This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I, Frogman2099, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Frogman2099 (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. both restored, look in history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
G13 (the draft is still needed as the topic is not covered in mainspace as far as I know. —Taku (talk) 20:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I have started to writing a new article on the same dude at Anatoly Gurevich. I was really surprised that a draft was available and only G13 about a month ago. It might be useful in terms of sources to restore the draft and so I determine if I can use any of the sources in the draft, if they are available. If really rubbish it go back in the bin. Thanks. —scope_creepTalk 21:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Graeme Bartlett: How are you. That article is some nick. No wonder it got g13'd. I've taken a couple of sources off it that may helpful and some notes that I can use to I build my own article, but most of it is junk and unreferenced. I cant do anything with it really, without finding a whole bunch of sources, which I plan do with my own article anyway, so there is no point in keeping it. I guess you just can delete it. Thanks for bringing is back from the dead for a wee while. scope_creepTalk 23:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Brookline1 (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please make the text available for update.
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 00:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
No. Just like the last time you asked. What is your connection to the article subject? —Cryptic 00:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —49.176.7.103 (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there
I would like to have Mitu Bhowmick Lange's page reinstated. I have attached some information about her. Can you please advise if this is possible?
Thanks so much
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Considering that the AfD debate was plagued by sockpuppets and that this is an IP who's linking to the subject's website requesting it... —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 03:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitu Bhowmick Lange, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I want to back my User Page which i had earlier requested for deletion —Chinar (Message | Contribs) 02:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC) Chinar (Message | Contribs) 02:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Rodsrazor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rodsrazor (talk) 03:57, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that this topic does not appear to be suitable as no one else has written about it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See User:Youllneverwalkalone2019/sandbox. Next time don't give up and request delete yourself! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I, ThatMontrealIP, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
I noticed this draft when I published Ellen Carey. I am thinking there might be some usable material in there. She is notable per point 4 of WP:ARTIST: work held in multiple museum collections.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Nothing much of value there (and no reliable sources either) so feel free to re-delete.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Adam4cSports, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adam4cSports (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I, TheMechatronicist, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.TheMechatronicist (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Article was deleted due to being "self promotional" was not written by Tim Girvin nor anyone who worked with him. Would like to review the article to establish what was self promotional and change.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.210.187.204 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Just Chilling (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 20:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
The article has been edited by many different people, but has been promotional ever since its creation more than one and a half decades ago. I suggest that you ask user:Just Chilling to put this into a draft, as the topic looks to be notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I have restored at Draft:Tim Girvin. I have also restored the talk page which has useful discussion. This page is so promotional that it cannot remain here, in its present state, for long so, if it can't be fixed promptly, I suggest that it is copied to the applicant's own device. Just Chilling (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
637 Portal subpages
Automated portals are being deleted en masse per recent MfD discussions (for an example, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mass-created portals based on a single navbox, where 1,390 automated portals with no previous, non-automated versions in their Revision histories are nominated for deletion in a bundled nomination). Upon examining the Revision histories of other portals, outside of those listed for deletion in this example discussion, many have manually-created, pre-automated versions that cull information from portal subpages. Unfortunately, many of these subpages were hastily nominated for speedy deletion without allowing enough time to see how the community would respond to the mass conversion of portals to automated versions. The community has demonstrated a strong, noticeable dislike for automated portals, so it makes sense to begin the process of reverting to previous, non-automated versions at this time. Requesting restoration of the following portal subpages that were deleted per WP:G6 housekeeping, to enable the reversion of portals converted to automation back to their pre-automated versions. North America1000 08:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
If they're sufficiently uncontroversial to list at WP:REFUND, they're sufficiently uncontroversial that you can restore them yourself. —Cryptic 09:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Cryptic: Yeah, I thought about that, but after this recent unfortunate turn of events, where I had to spend lots of my time defending myself against misguided accusations, which ultimately led to the thread against me being closed as baseless, I feel that it would be best if an uninvolved admin performed the task. It is not worth it to me to risk another round at ANI for having done absolutely nothing wrong, a complete time sink that took lots of time away from functional activities. Since I was mischaracterized as a "strong portal advocate" in the beginning of the thread (I'm actually rather neutral, not that it should matter; I have opined for deletion of many portals; read the ani if you'd like for more information, but yeah, I like some portals and their use), someone could just read the first part of the thread where it says "strong portal advocate", ignore the rest, go along with the typecasting, make a snap judgment, and then complain that self-performed refunds are "disruptive". If this were to occur, and I pointed to your comment here, people could just disagree for whatever reason(s), say it's controversial, and that it's therefore a disruption. Yup, welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you understand. North America1000 10:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Please DO NOT do this undeletion as listed: several of the portal subpages listed above are subpages to portals that no longer exist, so this REFUND as listed will only create more work for editors. No opposition to REFUNDing of a properly researched list. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Well, there's complaint #1. UnitedStatesian: could you provide a list of portals that have been deleted? Then, I could remove them from the list. I'm already quite busy working on restoring portals that have not been deleted, which is very time consuming. I'm only one person, and one person can only do so much. This isn't against you at all, but as a general observation, this is what happens when people get all excited about overly WP:EAGER deletion; the present MfD crusade is now literally preventing portals that have not been deleted from being significantly improved. It's ass backwards. North America1000 11:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
As a non-admin, I don't have such a list. Sorry. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I feel that it would do no harm to the encyclopedia for some portal subpages that don't have an accompanying portal to be restored at this time. They can be weeded out as the restoration process occurs. Conversely, it significantly harms the encyclopedia to prevent significant improvements from occurring per rash actions of G6 being requested too soon and rash actions at MfD where people may not be researching matters adequately, with many just saying "delete all per nom, portals are no good", and such. People should slow down on the deletion frenzy. North America1000 12:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I've added links to the parent pages; there's only about fifteen that are red. I'll restore the rest of the subpages later today when I have more time, if nobody beats me to it. —Cryptic 12:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your assistance, it is truly appreciated. North America1000 12:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I, LaWr123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LaWr123 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I would like this article (which was deleted through the Proposed Deletion system) to be undeleted and then moved to either Draft:FairBnB or User:Gerrit/FairBnB, so I can continue working on it and/or request it to be moved back to Article namespace if the organisation grows and it is no longer WP:TOOSOON (after adding articles that are not only about its launch). —GerritCUTEDH 15:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
If the PROD is overturned, I will take it to AfD. A Google News search turns up absolutely nothing useful. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 20:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Writerone, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Writerone (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please ping me when you're through. Abyssal (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Have not made a edit for more than a year due to a busy schedule, I’m ready to make further edits —RomeZw (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright holder has emailed the OTRS team to release the logo under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free
Documentation License, OTRS ticket number regarding the request is 2019040110008395 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
In that case we await OTRS team to confirm this is proven. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
User talk:The Duke of Nonsense/Archive/2018/September
User talk:The Duke of Nonsense/Archive/2018/September · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Hi there, I am requesting this to be undeleted so that people can see what I've done in the past, and so they can learn who sockpuppeting, and lying get you nowhere on this platform. Me trying to delete this was the wrong thing to do, as it seems like I'm trying to hide it, and I never want to do that. Thus, I am requesting for this to be undeleted. Thank you. —The Duke 23:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Kanosike, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Kanosike (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Shelyric, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shelyric (talk) 04:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 86.185.233.123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.86.185.233.123 (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
though the page was created by a banned user, I think the page history will be useful —Jax 0677 (talk) 19:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I suggest that you consult with User:CactusWriter to see if this is restorable or if there are likely serious problems. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Dixitssumit, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Dixitssumit (talk) 12:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Despite the page was an unsourced BLP, the player passed WP:NFOOTY and will be improved after the restore. —MYS77✉ 16:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Done@MYS77: I've moved this to Draft:Wesley Tavares dos Santos for improvement. It wasn't technically a valid BLP PROD because the article did cite a source when it was tagged, but I still think it would be best to improve it before moving back to mainspace. Hut 8.5 21:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 65.126.92.250, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.65.126.92.250 (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Which page are you talking about? Neither Sezzle nor Draft:Sezzle has ever existed, you don't have any deleted contributions, and there don't appear to be any deleted pages containing "sezzle" in the title. Hut 8.5 21:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Player actually pass WP:NFOOTY now, as he played in a WP:FPL. —MYS77✉ 16:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. @MYS77: can you add some evidence that the subject meets NFOOTY? Hut 8.5 21:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5: According to WP:FPL, playing in the Ecuadorian Serie A makes him eligible through NFOOTY. Cheers, MYS77✉ 13:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Draft:List of video games developed in Romania
Draft:List of video games developed in Romania · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, ZarnotRO, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ZarnotRO (talk) 09:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted under the f7 criteria, but I'm not exactly sure why. No mention on the talk page previously. if the problem was an incorrect fair use rationale then surely that could be fixed. —Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion F7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
The specific rationale for deletion was "Criterion 3a, because multiple non-free images (including File:University of London logo.svg) are being used when one would suffice." —Cryptic 05:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
A well known hosehold name with over 1000 published article in main stream news paper, over 100 interview show in India's leading TV channels. —122.162.105.187 (talk) 08:07, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Mishra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Sandstein (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
It was deleted by someone with a strong preference against Dragonchain. Like all other blockchains such as Ethereum, NEO, Dash, Monero, Bitcoin, I fully believe I should be able to visit that page and make improvements. I did not start, write or contribute to that page, but I would like to do so and prevent future deletion. If my request will be accepted. —JeffreyDutch (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonchain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Michig (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. We don't actually know the opinion of the one who deleted it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
That is true, we do not know the opinion of the one who deleted it. Thank you, I will try that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyDutch (talk • contribs) 13:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
@JeffreyDutch: The deletion was per process in accordance with the AFD discussion. The participants in the discussion were unanimous in their support of deletion. Any personal views of the admin who deleted it are irrelevant in this context and they should not be pestered about it. – Athaenara ✉ 22:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
@Athaenara: Yes, I already agreed on that in my above comment and more than happy to apologize again. JeffreyDutch (talk) 10:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I, CLoveday87, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CLoveday87 (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done Since your work was deleted as a copyright infringement, you must start again without copying other works. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Trebacze, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Trebacze (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Abyssal (talk) 00:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
It was mistaken to be the work of LOVEOLOGIST, But in fact it is the work of YOHINUNA. I'm asking for undeletion because the reason the reviewer left was not TRUE, Patrick Rogel mistaken the pics' source for LOVEOLOGIST's work when in fact it's YOHINUNA's work and i have added the reference correctly too. —Otterlyhwi (talk) 03:16, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – This file was deleted on Commons. Otterlyhwi, you will need to make your case to the deleting administrator or at the undeletion requests page there. ℯxplicit 03:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Abyssal (talk) 12:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I object PROD deletion. The article had a reliable source. The concern "The authors don't define it as an object in a known axiomatic first order theory" is not a valid reason for deletion. —Alexei Kopylov (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
The source that @Alexei Kopylov: speaks about is reliable in the field of category theory, not in set theory, and not in foundations of mathematics, as it should be in this article. As I told to Alexey Kopylov many times, there must be serious reasons for making declarations like this
Можно пойти дальше и рассматривать совокупности классов — конгломераты, совокупности конгломератов и так далее. (One can go further and consider sets of classes — conglomerates, sets of conglomerates, and so on.)
and citing authors who make declarations like this
Математика была вынуждена бесповоротно отказаться от претензий на абсолютную достоверность или значимость своих результатов. (Mathematics had to irrecoverably abandon claims for absolute certainty or significance of its results.)
I, Abhi1012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abhi1012 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
'Hustle & Soul' is a very well known reality show out here. I don't understand why it was deleted in the first place. This reality show needs a wikipedia page so that people know who they're watching and so they can keep up with the ratings.—77.173.134.237 (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done The Hustle & Soul was deleted because the writer blanked the page. They never put in more than a broken infobox, so there was nothing usable to restore. Others are welcome to write on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I do not understand why a bio page of a poet and nurse was deleted, especially since she is being widely confused with Laura Gilpin, the photographer (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Gilpin) on various well-known websites including goodreads. —Jvanala (talk) 20:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If the deletion reason was R2, add "Draft:" to the start of your article's title. It was draftified, not deleted. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 21:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
See Draft:Laura Crafton Gilpin Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Media-hk, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Media-hk (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I suspect this may be copyvio, part of it is definitely taken from [1]. Hut 8.5 21:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Parker24 22, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Parker24 22 (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Contributor will continue working on the article and publish it. —Lennart Holmquist (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per WP:G6. This page is needed per the portal being restored to it's pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in working on the portal, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. North America1000 17:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I, W1nless, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. W1nless (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:05, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Subject is notable. Also deletion process was not followed correctly and no vote or reason for deletion was given. —2600:1700:7BB0:950:2C4C:D40C:9E1C:43EF (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Done restored as a contested soft deletion. Ping User:Scope creep as the AfD nominator. Note that the deletion process was followed in this case. Hut 8.5 21:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5: Hi I think this is the first time we have spoke. How are you? How are you keeping? Unfortunately it will be going straight back to Afd, once I strip out all the promotion that is in it. The whole article would need a significant rewrite backed by proper references that satisfy WP:V, WP:BIO, and supposedly WP:NPROF. The very first ref which is supposed to establish bona fides in the article is on a luxury lifestyle brand site where he is selling his book and it starts there and it gets progressively worse. Not even a medical ref/site to kick it off. The first ref is Non RS. On top of that his h-index is far far too low to satisfy WP:NPROF. scope_creepTalk 22:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cschff (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Cschff: Last time I restored this, no one did anything to improve the page. What do you plan to do to make this better? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —206.81.201.82 (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I have worked on this page and related content in the past. I was unaware it was marked for deletion and would work to ensure the content is in line with Wikipedia content guidelines. Mr. Schulz is a member of a relevant American rock band and has other touring and composing credits to his name. Thank you. —99Perfectos (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I would like to resume working on creating the article as it was left as a draft. In addition, if anyone is willing to assist with the creation of the final article, I would be most grateful! Thank you for your time! —Jojohot1 (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Parts of the draft appear to be lifted from here. Most of it's an unattributed copy of Justin Willman. —Cryptic 11:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm new to Wikipedia and didn't realize my draft page had violated copyright infringement since the website it was taking the text from was created by me (www.iconcreativestudio.com/about). I'd like to undelete the Wikipedia page I created and change the section that was deemed as copyright infringement —CLoveday87 (talk) 21:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done It was also promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Since you say you wrote that page, you'd have to go through the formal process detailed at WP:Donating copyrighted materials in order to release it. I urge you not to bother, though, since - as Graeme says just above - it's so promotionally written that there's no chance we would use it, and no realistic chance that we would use anything even based on it. —Cryptic 11:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Mania.pour, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Mania.pour (talk) 11:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 38.88.216.18, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.38.88.216.18 (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
First, this was deleted as a block evasion, this does not indicate that the subject is not notable, etc. Second, I want to add a picture to the article from Commons for a Valued Image nomination, thank you. --BoothSift 04:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC) —BoothSift 04:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Bbb23 (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
@JJMC89: I understand, I will leave it like this, thank you. --BoothSift 04:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Requesting undelete, as I intend to work on the article further. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 18:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon du Toit, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I did have a talk (link) with AfD discussion-closing admin Sandstein, who don't userfy pages and consider it as no view one way or the other. Is the article eligible for undelete? --Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
The process at WP:DRV is technically open to you, but you are more likely to be successful if you have new sources that help to refute the criticisms given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon du Toit. As noted at AfD, the requirements of WP:CREATIVE are fairly demanding. See points 1 through 4 of WP:CREATIVE and ask yourself if can find sources to show that he meets them. EdJohnston (talk) 18:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Got it. Thank you EdJohnston. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 07:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Fogden, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Fogden (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm attending a special session in honor of the deceased subject at an international conference in September. I plan to recruit others to help edit the page and convince the reviewer that (1) the subject is of note and (2) my page is not an advertisement... —Fogden (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
This article was incorrectly labeled as advertising , where it was simply background and biographical information about a company responsible for very well known african content ( which most of these TV and film projects have their own verified wikipedia pages). Most of the text submitted was supported by third party texts from journalistic sources both national to portuguese speaking territories and international, as well as links to appropriate wikipedia pages of the company's people projects that seem to have already been reviewed with appropriate sources recognised/ revised by wikipedia. This is a popular portuguese-african media/entertainment company with projects seen all over their region and the world , many awards and they were mentioned on other articles but did not have their own wikipedia page. It´s very strange that information submitted about them, with the appropriate sources was deleted claiming its advertising, when information about similar European and American companies still has a wikipedia page and were not deleted as advertising. As someone who took the time to try to contribute information to the wikipedia community about a topic, its very discouraging to see this practice. I hope this was simply a mistake and does not denote any form of discrimination toward biographical information coming from developing countries . and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cudcorp (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Pointing to sources to dispute a G11 deletion is nonsensical - the issue is with how the article is written, not the sources used. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 21:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Expired prod from a while back, but the topic likely passes WP:NSOFT. I usually prod stuff, instead of asking for it to be restored, but in this case, reviews exist: [2], and 1-2 book manuals [3], [4]. I also found a mini-review with a how-to-use in a reliable Polish magazine (pl:Komputer Świat, 20+ years in print): [5]. I have no prejudice against this being AfD after restoration, but I don't think a soft with a PC World review should get prod-delete. Ping User:Djm-leighpark who I think has more experience then me in rescuing such articles. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
There really wasn't much there. The entire prose of the prodded version was "PhotoFiltre is a freeware image editing and effects program published by Antonio Da Cruz. It is not as powerful as GIMP, but also considered a portable application." The entire prose of the A7'd version was "PhotoFiltre is an image retouching program with a wide range of filters." Both linked http://www.photofiltre.com/, the A7 also https://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2005/02/07/free_digital_image_editor_review.htm and http://www.snapfiles.com/get/photofiltre.html.I don't think the prodded version would be of any help creating a new article, but I'll restore it if you still want to work from it. The A7 version technically has to go through DRV, which seems more trouble than it's worth. —Cryptic 11:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
I think we should restore that version in the mainspace for attribution history, since I think I sources I presented above were presented in AfD it wouldn't have been deleted. I'll add those sources to the article while it is created (please ping me when this done, TIA). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Scallar8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scallar8 (talk) 09:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd like to ask what the necessary measures are to ensure my Taulia page is removed from deletion. The company is credible and, given it employs 200+ employees and works with some of the world's largest companies, I believe it warrants a Wikipedia page. I am able to edit the page in order to make sure it meets the Wikipedia standards. Please advise on further instructions. —Danmiddlehurst (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Tatibitati, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Tatibitati (talk) 13:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I noted that the 1914 meteorology page was missing. The log states that Fastily deleted it in 2012, it was restored by R'n'B in 2013, and then deleted again in 2018. Looking at the Category: Meteorology topics by year, it appears that 1923 and 1907 were also deleted since 1870. Entries then become more scarce between 1800-1870, and just a few notable events are listed for previous years. All of these were deleted in 2012 with the reasoning "Empty category" by Fastily, but the 2013 restoration says "4 revisions restored. No longer empty." All three of those years have corresponding entries in the "19** Atlantic hurricane season" articles, although they indicate that activity was unusually weak. Please look at these articles and determine if deletion was appropriate, if they should be retained as placeholders, or if there were actually items in those categories such that deletion was not appropriate. Thank you. —Ryan Reeder (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Well there are no pages in those categories, so they can stay deleted. You are welcome to add redlinked categories to articles and then request undeletion. It is too hard to tell where the categories were iused in the past, as the history of unknown pages has to be examined. If you know suitable pages to look at then please do that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)StarReaper (talk) 23:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC) Diaspora: Mass Exodus
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Subject matter is notable and has been nominated in several award shows, need a Wikipedia face, I request undeletion as I need to work on this article. —Redcap78 (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Cyphoidbomb (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. I will note that this title and both the correct and misspelt draft titles are salted. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 19:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
There is nothing to undelete at Alisha Panwar; it was just a redirect. A bigger issue is that because of excessive promotional editing, Panwar's name has been added to our title blacklist, so not even a draft article can be created at this time. Since Redcap78 has no experience editing, I think I'd like to see what they're proposing article-wise before moving anything into Draft space. I'd probably recommend they start work in their sandbox, unless another admin has a different opinion. @Redcap78: you should probably read Your First Article, and note that per WP:PAID, if you are being paid to edit an article, you have to disclose that, as well as who is paying you, who your employer is and any other relevant relationship. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
The original request was for "Aalisha Panwar", which was empty. I thus defaulted to the closest title with a deletion history. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 03:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Can you go through the draft in my sandbox about Aalisha Panwar.Check, If the Draft article is ready to move in namespace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redcap78 (talk • contribs) 12:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Sociologee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sociologee (talk) 00:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017-19 (Gibraltar)
I, RaviC, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.RaviC (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Faure Op7 No1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Faure Op7 No1 (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 131.179.59.91, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.131.179.59.91 (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Requesting undeletion as it may be useful for editors to see what the task was when it ran. I am the bot op for this retired bot. —Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Good morning, it was brought to my attention that my Wikipedia page has been deleted. I was unaware of this, there is no reason my Wikipedia page ought to be deleted.
I am a public figure, a professional actress and spokesperson with over 100 credits on IMDb. This page is relevant to my line of work and Industry professionals demand I have it.
I originally provided links to my IMDb, web page, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook.
Please restore the page for Lisa Catara. I would like control over its content and existence.
I, Tetsuo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tetsuo (talk) 01:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 141.142.60.255, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.141.142.60.255 (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Page was deleted because the primary sources were incorrect and unable to verify political party position. Shawn Steel is in fact a Republican National Committeeman of California, which can be verified through the Republican National Committee's website and through multiple other news sources such as Fox, CBS, and KABC Radio. Finally, he's written a plethora of articles lending his expertise as the Republican Party's representative of California. —Spicybrownie (talk) 21:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[1][2][3][4][5]Spicybrownie (talk) 21:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Steel, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Ritchie333 (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
I, VindevogelTaho, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.VindevogelTaho (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – I won't restore a version that was deleted per WP:CSD#G11. But meanwhile, the requester has restored the draft already, perhaps from a personal copy that they had stored offline. The new one is somewhat less spammy. The revised article still might not survive WP:AFD, so I recommend you finish taking it through the WP:AFC process. EdJohnston (talk) 03:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
The following pages were deleted per WP:G6. These pages are needed per the portal being restored to its pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in working on the portal, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. North America1000 02:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I would like the revision dated 10 November 2016 to be restored since I intend to transfer it to Commons in high res. Please ping me when this revision is restored. —Kailash29792(talk) 09:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
@Kailash29792:Since this is claimed to be fair use, Commons will reject it. Do you believe that a free license can apply? If so update the file description page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
It satisfies the criteria for PD-India / URAA per this. Unfortunately, I cannot generate the text ((PD-India-URAA)) here, and it is possible only in Commons. Hence, I have written only ((PD-India)), but can you please do something? --Kailash29792(talk) 11:57, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
The poster probably comes from 1957, but for PD-India-URAA to apply it must have been published before January 1, 1941. The discussion you linked to, says that another discussion is needed to delete or restore files. But this space here is not that suitable for discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Alright, maybe I was mistaken about what comes under URAA. But is this a better discussion? Or this? Even if the URAA licensing does not apply for post-1941 Indian files, I think files like this 1951 image (which was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion) can stay on Commons with the PD-India tag only. Since the MPM file is dated 1957, it is eligible for PD-India and I would like to transfer it to Commons in high-res. Kailash29792(talk) 03:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Fhurfu21, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Fhurfu21 (talk) 18:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per WP:G6. This page is needed to restore the portal to its pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in portal restorations, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. —North America1000 02:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 183.82.39.53, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.183.82.39.53 (talk) 07:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
the page was deleted under G13 and can be actively worked upon now —183.82.39.53 (talk) 07:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
When you have a reason that justifies fair use, then please specify it. "Trademark dispute" is not quite enough yet to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett:. As pointed out by Explicit at WP:MCQ#Restoring deleted file, this logo seems to have been used in the main infobox of BNC Bank. It looks like the file was removed here in June 2018 by an WP:SPA, became orphaned and was eventually deleted by Explicit per WP:F5 in June 2018. Nobody noticed this until Vchimpanzee did here in April 2019. Vchimpanzee did ask Explict about this but got the file mixed up with File:Bank of North Carolina logo.png, which confused things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Feelingsarts (talk • contribs) 19:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
(I'm just going to redact the (presumeably auto-)biography that was above and leave it for a less appalled admin to formally decline this. —Cryptic 20:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC))
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted viadeletiondebate (specifically, WP:Articles for deletion/Sakit Mammadov). Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. This is far from the first time the page has been deleted, with every deletion being under a circumstance that won't be covered here. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 21:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakit Mammadov, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, MelanieN (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Mnh5065, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mnh5065 (talk) 20:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I request undeletion of the page.Deletion was done without any warning or discussion this time and the cause of deletion of the previously deleted article no longer apply to the recreated article —Davidwarner (talk) 13:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes it is pretty clear that this page should not have been speedy deleted as it was quite different from the earlier deleted version. However because this is a G4 speedy delete, you should first ask the deleter user:Deb to restore it. Note that warnings and taggings of articles are optional, but I would very strongly encourage these processes as more people then get to consider whether the page should be deleted or not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to Graeme Bartlett for your kind opinion and suggestion.I request user:Deb to kindly reconsider and restore the page as the recreated version is quite different from the previous deleted version. The recreated page passes WP:GNGWP:SIGCOV and the artist has credit for writing lyrics and music for a notable composition WP:COMPOSER. So, its my humble request to ponder over the matter of deletion.Davidwarner (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd be prepared to restore it as a draft, but not to article space. It's clearly promotional and there remains a lack of evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 07:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Deb Its not a promotional article. I found significant coverages about the artist in significant newspapers like The Asian Age, The Deccan Chronicles, News18 (CNN News) that makes him pass notability.WP:GNGWP:SIGCOVDavidwarner (talk)
Like I said, I'm willing to create a draft but you've got a lot of work to do on it. Deb (talk) 08:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Deb Can you please make it clear the exact reason for which the article should be deleted, so that I can work on it.Davidwarner (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
As I've said above, the primary issue is one of promotional wording, and the second is that notability is not adequately established. That's why it was deleted first time round as well. If I were you, I would read that deletion debate so that you fully understand the issues. When you've read it you can come back to me and I will put the article into draft space. Deb (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Deb I have read the debate. As I realised from the debate the artist was not notable as per wikipedia guideline that time. But he passes notability now. If you please go through the new article you can see the page has no notability issue. And neither the page is promotional nor any promotional word I have used nor any original research I did. The page contains what I obtained from different reliable sources.I request Graeme Bartlett if he shares his opinion too regarding it.Davidwarner (talk)
And the recreated article is largely improved and different than the earlier one. That debate doesn't work on the recreated version. Davidwarner (talk) 10:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
WP:G4 says clearly "It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies"...And this recreated page is not substantially identical to the deleted version and the reason for the deletion no longer applies. So this deletion is going against WP:G4 .This topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources (The Asian Age, News18-CNN News, The Deccan Chronicle) that are independent of the subject. So this deletion goes against WP:GNGWP:SIGCOV.'O Bandhobi'(a song composed and written by the artist) has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it WP:NALBUM.So, that song itseft passes notability and thats why he has the credit for writing lyrics and music for a notable composition. So, this deletion goes against WP:COMPOSER. Its not fair to delete something or sending something to draft when a page already obeys wikipedia guideline. Davidwarner (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm not Graeme, but since you've been unable to convince the (re)deleting administrator, your recourse is to list it on WP:Deletion review. G4 deletions aren't undeleted here; this page is only for completely uncontroversial restorations, and isn't set up to deal with cases where there's disagreement about whether an administrator acted correctly in deleting the page. —Cryptic 20:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Comment from the deleting administrator. Although the articles are not identical, I believe that the reason for the original deletion still applies. In fact, the original deleted article is in some ways better than the new one, although there are more references in the latter. These claim nothing more substantial than that the subject "will make his Bollywood debut soon" and that he has released three singles. The fact that the article creator cannot recognise when he is using promotional wording will, however, hinder him in attempting to create a fresh draft. Deb (talk) 21:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
@Cryptic Thank you for your guide. I'll do so. @Deb I haven't used such kind of phrase "will make Bollywood debut soon" in the article. I have used only the fcats which I found established in different sources.I have also found seven singles from the artist released from different significant record companies. I would want a deletion review from uninvolved administrators . Davidwarner (talk) 02:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
can be updated to meet wikipedia criteria —Drmonkey2 (talk) 11:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Work on the draft instead. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 18:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Also, wouldn't hurt to undelete USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation and Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, as per [6], as well, for completeness sake, and in case talk has something useful. MureninC (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Only the first was an article when deleted, the others were redirects. You can ask user talk:RHaworth to revert the speedy delete, as this administrator who deleted the page is still active. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Are you saying you don't suggest that the history on the redirects is restored as well? I'd prefer to have it all properly restored with original data and dates instead of being re-created anew. Is there a policy for this either way? As for contacting the administrator who erroneously speed-deleted the page, this has already been done at least once a couple years ago, and instead of fixing their mistake, they decided to make fun of the requester; see Special:Permalink/781071611#OSDI page recreation. MureninC (talk) 23:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
If I restored the article then I would restore known redirects. In this case the request looked like three articles, but was one and two redirects, that's why I commented. But I did not restore the page, so I would not then restore redirects to nowhere. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – in part. I restored the A7-deleted article at Draft:Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Will notify the original deleting administrator, User:RHaworth. Please note that the article is unlikely to survive an WP:AFD nomination in its present form. (No adequate article has yet been written). I recommend you improve the references, fix all the broken links, and then try the WP:AFC process. If the article does get accepted there and goes back to main space, it's reasonable to restore the redirects at that time. EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
User:EdJohnston, I don't think it is fair for you to be moving this to the Draft space now, whereas all the other similar conferences have wikipedia pages that are just as thin. I've fixed the reference links by copying the latest updates from its sister SOSP, plus did a few further corrections, quotes, and improvements to format, but, as per WP:REQUIRED, I do not intend to make any further edits whilst in Draft, or take any further action on this article. It is disappointing that nomination and deletion of articles is so random without the most basic fact-checking on the content being done WP:BEFORE. Please restore the rest of the redirects and move the page back out of Draft. BTW, because this conf doesn't have its own article, it keeps being unfairly removed from List of computer science conferences § Operating systems, for example, even though based on the references, it's second only to SOSP, yet several less significant conferences are listed there instead. MureninC (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@MureninC: The idea is that you improve it while it is in draft especially with independent references. Then when it looks like it is AFD-proof it can be move to article space. If it stayed as an article it would soon be deleted——unless it gets improved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: The article already had independent references at the time of speedy deletion; it was deleted in error. How many independent references are required? MureninC (talk) 05:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
The independent references need to have substantial content and also be reliable. What I see there is things that just have a one line entry, not substantial. One supplied references does not even mention the conference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Are you saying they're not reliable? Which exact reference doesn't mention the conference? Don't make me WP:GUESS! And can you kindly give me an example, from List of computer science conferences, as well as the percentage of other conferences that satisfies your criteria? For example, do you want to nominate SOSP for deletion as well, or move it to Draft for folks to improve? Many other ones don't have any references at all; huge number from the list doesn't even have a Reference section. Your application of requirements is not being consistent or reasonable; and your claim that one of the references doesn't mention the conference shows that you didn't even bother to do anything more than an exact search for the title. MureninC (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Try looking for references that have substantial content on the topic, say more than one paragraph. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: I will not do that, because WP:NOTREQUIRED. Just as an example, per WP:A7, there's already an exception for educational institutions; perhaps there should be one for A-graded academic conferences as well? (The above is just as an example, as deleting this through WP:A7 already violated due process and WP:BEFORE.) Also, you're violating WP:OTHER and WP:5P5 by singling out a single article when about half of articles in same category are left alone (you don't have to go far to from List of computer science conferences to find the rest). I'm very disappointed with the handling of this, and I'll refuse to play by your tricks — if you want to intentionally sabotage the correctness and reliability of List of computer science conferences § Operating systems (Special:Permalink/892553371 § Operating systems) by randomly omitting a one of top-two conferences, its on you, @Graeme Bartlett, EdJohnston, and RHaworth:, I already did more than my fair share and more than is reasonable to bring this issue to your collective attention, as well as to fix the references. I consider the handling of this issue to be an instance of intentional vandalism by EdJohnston and RHaworth at this point. MureninC (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
We are giving you a chance to get this as an article. The page is already restored. You may be the best placed user to get this page into good condition. But if you do nothing, it is unlikely anyone else will improve the page, and ultimately the draft will be deleted again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Claytonodom, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Claytonodom (talk) 23:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Claytonodom (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 82.31.20.153, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.82.31.20.153 (talk) 08:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I hope I'm right on this page, I want to ask if an admin can send me the text of the article via wikimail. I don't want to request a undeletion, or recreate the article here, but I want to check if I can use the text and the information of the article to improve other articles in other wikis. Best regards, —Luke081515 11:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
subject has an internationally distributed book being published in July 2019 and is already generating press for this so should meet the criteria for notability —Spongolian (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See if you can have notability proved for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, EnPassant, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.♟♙ (talk) 14:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Sdoctrow, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sdoctrow (talk) 15:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Sajalmtiwari, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sajalmtiwari (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I, KZMelling, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KZMelling (talk) 18:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
We were actively making changes to meet the Wikipedia requirements. We need to have access to the page so that we can compare our original version to the final version and see where we could make additional changes to meet the standards. —Kshear04 (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Badwin goodminton, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Badwin goodminton (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Emdadkhan (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Eastmain, request the undeletion of this submission deleted as a PROD. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per WP:G6. This page is needed to restore the portal to its pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in working on portal restorations, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. —North America1000 04:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Sarahtigerspring, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sarahtigerspring (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Ilyash-b, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Ilyash-b (talk) 10:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you are the creator of the language then I suggest you read WP:COI. Hut 8.5 22:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Aabn2424, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Aabn2424 (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2605:E000:141F:480C:10FE:529B:EFD:8AF (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? I haven't looked in userspace yet as I haven't the foggiest whose userspace it would be under. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 22:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I want to keep working on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.179.59.88 (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. This was restored above. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 00:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 186.151.61.115, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.186.151.61.115 (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Pickledmyself, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Pickledmyself (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 06:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I, PAKComposer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. P.A. (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Joshuacouch, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Joshuacouch (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@Joshuacouch: when this was restored before, no one did anything to improve the page. What do you plan this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 193.170.216.82, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.193.170.216.82 (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Do not add text copied from other web sites. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
This Wikipedia is not promotional page.. Page must be published on Wikipedia.. All information is true. and don't have any promotional source.. Please retrieve page.. Thanks in advance!Please review this Wikipedia page & publish on Wikipedia! Thanks in advance! "Publish changes" button below —77.244.126.12 (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. The only revisions that would be restored here would be whatever ones came after the G11 deletion in the hour or so between its re-creation and the G7 deletion, unless the G11 was inappropriate (which given your claim that the page "must be published", I'm inclined to believe that the G11 was justifiable). —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 20:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
This image was removed from Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V by a bot due to no valid WP:NFUR existing, and then deleted due to being unused. There was apparently a valid NFUR at the time it was reviewed for GA status, so I'm not sure what could have changed, or if the rationale was just vandalised away. 93 (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Done@93: I've restored the image and reset the clock, you have a week to add it into an article before it gets deleted again (I suggest you revert this edit so it is the subject of sourced commentary in the article). I'm pretty sure the reason the rationale was considered invalid is that it named Grand Theft Auto V as the article is was being used in, rather than Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V. If you're wondering why the editor removed the image instead of changing the article in the rationale then I'm with you. Hut 8.5 21:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
I, VoqalEditor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VoqalEditor (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@VoqalEditor:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --TheSandDoctorTalk 06:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I, CH-BUESI, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.CH-BUESI (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@CH-BUESI:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --TheSandDoctorTalk 06:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Caelanmac, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Caelanmac (talk) 07:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. No draft by that name has ever existed. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 08:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussion closed, closed as soft delete. I ask for a WP:REFUND for a more material published about the show. —180.190.35.143 (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I originally asked for speedy deletion because I thought it would never be notable at all. However, I think I can develop the article more to make it notable. I see that some sources that mentions Penguin Point are from Texas, which would make it a reliable secondary source that is far away from the Penguin Point location (which is Indiana). With that, I request for undeletion. Thanks! —INeedSupport:3 18:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd like this article draft restored or userfied so that I can continue improving it and resubmit it for review with additional references and links demonstrating noteworthiness. —Zoeyt (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
The article is for the tv show that already premiered. Article was deleted for the article being created too soon. —TheHotwiki (talk) 14:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love You Two, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Moreover, there has already been a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 April 3 which found that the deletion was appropriate and the article should not be restored. If you believe there have been changes in the notability of the subject since the show has premiered, feel free to start a new article at Draft:Love You Two. (Which I see you have already done. Please work on that one.) ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:34, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Mpwiesner, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mpwiesner (talk) 21:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Lindseyleebee, request the undeletion of this article so that I may continue working on it. —LindseyLeebee (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Though it was deleted under WP:PROD, and could normally be resotred upon request, the reason for deletion was "Obvious self-promotion", and if restored as an article it would be quickly deleted again. I've therefore restored it to Draft space as Draft:Doron Gazit. If you have any connection with the subject, remember to declare the WP:Conflict of Interest according to our rules. And be sure that all images have the necessary notice for being released under a free license. DGG ( talk ) 00:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The deletion discussion unfortunately did not provide much clarity on the previous contents. I'm planning on creating a template at this name, and I would like to ensure I understand the previous contents so I don't unwittingly duplicate them (admittedly, this seems rather unlikely, because I'm not planning to create a template with Unused, hardcoded text, but I would prefer to be informed). As this request is more for information-seeking than for the sake of the actual page itself existing with the previous history, it would be ideal if the previous contents could be emailed (it is my understanding this is allowable based on a previous undeletion request I made). —eπi (talk | contribs) 02:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The content was: In 200(({1))}, it was one of 50 recordings chosen that year by the [[Library of Congress]] to be added to the [[National Recording Registry]].
<includeonly>[[Category:United States National Recording Registry]]</includeonly>
Credit to user:Gamaliel for writing this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I, VeraqueVeritas, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.VeraqueVeritas (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The article was PRODed some years back claiming the subject would be of only minor notability. I do not share this opinion at all: This error message has become "famous" for indicating a bug causing all Pascal programs compiled with Borland's CRT unit to stop working on PCs faster than some 200 MHz. Ten-thousands of programs were affected, dozens of patches for existing programs and compilers have been developed, and hundreds of magazine articles were published about the topic and possible fixes internationally. The net is full of discussions about this topic even now (more than two decades later) - hardly not notable... Nevertheless, the topic is covered in the Turbo Pascal article now, and for as long as that article doesn't become too long, a redirect to this article would be sufficient (something the PRODer should have considered himself in a collaborative project!). However, before I create a redirect under this title, I would like to have the original article restored in order to see if there is any useful info which could still be merged into the Pascal article and also to preserve the edit history of the original article. Therefore, please restore. Thanks. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Done I've restored it and redirected it to the relevant section at Turbo Pascal. Hut 8.5 11:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Perfect, thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Watching this article, I could not discover any advertising or promotion. Appreciate a review. —Rudolf Simon (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
This is not the place for a review. Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Deb (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
After reverting the article back to normal after hijacking, the article's talk page should then be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:44, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azmat Tarin, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Scott Burley (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Iransoccerss, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Iransoccerss (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of this draft is requested by an [unrelated vandal]. This is [that fake author (vandal)] who requested the deletion and also has no contribution to the Draft. Since I have written all of the material using various sources, I request this draft be undeleted and reviewed by admins of Wikipedia. —27.34.68.81 (talk) 05:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
An unrelated vandal also requested for the deletion of this page. So, I would like to request you to restore the article for submitting it to fair review under admins of Wikipedia.27.34.68.81 (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC) —27.34.68.81 (talk) 06:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 79.222.193.47, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.79.222.193.47 (talk) 10:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Jpsorts (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
The deletion history here is confusing. There exists a draft because the page was draftified, however it was then deleted about 45 minutes later as a G7. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 18:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Continue with Draft:The Etawah Safari Park. Please don't move the page and get confused where it is! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Chadlewine, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Chadlewine (talk) 20:15, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Dorian Gray Wild, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Dgw (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)Satyesh Singh (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This was a waste of time! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Lawrni2000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lawrni2000 (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Dopedaniel, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Dopedaniel (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
This deletion was speedy without any discussion. The reason for deletion because of lack of notability is not supported. Vichet is the most notable tech startup entrepreneur and founder in Cambodia. The sources with Techcrunch, CNBC, Channel News Asia, BBC, and Voice of America are the most credible, Can you discredit those sources? I quote the basic requirement of notability "people are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". He very much fitted the criteria. The attempt to discredit tech topics as irrelevant is unfounded and unacceptable in this digital world. Besides, Vichet just raised another funding round of 5 million USD, the record tech funding in Cambodia based on https://www.techinasia.com/cambodia-records-largest-startup-funding. Considering that Vichet is the most notable tech startup founder in Cambodia with credible number of sources, I request the article to be restored. —103.20.83.222 (talk) 23:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Done There was a chance for discussion available, see the afd link. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Olive Gray (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm so sorry but I intended to insert this draft article into the Elizabeth Wolstenholme Elmy page as requested by the reviewer who made assessment. I will do this as soon as it is sent to me.
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted G6 as a "blank page presumably created by mistake". Would like to retrieve the page history for future reference. —CoolSkittle (talk) 02:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I, ACase0000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.ACase0000 (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I, MarianneGV, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.MarianneGV (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Camlach20, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Camlach20 (talk) 10:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Stepanphoto, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stepanphoto (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
It has come to our attention that the “Global Love Day” page has been removed. We are requesting that it be reinstated based on the following criteria. We have also drafted new text/wording shown below, since the original text was posted over 10 years ago. We would be happy to work with editors to ensure that the page is compliant with current Wikipedia standards.
(Redacted) —Jtgoltz (talk) 21:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)— Jtgoltz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
This account (which had not edited in 10 years until this request) was only used to spam for Harold Becker, Becker's books, The Love Foundation he founded, and this bogus holiday he created, between 2007 and 2009. It has never been used for any other purpose. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Deb (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. I'm also going to redact the obscenely large list of links and the arguments they are making (they remain in history) as not germane to this request. Existing for that long does not make it immune to deletion, especially if it's been in an unacceptable state for most of those years. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 23:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Sbutler711, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sbutler711 (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Massimoimpulse, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Massimoimpulse (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Azzyoucansee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Azzyoucansee (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Article was nominated for deletion last year (see deletion discussion here) and closed as delete since the subject failed WP:MMATIER. Recently Turner has fought in his third UFC fight at UFC 236 which satisfied WP:NMMA. See here for proof of that. Closing admin was contacted but they recommended to come here. Inter&anthro (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC) —Inter&anthro (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't know why they would recommend coming here, unless their intent is to see the page draftified... —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 23:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Well Sandstein does not undelete pages and refers people here for other admins to make a decision. SO we just have to base it on the reason provided to see if that overrides the reason for deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
I checked this fighter's record against the requirements of WP:NMMA. It seems to me that he has now met the requirements of three UFC fights, so the article can be restored. Meanwhile, somebody has restarted the article with prose that seems identical to the old version. So the only purpose served by a restore would be to merge the histories, which of course is worthwhile. I suggest that an admin should go ahead and do that if they have time (which I don't for the moment). EdJohnston (talk) 00:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I wonder how one man who is distinctly not from Cyprus can argue against local legends, especially since the page has been up for over a decade —Dorotheou (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done Given the reason for deletion you'll have to use WP:DRV or speak to the deleting admin. Not that it's relevant but the person who nominated this for deletion does claim to be living in Cyprus. Hut 8.5 21:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I, JoliPu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JoliPu (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I, 09bryant, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 09bryant (talk) 10:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I hadn't finished working on it —09bryant (talk) 10:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Barbora42 (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Landbot.io entry was still a draft. It was deleted on basis of G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I expected to be given feedback to make the entry more appropriate. Therefore, I would like to restore the draft status of the entry and receive constructive feedback so it may be published.
You ask the deleter user talk:Randykitty to restore this as it appears you were trying to remove promotional language. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I, Oscaredd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Oscaredd (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)2603:301B:1076:80E0:F166:F8C6:DC39:D07D (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Their is a Felly Wiki page, and I want to pull from the draft I had made to edit the article —Gfriedberg (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Bbb23 (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
This was deleted in TfD in 2013 after a limited discussion of only 3 delete votes and no bolded opposes. If I had been present I would have opposed. I plan to evaluate the previous version as a working base for improvements. I think I deserve a chance to demonstrate this is a worthwhile template, especially since it was deleted exactly five years ago. —eπi (talk | contribs) 00:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Request withdrawn Alright, thanks for the heads up. I'll be sure to keep that in mind in the future.eπi (talk | contribs) 01:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Request renewed: While my original request for full restore at the original location here was made in error, I think this current request is reasonable. For context, my recently-created version was redeleted under G4, which requires the template to be "sufficiently identical" to its original contents. As a non-admin myself, I have no way to evaluate or argue against it being "sufficiently identical" without seeing the original template myself.
I am not asking for the deletion to be overturned here, but simply for more information. The top of this page states: [C]ontent deleted after discussion... may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. As this was a purely procedural redeletion, and the previous contents were not deleted for abusive reasons, could the previous contents, including my own version, be divulged in some way (email or on this page) so I have the full picture? eπi (talk | contribs) 10:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
It'll very likely be thru email, provided you have an email address associated with your account. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 08:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I ewas too busy lately to edit it. Added to that why warn me the draft is up for deletion, giving me steps to do and then delete it (immediately) before I can respond. The policy should be wait 24 hours or 7 days between the two. —Broichmore (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Broichmore, Draft:Echoism was already restored on the 23 April 2019 after you left this message for Liz. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 12:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done as DRV clearly endorsed deletion. If notability is proved and an article is actually written (not just a redirect) then we can restore the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I agree with you that the category is not nonsense. In this speedy delete case we ask user:El C to reverse this deletion. If this is rejected then it can be taken up at WP:DRV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Newystats, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Newystats (talk) 02:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Vidarino, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vidarino (talk) 07:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Notable and I plan to work on it —FloridaArmy (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Ozaru, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Ozaru (talk) 11:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:People from the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao and friends
Category:People from the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Category:Cities in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Category:Municipalities of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Category:Provincial governors in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Category:Politics of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Category:Populated places in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I want to continue editing the page and submit for publication —寛 Johnpaul Williams 03:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I want to continue editing the page for publication —寛 Johnpaul Williams 03:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
This template was deleted because it was unused. It should have been added to all the municipality articles of Huron County, as per the pattern of all other counties in Ontario; I don't know why it was never done. I will use the template as soon as it is restored. — P 1 9 9✉ 20:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for pages that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to pages deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the page you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 21#Template:Huron County, Ontario, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Fastily (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks JJMC89. Will do. -- P 1 9 9✉ 15:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Jplevene, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jplevene (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done at Draft:Riley Levene. -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Rig Chillson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Rig Chillson (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done at Draft:RigFest. -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand why this article was deleted and merged into the Donkey Kong article. It had a lot of substantial information. The Donkey Kong Country series is big enough to warrant its own article. —Toadster101 (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done - The article was not deleted, only redirected. You can restore it from its history, here. Keep in mind that this was done as a result of a discussion on the article's talk page, so it would be a good idea to address the issues brought up there. -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I was looking for external links and now have them. The page was recreated in the Rick Covert user page - and now needs to be moved to an article. —Richard Covert 19:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Can you help me or show me how to do this?
Thank you,
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Covert 1. You will need multiple reliable independent and substantial writings to support the draft page. Also see WP:Autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Alexandre a g, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. a_g_1307 (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemphill Chevrolet Buick GMC
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemphill Chevrolet Buick GMC · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, WhiteyChev, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WhiteyChev (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Business is no longer. this is a histirical reference, not promotional.
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. No need to ask twice! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Flickyard, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Flickyard (talk) 06:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
pls review my page and verify it. —112.110.106.69 (talk) 00:58, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Athaenara (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. We don't do official pages, and we don't approve drafts just for social media verification. Asking us to approve a draft that violates a core policy is just going to result in being rebuffed in the most unambiguous terms. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 02:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
This page will not go anywhere, so it may as well stay deleted. Please take a read of WP:Autobiography and WP:CIR. Normally we give more lenience to drafts but I am not restoring this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by prod, which I would have contested had I seen it, it appears that this song actually charted higher than other songs of the same title. —The Rambling Man (talk) 11:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
An editor has emailed me and asked for a copy of the latest version of this article deleted by G4 to be sent to him at (Redacted) —Atlantic306 (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
The best way to go about this is to forward the email you got to another admin, if there's one willing to both undelete the article and send it to them. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 18:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted in 2008 as "Obsolete", I'd like to see what content it contained to try and sort out some North Vanuatuan languages categories and see if it can help improve Epi languages. Feel free to restore the content to my user space or email it to me. —Wugapodes[thɑk][ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 23:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
In this case the page was written by, and deleted by user:Kwamikagami who is still active around here, but is no longer an administrator. So we can treat this as a G7 delete. Very likely Kwamikagami knows why it was labeled obsololete, and may be able to tell you what page replaces it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
I suspect that the page was only ever a rd to Southern Oceanic languages, and that I created it because so many info boxes had red links to it, but then deleted it because the S.Oceanic article does not list it as a branch, and I thought a rd there would be confusing. That is, I doubt there ever was any classification or sources given. The history, BTW, should be at Northeast Vanuatu–Banks Islands languages.
I believe that that classification was simply inherited from Ethnologue, which is not a RS and does not provide sources. They still have the clade, BTW, here. I suspect that many of our language articles might still inherit an old Ethn. classification, because there were too many of them to update them all to RS's.
At the time I deleted it, I was engaged in a misguided attempt to 'update' articles to correspond to this classification, which isn't from a RS. (Automated DB analyses are not reconstructions.)
I don't know why S.Oceanic no longer reflects Lynch, Ross, and Crowley (2002), since our current classification is their summary of Lynch 1996.
It looks like Clark (2009) resurrected the clade. He might've been working off the same source that Ethn. used, or maybe even just used Ethn directly,, I rather doubt he independently developed the same classification, but I don't know.
A sourced classification is at Glottolog here. Harald usually does a decent job of evaluating which published classifications look the most solid, and he gives his sources so you can check.
AFAICT, the classifications at this level are impressionistic rather than based on reconstruction. We have absolutely no standards here on WP as to which clades are WP.NOTABLE and thus actually deserve articles. I've never done a whole lot about this, apart from consolidating a few hundred iterative clades into summary articles (i.e., rather than saying "clade A consists of clades B and C", and then have links to articles on B and C that say the same kind of thing, I would merge them so that the article on A either listed all the child languages, or only split off a branch if the list was long enough to be distracting in the parent article.) But that's also arbitrary, if less of a mess: containing lots of languages doesn't make an alledged clade notable.
Ideally, we should only have articles on clades that (a) have been reconstructed, so there's the possibility for it to be developed into more than just a laundry list (we could detail the reconstruction, for example, or give arguments for and against it), or (b) have triggered notable debate in the hist-ling lit, or (c) are found in the anthropological or other lit even if they're not credible linguistically. Articles on all such clades would have an encyclopedic purpose. Where the list of languages in a branch of a linguistically supported clade get so long as to be distracting, I think we should collapse the branch rather than splitting it off. Besides not being notable, all of these unsubstantiated clade articles are difficult to maintain, as they're potentially obsolete with every new publication. But few editors would know the hist-comp lit well enough to implement WP.NOTABLE for more than one or two large branches or families. — kwami (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted as an unused fair use image after an article was deleted via prod. Said article has been restored so this can be restored too. —The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)LADscribe1355 (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Uptane
I was still working on the document offline. I just did not have the time to enter the changes into Wikipedia itself. I was trying my best to get it right before entering it —LADscribe1355 (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Rain chua, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Rain chua (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
The article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2017 (see deletion discussion here) and closed as delete since the subject failed WP:NHOCKEY. Recently Loewen played for more than 200 games in a "major junior" league. Loewen was selected seventh round (199th overall) in the 2018 NHL Entry Draft by the Dallas Stars, making him the first Jamaican-born NHL Draft pick. See here for proof of that. —AaronWikia (talk) 03:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Note that the deletion discussion doesn't preclude writing a new article about him if the NHOCKEY concerns have been addressed. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 05:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jermaine Loewen, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Patar knight (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Falkland Islands national ice hockey team
Draft:Falkland Islands national ice hockey team · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, AaronWikia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.AaronWikia (talk) 03:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
The page was deleted on 25 February 2013 and subsequently recreated by someone based on her recent popularity. I feel the subject is notable and the article should stay, would like to see the deleted version. Can it be restored in the article history or my sandbox (if it cannot be restored in the article history) —DBigXrayᗙ 07:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm vaguely INVOLVED here, but FWIW, I endorse this request; there is material in the deleted version that would be helpful to someone hoping to improve the current one. Graeme Bartlett you skipped over this one when processing most of the rest of the page; might I ask you to take another look? Vanamonde (Talk) 11:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
That's right, I skip over the ones where the policy does not clearly state I can restore it. Often I will refer the requestor to the deleter, rather than revert another admin's action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: That's fair, but in this case the admin who deleted it has been inactive for three years and is no longer an admin. Were I not involved, I would certainly restore this myself, but my hands are tied. If you are still reluctant, perhaps DBigXray would do well to ask for other volunteers at ANI. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Giannruizzz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Giannruizzz (talk) 01:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Alejandro Ros Comesaña, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alejandro Ros Comesaña (talk) 18:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Is the draft basically a translation of that article into (I presume) Spanish? —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 20:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
The page is basically the same as es:Gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica. It is not a translation. I don't actually know if this is the same subject or not.
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Alejandro Ros Comesaña: This content belongs on the Spanish Wikipedia. If you want another article here it must be in English. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Tvsk777, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tvsk777 (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 112.196.160.48, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.112.196.160.48 (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Although this article had problems, I believe it was slowly improving and could be improved further with good sourcing and judicious editing rather than outright deletion —ZebeFirst (talk) 06:13, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I'll userfy this. Abyssal (talk) 22:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Multiple files were deleted as "F5: Unused non-free media file" now need restoring after Materialscientist reverted Sleighey88s edits as a sock. Listed are the ones I found as listed in CAT:MISSFILE so there may be more
They were all replaced by files on Commons meaning they don't satisfy WP:NFCC#1. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:50, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89, so if the local files don't satisfy WP:NFCC#1 because the commons now exist, why revert the edits of the sock? We acknowledge the images on commons exist to falsify WP:NFCC#1, but wont use them? The sock(s) should obviously be blocked, but they have now created a situation where we revert to invalid images we cant restore rather than use the commons images just because they are a sock? Should we not put the articles and readers before the sock and use the images, rather than just remove them all just to not let the sock 'win'? KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Wpcontribuser, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Wpcontribuser (talk) 08:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
When deleted, among the reasons was 'no refs'- I found 2[1][2] apparently good secondary refs, and would happily see if the article can be satisfactorily revived... —Yadsalohcin (talk) 18:15, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Jonkennedy1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jonkennedy1 (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I, BBWallstreet33, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BBWallstreet33 (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Although the page was blanked by myself, it was used to hold sources which I had not used yet and so has a history of sources which I may want to use later. It was deleted because it was empty. —Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Guadapuche, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Guadapuche (talk) 23:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
My apologies, I forgot to edit the article —155.93.145.176 (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:SA Business School Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Automatically deleted by scripts after the article it illustrated was deleted, but the article has been restored via this process, and now we need the images back in order to resume improving the article. —ZebeFirst (talk) 07:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Automatically deleted by scripts after the article it illustrated was deleted, but the article has been restored via this process, and now we need the images back in order to resume improving the article. —ZebeFirst (talk) 07:07, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemphill Chevrolet Buick GMC
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemphill Chevrolet Buick GMC · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, WhiteyChev, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WhiteyChev (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)Slice19 (talk) 07:20, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Rp2006, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.RobP (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
No need as it is empty. Just create it with some real content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Are you positive? My recollection is that I had started the article. Can you check its history? RobP (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
It never had any content other than ((Userspace draft|date=January 2017)) and speedy deletion tags. Hut 8.5 21:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I, IDeregibus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. IDeregibus (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. as you've recreated the page the previous content is in the edit history. Hut 8.5 21:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
LaMoille123 has requested that the deleted content of the two above pages be emailed to them. I do not wish to expose my email address, so I am forwarding the request here. MER-C 19:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Done emailed it to the user. Hut 8.5 21:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I want to copy the article —Powered by the Human Spirit Mhotep (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Quadroon (1971 film)Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Loves2splug, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Loves2splug (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —183.82.38.147 (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Noringai, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Noringai (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Burnbabyburn, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burnbabyburn (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done copyright violation from [7]. Hut 8.5 21:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I, aerlenbach, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unable to finish working on it for a while and was unaware of the strict deletion process. It was deleted without warning. —Aerlenbach (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I, ScouseJudy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ScouseJudy (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Flounderedturtle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Flounderedturtle (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:49, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
I was still learning all of the rules on page creation and was going to be adding new content, references, and hoping others could contribute. If I may please have the page back as a draft, it would be greatly appreciated. It is NOT a HOAX. CoronadoBros (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC) —CoronadoBros (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
It was almost entirely fabricated and there's not a single source to support a word of it. Praxidicae (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Can you prove it's not a hoax by providing a reliable source to support any of the content of the article? If you can't then it's not going to be acceptable to Wikipedia in any case. Hut 8.5 21:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The movie has now been seen by the public at a film festival, and has additional reviews and reception from sources including Independent Film Festival Boston. Would like to add whatever I need to in order to complete the page. —Tophmandude (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The photo was created by World Economic Forum which has designated the copyright as "This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication" directly under the image on this page: https://www.weforum.org/about/leadership-and-governance
Deleted per WP:G6. This page is needed per the portal being restored to its pre-automated version. Since I'm involved in working on the portal, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin. —North America1000 06:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done I think you'd be entirely justified in doing these restorations yourself, given that they are only housekeeping deletions. Hut 8.5 06:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5: Yes, I have considered this. I hesitate, however, per the previous discussion here. With all of the contention regarding portals at MfD, etc., I would rather err on the side of caution. Those who are strongly for portal deletion may say that I'm being "disruptive" if I self-restore G6'd pages and then utilize them, regardless of the non-controversial nature of their deletion. North America1000 13:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Nir Brand is an international humanitarian and performer whose work and performances around the globe have been mentioned countless times on local media and publications in African, Asian and European media. I would like to request to undelete his page which I have spent a lot of time editing so that I can add all the sources to make his page notable according to your standards. —Utrecht1 (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I, FortniteXBL, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FortniteXBL (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Packletide, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. It didn't meet the criteria at the time of creation, but does now. Thank you.Packletide (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Jlaw2189, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jlaw2189 (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The article of the name Faizullah Arain previous got deleted because it redirects from the previous same page thats why the new similar article cant be moved. So it was necessary to delete the duplicate or redirect , After the deletion of the redirected page. I improved the original draft and moved it to the mainspace without any redirects as its ready for the mainspace . I request you to take a look and undelete it. if some changes are needed any wiki editor can do that. —Davidvoki (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
@Fastily: It was a G7 ("Author requests deletion") speedy deletion. Lectonar (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
@Lectonar: kindly take a look at my issue ,I am the one who requested the previous page to get deleted due to page move under G7 . I believe after move this page got deleted by mistake. Kindly help me for its undeletion. Davidvoki (talk)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I had started to update the information and references to improve the article. And had stated in the talk that I was. But I feel it was ignored, and the users that wanted to delete the page, their comments had personal criticism laced within them, rather than just objective reasons for deleting the page. There was an equal amount of keeps to deletes, but the page was deleted while changes were being made, within a week.Naninnewetuah (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC) —Naninnewetuah (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanthochroid, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, JJMC89 (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Wikied2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wikied2 (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:PitBull Trusted Computing Platform Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Was not given enough time to make changes to get it removed from being considered for deleted. We will add better sources. —Thewisenoob (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
See above. Perhaps you can ask for convert to draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 203.145.180.59, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.203.145.180.59 (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? I searched in article, Draft, and Wikipedia talk spaces. I did not check in userspace as requestor is an IP and I don't have the foggiest in whose userspace I'd even start looking. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 18:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
this article meets WP:NFF, Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force, WP:UCS but some administrator tagged deletion tag and delated without strong reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudhakar naidu 118 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done Articles deleted as a result of an WP:AFD are not eligible for undeletion at this venue. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
There is no reason for deletion of the page,I request the undeletion of the page "Publish changes" button below —41.13.228.200 (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 18:00, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
On behalf of Mr Vijay Kumbhar, an RTI activist and social worker in Pune, I request to undelete his page. He is a notable personality in Pune. His line of work is against corruption. His popularity is of value to many Indians who are not as well versed as him in matters of law and especially the Right to Information act. His recent efforts have brought justice to many DSK victims of fraud. Please review the reason to delete the page and advise on measures we can take to restore it. —PadmashreeGhangale (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Kumbhar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Also, please read WP:COI. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The article has disappeared from its history after it was replaced by a redirect to Bengali–Assamese_languages. Bengali-Assamese script is not the same as Bengali-assamese languages. —Chaipau (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
There is nothing to undelete. The article was moved to Bengali Script. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:33, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
I wanted to edit with proper information with propers sources —Vijju244 (talk) 10:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Vijju244, your draft Draft:Vijayakrishna satyamsetti has not been deleted if was just declined at this time for not meeting the guidelines. You can continue to improve and resubmit if you can show this person meets the guidelines for the notability of people. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Geapsu (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
This page was deleted. It was created and modified according to input from an editor. The editor kept asking more and more questions and suddenly the page was deleted. This is a verbatim honest and true reflection of an academic Steve Damelin at the University of Michigan. The page is one of 1000's attributed to well known academics and mathematicians in particular. We do not understand why this page was deleted. This has been created by [George Andrews]], see Steven's webpage http://www.umich.edu/~damelin where George Andrews is mentioned as a true and verbatim colleague. Please reinstate and approve this page or let me know why it is not being accepted. Thank you for your help.
Geapsu (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
The draft is still here; and who is "we"? Lectonar (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. As noted above, there is a draft, but there was never a mainspace page.
@Geapsu: Please continue to work on the draft. Please also note that any review about whether the article is ready for the mainspace needs to be done by a Wikipedia editor, not an outside party. —C.Fred (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)202.61.164.186 (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Abyssal (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Redpolar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Redpolar (talk) 09:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Nyclapo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nyclapo (talk) 03:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
This hasn't been deleted, only declined. Hut 8.5 21:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, ArbreDuVoyageur, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ArbreDuVoyageur (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Écrire en Anglais ici, s'il vous plait. Hut 8.5 21:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Since I'm personally involved in portal restorations, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin for this G6'd page. Thanks. —North America1000 11:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Since I'm personally involved in portal restorations, requesting undeletion from an uninvolved admin for this G6'd page. Thanks. —North America1000 11:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Done the second one was just a redirect as the page had been moved somewhere else. Hut 8.5 21:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Taylor, S.M. (November 2004). "Deciphering human language [information extraction]". IT Professional. 6 (6): 28–34. doi:10.1109/MITP.2004.82. ISSN1520-9202.
Reeve, Lawrence; Han, Hyoil; Chen, Chaomei (2006), Geroimenko, Vladimir; Chen, Chaomei (eds.), "Information Visualization and the Semantic Web", Visualizing the Semantic Web, Springer-Verlag, pp. 19–44, doi:10.1007/1-84628-290-x_2, ISBN9781852339760
Reeve, Lawrence; Han, Hyoil (2005). "Survey of Semantic Annotation Platforms". Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. SAC '05. New York, NY, USA: ACM: 1634–1638. doi:10.1145/1066677.1067049. ISBN9781581139648.
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Ping User:Piotrus as the PROD tagger. Hut 8.5 21:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —162.157.78.155 (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
There is an individual page for the past several Lethbridge municipal elections (2007, 2010, 2013), with the exception of 2017. Therefore it would be appropriate to have an individual page for the 2017 Lethbridge Municipal election.
This was deleted because the author asked for it to be deleted, and the version before deletion had essentially no content - just a small infobox. I suggest you start again, there's nothing stopping you. Hut 8.5 21:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Stoptosmellroses, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Stoptosmellroses (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Effemm, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Effemm (talk) 22:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Rusted AutoParts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Rusted AutoParts 03:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
The page was said to be a recreation of the page previously deleted, but was actually created as just a beginning for people to expand on which contained the time the band was started and members' names. All content was factual and conforming with wikipedia guidelines. —OvertonAlex (talk) 23:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted viadeletiondebate (specifically, WP:Articles for deletion/The Wrecks). Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. The problem is that G4 applies if the article as written doesn't addresss the concerns that got the article AfD'd in the first place. Creating a draft is the proper way to go (drafts are resistant to G4) as opposed to trying to recreate an article skeleton in mainspace with the intent to improve it later. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 01:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Maslen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Maslen (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Killiondude (talk) 03:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Azmi Haq
((subst:refund|1= Azmi Haq |2= azmi haq be undeleted based on the fact that he is a prominent Pakistani actor and political figure. You also checked the notability guidelines for people and he meets that criteria based on the cult following his television dramas have in Pakistan and the fact that he is often taped by media for political commentary. Thank You
Please do let us know if your require any proof and we will get it to you. This is true to the best of our knowledge, but due to non-familiarity with Wikipedia navigation related to Undeletion. Thank You
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azmi Haq (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Meets notability requirements. Sufficient sources are available to add to whatever content was there prior to deletion. In addition Jenkins has recently been signed by the New York Giants; this has been widely reported, especially in the UK —91.125.214.228 (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Bode Oje (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Yoruba fiction (science fiction)
There is no such page. I saw that you were editing Yoruba literature, but the edit filter stopped you. Firstly if this writing was about you (which may be based on your user name) see WP:NOTABOUTYOU, and secondly you deleted most of the article to insert your paragraphs. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 217.196.227.2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.217.196.227.2 (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, ArmVlad, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ArmVlad (talk) 08:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 169.1.154.121, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.169.1.154.121 (talk) 07:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Olga Rekovskaya, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Olga Rekovskaya (talk) 06:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Page was wrongfully deleted. Content contained in article was accurate and credible with appropriate links and factual information. Please restore deleted page for professional actor Chris Northrop —Realchrisnorthrop (talk) 06:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment This seems like a case of WP:AUTOBIO/WP:COI. I am not sure this should be restored even if the deletion itself was a soft one. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Sodanational attempted to submit this request, but it was malformed. I am merely properly submitting it for them. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 20:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. This is not a place to draft the article, so I have redacted the attempt to do so. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 19:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Still gathering further data to amend the draft for resubmission —Autocreeper (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
The person working on the page is no longer associated with the this endeavor —Nohop (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Wkrif, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wkrif (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mikenoza (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Message from Mikenoza: Yes, this is an undeletion request for Draft:Roy Purdy.
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stuart Shostak
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stuart Shostak · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Valleyguy56, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Valleyguy56 (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Cnii, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Cnii (talk) 12:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mias11 (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Please reinstate this page. I have been in hospital and unable to complete the submission until now.
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. As you've recreated the draft you can find the previous content in the edit history. Hut 8.5 21:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Wkrif, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wkrif (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Page was randomly deleted a few weeks ago. Originally, the page contained accurate information from credible sources. If restored, I will update it with any accurate information if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.140.120.98 (talk • contribs)
Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. Hut 8.5 21:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I just want to copy the article for myself -- I stupidly did not keep a copy of what I wrote! —gpeterw (talk) 09:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you -- I have made a copy. gpeterw (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Emil170818, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emil170818 (talk) 22:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I will like to publish page about me on wikipadia Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Nazarasvitlo (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 217.103.110.188, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.217.103.110.188 (talk) 08:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, GSB95, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GSB95 (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
there have been further developments in the career of Andrew Hung which I think are worthy of a wikipedia page —ZS D (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:18, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 108.45.174.127, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.108.45.174.127 (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, B4chex11, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.B4chex11 (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Timed-out before completed editing —B4chex11 (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Femalescientist2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Femalescientist2 (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacob Arfwedson
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacob Arfwedson · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Ontogloria, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ontogloria (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Ontogloria (talk) 14:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment I'll leave this to the reviewers here, but this could have been speedied as G11 in my opinion. It's a self-written vanity page, no references, but plenty of self-praise and lists of everything he's ever written. The current requester has made no contributions to a Wikipedia article before. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I will give this requester a chance to unpuff the piece. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Deletion reason stated fails WP:NCORP and questioned the number of employees. —JScott-NL (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
It is common for technology companies to scale quickly. In 2016, EnPowered started with its Founder as the sole employee. As of January 2019, the company had 11 full time employees and 1 part time employee. Today the company employs 7 full time employees and 2 part time employees (as of May 1, 2019). The company’s Cruncbase profile has always accurately reflected its workforce. As of May 2019, its Crunchbase profile stated 5-10 employees.
As for cited sources, additional significant, reliable, and independent source coverage has been found and would like to be added. Addresses WP:NCORP requirements.
Can you post some links to the additional coverage you've found? That's about the only way you can satisfy the NCORP guidelines. Having 5-10 employees does not mean the subject meets NCORP, in fact a company of that size is unlikely to. Hut 8.5 21:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
The original statement of deletion stated "Small startup. Per sources in the article, in 2016 it had a staff of one. Per their crunchbase profile they currently have 11-50 employees. Fails WP:NCORP - specifically the cited sources in the article are not reliable, not independent, or not in depth (or a combination thereof)."
So I'm confused if it was deleted over company size (number of employees) or due to cited sources.
Two additional sources to be included are: 1. An article about EnPowered and it's technology by G. Feller of T&D Magazine[1], and 2. an article about EnPowered's charity involvement by BetaKit which reaffirms its technology[2].
The rationale for deletion was based on failing WP:NCORP, the main criterion of which is lack of suitable sources. Company size is not part of the criteria and it is perfectly possible for small companies to pass the criteria, although it is less likely that a small company will than a large one. I don't think either of the sources you've posted show that the subject meets NCORP, the first one certainly sounds like something the company could have written itself and the second one is a trivial mention. While I won't restore it myself any other reviewing admin is welcome to. Hut 8.5 20:53, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Hut 8.5. I appreciate the clarification. I can understand the trivial mention does not satisfy the criteria. I fail to understand, however, how the article's previous sources failed WP:NCORP. The original sources should have met WP:NCORP. In reference to the business itself, its origins, and service offerings, these facts were established with sources that met WP:NCORP criteria. "Group-buying hydro startup hopes to cut bills"[3] and "New business says group-buying will save some homeowners money on hydro, gas bills"[4] are both two news pieces that met the criteria. As an aside, there was concern about one recently added source needing additional support (which the two sources discussed previously now do). The majority of the original sources should establish the notability. The news piece, "AI Platform Powers Savings For Kitchener Startup’s Customers"[5], was written by the newspaper that covers all verified Waterloo related technology (the piece is significant, reliable, secondary, and independent). This piece is now supported by the two additional sources to be added(T&D Magazine and BetaKit, above). I respectfully request the article to be undeleted based upon these sources. JScott-NL (talk) 14:40, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Toby is mentioned this week in several papers for his performance in Summer of Rockets. His film is due to be released. His page has only recently been set up in order to have information about him for journalists writing about him. I was not informed that his page was being discussed for deletion and have not had the opportunity yet to put the new page references to support his acting history. I would be grateful if you could reinstate his page ASAP. —Mw1357 (talk) 09:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. No journalist worth their salt is going to base an article of theirs off of what Wikipedia says unless the article is emphatically about Wikipedia. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 21:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby Woolf, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, RoySmith (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
This article was proposed for deletion on the 28th of September 2017. Within 7 days the article was deleted. It had remained active since 2014. The subject is notable through various sources the most recent [11] Subject has been an RTI activist and has solved cases that led to the resignation of a former Chief Minister of Maharashtra There are many other RS that establish the notability of the subject that relates to other articles on WP such as Attacks on RTI Activists[12][13] —PadmashreeGhangale (talk) 21:41, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. You were told this above. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 21:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
i have been out of the country and not been able to update and edit the page —Carl B Miller (talk) 08:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when Josef Zwernemann was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 74.96.66.186, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.74.96.66.186 (talk) 11:02, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Beaabae, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Beaabae (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Faeton73, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Faeton73 (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)DominusVilicus (talk) 06:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:17, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Sahrudayan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Sahrudayan (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Parviziskender, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Parviziskender (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
the category was created by me to contain the list of people who have received the title of honorary citizen of Seoul —Veverve (talk) 08:04, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
What I suggest you do is to add one or two articles to your new category. When you recreate the category, add it to Category:Honorary citizenship rather than making a totally blank page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Das osmnezz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Das osmnezz (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Das osmnezz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Das osmnezz (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Das osmnezz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Das osmnezz (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Das osmnezz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Das osmnezz (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 103.70.155.79, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.103.70.155.79 (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
G13 Long story short, I created this draft at the beginning of my Wikipedia exploits, outside of the years of arguments about his notability (people assumed he would be a footballer and kept AfDing the page leading to then-full protection of a redirect. Draconian in my opinion so I had it unprotected.) A lot has changed in 3 years and he has more than enough reliable sources to continue the page including GQ, Vogue, etc. —Trillfendi (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Ericksen
Hello, I am requesting to have my page request retrieved for further elaboration if possible.
My name is Marc Ericksen and I created over 95 videogame covers. In an ongoing process, I have currently been credited by Mobygames https://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,25/
as a developer: credited with over 75 confirmed videogame boxart covers for 30 separate videogame companies,including Accolade, Atari, Activision,Avalon Hills, Berkeley Systems, Brittanica, HesWare, Infogrames, Learning Company, Lucas Arts, Maxis, Palmtex, Broderbund, Capcom, DataEast, Designware,Electronic Arts, Sega, SNK, Softsmith, SSI, Tengen,Tree Sixty Pacific,Tronix,between 1882 and 2002.
My Illustrations for Megaman 2, Strider, Tetris, Bad Dudes, Choplifter, Thunder Force II, Herzog Zwei, Pole Position II, P.O.W.,
Bonk 3, Afterburner, James Pond,Heavy Barrel, and Blasteroids are considered retrogame classics.
The premiere issue of GamePro magazine was the first of the initial first four covers that I created and painted for GamePro Magazine, and My work was also featured on covers for PC Games Magazine in the in the early days of gaming.
I am currently listed in Wikipedia in a number of edits I have created as boxart credit notations relative to many of the video games For which I created art for the American and European releases that appear on your site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C0martman (talk • contribs) 00:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Marc Ericksen again (cOmartman) with further details. I apologize for missing the fact that my career is also reprised in a book titled Art Of Atari (artofatari.com) ISBN 978-1-0103-9 Fall, 2018) (Standard edition) and ISBN 978-1-5241-0103-9 (Deluxe edition)in reviewing my illustration for Atari's Galaga.
The draft was deleted because I haven’t worked on it for 6 months I want to edit the draft again —BubbleGuppiesIsTheBest (talk) 02:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Rachelkauffman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rachel Kauffman 03:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, The tree stump, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.The tree stump (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:40, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Paul 012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Paul_012 (talk) 11:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Sjanellem, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sjanellem (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 37.223.191.229, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.37.223.191.229 (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, FlyingScotsman72, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I restored this for you before and you did nothing with it. What do you intend to do this time FlyingScotsman72? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Winerock, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.E. F. Winerock (talk) 20:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Adam valt, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adam valt (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
I, SJTatsu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.SJTatsu (talk) 02:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Danyfantome (talk) 06:13, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see User:Danyfantome/sandbox. you may wish to ask at Wikipedia:Teahouse and read WP:referencing for beginners. If you use the visual editor, it can handle ISBN referencing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I, JoyceEL, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JoyceEL (talk) 09:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 09:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Nisaba18, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nisaba18 (talk) 10:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) gregory l. ingram (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —gregory l. ingram (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have restored User:Gligraphics/sandbox. You should also consider WP:Autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I feel the page should be back because the person should be on Wiki even as per Notability guidelines because the person has written two books that are highly important in education of Marketing.--Babitahamdard (talk) 14:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk·contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 19:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I, 38.104.166.126, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.38.104.166.126 (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 06:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of these 3 draft or Articles for creation submissions deleted under CSD G13. Please restore these pages as I intend to work on them.UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done the first one was so spammy I've redacted a couple of sentences so it isn't a G11 candidate. Hut 8.5 06:48, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Mistermoab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mistermoab (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Jess7986, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Jess7986 (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, CynK6, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CynK6 (talk) 18:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I WISH TO CONTINUE WORKING WHERE I LEFT OFF ON MY LAST DRAFT —Hedvaamrani (talk) 01:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Zjak.techy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Zjak.techy (talk) 03:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when August Lambert was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Falilou224, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Falilou224 (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Note the current content is a redirect to the new article. --Scott DavisTalk 15:17, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Done restored the history of the redirect. The current article doesn't mention that he's been elected to parliament. Hut 8.5 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Hut 8.5. The election was only last weekend, but he has enough votes to get in even though the formal paperwork isn't signed yet. I've merged and tidied up the article now, and expect others will add to it in coming days/weeks. --Scott DavisTalk 15:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Alamspadron, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alamspadron (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when Franz Woidich was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
The Article Shuchir Suri was neutral and was completely based on the reliable sources which are fair enough as per Wikipedia Policy. There was no promotional word in Article and also there was a Criticism Section added which shows that the Article was neutral, not promotional Article. Being en an experienced Wikipedian, I also don't understand why this article was deleted —Radadiyageet (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletiondebate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —A little blue Boriv^_^vBori! 06:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when Wolfgang Tonne was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Mediawiki is giving me a weird error when I try to restore this. Hut 8.5 21:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I can only restore the file description page. The error is some sort of bug. Anyway you can now see that you can get the image from http://www.luftwaffe.cz/tonnew.html and it could be uploaded under another name. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Quinacridone, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Quinacridone (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Boobastank, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Boobastank (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Tingrin87, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -TG 22:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Juice: How Electricity Explains the World
Draft:Juice: How Electricity Explains the World · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Jrtimms, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jrtimms (talk) 00:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, FabioNogarotto, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FabioNogarotto (talk) 06:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Khiikiat, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Khiikiat (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I, Jobbish, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jobbish (talk) 08:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure why Kim Beasley page was deleted. Kim is an active social media person, Google expert, and WordPress expert. She is a woman of color who has been confused with Kim Beazley of Australia, a white male. —2601:645:800:1A82:CD8D:F3DE:21AC:8BC (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Beasley, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Black Kite (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)