The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayushmaan[edit]

Ayushmaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pay-TV show doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Shellwood (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom, subject lacks IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed promos and listings.  // Timothy :: talk  04:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unless an appropriate redirect can be found. Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.