The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita Pelizon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many sources for this BLP, however it is the quality of the ones that provide in-depth coverage that are the issue. Most of these are either gossip magazine stories or WP:ROUTINE coverage of reality-TV events. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Dance, Fashion, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Having looked at the first block of 14 references. Lots of PR, interviews, profiles and clickbait and not a single WP:SECONDARY source amongst the lot of them. They are all WP:PRIMARY, many of the puff pieces. Not an actress nor a television personality. Most of its generated from Big Brother. scope_creep^Talk 16:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I looked at the second block of references, promos, interviews, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  // Timothy :: talk  02:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - can't find any WP:SIGCOV to show they meet pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martina Chukwuma-Ezike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP written by SPA author who has not responded to a COI request. The coverage in independent sources is largely about her appointment as rector, therefore I think that WP:BIO1E applies. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The nominator's attempts at WP:OUTING by demanding personal information of editors are both inappropriate and irrelevant. Aberdeen has an unusual governance structure, but it appears that their head academic officer is their pro-chancellor; the rector is an elected representative of the students. So this is not the kind of position that passes WP:PROF#C6, and aside from that Chukwuma-Ezike appears not to be an academic. To me this implies that the appropriate notability criterion is WP:GNG. We do have in-depth news coverage of her in her new position as rector [1] [2] [3] but we also have coverage of her asthma work [4] [5]. Although this additional non-rector coverage does not have as much depth about her, I think it's enough to save this from WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There are more than enough sources shown to meet notability requirements and the author of the article has no relevance to this discussion. While there is a lot of coverage of her appointment and the importance and notability of that, there is also plenty of coverage about her actions as the head of the asthma group. Here's some additional sources beyond those presented above:

  "Martina Chukwuma-Ezike becomes first black female elected as Rector of University of Aberdeen". Vanguard. March 28, 2022. Retrieved March 12, 2023.

  Shanks, Ciaran (September 29, 2022). "University of Aberdeen rector and asthma charity chief urges Scottish Government to rethink 'green' inhaler plans". Aberdeen Live. Retrieved March 12, 2023.

  Munro, Craig (May 1, 2022). "Meet the three black women making history as rectors of the ancient universities". The Press and Journal. Retrieved March 12, 2023.

So add those to the pile. Silverseren^C 01:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I disagree that WP:BIO1E applies if coverage is largely about one thing, because that means coverage is also about something else. WP:NOTBLP1E deals with this well. Even further to that, it should be about one event, not one thing. Madonna is mostly notable for one thing (singing) she doesn't need to be notable for two things to be the focus of an article.

There is significant coverage in reliable sources (about her appointment, about a ceremony, about Asthma things). It seems like a clear WP:GNG pass to me. Here's some examples:

1. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/3684126/charity-chief-executive-martina-chukwuma-ezike-elected-aberdeen-university-rector/
2. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/4097696/martina-chukwuma-ezike-installed-as-rector/
3. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/asthma-chief-demands-review-of-eco-inhalers-before-people-die-6v07qkzjn

CT55555(talk) 01:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CT55555, thank you for providing the examples. To explain the BLP1E rationale, it is because the in-depth coverage about her relates to the event that was the appointment to the rector role. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: the position of Rector at a Scottish university is held by a well-known person elected by the students: see University of Aberdeen#Lord Rector, where it shows that her prdedecessors in the role include Winston Churchill and Clarissa Dickson Wright, so indicates her notability. As for the creatiing editor being {tq|"SPA author who has not responded to a COI request")) : it is clear from their talk page that they took part in a "training session and mini-editatathon" led by WikiMedia trainer Watty62 on 25th January and, apart from signing up to WiR on 27th, they have not edited since. Unless they signed up for email alerts for talk page posts, they will probably be unaware of the COI challenge to which they have not replied. I think it is generally accepted that being a student at an institution does not debar an editor from editing about all members of staff or other people associated with that university. PamD 08:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She was apparently at Buckingham Palace last week as one of the representatives of the University of Aberdeen, which is one of the "Privileged Bodies" which offered loyal greetings to the king - this was the event but I can only see her presence mentioned in her own LinkedIn as yet, rather than a WP:RS suitable for adding to the article, but it's unlikely to be a fabrication. Will presumably appear in Aberdeen city or uni sources in time. PamD 09:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Declaration of Interest - I am a Wikimedia UK trainer who ran the training session at which this article was first drafted. The attendees at that training session are all committed to working on the WiR project. The subject of this deletion request holds a prestigious position while in office (ie not a single event). All previous holders of the position of Rector of the University of Aberdeen since 1809 with only 5 exceptions (each of which ought to be addressed) are the subject of WP articles. Further, the current holder is only the third woman, and first person of colour I believe, to have held that role. Additionally, others have mentioned her notable work at the Asthma charity which she leads which ought to be fleshed out once the possibility of deletion of this article has passed. Watty62 (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep We have more than enough sources, and I don't see how WP:BLP1E applies. XOR'easter (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 12:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfrid Marcel Agnès (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Unreferenced stub for 16 years. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Ethiopia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The nominator's extreme enthusiasm for deleting articles on Canadian ambassadors is not constructive. NB, Wikipedia:Introduction_to_deletion_process#Competence notes that This means articles, categories or templates should not be nominated in a routine fashion, nor because one feels too lazy to check for sources... The escalating campaign is not taking us towards better coverage of diplomacy or anything else. Moonraker (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zero attempt to address notability concerns, and a recycling of !vote that don't address notability from [6], [7], [8]. LibStar (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, but the huge number of your Afds aiming to delete coverage of ambassadors are all drive-by and all begin with the claim "Ambassadors are not inherently notable." Some standard replies are called for. Moonraker (talk) 04:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the closing admin will take your weak (non-existent) arguments for keep here into account. LibStar (talk) 04:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right, as you appear to have unlimited time for pursuing the deletion of diplomatic articles, while others do not have the time to rescue them. But the massive scale and focus of your campaign ought to focus minds on whether there should be a presumption of notability, after all. Moonraker (talk) 04:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have sources with SIGCOV or is this another WP:ILIKEIT keep vote?  // Timothy :: talk  02:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Unreferenced and I could find nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indwepth (ProQuest, Newspapers.com, JSTOR, Project Muse). Ping me if someone does find sources with SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  02:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)  // Timothy :: talk  02:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NPOL.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep following improvements to the article. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Joseph Burbridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Unreferenced stub for 15 years. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and New Zealand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete without prejudice. I couldn't find any sources online other than a few lists that verify the existence of this person. It seems possible that offline sources exist given that this person is most notable for stuff that he did in the mid-20th century, so I wouldn't be opposed if someone recreated with proper sourcing. — SamX [talk · contribs] 02:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in light of well-sourced additions by Paora. — SamX [talk · contribs] 00:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep following expansion. Paora (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Paora: Nice work! How'd find the sources? I'd like to be able to do more thorough WP:BEFORE checks and finding really old sources can be difficult. — SamX [talk · contribs] 13:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @SamX: Old New Zealand newspapers can be searched at the PapersPast website. For the period 1950 to 1979 the only newspaper on the site currently is The Press. For North American newspapers, you can search Newspapers.com and NewspaperARCHIVE.com via The Wikipedia Library. The British Newspaper Archive is also available by application through The Wikipedia Library. Paora (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Hey by Paora.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per sources found by Paora. Suonii180 (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayushmaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pay-TV show doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom, subject lacks IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed promos and listings.  // Timothy :: talk  04:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unless an appropriate redirect can be found. Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soy Chicano Rap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

Gansterism Part 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

N.T.I.R. Part 2 The Revenge of Serio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nightmares Turned Into Reality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirected all four albums by this artist because the coverage on page (AllMusic pages with no editorial coverage, an MTV.com bio which doesn't provide much info on any individual release, and nothing else reliable/primarily about the artist and his music) is not enough and I found nothing additional, plus the artist himself is also facing deletion and looks highly unlikely to survive. Those edits have been undone just now by Josefina213, but my opinion on the pages has not changed so I'm bringing them here now. QuietHere (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Mexico, and California. QuietHere (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete non-notable albums by a non-notable rapper. I'm not sure what we're debating, there is no coverage for any of them, they've never charted or won a Grammy award. Oaktree b (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This album has been covered by Fox News recently and all articles related to Serio will have the deletion tags removed. You are a very reckless editor and are on the line of vandalism to Rap Artist articles very unprofessional cyber bully. Josefina213 (talk) 23:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a lot to learn about how Wikipedia works.   ArcAngel   (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serio is likely not notable as there is no coverage about the individual. Any album they made is also then not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The album is not covered by Fox News; that's false. The album is mentioned in connection with the arrest of another person in Mexico. The Fox News story is about another person altogether, Serio is mentioned in one line. That's not required coverage for notability; we need to see articles about the person, not name drops. I'd suggest you read the various notability requirements that have been pointed out to you over the course of these deletion debates. Oaktree b (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.   ArcAngel   (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all for the reasons stated by myself and others at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serio (rapper). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 02:07, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The rapper's article has now been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serio (rapper), so there is little reason for these albums to still be sitting here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  They wouldn't be if Josefina hadn't objected, but they did so this was the only other option available. QuietHere (talk) 13:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to merit inclusion. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Niger at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Judo. Joyous! Noise! 03:18, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ismael Alhassane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Africa. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Niger at the 2020 Summer Olympics. Couldn't find more than a passing mention on him but he seems to be inline to get another appearance at the 2024 Summer Olympics so something might come up then. Adamtt9 (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO. BEFORE showed nothing but listings, stats, BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. THis has none. This microstub article reflects the lack of SIGCOV. No objection to a consensus redirect.  // Timothy :: talk  04:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Niger at the 2020 Summer Olympics#Judo, where he is mentioned. But not enough in-depth coverage to sustain an independent article.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Temish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | [[Special:]])

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See talk page: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Teddy_Temish) This article was created in March 2009. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teddy_temish&action=history) (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teddy_Temish&action=history&offset=20190215210404%7C883511189&limit=500) It appears to be the 9th longest-running known hoax in Wikipedia history, based on: Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. To quote the article itself, it seems like a "towering, fraudulent persona," fabricated "out of whole cloth." A 2022 podcast, which I cited in the talk page, discussed "Temish," and the host said he had no source besides Wikipedia and wasn't sure "Temish" ever existed. None of the citations on the page are actually about "Temish"—aside from this podcast, which cites Wikipedia itself. Indefatigable2 ^talk 21:24, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The fact it's an orphan and the inappropriate sources are a red flag to me. All other sources are Wikipedia mirrors or copypasted from Wikipedia, or podcasts and podcast forks which aren't particularly reliable either. Looks like another hoax. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 22:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - appears to be a hoax as per nom's research Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I find no sources other than a youtube video about this person. If this is a hoax, deletion is the answer. Oaktree b (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Looks like I was wrong. The article appears to be 13 years, 11 months, 22 days old, making it more like the 15th oldest hoax. Not that this makes it any less of a hoax.Indefatigable2 ^talk 01:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks to be a hoax like nom said. Greyhound 84 (talk) 23:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Appears to be a hoax. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete given it appears to be a hoax. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:BIO and is probably a hoax. CJ-Moki (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also add to the WP:HOAXLIST. CJ-Moki (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Already did Indefatigable2 ^talk 21:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keithroy Freeman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - another football biography written with the old WP:NFOOTY (now deprecated) guideline. Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benetone Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced with routine coverage which doesn't meet WP:CORP. Uhooep (talk) 20:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Companies, and Thailand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It's one of the best known names in the local film production service industry, but I'm finding it hard to identify in-depth coverage beyond passing mentions. This conference paper (full proceedings) includes the following passages:

  Living Films, De Warrenne Pictures, and Benetone Films are among Thailand‘s leading film production service companies. They have been involved in the majority of most expensive foreign films shot in Thailand.

  Benetone Films (2016) provides film production and film production services, directors and cinematographers, and operates in Thailand and the U.S. Since 2003 the company has been involved in the making of more than 80 films, many of them Bollywood romance and action films, and 800 TV commercials. Indian films line produced by Benetone Films include Bombay to Bangkok (India 2008), Golmaal Returns (India 2008), Toonpur Ka Superhero (India 2010), and Ek Ta Tiger (India 2012). It also produced films such as A Stranger in Paradise (USA 2013), Pernicious (USA 2014), Ghost House (USA 2016), and several more.

  This paper says,

  There are small numbers of movie production companies in Thailand. The notable movie production companies are Benetone Films, Five Star Production, GDH 559, Kantana Group, Phranakorn Film, and Sahamongkol Film. BenetoneFilms is a creative film and TV production and production services company headquartered in Bangkok, with offices in the US, Europe, India, and Myanmar. It has been ranked the leading service provider in Thailand.

  There's more in the press that specifically concerns its joint venture Benetone Hillin Entertainment[9], so redirecting/merging there should be considered if the stand-alone article is not kept. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No convincing evidence of WP:RS to demonstrate required WP:Notability despite the efforts. Plutonium27 (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG, NCORP. Source eval:

• "Production: Pernicious" (PDF). Film in Thailand. Thailand Film Office. A promotional flyer
• "Thai Mafia Thriller A Stranger in Paradise, With Collin Egglesfield and Stuart Townsend, to Hit Theaters 2/14". No information about subject
• "Screen Daily". MBI, Ltd. Promotional, interview quotes, about a film director not the subject. Not SIGCOV
•  "IMDB - Benetone Hillin Lines Up Oliver Storm". IMDB is not a source for notability
•  "Benetone Hillin lines up Oliver Storm". Promotional, press release type paragraph about a film director, not the subject. Not SIGCOV

None of the sources above are SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Before showed mentions in promotional material and film databases, nothing SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  04:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jevon Francis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. Only source is just a general sports profile website, no indication of notability. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 23:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article fails WP:GNG; besides match reports and database entries, this troubling article was the only thing I could find on Francis. Jogurney (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The analysis of arguments and rationales lead to a delete conclusion, per detailed analysis provided below of the sourcing. Courcelles (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Morris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Routine coverage here fails WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Morocco. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This seems to be one of a number of drive-by nominations of British ambassadors. Coverage here is a little thin, but there is a nultiplicity of hits to news sources. The GNG is nothing to do with importance, so in theory an ambassador could prove to be non-notable, but thanks to the coverage they get in their international role from journalists and academics it would be hard for one to achieve such obscurity, especially when it comes to diplomacy in Israel. And what may be "routine coverage" for an ambassador is at a higher level than for less notable roles. The GNG gives this helpful definition: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Moonraker (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  What has this to do with Israel? Currently the article is based on primary sources. LibStar (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Lots of words, but no sources.  // Timothy :: talk  05:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Moonraker, could you clarify your comments? Israel is mentioned nowhere in this debate, nor in the article under consideration. Thanks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Randykitty, I don't understand Israel either, it must be a typo. On the point about primary sources, there is no harm in them for facts, but as with any British ambassador there is a mass of sources available. I have just spent about twenty minutes finding and adding a few. In my humble opinion, we need a less negative attitude to a significant group of people, who are far more likely to prove to be notable than not. I would only propose the deletion of any article if I had looked for good reliable sources and not been able to find any. Moonraker (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I know what happened: there was another AfD for an ambassador to Israel, so this must have been a simple copy/paste error. No harm done. --Randykitty (talk) 17:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting in the light of the new sources added by Moonraker
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 19:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the added sources pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO. No sources with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:

• 1.  "Latest news". webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 1 September 2008. Retrieved 1 August 2017. Government archive website, no SIGCOV and fails IS.
• 2. ^ "Mr Tim Morris - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 1 August 2017. Government website, fails IS
• 3. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Africa Programme UK Heads of Mission Series 2016: Ambassador to South Sudan, Timothy Morris" in Africa Programme UK Heads of Mission Series 2016 (Chatham House, July 2016), p. 18 Promotional material for a conference fails IS RS
• 4. ^ Jump up to:a b "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador South Sudan - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 1 August 2017. Government website, fails IS
• 5. ^ The Diplomatic Service List (1994), p. 258 Government website, fails IS
• 6. ^ "Mauretania" in Dod's Parliamentary Companion (2009), p. 1159 Listing with brief biography, contains all member of the civil service, is not a source for notability, no SIGCOV
• 7. ^ "April 2011", Royal web site, accessed 6 March 2023 Government website, fails IS
• 8. ^ "Peace now, “shape of country” later – UK", Eye Radio, 28 January 2016, accessed 6 March 2023 Interview, fails IS RS.
• 9. ^ "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to South Sudan: Alison Blackburne". GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 January 2021. Government website, fails IS
• 10. ^ "Morris, Timothy Colin, (born 17 Sept. 1958), HM Diplomatic Service, retired; Director, Tim Morris Consulting Ltd, since 2018", Who's Who, doi.org, 1 December 2022, accessed 6 March 2023 (subscription required) Who's Who listing is not a source for notability

Keep votes above have shown no refs with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV (ProQuest, JSTOR).

BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  // Timothy :: talk  05:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as show by TimothyBlue, does not pass the WP:SIGCOV barrier.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: TimothyBlue's assessment seems correct. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of rulers named Robert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Royalty and nobility. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WP:LISTCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. You're a good ruler, Bob and many other jokes, I'm sure MNewnham (talk) 22:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'd like to point out this list was created by a user named User:RandomGuy2018, who was blocked last year for sockpuppetry. Truly hilarious; a guy creating a random username with "random guy" in it (in order to circumvent a block) creating a list of random guys with a random name. It could hardly be more WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NLIST. Nobody on the "outside" has compiled/published a list like this. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. WP:LISTCRUFT. Fails WP:NLIST.  // Timothy :: talk  05:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Lopez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Joeykai (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Chile. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obviously fails GNG. Bedivere (talk) 04:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC) On a second look the article was vandalized and this actually referred to soccer player Benji Lopez. It should be renamed to Benji Lopez and ask nominator to reconsider this nomination, and have it closed as Rename and Restore. @Joeykai: Bedivere (talk) 04:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually the current title (Benjamín López) is correct as per the Spanish wiki. Bedivere (talk) 04:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or draftify he has a spanish wiki, added a reference from that in the subject page. if that doesnt satisfy notability it may be draftified Christopheronthemove (talk) 06:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The source you added was to a fan blog of SB Nation (considered generally unreliable); I removed it as non-RS. JoelleJay (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wasn't able to find source to sustain the article currently fail WP:GNG.Epcc12345 (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Néstor Salomé Martínez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Apparently after an unsuccessful club football career, he found some success in beach soccer. However, I don't see enough online coverage to suggest WP:GNG is met. Most of the hits relate to the Guatemalan international footballer Néstor Martínez. Jogurney (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Sánchez Arellano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article comprehensively fails WP:GNG; I can only find database entries, match reports and a note that he was part of a draft. Jogurney (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Morales Agüero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Joeykai (talk) 19:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article comprehensively fails WP:GNG; I can't find anything other than database entries. Jogurney (talk) 23:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election. Salvio ^giuliano 19:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Money Economics System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Seems like a very minor political party that stood a small number of candidates then folded JMWt (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. JMWt (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: to 1941 Manitoba general election. The party did exist, as I found contemporary sources on newspapers.com, but I don't see any WP:SIGCOV of this very minor party. Curbon7 (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I believe we should keep it there are many minor parties in wikipedia i will gladly add the election result but the article is a bit bare bones it would help if we could get some more info about it User:Friendlyhistorian — Preceding undated comment added 21:46, 12 March 2023‎ (UTC)
• Comment. @Friendlyhistorian: Are you able to provide descriptions of some of the sources that you plan to add (such as hyperlinks or books w/ page numbers)? This would be helpful in evaluating notability. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I am looking for it tbh i am not really good at editing and adding . I usually do minor stuff do you think i could find someone to do it for me Friendlyhistorian (talk) 21:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  But for real its insane how obscure this party is Friendlyhistorian (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  If it's super obscure, to the point where we don't have sources on it as a party, it might be better to just cover it in the broader context of the election it contested rather than for the party to have its own article. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election per Curbon7, as a viable ATD. Sal2100 (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to 1941 Manitoba general election. Based off of my searching, it appears to fail WP:NGO (it's an obscure subnational political party that we can't find significant coverage for), but it would make sense to target it to the article on the election instead of deleting it. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 19:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rockstar Nino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Draft:Rockstar Nino already exists so not able to draftify. WP:AUTOBIO on a subject that comprehensively fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO according to my own searches. Only his own social media accounts are coming up, no independent news media or professional reviews or national charts. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Hawaii. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete : non-notable artist.Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Pershkoviski (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I am unable to find significant coverage of this artist, so the artist appears to fail WP:NBASIC. Looking at the various criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, he doesn't appear to pass any of them, so I think that this article should be deleted as having a non-notable article subject. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems strange to delete an article about such a common brand name product but that's the consensus here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tender Vittles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I wasn't sure what I was expecting to find, but other than blogs and adverts going back many years, I'm not finding anything significant. Nothing that looks like a RS which meets the GNG to me. JMWt (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Companies. JMWt (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also if anyone can decipher what happened at the first AfD, I'd be curious to know. I assume it was a !keep but it isn't clear. JMWt (talk) 17:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Just in my looking for sources, it seems like a really poor case for satisfying notability policy, so I'm leaning delete unless there are a few additional sources out there. All the sources are pretty much that the product simply exists and is sold (from vendor websites) with little to no actual secondary independent sources on it. The only source that seems to scrape slightly above the bottom of the can is from cats.com Pretty meh, but if there are other reliable sources that talk about semi-moist cat food like this product, then it may just be worth a redirect to Cat_food#Commercial_foods with a new section on semi-moist food. It seems hard to reach the point of sourced notability here though. KoA (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment It's mentioned here [10] but I don't have access to it, so I can't comment how notable it is. Oaktree b (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like basically a passing mention; I can see it here on Internet Archive. Tender Vittles are actually mentioned (in passing) in a ton of articles on Google Scholar, because it serves as a useful example of a descriptive trademark. There's discussion of a related court-case in a few places e.g. see ref.^[1] I suspect better sources exist given the prominence of the brand, although they may not be online. I would expect more discussion of the brand in marketing/brand/law books by academics. Suriname0 (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Here's the press release.^[2] I can't see any evidence the relaunch was actually reported on at the time i.e. in 2011. Small press blurbs about the discontinuation.^[3] Still not seeing anything that looks like WP:SIGCOV. Suriname0 (talk) 01:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Promising: another source^[4] lists marketing articles from 1977, and provides the following citation and note: Top Promotions, Fall, 1976: How Nestle Got a Head Start in a Burgeoning Category. Curt Schleier, Product Marketing, February 1977, pp. 33-36. [Hendon] 77-468. "Most of the article discusses Nestle's cookie mix, while space is also given to Purina Tender Vittles cat food (best packaging)." I wasn't able to find an online copy of the source, but it could very well have significant coverage. Suriname0 (talk) 03:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• This source^[5] discusses the more recent reacquisition of the brand, in two sentences. Suriname0 (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Cat_food#Commercial_foods. It existed, but there doesn't seem to be coverage. Valereee (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just because it exists does not mean needs an article. As it fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, what article it does have should be deleted. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Mentions and promos are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. None of the sources in the article are SIGCOV from IS RS, none of the sources mentioned above are more than mentions, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Evidnece of existence is not enough to merit an article. No objection to a consensus redirect.  // Timothy :: talk  05:53, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Hey User:TimothyBlue, can I take it from your comment that you were able to access a print or digital copy of "How Nestle Got a Head Start in a Burgeoning Category" (1977) article mentioned above? If so, would you mind describing or quoting the relevant contents for the purpose of this discussion? Suriname0 (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the commonality of the name makes searches difficult, but I can't find any in-depth coverage about this product. I was surprised, as I thought it would be an easy keep. I actually used to see this in the cat food aisle back in the day when I had cats. No prejudice to recreation if in-depth sourcing can be found.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ljupka Gojić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is currently married to a Croatian football player Mihael Mikić - apart from fame thank to the footballer what is her independent notability? Article is described based on weak sources. Should be much corrected or deleted if no reliable sources will be find. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: Although one of her sources is just a user-generated profile, this source in Croatian seems to be covering the subject significantly, have a clear byline of an author, and published in a locally known outlet. AmshitBalcon (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maura Rivera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rivera is the wife of the retired footballer Mark González. - apart from fame thank to the footballer, what is her independet notablity? Article is desribed based on weak souces. Should be muuch corrected or delted if in next days no more reliable sources will be find. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mais Gomar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is pretty muh not sourced about not notable person. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hilla Nachshon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her first marriage was to Israeli Premier League footballer Asi Domb between the years 2004 and 2006. Apart from fame thank to the footballer what is her idependet notabliy? Article is described baed on weak sources. Should be much correctde or delted if no reliable sources will be find. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Milana Vlaović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from her fame related to her relationship with Goran Vlaović (football player) what is her independet notablity? Article should be much corrected or delted if no more reliable sources will be find. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ebru Destan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She dated Galatasaray S.K.'s former defender and Turkish international Vedat İnceefe over three years[1] and Beşiktaş J.K. defender İbrahim Toraman.[2] - apart from fame related to her relationships with fotball players what is her independet notablity? Article should be much corrected or delted if no more reliable sources will be find. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Whilst I am no position to comment on the domestic Turkish TV/Film/Music industry, the Filmography section of her entry seems to be a straight copy/paste of her IMDB entry, and her albums are streamable on major platforms. This should get her to notability even without her modelling career. Her lovelife isn't relevant to her notability. Page is low-grade and needs help, but is tagged as a stub MNewnham (talk) 22:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hawra al-Nadawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is married to footballer Nashat Akram, who played for the Al-Shorta Sports Club where her father Ayad Bunyan was the club president. - apart from fame related to her relationship with football player, what is her independet notablity? Article should be much corrected (based on reliable sources) or delted if it is not possible. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep 90 seconds of research would have shown that this person is an author and opinion writer including an opinion piece published in the NYT. This nomination (one in a string today), feels malicious. MNewnham (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamara Gorro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She has been in a relationship with footballer Ezequiel Garay since 2010. - apart from that what is her independet notablity? Article should be much corrected or delted if no more reliable sources will be find. Article should be corrected or delte if no more relible sources will be find. Being member of Mujeres y Hombres y Viceversa, some Trajectory and published works is not enough for current standards of Wikipedia, IMHO. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. Clearly established notability in Spain. This nomination (one in a string today), feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 23:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Murgia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She married footballer Andrea Bertolacci on 23 December 2015 - It is the only sourced info in the article so this speak for itself that form is not acceptable for Wikipedia. The article should be delted or much correcte if there are any sources which could defend her independet notablity. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Exoand based on Italian wiki article. PamD 09:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ludovica Caramis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She got engaged to footballer Mattia Destro. - Apart from relationship with famous footballer what is her independet notablity? Article shoudl be delted or much corrected based on reliable sources which can defend independet notablity. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

María Eugenia Larraín (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per notablity tag. Article is not desribed based on reliable sources. Person is not independly notable, even for all categories there are no sources. Let wait until someone will find reliable sources or delte that if will not be corrected. I suggest to bit review this article, according to the content she is amarried to famous tennis player Marcelo Ríos but is in category [[Association footballers' wives and girlfriends Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep : Article is poorly sourced, otherwise plenty of citations exist in Chilean publications and she seems to be a celebrity in her own country. I have added a few new citations. Pershkoviski (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I could not get the archived citations to article in "La Nación" to work. But I had no difficulty in finding vast numbers of reliable independent sources about María Eugenia Larraín by clicking on the Google news* link above. Deleting articles is not meant to be a process for article clean up.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly established notability in her domestic market. This nomination (one in a string today), feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from relationship with famous footballer Dentinho what is her independet notablity? Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Fashion, and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Zelić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from fame thank to being sister of more famous footballers what particularly is her independet notabliy? Article is poorly sourced for now and has wrong categories. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I found [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], and [18] among many many more sources. Clearly significant figure in Australian soccer. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Das osmenezz. An established figure in Australian Soccer Journalism. This nomination (one in a string today), feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 23:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All the nominations also happen to be women as well, which is coincidental given that it's currently Women's Month... Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 04:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz Please also update the Personal Life section of the article. From Bassie f (his talk page) 08:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per sources found by Das osmnezz. Suonii180 (talk) 09:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anica Kovač (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from relationship with famous footballer what is her independet notablity? Sources are generally weak for now. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nuria Bermúdez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of relatioship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independed notablity? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I found [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], and [25], among many many more Spanish sources. Clearly significant figure in Spain. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alessia Merz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now the article is quite pootly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, Fashion, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly established and documented notability in Italy. This nomination (one of dozens today of notable women with connections to professional soccer players) feels malicious. MNewnham (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marta Cecchetto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of her relationship with Luca Toni. Apart from that what i her independet notablity? For now aricle is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note:This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article is poorly written but there are literally hundreds of high quality glamour and fashion photos of this woman online. This nomination (one of many today of women associated with professional soccer players) feels malicious. MNewnham (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Lee Darley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, England, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Menaye Donkor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have ambivalent thoughts when report that article for deletion. She is national titleholer as miss universe of Ghana but on the other hand there is template at the article (not added bey me) that article should be improved and yet her fame is significantly overrated due to relationship with Sulley Muntari who is globally famous. Let carefully discuss that. Cheers. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Beauty pageants, Ghana, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Bux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of her relationship with Gary Lineker. Apart from info about her privaty life article is quite short and spoorly dscribed. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Fashion, and Wales. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Santarelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now, article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Television, Fashion, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn by nominator After reading more aout subject, it it is really evidenced she can be more notable than her husband. I made nomination with mistake and I am sorry for that. Dawid2009 (talk) 09:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep, part of a disruptive mass nom, 33 AfD in 3 minutes probably created via BOT, no authors notified, copy-pasting the same inaccurate rationale everywhere, obviously no WP:BEFORE and in many cases (like this one) the subjects were notable before their engagement to footballers and are more notable than their counterparts. Cavarrone 08:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Şükran Ovalı (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is quite poorly sourced for now. What is her independet notablity? Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly established notability already documented in Wikipedia. This nomination (one of dozens today of notable women by the same contributor) feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep What do you mean by "independent notability"? She's an actress. That's her claim to notability. And the sources in the article are fine, which include NTV, Takvim, Sözcü, and Hürriyet. You obviously did not look any of them up as you have nominated 25 articles on different women for deletion in one day and it's not possible to do that with proper research on each subject. Keivan.f^Talk 01:15, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ibi Makienok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Television, Fashion, and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, No, she famous because of her many roles as a TV host. Lots of interviews if someone wants to update the article (she is also known as Ibi Støvring) Christian75 (talk) 08:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]