The result was delete. Courcelles 23:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns. References are singular listings of the person and their title, in one case primary, there's essentially no secondary coverage of this engineer, and I don't believe the committees in question rise to demonstrating inherent notability themselves. Of course, additional sources, as always, are welcome. j⚛e deckertalk 23:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. The article Tribune Company makes a lot of claims about Tribune Digital but none of these are cited. Marcus Qwertyus 22:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This page failes WP:NOTE and WP:PROMOTION --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 22:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficiently notable person. There are a lot of claims of importance in this article (respected lawyer, founder of charities, political activist), and I don't doubt that any of it is true, but I doubt that collectively they add up to notability. The strongest claim to notability here is unsuccessfully running for Treasurer of the Labour Party, which did receive some coverage from third party sources: [1],[2],[3]. But failed political candidates aren't automatically notable, and I can't find much coverage in reliable sources apart from that. Robofish (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this topic is notable, absolute lack of third-party coverage. — Timneu22 · talk 21:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep based on sources found. Bearian (talk) 16:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent self-promotion/WP:COI by awards founder. Google news search on "The Asian Awards" shows no hits for this particular award. Some claims of notability appear to be either based on unreliable sources (primary, blogs) or misconstrued (claim of Times Square "broadcast" was driven by PR NewsWire, which essentially makes it self-published) TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have found the following links on the web associated with The Asian Awards. Many are very notable and from credible sources. Please advise.
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1101028/jsp/sports/story_13110255.jsp http://gulfnews.com/sport/cricket/tendulkar-on-why-the-dream-chase-is-still-important-1.703747 http://www.crichotline.com/sachin-tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk/ http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sachin-tendulkar-gets-lebara-peoples-choice-award/703380/ http://www.cricinfo.com/t20champions2010/content/image/483691.html?page=1&cmp=viral_image http://www.prlog.org/10990909-lord-coe-ar-rahman-sachin-tendulkar-vips-at-the-asian-awards-2010.html http://wallpapers123.blogspot.com/2010/10/sachin-tendulkar-at-asian-awards.html http://aboutsachintendulkar.blogspot.com/2010/10/sachin-honoured-at-asian-awards.html http://www.deccanherald.com/content/108029/tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award.html http://cricket.yahoo.com/cricket/news/article?id=item/2.0/-/story/cricket.yahoonews.com/tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-asian-awards-uk-20101027/ http://cricket.ndtv.com/gallerydetails.aspx?id=8467&category=SPORTS http://www.cricbytes.com/cricket-news/sachin-tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk/ http://blog.mp3hava.com/sachin-tendulkar-awarded-by-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk-tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk-rahman-niigaam-and-sachin-tendulkar-at-the-asian-awards-2010-b/2010 http://www.24dunia.com/english-news/cricket-news/showgroup/7871812.html http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk/172220 http://www.flashnews4u.com/2010/10/asian-awards-2010sachin-tendulkar-gotpeoples-choiceaward-in-uksee-the-list/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/offshorefinance/8092229/Celebrities-raise-over-100000-for-Save-the-Children-at-Asian-Awards-launch.html http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/celebrities-raise-over-100-000-for-save-the-children-at-asian-awards-launch-tele-e75b35e603c7.html?x=0 http://cricket.yahoo.com/photos/Tendulkar-awarded-in-UK_12881935611881#4 http://soccernews.bigsoccer.com/article/087scFeaw46P5?q=Sachin+Tendulkar http://filminews.net/sachin-tendulkar-awarded-by-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk-tendulkar-gets-peoples-choice-award-in-asian-awards-in-uk-rahman-niigaam-and-sachin-tendulkar-at-the-asian-awards-2010-f/2010 http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/corporatenews/Sunil-Mittal-bags-Philanthropist-of-the-Year-Asian-Awards/Article1-618546.aspx http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/top-stories/Tendulkar-gets-Peoples-choice-Award-in-Asian-awards-in-UK/articleshow/6821962.cms http://www.bollyspice.com/view.php/5754-rahman-niigaan-and-sachin-tendulkar-at-the-asian-awards-2010.html http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/et-cetera/Sunil-Mittal-bags-Philanthropist-of-the-Year-Asian-Awards/articleshow/6821939.cms http://www.bollyspice.com/view.php/5879-bollyspice-at-the-asian-awards-2010.html http://www.mobilenewscwp.co.uk/2010/10/lebara-adds-asian-awards-sponsorship/ http://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/article852641.ece http://www.asianimage.co.uk/sport/8478430.Tendulkar_wins_People_s_Choice_award/ http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/bollywood/news/a284556/yash-chopra-honoured-at-uk-asian-awards.html http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/index.php/business/127-local/25488.html http://www.isport.in/international/sachin-tendulkar-wins-lebara-peoples-choice-and-outstanding-achievement-in-sport-awards-at-the-1925 http://tellycafe.com/general-news/sachin-tendulkar-tendulkar-%E2%80%9Chonored%E2%80%9D-by-people%E2%80%99s-choice-award/ http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Sachin-Tendulkar-gets-Lebara-People--s-Choice-Award/703380/ http://www.india-cricket-live.com/india-cricket-live-tv-video-telecast-webcast/3018 http://www.indiainfoline.com/Markets/News/Sunil-Bharti-Mittal-named-Philanthropist-of-the-Year/4976930035 http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/Sunil_Mittal_selected_the_Philanthropist_of_the_Year-nid-73228-cid-1.html http://www.bollyspice.com/view.php/5837-more-on-the-asian-awards.html http://www.bollyspice.com/view.php/5814-amitabh-bachchan-on-his-lifetime-achievement-award-at-uk-the-asian-awards.html http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2010/10/interview_with_2.php http://www.eventmagazine.co.uk/News/MostEmailed/1035599/Lord-Coe-present-Asian-Awards-2010/ http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-greatest-gathering-of-asian-excellenceever---amitabh-bachchan-actor-105158489.html http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/top-stories/My-age-doesnt-worry-me-Tendulkar/articleshow/6823660.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshowpics/6826667.cms http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/articleshow/6822926.cms http://www.espnstar.com/home/news/detail/item521690/Tendulkar-bags-UK-award/ http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lloyds-banking-group-honours-international-asian-icons-105158474.html http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/cricket/article-23891876-kevin-pietersens-slump-is-all-in-the-mind-says-sachin-tendulkar.do http://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/article852641.ece http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/society/article852580.ece http://www.asianimage.co.uk/news/8478514.__100_000_raised_for_charity_at_Asian_Awards/ http://www.imdb.com/news/ni5174921/ http://www.eventmagazine.co.uk/news/rss/1035599/Lord-Coe-present-Asian-Awards-2010/ http://www.ndtv.com/news/videos/video_player.php?page=4&id=172220 http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//101026/482/urn_publicid_ap_org315f0894ffad4e0ea9d3017cad6063e2/ <http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo/101026/482/urn_publicid_ap_org315f0894ffad4e0ea9d3017cad6063e2/> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Sachin-Tendulkar-gets-Lebara-People--s-Choice-Award/703380 http://www.punjab2000.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2461&Itemid=2 http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2010/10/interview_with_2.php http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/cricket/article-23891876-kevin-pietersens-slump-is-all-in-the-mind-says-sachin-tendulkar.do http://www.bollyspice.com/view.php/5859-yash-chopra-to-attend-the-asian-awards.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sikhdirector (talk • contribs) 22:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Eminem#Acting_career. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speculative film project; severely fails WP:CRYSTAL. Apparently, it hasn't even been written yet; according to this source, somebody "is set to begin writing immediately and will reportedly turn in a draft in February. No word on a possible release date or when production may begin." Contested PROD. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
^What do you mean consider? Pfft. Then there WILL be an article, but I guess for now it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.184.144 (talk) 11:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can discern, this is a dime-a-dozen strip mall. I would also like to point out that other articles that are on the disambiguation page Gateway Center are all notable for different reasons, and none of them are actually strip malls, but rather building(s) with significance. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 23:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not finding any coverage out there for this historian. Gigs (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Run of the mill player for a national team that has never even qualified for the world cup. Gigs (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This was nominated before, and the consensus was to keep based on the notability of the concept. But the concept exists in the cell group article - I split off the material about group Bible study there, and the material about personal Bible study to the Quiet Time article. Hence, this can be deleted, or become a disambiguation page. StAnselm (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable video game entity Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Bearian (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band, fails WP:MUSICBIO. Only connection is to the notable lead singer, Matt Cardle, but the band are not signed to any record label. AnemoneProjectors 18:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. One two three... 10:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unfinished book by author of unclear notability. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 18:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article appears to fail to meet WP:NSOFT. Searching Google News, I can only find press releases and the normal selection of product reviews that would apply to almost every software product and nothing to establish long term impact on the historic record such as international awards. Fæ (talk) 18:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added some points on the discussion page of Mac DVDRipper Pro --maknak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maknak (talk • contribs) 18:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maknak (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maknak (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unverified BLP. Article's content does not really substantiate notability and the lack thereof is indicated by Google searches. PinkBull 18:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A list of 6 articles, 4 of which are redlinks. Unsourced and largely untouched since 2006. I'm not sure if this is trying to be a list or an article, but it doesn't seem to be necessary. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Not the place for this discussion Jclemens-public (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The sandbox is a page that has no clear intention, rather than new users posting at times libelous, offensive material and other kinds of vandalism. People should use their user page for experimenting, and removal of the sandbox will decrease vandalism acts, if users are urged to carry out editing tests on their own user page. MikeNicho231 (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Book seems to fail the criteria in WP:NBOOK. I removed a lot of links from the article that were simply to Youtube, blogs, aggregators, etc. and what I ended up with were 2 articles in minor local papers. A Google search mostly brings up discussion topics related to Alice in Wonderland or Alice Liddell, or pieces written by the authors themselves (primary sources) and I can't really find any significant number of reliable, third-party sources covering this specific book. As far as I can tell it has also never won any major literary awards, it has not made a significant contribution to a major motion picture or other art form or religious movement, and the author herself is not uniquely significant. Finally, the article appears to have been originally created by someone with a COI, who has created a number of other abusive sockpuppets to edit war and make legal threats at Harry M. Rubin, as well as creating the article about this book's author. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiography (presumably) of a young chap who likes writing stories. No evidence of notability at all. Note that he has also created a range of articles on his works, all of which are also up for AfD -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Userification happily done on request. Courcelles 23:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N. No reliable independent sources discuss this "Jihad Kandahar" organisation, only primary sources. The unnamed unit is mentioned once, on the Guantanamo Inmate Database (linked in the article). This is az bare mention, not any significant info. No other sources could be found through Google Books or News Archive. Fram (talk) 12:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fram is correct to say this isn't notable, but the primary sources mean it is verifiable. Because it's verifiable it shouldn't be entirely removed from Wikipedia, but because it's not notable, it shouldn't have its own article. A merge or redirect are the only outcomes that would be fully in accordance with our policies and guidelines. I'm normally vocally opposed to "delete then redirect" as an outcome but in this case the BLP issue means that deletion prior to redirecting is a sensible precaution. Delete, then create redirect to Taliban which should contain a footnote or one-line mention of this organisation's alleged existence. Closer to consider protecting the redirect, because I'm anxious to ensure that living people are not named as members of this organisation without excellent sources.—S Marshall T/C 12:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My interpretation of Wikipedia policies is that users don't get to remove sourced information from the encyclopaedia on notability grounds alone, which I think is an uncontroversial reading of WP:PRESERVE; I believe it's the opposite view that's a misinterpretation of policy.—S Marshall T/C 12:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The white pages (which I presume is an American institution of some kind) is, like so many analogies, a bit of a straw man. I didn't say "let's include material from the white pages". I said "let's create a redirect to a one-line mention of a terrorist organisation linked to the Taliban".—S Marshall T/C 13:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N; Prodded right after creation, but contested. Tagged for notability for over a year now. Mentioned in some primary sources, but no reliable independent sources about this are available at all (Google Books and News archive return nothing, regular Google has 93 distinct results[7], mostly Wikipedia and its mirrors. Fram (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete (A7) by Rodhullandemu. Non-admin closure --Pgallert (talk) 07:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to satisfy WP:N or WP:ATHLETE. References do not mention the subject once. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like a personal essay, not quite sure what this 'article' is all about. E. Fokker (talk) 19:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend editing the linguistic style and developing the content of the article. More importantly, I recommend merging this article's content with (i.e., into) the entry on organizational identification. The content of this entry represents a significant theoretical area of organizational communication studies. In the interest of full disclosure: I am a professor associated with the individuals who authored this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendenkendall (talk • contribs) 15:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Article is about a school, but does not demonstrate any coverage in independent reliable sources. The only sources I could find were press releases and yellow-page listings. TNXMan 19:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirected to Cell group per nominator suggestion. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is mostly original research, and the notability is marginal. I have added a paragraph about huddles to cell group - I suggest this article be redirected there. StAnselm (talk) 08:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO. There are quite a few Rahmatullahs associated with the Taliban, Guantanamo, Afghanistan, ..., making it hard to search for this one (e.g. Rahmatullah Sangaryar, see also Rahmatullah (disambiguation)). The article provides no reliable independent sourcse about him, only government documents and reprints of those, which are not independent since the government is the one detaining him. Searching for more info did not return any reliable independent sources. Fram (talk) 08:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to 2010 Panama City school board shootings. At first glance it seems clear that the consensus is to delete this article. However, most of the content has already been merged into 2010 Panama City school board shootings so the history of this article needs to be kept. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person ... classic one event. Bongomatic 08:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
— 24.1.211.254 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Ok, I understand the general consensus here is to delete Clay Duke, so as the author of both Clay Duke, and 2010 Panama City school board shootings I will merge Clay Duke into 2010 Panama City school board shootings. The information from the Clay Duke page will be incorporated into a subsection of the event page. Clay Duke will also become a redirect to 2010 Panama City school board shootings. Ashershow1 (talk) 23:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There already exists an article listing the various routes of BMTC. I do feel that it is not required to have a separate article just to mention which of the routes are operated by AC buses. A separate section in the article Feeder and Metro BMTC Routes about what routes are operated by AC buses is quite sufficient. Abhishek191288 (talk) 07:53, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:BAND, WP:WEB and WP:BIO, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, zero Google News hits for "James Michalos", "Plastic Snow" or "Rock n Rolling Snowman". If the song actually does well in the charts, then that might become notable enough for its own article. Proposed deletion removed without explanation by WP:Single purpose account. Invitrovanitas (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
News coverage for the song has been mainly radio so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CityLawyer (talk • contribs) 08:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to show that this book is notable. No GHits or GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 07:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:29, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to show that this book is notable. No GHits or GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to show that this book is notable. No GHits or GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
this article hinges on 4 sources. 3 of these sources are from embassy/foreign ministry websites so not totally third party. one source merely confirms the existence of a non resident ambassador. the number of actual sources specifically describing Estonia – Sri Lanka relations is weak. this article is not about Sri Lanka-EU relations, just because Estonia entered the EU does not suddenly translate to more relations exist. only one real "cooperation" agreement exists. "Agreement for Co-operation Between the Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce " is from 2 non official organisation not official government treaty. those wanting to argue keep should provide actual evidence of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
many articles were deleted though. LibStar (talk) 07:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable person -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete'. Non-notable. Yet another example of how low some people set the notability standard. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 06:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-charting album, no sources outside Allmusic. Permastub. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not noteworthy, First Person Links ☠ Travis "TeamColtra" McCrea ☠ - (T)(C) 20:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Advanced search for: "International Montessori Society" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
I went to try to balance this article today, and found it impossible without deleting a great bulk of the content enclosed. It is well written from the point of view of IMS, but seeing as it's an extreme splinter group, with fewer than 10 'accredited' schools in the USA, and is non-accredited by the certifying body for Montessori teacher education (which is not funded by either AMI or AMS), this article is essentially an advertisement. A closer look at the IMS website revealed no quantifiable criteria for a school or teacher of theirs, they cite no work not published by themselves, and not known in the industry. They are accredited by an accrediting body that is not recognized by the USA department of education and of which they are part of, after being denied certification by the state of MD and the USDE. They appear to be a Montessori diploma mill. For these reasons, I am nominating this article for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLastAlcoholic (talk • contribs) 2010-12-09 01:25:49
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Trivia. WP:NOTADIR. No reason why this deserves a separate article. Bulldog123 01:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to HBO. Courcelles 00:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very Promotional Winner 42 Talk to me! 01:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Both parts of the deletion rationale have been addressed, not delete !votes standing (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 07:32, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very short, limited notability. • 03:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest keeping, it could have limited notability but for now this is a topic people care about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.156.54.135 (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No professional games, therefore fails WP:ATHLETE (see: stats) Fache (talk) 02:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Admrboltz (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Apparently fails WP:GNG, can't find any third party sources and doesn't indicate how it is notable. Falcon8765 (TALK) 02:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A link to the Urban Firearms News Page will show you the majority of the information. Other information has been acquired by talking to my fellow designer, as I am the CEO & Founder of UFWD. A lot of the information regarding this round has not been decided. Please reply ASAP and notify me of you doing so. Also, around 5-10 minutes after this post, an updated version of the drawing will be uploaded and inserted. This is not an advertisement, as we are not planning to have the round manufactured, though a good friend of mine is making a prototype. This is only a concept round, once the prototype is made, a picture of it will be added to the article. LiamMCSHERRY (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This round will exist, though it may not be in use. Dates are currently confirmed, as stage 1 ends January 31st 2011. Already, a prototype is being made. The round is not in the List of rifle cartridges because the project to design it was started on the 5th of December 2010, once it's design is officially completed and if the article is not deleted, I will put it on the list with a reference ([1]) beside it saying who it was added in by, why it was added and when. LiamMCSHERRY (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
@Bahamut0013: It is not an advertisement because we are not the manufacturer. At the moment, there is no manufacturer. Only an outside source, one of my friends, making a prototype cross-section. We are only the designer.
I am trying my best not to be biased in favour of my conceptual round. In the case of conflict of interest, I'm trying to be unbiased which I think I have succeeded in. It is quite reliably sourced, with a link to the Urban Firearms Website. Other information was gathered by talking to another official designer working at Urban Firearms, which wont be on the site. I don't think I'm promoting my design as it isn't for sale officially. LiamMCSHERRY (talk) 11:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Company Urban Firearms may have been founded on the 8th of November. But designers from a larger parent company have been designing for a few years. As for the project to design it, that was for the weapon designed to fire it. We have ideas like this for some months before. As for the picture, It exists, but the file itself is too large, and we have greater things to worry about than getting a picture the right size. Since it is only a concept at the moment, no other websites have been given mention of it. Once the model a friend is making arrives, we will take it to a manufacturer. The designs up for sale are not for the rounds, but for the weaponry. Although the site shows 3 or 4 weapons, there must be about 20-35 more stored in a cabinet somewhere. LiamMCSHERRY (talk) 17:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I'm storing a copy of the coding and text on my page. Feel free to delete the article. LiamMCSHERRY (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 05:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
US-centric, non-notable type of theft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emiao (talk • contribs) 2010-12-16 02:37:02
Filler stories on everyday petty crime, absent serious discussion deeper than that of the Washington Post article, cannot be the basis of an article on Wikipedia. EEng (talk) 10:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Old Dragnet episodes, as outlined in the article, don't count as reliable sources.
You (collectively) say there's a phenomenon of increased Jesus thefts. OK, point me to a source that seriously considers that question via sober numerical analysis. Can't find one? Is it possible that there just aren't any good statistics on this? Then, unfortunately, this subject will have to remain outside of Wikipedia, because it's outside the realm of the knowable.
EEng (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile, we're well past the point where we should be comparing the available sources to applicable guideslines. At this point I'll outdent, and the bolding here is mine:
Let's start with WP:INDEPTH:
One user's essay on the subject([16]) puts it very well:
Can you point me to any of this with regard to our poor baby Jesuses? Or, if you prefer, can you explain why the criteria set forth above shouldn't apply? EEng (talk) 22:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The essay cited (not even a guideline, let alone a policy) applies to current events, and in no way to a cultural theme going back more than 60 years. One from 1949 cited the Dragnet radio episode as a "famous story" about a boy taking the stolen Baby Jesus for a ride in his new wagon. Edison (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have to ask you: Really? This is really the "in-depth coverage" documenting (what you call) "a cultural theme going back more than 60 years"? A 900-word article from 2004,[18] and a 400-word article in 2009,[19] constitute treatment "such as is often found in books, feature length articles in major news magazines (like Time, Newsweek, or The Economist), and TV news specialty shows (such as 60 Minutes or CNN Presents..."? Really? EEng (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
not WP notable - has not played professional gridiron football Mayumashu (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to A Trick of the Tail. Courcelles 00:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this song has the needed notability D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources besides Allmusic found. Fails notability for albums. Simply being by a notable act means nothing. Only other source in article appears to be an unreliable fansite. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources beyond Allmusic found. Fails notability for albums as no one's reviewed it, the album didn't chart and wasn't certified, etc. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Very limited scope, not really deserving of its own article. Questionable notability. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if this particular subject meets the notability guidelines for WP:BIO. (Former prisoner turned motivational speaker.) He is apparently quite well known in Buffalo, but his notability is geographically limited from what I can see. He was mentioned in the NY Daily News as having been paroled under Gov. Spitzer, but it's just a mention.[20] On the other hand, he was on the 700 Club.[21] I'm neutral on the issue, but I feel like it needs clarification. ... discospinster talk 02:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Advanced search for: "social minimum" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
This article in a nutshell states the following: "A social floor is something that all people are entitled to. Here's what a social floor includes and what it may or may not include. Here's why it's right. Some people don't agree, but they're wrong." Wikipedia is not a place for advocacy of any particular point of view, and this article would need to be completely blown up and started over to come even remotely close to being NPOV. POV issues aside, I find minimal reliable, non-editorial coverage of either "social floor" or the related "social minimum".redacted; see below —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep (a) I think the nominator did not quite capture the meaning in their summary. The page does not say "A social floor is something that all people are entitled to" but rather "A social floor, also called a social minimum, is the concept that there is baseline level of social services and human rights to which every human being should have access." one is POV, the second isn't. So the POV objection is not valis. (b) a page being POV is not grounds for deletion anyway, only for rewriting. (c) a cursory search on Google finds tens of thousands of hits for social floor, including presentations at the UN, so it is clearly notable. Francis Bond (talk) 04:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. –MuZemike 04:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Only notable for insulting France through his lyrics and allegedly fuelling riots. I think WP:BLP1E applies here. Mattg82 (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Týr (band). feel free tocopy across content Spartaz Humbug! 05:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:BAND. despite attempts at improvement since last AfD, still has many unreliable sources. LibStar (talk) 00:40, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Van Halen discography. Courcelles 00:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Composed almost entirely of unreliable sources. Any important projects can be mentioned in Van Halen. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not finding any reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. BLP is unreferenced with two external links to IMDB. SnottyWong express 23:44, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG can be found. There are several other Mark Lawsons out there who are more well-known than this one (see Mark Lawson (disambiguation)), so sources may be harder than usual to find. Everything I could find about this particular Mark Lawson was Myspace and LinkedIn, no significant coverage. SnottyWong soliloquize 23:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, default to keep. This AfD has been up long enough, move along. It appears to be unique as a 501(c)(3) team. Bearian (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've listed this separatley from several other semi-pro football teams nominated for deletion because there is more content to the article. This one has the most information on the page. However, the same issues do persist: extraordinarily weak assertion of notability, no independent reliable sources, and a stronger case for violation of neutral point of view. Paul McDonald (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've listed this separatley from several other semi-pro football teams nominated for deletion because there is more content to the article. However, the same issues do persist: extraordinarily weak assertion of notability, no independent reliable sources, and a stronger case for violation of neutral point of view. Paul McDonald (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All of these pages are semi pro football teams and should not be deleted due to the fact that people use these pages for information on teh teams.
Extraordinarily weak assertion of notability and no independent reliable sources. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are essentially the same articles with only changes in names. All have same notability, reliable sources, and potential NPOV issues:
SEE ALSO Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake County Steelers for similar discussion of similar articles.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a batch nomination for a series of regional football teams. I declined speedy deletion - this nomination is procedural because it seems there are real doubts about notability, but it warrants discussion. The 7other noms are:
If this is a keep or no consensus close, Chicago Mustangs (football) should be restored. Mkativerata (talk) 18:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not as accurate as you think, last years the Steelers had games broadcasted on ESPN Radio and Blog Talk Radio. This will be the 12th year of the Lake County Steelers Football program who not only provides a good football game, gives young players the opportunity to earn college scholarships as well as some players get the opportunity to move up to the next level by playing in Arena Footbal.
The result was merge to Transformers: The War Within. Courcelles 00:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no reliable third person sources to assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a completely non-notable "designer" dog cross. There are hundreds of these portmanteau names for crossbreeds. This material could be covered briefly in the article List of dog hybrids. Precedents have been to delete these pages for portmanteau names and move them to the list page. JoKing (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per Wikipedia policy, the simple fact that an article is not notable is not sufficient reason for an article to be deleted. This article has several reliable sources as per the general notability guidelines and provides information that would not easily be merged into the List of dog hybrids. Merging information into that list would force much of the information contained in this document to be deleted. Similar to specific products of a company in the product article guidelines, if all of the information of specific types of dog hybrids were contained in the list of dog hybrids, the list would become unwieldy. Per Wikipedia policy, specific articles can be summarized in a larger article, in this case the hybrid dog list, and provide more detail in individual articles, which is the purpose of the Pekeatese article.--Falconhs02 (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no reliable third person sources to assert notability. A poor article with poor notability that should be deleted. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable former child actor. Does not meet WP:ENT as he has only had a single significant role in one production (Forrest Gump as a child actor). Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources - there is a smattering of coverage in local news affiliates only. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet WP:SIGCOV or WP:CREATIVE NW (Talk) 04:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not state why the subject of the article is notable. Google searches for the author bring up mostly self-published sources and eBooks. Also the author of the article is the subject of the article itself. Jeff3000 (talk) 12:49, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Part-advertisement of an article. The subject doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE or WP:SIGCOV, at least from my impression. NW (Talk) 15:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks more like a resume' with no work being attached to anything notable. Hourick (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]