This is an archive of past discussions with Vibhijain. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - ... (up to 100) |
On 11 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Niranjan Bhagat, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Gujarati poet Niranjan Bhagat won the 1999 Sahitya Akademi Award for Gujarati for his critic Gujarati Sahiyta-Purvardha Uttarardha? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niranjan Bhagat.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for joining! We will try to get the backlog gone! ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 13:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for picking up Port City Cricket League 2010. I had been wondering what to do about that (as you may have seen on the GOCE Drive's talk page) and I thought you made a good job of it. Best regards, --Stfg (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I moved the template to Special occasion holding area. — aηsuмaη ツ ༽Ϟ 17:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Vibhijain, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)
First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.
Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Vibhijain/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.
For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).
Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type ((reflist)) on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.
Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.
One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 13:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
These require two parts;
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
== References == ((reflist))
(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)
To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Vibhijain/reftest and try it out.
Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>
Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.
You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;
Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> ((Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 )) </ref>
Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.
For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.
You might want to consider using this tool - (tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py) - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well all by itself. For those it can't do by itself, it gives you a pull-down (or up) menu of templates to choose from, which you can then fill in manually. Often the problem is "No title found" - sometimes the title is obvious (especially if it's a pdf), bit, if not, just open the page yourself and choose something appropriate if there's not already a clear title there. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 13:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, not required actually, but thanks anyway. AshLin (talk) 13:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christiane Pflug. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I am writing from WikiProject Barnstar Awarding. As a member of the project, I thought you may be interested in one of our new feature - a live news feed. Formally, any project news was displayed on the project page and any important messages (like this one) had to be idividualy delivered. We now, however, have a new feature - a news feed. The way this works is by the project having a news page (which can be found [[WP:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding/News|here). Users then place the following on their talk page
((Wikipedia:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding/News))
News will then be updated on your talk page (or anywhere else you decided to place this template). Please note that the new messages template will not be shown as news is updated.
We hope that you will help support this new feature and will add the template to your user space. Now this feature is in place, messages adressed to the whole WikiProject will no longer be individualy delivered.
Oddbodz (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In general, although it is a guideline and not a policy, standard accepted procedure is to redirect clearly non notable schools to the article about their locality. This needs no discussion, relievs the backlog at AfD, avoids physical deletion, and leaves the subject open to become an article again if it can later be proven to be notable. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
On 19 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wiki Conference India, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the three-day Wiki Conference India (logo pictured) is running from 18 to 20 November at the University of Mumbai? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wiki Conference India. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 backlog elimination drive update
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 46 people sign up for this drive so far, and 28 have copy edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't joined, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We are making great progress in our goal of clearing out the oldest articles (April, May, and June 2010) from the queue. There are 122 articles left in those categories, which compares very favorably with the 281 that were present at the close of the September drive. We have reduced the 2010 backlog by 184 articles so far. Coordinator elections: The term of our second tranche of coordinators will be running out at the end of the year, and we will be accepting nominations for new coordinators early in December. The election will likely run in the last two weeks of December. Please consider helping out by nominating yourself or someone else in the Guild as one of our coordinators. The commitment is for a six-month term. Thanks. Your drive coordinators – Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02 and SMasters |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks very much for reviewing the article and the barnstar. Much appreciated! —Commander (Ping me) 15:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I recently reviewed an article that you copyedited. Although you did a good copyedit, I found a few things that you missed. You can see my changes at [1]. Remember to keep an eye out for proper comma placement (and especially make sure that, when a comma is used before an "and" in a list, that the practice is retained throughout the entire article) as well as standard date writing (day, month, year or month, day, year- keep it the same throughout the article). Also watch out for strange capitalization mistakes that are sometimes scattered in articles.--Slon02 (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you reviewed the article on Karthi and told the nominator to add an image. When no free image was found you told him to use a non-free image. You must have forgot, the Good article criteria require that "valid fair use rationales" are provided for images. For a non-free image of a living person like Karthi that is impossible, because it automatically fails WP:NFCC#1, the criterion that no free equivalent could reasonably be found or created. In fact, no article on a living person should have a non-free image for identification purposes because of this Wikipedia policy, and you will find that they don't. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks Hekerui (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
For your excellent contributions! That's me! Have doubt? Track me! 06:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Vibhijain,
Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Vibhajain, I'm here to talk about a couple of articles you wikfied for the December Wikification drive today. I was asked to look over your work, and so I've checked up on what you've done so far. Your first article looks good, but there are a couple things about the second one you wikified that could be fixed. In the "On Campus" section, you linked the three schools that the blueprint is based off, but two of them (Franklin High School and Pleasant Grove High School) lead to disambiguation pages, so that doesn't really help much. Please make sure you follow your links, make sure they go where you want them to go, and use piped links ("[[Example page|Text that will be shown]]") if needed. In this case, its pretty easy to see that the correct links would be Franklin High School (Elk Grove, California) and Pleasant Grove High School (California), as both of these are also in the Elk Grove District.
Hans Andersag, your third article (diff here), has something else related to the link destinations. You linked Chloroquine and Resochin, which seems good, since they are technical-sounding terms. However, had you clicked them, you would have seen that Resochin is actually just a redirect to Chloroquine, and so a link is not needed. Furthermore, linking his wife's name (and even the name of the stadium in the other article) seems necessary.
I hope this helps, and that you take these tips to heart since you have the potential to be a great editor. Thanks, and don't hesitate to leave me a note if you have any other questions. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 00:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts December 1, and you can sign up today! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC).
Thanks for removing wikify from Aleuritic acid - it was not my intention to add it - I skiped it ones with AWB, but forgot it the second time (after I manually added a stub-tag). Christian75 (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
For your 4134 word count in the Guild of Copy editors' November Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 02:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
– Plarem (User talk contribs) 17:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
For all your research in my GA nominee, 200 euro note (talk). – Plarem (User talk contribs) 17:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
– Plarem (User talk contribs) 17:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ for copy editing articles totalling over 4,000 words in the Guild of Copy Editors' November 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! Dianna (talk) 19:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
I do not understand point 4 (Stability) of the GA REview. How is it not an NPOV? – Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (11/23): Opening this weekend (12/2): Opening next weekend (12/9): Other December releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 12 – December 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
– Plarem (User talk contribs) 18:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
– Plarem (User talk contribs) 18:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --Jetstreamer (talk) 22:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
As you have five or more DYK credits, you'll need to review another article at DYK before your nomination can be approved, per the QPQ rule: "Review requirement – Reviewing another editor's nomination is part of the nomination process for self-nominations. This makes it more likely that all nominations are reviewed in a timely manner. You may add your nomination before you undertake a review, but before it is approved, please review another editor's nomination and indicate at your nomination which you have reviewed, and (if you know how to do this) provide a link to the diff for your review. New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement, as is the nomination of another editor's article. For help in learning the reviewing process, see the reviewers' guide." Once you've done this, just reply at the nomination page, stating what you have reviewed. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Harrias talk 00:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors November 2011 Backlog elimination drive! We would like to thank all who participated in this drive. Here is the end-of-drive report.
There were 48 editors who signed-up for this drive, of which 35 participated. Thank you to everyone who helped reduce the size of the backlog!
During the drive, we reduced the backlog by 232 articles, or by about 6%. This is a two percent increase from our September drive, when we copy edited 4% of the backlog. We were successful in our primary goal of clearing the oldest three months—March, April, and May 2010—from the queue. Thanks to all who helped copy edit these difficult articles. Thus far we have reduced the copy edit backlog by 5086 articles, or by about 61%. End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here.
The term of our second tranche of coordinators has run out, and we will be accepting nominations from December 5, 00:01 UTC to December 15, 23:59 UTC. If you or any other member of the Guild of Copy Editors wishes to be a coordinator, add your name to this page along with a statement describing why you believe you should be a coordinator for the Guild. You must be able to commit to a six month term. Thanks! Once again, thank you for participating in the Guild's November 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Our next drive will be in January, and we hope to see you there! Your drive coordinators – Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02 and SMasters |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
– Plarem (User talk contribs) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding ((subst:Xmas3)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
– Plarem (User talk contribs) 13:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Yunshui 雲水 is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:Xmas2)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 02:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I trying to improve Ahalya to FA status and have started a PR Wikipedia:Peer_review/Ahalya/archive1. I request to give your valued comments to improve the article to FA status on the PR or the talk. Thanks a lot. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I closed the FLC as unsuccessful because it did not have enough consensus for promotion. The list had been at FLC for over two months, and in that time it gained one support, from Redtigerxyz. One editor giving support isn't going to be enough for a list to get a consensus for promotion, which is needed for an FLC to close successfully. As one of the closers, I tried my best to be patient and give the list time to be reviewed, but a list can't stay at FLC indefinitely, and unfortunately there wasn't enough support in the end to say the community favored promotion. My best advice is to ask The Rambling Man if his comments were adequately addressed; if so, feel free to renominate the list once your current FLC runs its course. Best of luck with the list. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Corsia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 19:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Sock puppetry. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)