The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amvona (site)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amvona.com has been described as "one of the most famous faith-based news sites today". On six occasions, articles about the site were posted at Amvona, but all were deleted, some after discussion (1, 2). A citation in this new article tells of the latest development in the history of the site: Photoflex settled a lawsuit brought against it by Amvona, paying $100,000.00 US Dollars. The story also tells us that Amvona "closed its retail presence in 2010 to focus on its blog". This is the reason the new Wikipedia article is called "Amvona (site)". The site is the brainchild of the Rev. Fr. Emmanuel Gregory Lemelson, whose posts have been reposted by theburningplatform.com and Zero Hedge. Lemelson has created a profile for the company on the prestitious CrunchBase Web site.

In 2009, prior to the divestiture of its photographic accessories business, the company was the subject of a full-length article in the North Attleboro, Massachusetts Sun Chronicle. The article hails amvona.com's "new marketing-social networking platform that blends some of the personal networking attibutes of Facebook with characteristics of commercial sites like Amazon.com and zillow."

In 2008, Mashable applauded Amvona (site) for its site-specific search. The search platform, dubbed "Amvona Trails", was the only search engine designed to show results only from the amvona.com site. Another achievement in search engine technology was Discovery, which the company called "revolutionary"; the company designed the Corridor, an online gallery where photographers can arrange their images by "clicking and dragging thumbnails into collections." —rybec 22:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable fails WP:NWEB Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources could be found that indicate this site has significance to pass the GNG. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.