The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Younan[edit]

Paul Younan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This individual fails to meet the WP:BIO notability criteria. The article's main claim to notability is that the subject's theories have gotten a lot of notice on a forum, and the article goes on to explicitly state that his work has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. There are no sources listed, and I couldn't find any reliable sources online either. Karanacs 16:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination: if anything, he is only 'famous' for trying to sell non-notable Church of the East manuscripts. — Gareth Hughes 17:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -Drdisque 17:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:BIO, very few to no results from google. Tiptoety 18:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I could find nothing that supports meeting WP:BIO Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - Not notable, article is a split-off of Aramaic primacy. — EliasAlucard|Talk 19:32 27 Oct, 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.