The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Edgepedia (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Racine Raiders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination. Very little sourcing, fails WP:N and WP:GNG. Potential violation of WP:ADV and WP:NPOV. Paul McDonald (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC) (categories)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Paul McDonald (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You see this search article for them in their local paper? 2,405 mentions (I don't think they archive). Most minor league football teams on this level don't get significant local coverage, but the Raiders do. Tom Danson (talk) 17:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it looks like most of those articles have the words "Racine" and "raiders" in the article but clearly are not about the "Racine Raiders." --Paul McDonald (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: This organization does appear to get a fair amount of coverage, more than enough to meet WP:GNG,[1][2][3][4][5][6]- I could cite many many more if I kept looking. Let this one rest, Paul.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 17:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk about}_{about my edits?} 17:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per the first reference in the article and references I added to it:
• The Milwaukee Sentinel - Google News Archive Search
• JSOnline.com News Archives (subscription required)
• Men young and old chase football dreams at Racine Raiders tryout
• Raiders leave NAFL for MidStates Football League
• Racine Raiders don't find the answer

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination Withdrawn sources look good now. WP:RELISTINGISEVIL.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.