The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Frenalose Galaxy Collection[edit]

The Frenalose Galaxy Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable trilogy published by vanity publisher. No GHits for reviews from reputable sources. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 21:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Factual and verifiable perhaps, but sadly not notable. The policy on vanity publishing says: "...it should be especially noted that self-publication and/or publication by a vanity press is indicative, but not determinative of non-notability....By the same token, it should always weigh against an article's inclusion if the author or other interested party is the creator of the Wikipedia article." Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 18:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.