The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete no enough good sources although I am willing to accept a merge as a compromise but there is not enough info to justify a solo article. Dwanyewest (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As with other similar articles, there is no objective evidence that the fictional character meets the general notability guideline. The article title is not a plausible search term due to the disambiguation and the content relies on primary and tertiary sources that aren't independent of the subject, so I do not believe that either a redirect or a merge are acceptable outcomes. Jfgslo (talk) 23:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.