The result was delete. Sandstein 08:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable content, tagged since March 2009. Topic’s website does not appear to be active or been updated since 07/12/05. Buttons (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources other than two very passing mentions in a Malay newspaper ([1], [2]). Posting the lyrics is probably a copyvio. Mkativerata (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 08:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Or and WP:SYN. No theory of such name seems to exist (see also here), the article is rather pieced together in synthetical fashion from various references none devoted mainly to the topic. The relevant core about the Qing's stagnancy could easily be covered in other articles such as on the dynasty itself, if it has not already long happened. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable footballer, having played no higher than the fifth tier of English football. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 22:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I,m sorry Tara but the consensus here is that there are no reliable sources for this subject and the one (and it's only 1) source you are trying to present is questionable. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unclear notability/existence. Every Nearly every reference given is a (homemade) Youtube video or wiki site. Google search for "Ritual of the angel of death" book results in five pages, all Wikipedia. Search for "Ritual of the angel of death" Romania is the same. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 21:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. One of the listed sources is a book. Publisher and copyright year are part of the source note for the book. Many Wikipedia articles don't have a single book among the sources.Tara grinstead friend (talk) 00:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected that page number. Sorry for confusion.Tara grinstead friend (talk) 02:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have the book authored by Leilah Wendell in front of me. Have you read it or seen a copy?
Several Wikipedia articles that I have seen use You Tube videos as references and sources. The article on Fred Rogers (children's television personality of the 1960s and 1970s) is one of them.Tara grinstead friend (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. I have an earlier edition of the book printed long before 2005 without the plug for the website that 2005 edition has.Tara grinstead friend (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to G-code and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Until July 9, this was a redirect to G-code. This new article lacks independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Though before the 7 day period, it's pretty clear this AFD falls under the snowball clause in terms of opinions here, and as a result, I don't see an issue with closing it early. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 11:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article really should be deleted because it's too short to get more information. And it needs a verification by an expert, but there's no expert can help except for me. Spellcast suddenly created it as soon as I told him the Chinese version. He seems to make one only for connection to the Chinese version.
Some readers will try reading on Simple English Wikipedia as simple as they want, of course, some people can not read English or consider reading in English is hard to hit.
So as my honest advise, removing from English wiki is the best choice not only in order to waste our time but also check this unfinished one. The Simple English verison is only enough, nothing can be helpful aside from deletion. 俠刀行 (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The concerns raised by the nominator have been addressed through normal editing of the article, to the effect that notability is now demonstrated. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 02:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be a notable concept (I've been unable to find any significant coverage after searching several sources; most instances of the phrase seem to refer to courtesy when speaking on telephones rather than to this specific subject), and the article is really clutching at straws for things to say: "Courtesy telephones generally have a distinctive colour..." ╟─TreasuryTag►Not-content─╢ 19:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This church appears to fail to meet WP:ORG due to a lack of any reliable, independent coverage. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted as a recreation. the wub "?!" 19:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This does not seem like a notable topic at all. It is purely original research. JDDJS (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I came across this page on NPP and cannot find any reliable, 3rd-party sources for it, so I am nominating it for deletion as it fails the general notability guideline. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed PROD - unsourced personal essay that violates WP:OR -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOTE Breawycker (talk to me!) 18:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The player has not attained the level of notability for WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. OlavN's opinion is not taken into account as it does not address the problems identified with this article in terms of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Sandstein 09:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. The only review on the article [6] is very flimsy, and a search turned up press releases and forum/blog posts alone - frankie (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article was deproded by an anon IP account. Yet the original reason of not being able to find reliable sources to establish notability has not been addressed. My google and bing searches have not turned up anything to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think his work as his publisher - director of Yale Uni Press - production of the Annals of Communism series (National Review: John J. Miller wrote a profile of Brent and the Annals of Communism series arguing It is perhaps not too much to say that Brent’s Annals of Communism series, which was launched more than a decade ago, is one of the most important publishing projects in the world. [7]) and Executive Directorship of the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research all would seem sufficient to establish notability.I am not sure if publisher would be better than author in the parentheses in the title (Msrasnw (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)) PS He is also the visiting Alger Hiss Professor of History and Literature at Bard College. (A named chair (but only a visiting one at a small college))(Msrasnw (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
The result was redirect to The Mask (film). Narrow consensus is to delete, but several advocate a merger, and a redirect is at any rate useful. Relevant and sourced material, if any, can be merged from the history to the extent editorial consensus allows. Sandstein 08:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko (The Mask)
The only appearance of this character is in The Mask (film). This article is basically a plot summary of that movie, written from the subject's perspective. The non-fiction info is unsourced. theFace 17:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Not redirecting as the title is not a likely search term and there is no sourced content that could be merged. An appropriate redirect can be created editorially. Sandstein 08:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian Tyrell (3nd nomination). This article was previously co-nominated with Dorian Tyrell back in 2006.
While I must say this is an interesting persona, being an appliance of the unscrupulous mafia boss stereotype often used in popular culture, the majority of this article is in-universe cruft and unsourced info. The character's only appearance was in The Mask (film). Any informational value can be put at that page, or at The Mask: The Animated Series. theFace 17:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed PROD. Cannot find any reliable sources that demonstrates this company meets WP:CORP. More specifically, there are no sources that this company "is considered one of the largest roofing contractors of the nation". Singularity42 (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which provide significant coverage of this singer-songwriter. joe deckertalk to me 15:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
a non notable sporting event. the article is merely a results listing. I could find no reliable third party coverage. google only shows fighting sources. also nominating for same reason:
LibStar (talk) 14:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Brockville Police Service. Any sourced and relevant content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 09:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Police chiefs are not inherently notable. Unable to locate verifiable sources to establish notability. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deletion by User:Fastily under criteria G3. Marasmusine (talk) 19:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No online sources, not even Nintendo themselves, cover this game. Therefore, this game does not exist, meaning that this article is merely a joke article. -- ThomasO1989 (talk) 14:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:45, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orange-breasted is a part heading Snowman (talk) 13:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Utterly non-notable local 4 July parade. Speedy was declined. PROD notice was removed twice without explanation. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 12:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I proposed deletion before, no evidence of notability. Added by an enthusiastic editor, but not notable, sorry Superp (talk) 13:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated at MFD (wrong forum), listing here instead.
Reason given was: "Not notable, only song from the film with a page, very little content." Original nomination made by Bollyjeff (talk · contribs). Acather96 (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was already deleted (non-admin closure). Some Wiki Editor (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article fails to address WP:BIO. After massive trimming of fake links, forum posts and promotional chaff text, I find only one credible citation and that is to an obit in the Daily Star which does not appear to demonstrate suitable significant impact to address WP:GNG. Fæ (talk) 10:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Requested by 72.244.204.221 on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#FC Chalon — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article was PRODed in May 2011, with "Stand-alone Notability outside of its league not established, i.e. it fails WP:GNG" as its reason. The PROD was contested because "level 5 of a major league system seems, on the face of it, high enough for notability but by all means try an AFD". The article is a two-sentence stub created in 2006 and minimally improved since then. A check of finds a stub with a single reference (http://www.footballenfrance.fr/clubs/liste/chalon.php) that would be of use if notability is established, but nothing that meets GNG. Since an internet search does results in hits, there may be notability buried somewhere out there, but I couldn't find it. As an organization, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH, and is not notable beyond perhaps a mention on the poorly-maintained List of football clubs in France. 72.244.204.221 (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Almost entirely unsourced, WP:OR, and cruft. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:06, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, with the reasoning that I see tons of non-primary sources all over Google news. However, I found 8 for "Corero Network Security" and 4 for "Top Layer Security" - all of which appear to be either press releases or standard, general announcements. I could find no evidence that this company meets the notability criteria for businesses or the general notability criteria. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Had to think over a decent rationale for this one. While some have mentioned that other articles such as Herbert F. Christian are similar to this one, the fact that other articles exist really isn't a valid reason for an article to automatically be kept. That said, some of the articles that exist but received lesser awards is something I've taken into account. The fact that the award received isn't as notable as some that exist now is not overly relevant, this person was not around when these new awards have existed, so this does not apply. If they were awarded something that at the time was a high award, then that's what's relevant. This seems to be the case here, and he has received reasonable coverage in at least one of the sources presented. The article in itself is a perm-stub, and it might be best to summarise the information in the article into one paragraph, and merge it to another article. That's what I'd do. But that's a discussion for the article talk page. There's no consensus here for deletion, so I'm closing this as keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 01:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Individual who does not meet the general notability guidelines. The only claim of significance is that he died in a brave and honourable way - unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a memorial site, no matter how brave an individual is. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mark 15:024, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I believe that all the HC winners should have pages/articles of their own. Rather than deleting this one, we should add the others. It also seems to me that, excluding the performance on the bombing raid, the reason for issuing the VC to Edwin_Swales is the same as the issuing of the Honoris Crux to Kevin Winterbottom. BoonDock (talk) 14:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I'm sorry Mattwilcoxen but the consensus is that he's not notable yet. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A theologian. His PhD dissertation was published into a book in 2006. Is currently a lecturer at a university. Has another book being published later this year. Has published journal articles. Claims to be a popular blogger. Nothing comes up in searches except on other blogs. His university bio page has more about him. I think this is a case of too soon. Note for searches: He goes by Benjamin and Ben. Bgwhite (talk) 07:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure wether this is an ad or the manual itself but it is ridiculously spammy and should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable; Apparently self-published book; Various attempts to add the book into Wikipedia Wxidea (talk) 06:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This book, Annuaire de la Noblesse Moderne, has the following reference at Library and Archives Canada:
AMICUS No. 39134670 Serial NLC COPIES: NLC Electronic - TITLE(S): Annuaire de la noblesse moderne des maisons principales de l'Europe (En ligne) *Annuaire de la noblesse moderne des maisons principales de l'Europe [ressource électronique] PUBLISHER: Montréal : Kozma Petrovitch Prutkov. DESCRIPTION: Paraît depuis 2010? FREQUENCY: Annuel E-LOCATIONS: http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/101/201/300/annuaire_noblesse/ index.html Pour les fonds voir la Collection électronique de BAC. NOTES: Accès restreint aux clients de BAC sur place seulement. Type of computer file: Publication en série électronique en format PDF. NUMBERS: Canadiana: 20113008627 ISSN: 1925-5594 CONSER: ocn733231825
The articles was added by user Rapportroyal two months after adding a number of borderline citations.
The publisher is listed as "Montréal : Kozma Petrovitch Prutkov" -- which appears to be a bogus or self-published publisher. You can search for the book here: [22]
Note, it's possible that citations to this book should also be removed from Wikipedia.
While I am sure the author is sincere, this book appears to fail notability tests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxidea (talk • contribs) 06:38, July 9, 2011
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been questioned as to whether or not it meets WP:N. Article currently has a un-sourced lead, member list, and a collection of indiscriminate links. Phearson (talk) 13:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem to be notable, in the WP sense, although he seems to be talented and ambitious. Lack of secondary sources which give us information about him. BigJim707 (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:48, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. While Sustainability marketing exists, Sustainability Marketing Transformation doesn't outside of one recent book by Belz and Peattie. It's a novel concept, failing if not verifiability then by a large margin our notability guidelines. There are only seven Google hits for the term (excluding Wikipedia and its mirrors)[25], all but one by the authors of the book. Google Books and Google Scholar return no results (apart from the index of the same book). Fram (talk) 07:34, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: I am also nominating the following related pages:
This also appeared out of nowhere, fully formed at the outset from a user with no other edits, and again is written in the same kind of headache inducing prose, and plugs the same book and consultant:
The result was moot. The article has been rewritten as Mobile museums (in RVs). If that article is also deficient it would require a separate discussion. Consensus here is that the "Moveable Museum" is not suited for an article of its own. Sandstein 09:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is a minor offering compared to many of the permanent exhibits in the AMNH, which do not have their own articles on Wikipedia, let alone a mention on AMNH's wiki article. It is a service of the Museum's education department, not in any way a major part of the greater museum's collections or research. Simply, it's not it's own entity.
The wiki-link to "Gottesman Center for Science Teaching and Learning" which just redirects to the AMNH article, which does not even have a section on its gottesman center, something so improbably looked up at all, makes this look like a bit of a vanity page created by someone in the museum's education department.
The majority of the sources for this article are either published by the museum, or are regarding specific events, visits by the moveable to communities in local papers, or municipal education dept literature also describing specific events. I can not find any articles about the MM in a de facto NYC news source, say, the Times. ViniTheHat (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Newspapers:
- 2.^ "JIMMY VAN BRAMER BRINGS MOVEABLE MUSEUM TO QUEENSBRIDGE FOR FAMILY DAY". Woodside Herald. 25-Jun-10. http://woodsideherald.com/uploads/Woodside_6_25_10.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 5.^ "Fossilized Bones, Dinosaur Poo Are Hit in Park Slope". The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. December 4, 2009. http://www.brooklyneagle.com/categories/category.php?category_id=9&id=32312. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 9.^ "Moveable Museum". Stuyvesant Town Events. http://www.stuytown.com/#/events. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 10.^ "At Staten Island School, a Moving Way to Learn". SILive.com. 3-Oct-10. http://www.silive.com/northshore/index.ssf/2008/10/at_staten_island_school_a_movi.html. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 21.^ "American Museum Of Natural History Visits Rockaway". The Wave. August 3, 2007. http://www.rockawave.com/news/2007-08-03/community/004.html. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
22.^ "American Museum Of Natural History Visits Rockaway". The Wave. August 3, 2007. http://www.rockawave.com/news/2007-08-03/community/004.html. Retrieved 2011-04-15.23.^ "Fossilized Bones, Dinosaur Poo Are Hit in Park Slope". The Brooklyn Daily Eagle. December 4, 2009. http://www.brooklyneagle.com/categories/category.php?category_id=9&id=32312. Retrieved 2010-12-03.- Education community sources:
- 3.^ "The Moveable Museum". Edwize.org. November 3, 2010. http://www.edwize.org/the-moveable-museum. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 6.^ "American Museum of Natural History Moveable Museum Program “Discovering the Universe” visits P.S. 225". NYC Department of Education. http://schools.nyc.gov/SchoolPortals/21/K225/newsandinfo/News/amnhvisit.htm. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 8.^ "Moveable Museum". National Lab Day. http://www.nationallabday.org/resources/all?filter%5Bprovided_by%5D=American+Museum+of+Natural+History. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 11.^ "Dinosaurs, Moveable Museums, and Science!". United States Department of Education. 8-Nov-10. http://www.ed.gov/oese-news/dinosaurs-moveable-museums-and-science. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 12.^ "AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY BRINGS DINOSAURS "EXHIBIT-ON-WHEELS" TO LOCAL PRESCHOOLERS". Educational Alliance. http://www.edalliance.org/index.php?src=news&submenu=ArtGalleriesUpcoming&srctype=detail&category=Early%20Childhood&refno=72. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 13.^ "AMNH Moveable at Family Fun Day". Family Health Resource Center & Patient Library. http://www.nyupatientlibrary.org/hassenfeld/news/6-30-08/amnh-moveable-museum-family-fun-day. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 14.^ "M.O.N.H (sic) Moveable Museum". ColoriumLaboratorium. http://coloriumlaboratorium.com/m-o-n-h-moveable-museum. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 19.^ "American Museum of Natural History Moveable Museum Program “Discovering the Universe” visits P.S. 225". NYC DOE Schools Portal News and Announcements. December 9, 2008. http://schools.nyc.gov/SchoolPortals/21/K225/newsandinfo/News/amnhvisit.htm. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
20.^ "American Museum of Natural History Moveable Museum Program “Discovering the Universe” visits P.S. 225". NYC DOE Schools Portal News and Announcements. December 9, 2008. http://schools.nyc.gov/SchoolPortals/21/K225/newsandinfo/News/amnhvisit.htm. Retrieved 2011-04-15.- Museum Website:
- 1.^ "American Museum of Natural History 2009 Annual Report". The American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/about/AMNH_AR_2009.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
4.^ "American Museum of Natural History 2009 Annual Report". The American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/about/AMNH_AR_2009.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-03.- 7.^ "Moveable Museums Make Trip to D.C. (video)". AMNH Youtube Channel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0NZzEQ3xno. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 15.^ "Paleontology of Dinosaurs (K-2)". American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/education/school_groups/offering.php?id=194. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 16.^ "Dinosaurs: Ancient Fossils, New Discoveries (3-8)". American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/education/school_groups/offering.php?id=194. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 17.^ "Anthropology: Structures & Culture". American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/education/school_groups/offering.php?id=195. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- 18.^ "Astronomy: Discovering the Universe". American Museum of Natural History. http://www.amnh.org/education/school_groups/offering.php?id=196. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
The result was delete. The "delete" opinions are much more convincing in the light of the applicable guidelines than the "keep" opinions. Sandstein 08:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable website. Orange Mike | Talk 01:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Any particular reason this is non-notable? It seems like there has been a lot of work done on the page to increase notability. Dscanland (talk) 16:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn and once again I have to scream at people to get an article fixed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deprodded with addition of "sources" which amount to a primary source and Discogs. No notability asserted; no notability inherited from working with other artists. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Maybe reconsider after a few months to see whether the case continues to draw coverage. Sandstein 08:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
as per WP:NOTNEWS. children unfortunately disappear all the time and it gets media coverage when there are suspicious circumstances, but this is essentially routine news. got a spike in coverage in March 2011 but not much else. [34] LibStar (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I previously speedily deleted this per WP:A7, but since it has been restored following a request for undeletion and subsequent restoration, I am nominating this article for deletion. After searching for anything that would help make this article pass WP:GNG, I came up short (nothing in the media regarding this "movement"). Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet notability criteria for musicians. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable product, fails WP:GNG Mtking (talk) 03:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Sandstein 09:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person. No coverage in independent reliable sources; gets a lot of Google hits, but that's in part due to her being quoted in a couple of human-interest pieces about something else (ie. not actually coverage of her that satisfies WP:BIO) and mostly due to the fact that she has dozens of websites. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I'm sorry, but did you even read the article? This is an obviously notable person. She has authored over 40 books, some sites quote 50. The publishers include McGraw-Hill, Prentice Hall, New Falcon, Ronin, Random House, Brick House, Berkley, Kensington and other reputable publishers. She had a radio show with a million listeners. She has been featured on internationally-renown talk shows including Oprah Winfrey, O'Reilly Factor, Good Morning America and Montel Williams; THEY found her to be notable. After the first couple of hundred Google hits, you get dozens and dozens of book reviews. Barnes & Noble's website lists 114 hits; Borders gives her 79. I don't know what problem you have with her, but for this and other reasons stated in the article, she is obviously notable. Rosencomet (talk) 11:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't really meet the Notability requirements. Should any Chrome Extension that has been written about in a blog post or review have a Wikipedia entry? Pattern86 (talk) 07:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability doubtful. Unreliable sources. The way the author keeps removing the maintenance templates, gives me the idea of self-promotion or a COI-problem. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is interesting to see that the author also removed an AfD from Forensics ([47]) without adding really reliable sources and a speedy deletion request for Wrexile ([48]). It looks like he is creating articles to support The Divided Circle... Night of the Big Wind (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
YOU put in the speedy deletion request. And you did so in direct response to me linking it to The Divided Circle page - upon YOUR request. Also interesting to note that you marked my Wrexile page for speedy deletion within 30 seconds or something of me submitting it - so you couldn't even have read it properly, let alone checking any of the references. Do you get kicks from this stuff?
Also - why are the sources unreliable? And now you're accusing me of 'creating articles' myself? Why the hell would I do that?! Oh, and I removed the maintenance templates because (a) most of them were in no way relevant and (b) because I thought I'd fixed the others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miserable1 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've never claimed I'm not trying to promote myself/ people I work with.... if there's something wrong with that then by all means delete all my contributions. Am officially passed caring! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miserable1 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Made in Chelsea. Sandstein 09:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this page should be merged with the Made in Chelsea page? 16:07, 3 July 2011 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.122.64 (talk)
Person has been a player in one small tv show - perhaps will become notable and become a singer and recording artist but they are not yet as the external supports show. Aspiring to be this or that is not a claim of notability and neither is a part in an eight episode E4 (channel) reality soap production - Off2riorob (talk) 15:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. This is an unsourced article about a living person. No sources are cited either in the article or here. WP:BLP mandates deletion in this form, but it can be recreated if reliable sources are included. Sandstein 09:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:NTENNIS Mayumashu (talk) 15:52, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 02:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Minor fictional character which does not appear to have sufficient significant third-party references. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 02:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fictional character that does not appear to have significant third-party sources to assert notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Transformers: Victory characters. Can be editorially merged from history if there is any verifiable content to merge. Sandstein 09:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fictional character that does not appear to have significant third-party sources to assert notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Micromasters. Sandstein 09:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fictional character that does not appear to have significant third-party sources to assert notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Lágrimas Cálidas. Sandstein 09:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don´t believe this article meets WP:Notability Cdl obelix (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've added the chart position and nominations for the song. If nothing else, just redirect the article to its parent album. EDIT: I agree with Ron Ritzman, the best option would be merge it to its parent album and add the nominations there. DJ Magician Man (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. As there is no clear consensus here, I am closing it as no concensus, but with no prejudice against renomination for deletion PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability and article content contested in another deletion discussion. Vanisaac (talk) 10:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article still contains no information on why this particular inscription has any more importance than any of a thousand other random inscriptions, giving it any sort of notablility justifying inclusion in Wikipedia. I still vote delete Vanisaac (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]