The result was delete. No RS, as almost all comments are mentioning. Delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article was deleted from Wikipedia in Spanish. Google search does not return reliable sources: [1], [2]. The article was writen by Achado (talk · contribs) who apparently have written the book which was the source of the article (The author is apparently unknown: [3] and has written books on Wikisource: s:pt:Filosofia, pensamentos de pré-conceitos e de pós-conceitos). But, the problem is that Brazilian National Library Foundation (which is reponsible for ISBN register in Brazil) does not find results on the author: [4]. Another source is a homepage which is not a reliable source. The author of the other source cannot be found: [5]. Anyway, it seems to be a non-notable person. Dularion (talk) 00:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 01:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(Note: I am helping an ip user create this afd page. I have no opinion whether this should be deleted or not.)—Chris!c/t 23:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I just gave notice of this AFD at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism.
The result was delete. No sources. Delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the contents of the article. Does not appear to pass WP:ARTIST or WP:PROFESSOR, and without sources cannot pass WP:BASIC or WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 22:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No RS. Delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to verify the contents of the article. Searched using both the English and Japanese, 岩下清香, spellings of her name with no success. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. If someone can identify a target to redirect to, a redirect would be a good option but I couldn't identify one. J04n(talk page) 22:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no independent reliable sources indicating that these fictional species are notable, individually or collectively. Fails WP:GNG, WP:PLOT for describing the races by their role in the storyline and WP:TRIVIA. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It goes on to mention they had their own theme music, making them even more distinct. Can we all agree that the Gamespot review did give notable mention/coverage to the races of one of these games? Dream Focus 19:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Optional custom heading
|
---|
The first alien you are likely to encounter is the cowardly Captain Fwiffo. Guarding Pluto all by himself, he sets the tone for the entire game with his opening line, "Attention big, mean, hostile alien vessel hovering overhead in an obvious attack posture," which he follows by blurting out the location of his home world and his race's secret codes.
Other races span a range of emotions from the comical Utwig, depressed over the loss of a gadget they bought from interstellar hucksters, to the disturbingly scary Orz and the tragic Burvixese and Androsynths who are exterminated before the game begins and are known only from rumor and ruins. But nothing compares to the horrible plight of the Ur-Quan, ostensibly the major villains in the game. By the time you learn about the millennia of enslavement and mind-control they've had to endure in the past, not to mention the self-inflicted excruciating torments they underwent to gain freedom, the Ur-Quan become more sympathetic than most of the friendly-but-fluttery allies populating your own fleet. This is a rare and praiseworthy design achievement. |
Here's a sample quote from allgame.com showing the signifcant coverage of races,theres plenty more quotes in the existing sources.
“ | Other races span a range of emotions from the comical Utwig, depressed over the loss of a gadget they bought from interstellar hucksters, to the disturbingly scary Orz and the tragic Burvixese and Androsynths who are exterminated before the game begins and are known only from rumor and ruins. But nothing compares to the horrible plight of the Ur-Quan, ostensibly the major villains in the game. By the time you learn about the millennia of enslavement and mind-control they've had to endure in the past, not to mention the self-inflicted excruciating torments they underwent to gain freedom, the Ur-Quan become more sympathetic than most of the friendly-but-fluttery allies populating your own fleet. This is a rare and praiseworthy design achievement. | ” |
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:05, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - each of these articles, which describe an element of fiction in an in-universe perspective, should be deleted. They do not meet the general notability guideline as there are no reliable sources that are significantly about the fictional locations. They fail WP:PLOT as being nothing but descriptions of the sites in terms of their function within the narrative of the series. Every element of a notable work of fiction is not itself notable. There is nothing sourced here and there is nothing to merge. No one who is unfamiliar with MST3K is going to be aware of these terms in the first place. PROD removed by an editor who announced his intention to stalk my edits and disrupt the project because of his dislike of the PROD process. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No RS. Consensus is for delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable website. All sources link back to the home website, and no third-party, independent sources. Basically just an article for promotion. Jmlk17 19:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Armbrust makes the concise comment for this close; fails notability criteria for tennis players Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixing an AfD for User:Mayumashu. Reasoning given was "Guidelines for WP Notabiilty for tennis players have been revised and this player appears to fail them. I wish, as the same previous nominator, to now renominate this page for deletion." Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus overall points to delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Creating page for 69.181.249.92, nomination is as follows: PROD removed by article creator. Fails WP:NOTE in that it doesn't have significant coverage. Both the CNET and Tucows listings are taken from the publisher's site, as CNET freely admits. I have no opinion. Hut 8.5 18:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.brothersoft.com/1st-choice-ftppro-1210.html Includes screenshot created by brothersoft.com. http://www.archive.org/details/tucows_195116_1st_Choice_FTPPro Includes screenshot created by archive.org, and indicates that this software is in the Internet Archive for "long term preservation and access". http://fliiby.com/file/7209/rzv0elrobt.html Indicates the information was "provided by fliiby", not by the sofware publisher. http://www.softpile.com/apphistory/1st_choice_ftppro.html Version history created by Softpile.com, not by the software publisher. SisterMaryCatherine (talk) 21:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC) — SisterMaryCatherine (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was keep — nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not actually clear why this poet is notable. The citation style is not clear and it it is not evident how much of this ifnormation is actually reliable as it is not sourced with in-line citations. No attempts have been made to accurately source this article or make required improvements. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:13, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Christ gives the perfect reasoning; no references; not notable Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There does not seem to be any good reason for having a single list for contestants of different shows on two continents. Pichpich (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:06, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Purely promotional article about a band with no properly sourced indication of notability per WP:MUSIC. Previous prod declined because the article makes weak claims of notability. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Merging can be discussed on the talk page if necessary. T. Canens (talk) 01:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
POV fork Dlabtot (talk) 16:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If getting rid of valid articles that require cleanup is not your position here, then why you keep on telling others to cleanup the article? . Also afd is for discussion of deletion (whether this is a valid topic to be included in this encyclopedia), not for discussion of article improvement.
Nobody here has yet cited one valid reason to keep this topic. All the submissions for keep just say "Clearly a valid topic!" If it's so clear, then please be kind and offer some support for your argument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.124.102 (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 01:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disambig link farm, belongs at Wiktionary, to which it has already been transwikied. bd2412 T 15:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted (G6) by Fastily. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 23:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Collection of essentially dicdefs without articles, laid out like a disambig page; in other words, a disambig that doesn't disambiguate anything. bd2412 T 15:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 01:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable college residence hall. 28bytes (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Merge/redirect discussion may be continued on the article's talk page. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No real assertion of notability. It is an elementary school, like thousands of other schools. Not notable Purplebackpack89 07:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Individual editors have raised arguments to delete, merge, or redirect, but they have not received support and have been refuted by other editors. On the other side, there is a quite a firm consensus to delete. Mkativerata (talk) 20:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a almost five year old major WP:FAN article that has several issues. WP:NOTE and WP:EVENT, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:NOR, WP:PLOT to name a few. Click23 (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 12:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, lack of coverage in reliable publications. Dr. Blofeld 12:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete (A7). SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this organization is not notable, but I am not sure enough to give it speedy deletion. I just don't see any proof provided by the creator, nor do I see any sources online. Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Even though there are a few keep votes, the logic forwarded does not adhere to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Consensus - in terms of logic forwarded - is delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 11:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This seems to be a pretty obvious case of being non-notable, but it does make a claim to being a "directory of some educational systems" - it is entirely possible that any reliable sources on him are in Persian, maybe? Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Luc Hensill. Consensus that there should not be a standalone article. Since content was merged to another article the history must remain for attribution purposes. T. Canens (talk) 01:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Previous AfD ended as no concensus. This band fails WP:BAND. All the references come from a primary source. User:Raoniz, on his talk page, appears to show a COI by identifying as the son of the band's lead singer. Saskiart (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Leave the socks, the consensus is for Delete Wifione ....... Leave a message 11:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
this article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG & WP:BLP - article has no reliable verifiable sources Amsaim (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 09:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Hilarious" joke article. Two non-linked "references" which don't exist, nor do any third-party mentions. Gr1st (talk) 09:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 08:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of meeting any notability requirements. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 08:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 09:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability per WP:MOVIE. Low budget, independent film, direct to video. Written, directed, produced, starred, music, and distributed by Stanley V. Henson, Jr. Self-published, autobiographical story. Promoted by self-published press releases, of which, two are used as external links. The two references are IMDb profiles for the movie and individual model/actress. Meets zero criteria according to WP:MOVIE to establish notability. Cindamuse (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Cindamuse (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Almost speedy-deletable as G10, pages that disparage the subject. A very small amount is sourced, but the overwhelming amount is not, and therefore amounts to Original Research. If any of this were to be added to another article, it would not be admissible either, except to the extent there were actual good references. I am not evaluating whether or not the criticisms are correct--we do not do that. It would be a violation of NPOV. DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like an ad and is a hostile fork of sodium chlorite, sole editor is named after a related commercial product. Dylan Flaherty (talk) 04:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(the following is copied from the talk page)
The creator and (so far) only editor of this article is named DiOxiCare, which is coincidentally a commercial product (http://www.frontierpharm.com/dioxicare-system.php). The article reads like an ad, and doesn't link to anything, not even Sodium chlorite or Chlorine dioxide. I'm going to go look up how to sponsor a page for deletion. Dylan Flaherty (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylan Flaherty (talk • contribs)
(The following is copied from the Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide Discussion Page)
The subject of Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide needs to be discussed because of the widespread confusion of its meaning. I would welcome any comment on my critique of Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide.
The essay was carefully written and the subject investigated first.
The initial criticisms made, however, were not thoughtful and were unconvincing. In no case was the science or chemistry mentioned or discussed. None of the all too brief comments were made by dentists, biologists, chemists or those in the dentistry fields. I would have at least expected the manufacturers of stabilized chlorine dioxide to have a say!
We learn in philosophy that it is difficult to prove a negative. The words, advertising, marketing and strategy of the purveyors of stabilized chlorine dioxide are underhanded and misleading, or outright false. How does one easily untangle this knot of sophistry. I challenge anyone to follow the titles and references of the literature given by these manufacturers.
I have no problem with the salt, sodium chlorite. The difficulty starts with how the term is described and used in scientific journals and advertising. If someone says they can cure cancer with sodium chlorite, I have no fault with the sodium chlorite.
The user name under which this article was submitted will no longer be used.
Howard Alliger, Howard841 (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Howard841[reply]
Howard841 (talk) 20:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Howard Alliger, Howard841[reply]
The result was strong keep. Closing early because of overwhelming snow strong keeps. No deletion votes other than nominator, and strong keep votes outnumber keep votes. (non-admin close) —CodeHydro 12:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability problems of shortwave radio station; 6 of 12 references are newsletters/postings of various radio groups; 2 more are cached copies of an unreferenced and archived Geocities page that is not attributable to anyone; in any case, all of these are Self-Published Works by people who would not be evident as experts in their field, nor writing about themselves. Remaining sources include links to purported recordings of the station, a picture of the station (which do not themselves give an indication of notability), and a book whose mention of the station seems to only be a generalized mention. Aeternitas827 (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.57.12 (talk) 06:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's not much to be found on this article other than twitter, myspace and facebook :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SK 1.2 and 2.3 and WP:SNOW. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft and pop culture list. The extent to which this is meaningful can be covered in the article on the first Star Wars film and its Special Edition changes. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged with ((notability)) for two years and not addressed. Some content is speculative and attempts to weight possible future accomplishments as though they were current accomplishments. Orange Mike | Talk 03:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First prod removed by creator, who also created Vicariously, the web series by Clark, and hasn't touched any non-Clark related articles. No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of an individual. Clark certainly exists, but walk-on roles and a web series aren't sufficient to meet WP:NACTOR. tedder (talk) 03:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me if I'm incorrect on anything, but my Spanish isn't amazing, and this article is in Spanish. From what I can gather, it's about a type of therapy. Seems like WP:OR to me. No references, only some external links. Searches for it often come up with matches for "Risoterapia", but considering this means "laughter therapy", I'm not surprised. Searches for the full name in quotes gives results such as the Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, and blog pages. — GorillaWarfare talk 23:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism with few uses found outside of the title of a book [20] and the name of an internet forum [21]. Can't locate substantial evidence that the term is popularly used outside of these contexts, and as these contexts are proper names, they should be held to a standard of notability for which they are classified (book, forum). Torchwood Who? (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable song, not even a feasible redirect —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find RS for this article Weaponbb7 (talk) 04:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. The only reference about this movie is IMDB, and I was unable to find more. It appears that even with Michael Madsen and Dyan Cannon as part of the cast this movie never managed to achieve any notoriety. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Technology company that asserts notability via some large numbers, but fails to demonstrate any significant coverage. The references seem to be made up entirely of trivial mentions and citations, none sufficient to pass WP:ORG. Article seems quite different to the version deleted in a previous AfD, but doesn't demonstrate notability any better. ~ mazca talk 00:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiography, after being told that he should not continue writing an article on himself, he ignored it and continued adding content. No evidence that he is notable beyond a single online article; many of the boasting comments are unsourced and I can't find anything reliable to support them. Terrillja talk 02:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Serbian Air Force and Air Defence. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary article, all relevant information on this page is already in the main artcle: Serbian Air Force and Air Defence. Buttons (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Not that I understand the subject, but the guideline for keeping songs seems unambiguous, and sio does the consensus. I considered the arguments at the prior AfD also, & in particular the detailed closing there. DGG ( talk ) 02:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Permanent stub. As a terribly low-charting song (#17 and #47 for the two versions), it's not been talked about in any way by any reliable sources. The existing sources are mere directory listings: one that does nothing more than verify that Dennis Linde wrote it, and one that does no more than verify that it charted.
The fact that three artists cut it is not enough to pass the music notability guidelines; as it stands, the article is VERY unlikely to grow beyond a stub. But since it doesn't "belong" to just one artist, a merge is out of the question, which leaves us with one option: deletion. The associated artists' articles already say everything that can possibly be said about this song, so deleting it will not sacrifice any info. The only argument presented in the last AFD was that it should be kept only because three artists cut it, with no real policy being cited even after two relists.
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Self-released demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Self-released demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was I see you insist on your WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS politics. Heh. Moved the article to my userspace, will do a deletion review in a few months. --Diego Grez (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable per WP:ORG also a similar debate on EMS services was discussed here. Peter.C • talk 01:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My town's fire department doesn't have an article on it, and my town is almost 10x bigger... I honestly don't think that every town's fire department needs an article on it, unless it's big like New York, etc. Pilif12p : Yo 14:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. obvious total agreement DGG ( talk ) 01:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage of the term in reliable sources. Dbrodbeck (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nominator Withdrew. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG. Passing mention, it was obviously destroyed in an earthquake. However, it is only passingly mentioned in all sources as being a 'destroyed building' (one of many) NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. in addition to the lack of evidence for notability , there's the clear promotionalism, and, I think. a very probable copyvio DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Despite a lot of words, there doesn't really seem to be anything in this article which explains what makes this person notable. Sourcing is problematic as well, especially for a BLP. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find sources for this person Weaponbb7 (talk) 02:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed. No WP:RS to establish notability of a band or to WP:GNG meet other common critera. tedder (talk) 15:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable reality show contestant. Appeared in three episodes of RuPaul's Drag Race Season 2. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ENT and WP:BLP1E. PROD removed by anon IP with, of course, no explanation. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just not seeing sufficient notability for this singer songwriter. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
does not meet the requirements of wp:notability. there are no third party, reliable sources in this article. Theserialcomma (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
does not meet the requirements of wp:notability. there are no third party, reliable sources in this article. Theserialcomma (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]