of the 3rd world. nn. Carlossuarez46 03:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn fashion model, model of the week from some nn website, some paying gigs for big names doesn't equal notability - even if sources could be found for any of the claims. Carlossuarez46 03:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn fashion model, which is to say as spledid a career as he may have, he does not meet WP:BIO. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. It is an encyclopedia. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 17:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promo piece for the subject authored by a WP:SPA. Essential assertion of notability is she was one of 600 US delegates to a UNESCO conference. Needless to say, there are lots of conferences, hundreds of delegates to each - perhaps thousands - getting selected for one doesn't make you notable. The rest of the claims are that she has well-known associates, but notability doesn't rub off from your friends. Carlossuarez46 03:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This college publication offers only one source, and that's the college newspaper. In my opinion, it does not meet the notability criteria. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced BLP about an author without any indication that anything he wrote was notable, not self-published, and oh, yes, by the way he's a business consultant. Do I hear the phone ringing? Carlossuarez46 03:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. The notability arguments put forward by those proposing deletion are much stronger than those !voting "Keep". There also seems to be consensus that being in an iPhone advert does not warrant Notability, as well as the fact that injury seems to be an indication of non-Notability. Anthøny 10:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A pretty, possibly talented but otherwise nonnotable young ballerina. the only claim of glory is a "Bartholin Award", mentioned nowhere else on web (possibly confused with the international Bartholin Seminar). `'Míkka 01:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NF, no references, no notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola 01:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]