This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paul_012.
Paul - The movie is produced by GMMTV and copyright is with them. Please add back GMMTV link.
Chronology - Taiwan's movie with same name. To be given credit & be mentioned in the movie details.
For director - GMMTVs reference 2402:E280:3E2D:371:4C6F:56D4:3E26:E125 (talk) 07:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Replied on article talk page. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm not a regular AfC reviewer, so for that you might want to submit it through the usual process or ask someone else. I would comment, though, that unlike the EEC, which was the subject of a lot of sustained news coverage, these other economic corridor projects don't seem to be individually notable, and should probably be covered together under a single article, or as a section under an existing one. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also, do you think that if I submit it, the admins will delete the page and consider it as advertising? 2001:FB1:8B:8A53:A5ED:C82E:CE2F:1097 (talk) 08:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I still think all of them should have a separate page instead of being under SEZ. Alternatively, we could consider merging NEC, NEEC, SEC, and CEWC under a single page for Special Economic Corridors of Thailand. 2001:FB1:8B:8A53:AC27:BD11:C95A:6229 (talk) 12:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They shouldn't be at risk of speedy deletion for advertising, though they may not be accepted with the current references. I think they'd have better chance if combined under a single article. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Draft:Special economic zones (Thailand): I am unsure if this article will cover all of the economic zones in Thailand, including NEC, NEEC, SEC, CEWC, and EEC.2001:FB1:8B:8A53:7D46:BB64:5227:A6C6 (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's a good start. I think it could be developed either way (expanding to include the ECs, or having them as a separate article). Combining would allow for a single overview of their history, since their development is under the same government agency, but if/once they become more developed with a lot of content having them as separate articles might be better for readability. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As noted in the edit summary, it appeared to be a single product by one company and not notable according to Wikipedia's criteria. As for the second point, I am of the opinion that "inventions and discoveries" refers to scientific and technological advancements, not cultural heritage. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I understand your point regarding cultural heritage. However, the Elide Fire Extinguishing Ball has won multiple awards and is recognized in multiple countries, which could demonstrate its notability. 2001:FB1:88:A95C:6C7D:862B:3F90:A1E5 (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I could be wrong about the fire-extinguishing ball. I won't revert if someone re-adds it. In cases like this, writing the article first would also help to more clearly demonstrate notability. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:Rulers of Sukhothai has been nominated for renaming[edit]
Category:Rulers of Sukhothai has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question of proposed deletion and suggestion[edit]
Hi, I got proposed deletion from Prachin Buri radiation accident Which I don't agree with that propose. Because If there is no one make the Page then there will be none. For example in thai page. There's always other people who will ready to write after me. Siravijbb (talk) 16:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, I already retracted the proposed deletion but forgot to remove the message from your talk page.
You shouldn't have copied from the Samut Prakan radiation accident article, though, as the circumstances were very different and as such the copied content was wildly incorrect, short and abruptly ending as it was. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh,I see. Sory for my bad. And also reason that I copied because I want it to being natural to reader but my bad for not checking it. Siravijbb (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:Nobles of Kievan Rus has been nominated for merging[edit]
Category:Nobles of Kievan Rus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I removed the surname template from Lamsam family because it doesn't seem applicable when I read the template documentation. Moreover, a quick browse through hundreds of articles transcluding the template couldn't find any articles with Family in its title. And Family articles, e.g. those in Category:Business families of the United States don't seem to use the template at all. Aithus (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I redirected Lamsam to Lamsam family when creating the page and included the name list as a section there as the surname is exclusive to the family. If the name list was a separate page, the template would be included as standard, but the documented guidance doesn't quite fit this specific case. I think it's most within the spirit of the template to have it, as there is a name list in the article and pages linking directly to Lamsam should be corrected if they meant a specific person. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that this case is can be argued either way and I won't try to remove it again. I find it strange, however, that if the surname template is used, any short description specified will be overridden by a standard "Surname list" text. Aithus (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Paul, do you think the Wikipedia article on Sbai should be merged into the page on Shawl-like garment? I feel like the current article on Sbai places too much emphasis on its connection to Cambodia. I don't have experience with moving pages, can you help me request it? Tmaoa492s (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As this would be a potentially controversial move, raising the issue on the article talk page first, as you have done, is a good idea. I'll reply further there. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, an IP continually removes the image you mentioned as featured for one of poorer quality[1],if you want to check. Thank you. 151.37.64.37 (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I understand your point regarding the tik tok video, however, the editor claims to have taken the pic in November 2022, predating the tik tok upload. They've uploaded a number of other files, and have been selective in claiming authorship, or giving credit. Not sure about this one. Onel5969TT me 12:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm rather familiar with the contributor. He's contributed to dozens of articles on luk thung singers over many years; this one is very much within his normal area of interest. And he's literally a school student. It's very unlikely that he's connected to the subject by employment. A false claim on the Commons upload, of which he has a history, is a much more likely explanation. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Cool. As you are familiar with them, I'll defer to your knowledge. Thanks. Onel5969TT me 12:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Paul, I need little guidance, I am trying to upskill myself in tech field, hence exploring Wikipedia opportunities. Could you please let me know apart from HTML what domain majorly used in article making? BrightsForever (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wikipedia, like all sites using the MediaWiki software, uses wiki markup to format its pages. I don't know if you've been using the source editor, but if so, you're probably already familiar with it. Otherwise, see Help:Wikitext for a guide. Other than that, there's MediaWiki's template system (Help:Template), and more advanced features are implemented using the WP:Lua programming language. All of these are only used by MediaWiki, though, so they might not be a very useful skillset elsewhere. Not sure if this answers your question; let me know if not. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just saw the closed discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Si Bearing MRT station. Are you familiar with this RfC from July 2022 regarding notability of train stations? I see someone cited the 2019 discussion which the 2022 one supersedes, but not the 2022 one - I'm a little aghast that this happened. I'm not familiar with the details on this particular station, but you might have a case for DRV as most of the keep arguments are directly contradicting the RfC's close of "There clear is consensus that train stations have no inherent notability." Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the pointer. I knew of the 2019 RfC, but indeed not the 2022 one. I didn't think that that AfD singling out a single station was the best way to address the issue, so I didn't argue more strongly on the lack of source coverage. But the fact is also that pastexperiencehas made me averse to trying to enforce policy on railway station notability through AfD, as they seem to always turn into a battle against people piling on with I-like-it !votes not based in policy, RfC or no. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello,
Recently you reverted [2] and [3]. Both of them are valid edits. Did you do it in purpose or was an error? Regards! nirmal (talk) 04:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's probably the case. Newly created pages won't be indexed by search engines until they are reviewed by the WP:New pages patrol process, or 90 days have passed. See WP:Controlling search engine indexing for details. NPP isn't supposed to be a stringent review by any means, but the queue is unfortunately often backlogged and pages may go unnoticed for some time. I'm not a new page reviewer so I can't help you there, but if you need further advice the place to ask would be WT:New pages patrol/Reviewers. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This user is regularly deleting information from Bright Vachirawit Chivaaree work, without any justifications. Entire history this user is deleting artist achievements, which has reliable source. Requesting you to block this user from creating vandalism BrightsForever (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For cases of clear vandalism, the place to report them would be WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism, but the specific cases you mention could also just be content disputes, as there's often disagreement on what awards are notable enough for inclusion, so please try to discuss the issues on the talk page first. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was:
More sources and content are needed. This definitely seems notable, but also very incomplete right now. Will decline for now, but more sources and content will go a long way.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Farm Chokchai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Paul 012!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Losipov (talk) 03:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The article is now a featured article on Thai Wikipedia. We would like to improve it and nominate it as a featured article on the English Wikipedia too. Your kind participation in the process will be greatly appreciated.
I will bring on board a new team of students working on this project. @AmberMUIC:
-- Taweetham (talk) 11:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for reaching out. I don't currently have much on-wiki time, but I'll try to keep an eye on the article and see what I can do. —Paul_012 (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I appreciate your reply. It took more than a year for the article to be promoted on the Thai Wikipedia. I do not know how long it will take on the English Wikipedia. Most students are here for a relatively short term to learn some skills and experience. However, we are expected to be long-term volunteers who can take over the task if needed. My support for the article is to set a good example for both
composing/writing a comprehensive article from variety of online/printed sources rather than a mere translation of existing article from another language.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 07:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On 23 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Srettha Thavisin, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed[talk][majestic titan] 14:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On 27 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thai typewriter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Edwin Hunter McFarland could not fit all letters into the first Thai typewriter, he left out two consonants, eventually making them obsolete? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thai typewriter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thai typewriter), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Ah, apparently it made its way to Reddit.[4] I guess that helps explain the views. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One of the comments is quite funny. Yeah it is obsolete, but Japanese adopt it to use as cat pawBorgQueen (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The new pages patrol team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles and redirects needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Back in 2002, someone tried to make an article entitled ร์โ«นยฌรงโ«ฐยนรจยงรจยงยฃ on Wikipedia, which infamously got mojibaked. My attempts at translating it via Google have rendered it as either 'The Thai Money "Factory"' or a misspelling of "Royal Theater", but your translation help would greatly be appreciated; even if it's garbled (which I highly suspect), maybe you can suss out what was meant back then.
It's pure gibberish, and Google Translate's suggested "corrections" are also meaningless nonsensical character sequences that certainly don't translate to anything. Not sure why Thai was thought to be the intended encoding? --Paul_012 (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
From several encodings I tested from UTF-8, x-mac-thai was the only one without any "?"s or other faulty characters. Interesting to hear it still doesn't make any semantic sense, I'll let you know if anything else comes from it. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Graham87: No worries, I was just hoping (possibly beyond hope) that you had any of the revisions of the deleted pages themselves (so, any content that was on the "Ç‹¬ç‰¹è§è§£" page), but I assume that Phase II and Phase III truly, permanently, "shredded" any deleted pages. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 17:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Phase II deleted them permanently, yes. Phase III is MediaWiki and the deletion archive was created in August 2002, which is too late for us. Graham87 17:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Unreferenced Miss Thailand Universe articles[edit]
Regarding your dePROD of Miss Thailand Universe 2003 and others in the series. I'm not OK with unreferenced articles standing. Do you have a proposal to go forward, perhaps you are taking on referencing the unreferenced (or equivalently, those that are only referenced to the pageant itself). ☆ Bri (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, my Wikipedia activity follows an I'm-feeling-like-it basis, so I can't make promises. If you believe the articles shouldn't be allowed to exist in this state without a concrete future road map, there's always AfD. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
PS I'm not necessarily opposed to deletion or redirecting, especially if taking fancruft concerns into consideration, as there really doesn't seem to be much real content among these articles as they stand. My contesting of those PRODs was mainly on WP:NEXIST grounds. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I wanted to know what your plans were before I went that route, to avoid wasting effort for anybody. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, Paul 012. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here. If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: ((resolved|1=~~~~))
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, but I only did a little copyediting. Most of the article was written by Sodacan (who doesn't seem to be currently active). I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the available sources to really help there. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks again for your reply. The article was promoted and it will soon be on the main page of Thai Wikpedia. --Taweetham (talk) 01:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of this is unsourced and sources are routine announcements.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Intercontinental and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
S0091, you might want to direct the above message to the article creator, Rc ramz. I only pressed the submit button as a courtesy after it was unilaterally draftified. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Paul 012, thanks for letting me know. I will copy it over. In the future, if you are submitting a draft on behalf of someone else, the easiest way is to use ((subst:submit|XXXX)) where the XXXX is the user name that should get the notice. If you use the submit button, you can change the User parameter from your name to theirs (U=XXXX) after submitting. S0091 (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Noted; thanks for the pointer. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]