The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 17:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Costa Titch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:NMUSIC. I don't see any significant coverage of the musician; all the coverage, at least in reliable sources, is about his death. —C.Fred (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose he has a clip with 45 million views on Youtube and did a collab with Akon. Makes him more notable than 90% of bio entries on this site I guess. Synotia (moan) 17:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Steams can be bought so aren't reliable, nor any sort of notability criteria here. They aren't audited like newspaper circulation or radio airplay is. Oaktree b (talk) 22:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep @C.Fred Your point is moot since if he was indeed not notable why all the coverage from all international media?See this search link And this for awards given. Sbliecer (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Be realistic…. The article gives 2 generic sentences for his “biography”. There’s only one reliable source in this entire article, Washington Post, that gave no information about his career in his lifetime, only that he died onstage and they posted a social media link of a video. They didn’t mention any notable songs, anything. They only reported on the speculative manner of his death, the cause of which has not yet been confirmed. Notability for a musician on Wikipedia has requirements and unfortunately the subject did not meet them. His collaboration with Akon did not reach any certifications such as gold or platinum nor did it chart. The song itself doesn’t even have an article. Trillfendi (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
comment This bias is really strong and I don't see it going on for long. An alternative platform shall come up to address these kinds of biases.
Costa Titch is mentioned all over the net just by searching his name. I still don't understand how famous you have to be to qualify for a page in Wikipedia. I remember being in a similar deletion discussion of Kevin Samuels page till finally it was added. Same argument that @Trillfendi is making. You really don't have to have a collabo with Akon or be certified Platinum to deserve a page on wikipedia when millions of South Africans know your name. Sbliecer (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Without taking sides, I'd like to point out this is the English Wikipedia. When pages about non-English singers are created, they need to be well sourced enough and notable enough to be on the site, because otherwise we don't know how notable they really are. Race To Oblivion (ネザーへのハイウェイ) (talk) 12:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
non-English ? :) Synotia (moan) 19:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to take the information here to another platform, in fact, it's encouraged that you share it, that's what wikipedia's licensing allows! Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I go based on the evidence right there, not so-called bias of subjects that none of us even know personally. Kevin Samuels, famous for overt misogyny in his lifetime, was also on notable television shows and music videos as himself. So that had to have indicated notability on his part to reach mainstream audiences in the media. It’s ironic that Samuels only received reliable sources when he died, but in his lifetime he became notable as whatever cultural commentator he perceived himself to be. That said, Sbliecer, it doesn’t matter if millions know your name if you can’t get reliable sources to verify the criteria of notability on Wikipedia. In my opinion, unfortunately, Titch’s death only creates WP:ONEEVENT. Sources only covering him for the manner of his death rather than his career and they’ll stop talking about it by the end of the month. Trillfendi (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Point. I respect your opinion but I still beg to differ. No way an artist is one of the most nominated for a continental event in January 2023 and dies in March 2023 and that is classified as one event. See this Link Sbliecer (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article shows that he did not win any of the awards in this awards show. Trillfendi (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is turning to some troll kind of discussion. There is update with award he won. Will you now say the awards needs to be 4 won? Sbliecer (talk) 23:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm neutral on this nom for now, but I do agree that something has gone wrong, particularly on AFD, and it seems like well-known South African WP:RS are systematically disregarded despite WP:WORLDWIDE existing. I can't see this lasting much longer either: perhaps the WP:GNG criteria should include "of interest to readers, or generally known, in the Core Anglosphere". South Africa is in a weird position: it's de facto a large, English-speaking country. It's always been a bit isolated, first because of apartheid, now because of demographic differences. Popular culture, politics, education and the media are dominated by the English language, but as the white English-speaking population ages, emigrates or assimilates (see the subject of this nom), popular English South African culture could diverge even more from mainstream Anglosphere culture. Or maybe black South African English culture is becoming more prominent? Perhaps Wikipedia isn't the place for content from a country like that, and the time has come for clearer content guidelines, and to admit that a truly worldwide, English encyclopedia isn't really possible. South African editors aren't blameless here, and they don't participate in AFDs and edit regularly. I think the situation is analogous to what's happened with IMDB, where Indian movies made it into the Top 250, pushing out western movies (although Wikipedia has unlimited space so the analogy isn't perfect).[1]. Park3r (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion. I urge the OP to withdraw the request, which is borderline vandalism given the story of his passing is trending. Brmull (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Brmull has been given a warning template for referring to an AFD nomination as borderline vandalism. Do not yell vandalism to win a content dispute. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do the nominations for the awards not count towards notability? I'm not familiar with African music awards. Oaktree b (talk) 22:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of draftifying articles, especially since there's already a dearth of editors on SA topics and we need to encourage them wherever possible and a mainspace article is more likely to do that, and also because WP:NOTCLEANUP. Maybe consider withdrawing your nom? Park3r (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.