Grand Theft Auto V is an open world, action-adventure video game developed by Rockstar North and published by Rockstar Games.
[[Image:Grand Theft Auto V torture sequence.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The mission "By the Book" involves a sequence wherein players use torture techniques including [[waterboarding]] to interrogate a man. The sequence ignited debate among journalists, who noted the mission's function as political commentary. Some felt that the use of torture was in poor taste, but others felt that it was necessary for the sequence's purpose.|alt=A man is strapped to an overturned chair with a cloth concealing his face. Player character Trevor stands over him with a canister, about to pour water on his face. A text prompt in the upper left-hand corner reads "Hold [left stick] to pour water."]]
The mission "By the Book" generated controversy from reviewers and commentators for its depiction of torture. In the mission, protagonist Trevor Philips interrogates a man, Mr K., to extract information about an Azerbaijani fugitive who poses a threat to the FIB. Trevor uses torture equipment (such as electricity and pliers) on the restrained man, which players select from a table. Once Mr K provides the FIB with the information, Trevor is asked to kill him, but instead drives him to the airport, providing him an opportunity to escape. While driving Mr K, Trevor monologues about the ineffectiveness of torture, pointing out Mr K's readiness to supply the FIB with the information without being tortured, and expressing that torture is used as a power play "to assert ourselves".[1]
Reviewers echoed that while the mission served as political commentary on the use of torture by the United States government, its use of torture was in poor taste. Carolyn Petit of GameSpot felt that placing the torture scene in context with the monologue created a hypocrisy in the mission's function as a commentary device,[2] and Keza MacDonald of IGN felt it "pushed the boundaries of taste".[3] In an editorial, Tom Bramwell of Eurogamer discussed whether the political commentary was overshadowed by the violent content, comparing the mission to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2's "No Russian" controversy. He considered the sequence lacking enough context to justify its violence and summarised its function as "flawed".[4] Keith Best of Freedom from Torture said the torturer role-play "crossed a line". British Labour Party MP Keith Vaz expressed concern that underage players could be exposed to the mission.[5] Tom Chick defended the torture sequence, and wrote that unlike the "No Russian" mission or the 2012 film Zero Dark Thirty, the underlying political commentary on torture in "By the Book" necessitated the violent content.[6]
But is their [critics'] argument that in a game about gangsters and thugs and street life, there are prostitutes and strippers—that that is inappropriate? I don't think we revel in the mistreatment of women at all. I just think in the world we're representing, in Grand Theft Auto, that it's appropriate.
Dan Houser, Rockstar head writer and VP for creative, The New York Times, 9 November 2012[7]
Some reviewers concluded that the game's depiction of women is misogynistic. Similarly, Plante of Polygon felt that the supporting female characters were constructed on stereotypes, and wrote that the game's "treatment of women is a relic from the current generation".[8] Todd Martens of the Los Angeles Times considered the satirical portrayals of women uncreative, and added that violent and sexist themes hurt the game experience.[9] Edge noted that while "every female in the game exists solely to be sneered, leered or laughed at", it treated its all-male lead characters in a similar vein through their stereotyped tendencies towards violence.[10] Dave Cook of VG247 reinforced the sentiment that the female characters were constructed on stereotypes in an editorial: "They're either there to be rescued, shouted at, fucked, to be seen fucking, put up with, killed, heard prattling away like dullards on their mobile phones or shopping".[11] Sam Houser, Rockstar Games co-founder, felt that the development team sometimes overlooked their portrayal of women in Grand Theft Auto games, but that the weight towards male characters "fit with the story we wanted to tell".[12]
In her review, Petit of GameSpot observed misogynistic undertones in the treatment of women as "strippers, prostitutes, long-suffering wives, humourless girlfriends and goofy, new-age feminists", and felt that the satirical representation of misogyny legitimises it.[2] Her review was met with backlash as users responded with 20,000 largely negative comments on the webpage and a Change.org petition for her firing.[13] Petit's comments and the backlash against them prompted a wider discussion about the role of women in Grand Theft Auto V and the gaming community's defensiveness towards criticism. Helen Lewis of The Guardian felt Petit's observations were valid, but were stigmatised by gamers who have become "hyper-sensitive to criticism".[14] Tom Hoggins of The Telegraph felt that the backlash against Petit was predicated on an audience that has become accustomed to women being "shallow and sidelined" in the game.[15] Rob Fahey of GamesIndustry.biz felt that debate about games' thematic concerns could become stigmatised if gamers opposed criticism, writing, "This isn't just about women—it's robbing every single one of us of the opportunity to have intelligent, interesting discussions about how our medium deals with..... complex topics..... It's frustrating, it's stupid, and it's downright boring—and it risks making our games stupid and boring too".[16] Journalist Tom Bissell agreed with Petit's "defensible position", and wrote that gamers respond to game criticism more aggressively than fans of other entertainment mediums.[17] [[File:Target Logo.svg|thumb|right|[[Target Australia]] removed ''Grand Theft Auto V'' from their shelves following concerns raised about its violent depictions of women.]] In December 2014, Australian department store Target removed the game from their 300 stores after customers complained about "depictions of violence against women" and a Change.org petition amassed more than 40,000 signatures.[18] In a public statement, Target corporate affairs manager Jim Cooper said that the decision was reached following "extensive community and customer concern about the game".[18] The same week, another division of Wesfarmers, Kmart Australia, also pulled the game off shelves.[19] Take-Two Interactive CEO Strauss Zelnick publicly expressed the company's disappointment that the game had been pulled from the retailers, and affirmed that he "stands behind our products, the people who create them, and the consumers who play them".[18] IGN's Luke Reilly called the Change.org petition "misinformed", stating that its complaints about incentives for committing sexual violence in the game are untrue.[20] Kotaku's Mark Serrels said that the depiction of women is inherently "problematic", and that Target were within their rights to refuse to stock the game and were obligated to respond to the petition's wide support.[21] David Keogh of ABC News' The Drum felt that Rockstar depends on controversy and were "burned by the fire they voluntarily decided to play with" since the gaming industry is no longer on the margins of popular culture.[22]
In October 2013, hip-hop artist Daz Dillinger issued a cease-and-desist letter to Rockstar Games and Take-Two Interactive for allegedly using two of his songs without authorisation.[23][a] American television personality Karen Gravano of the reality television programme Mob Wives filed suit against Rockstar Games in February 2014 in allegation that a character in the game is based on her likeness and story and was depicted without her consent.[24][b] Rockstar filed to dismiss Gravano's lawsuit in April, and stated that the allegations are foreclosed by the First Amendment.[25] In July, actress Lindsay Lohan also filed a lawsuit, claiming elements in the game were influenced by her image, voice and clothing line without permission.[26] Rockstar responded in court papers that sought a dismissal of the case, saying that the case was frivolous and filed for publicity purposes.[27]