The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikey Rowe Bill Fay Sessions 2011 Snap Studios London.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Also here. The user name suggests that the uploader might be the copyright holder, but we need OTRS for this. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikey Rowe Hyde Park London 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Also here. The username of the uploader suggests that the uploader might be the copyright holder, but we need OTRS for this. Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Warbird, new member of the Astonishing X-Men, 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As the source states this image is scanned it from uploader's personal computer. Moreover, it is a character created by Marvel Comics and can't be licensed under cc-by-sa Morning Sunshine (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uraeus Cobra figures, Reverse side of the throne of Pharaoh Tutankhamun, Egyptian Museum, Cairo, Egypt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph sourced to a copyrighted website, with embedded exif copyright data confirming the owner of the website as the photographer and copyright holder. Uploader has made confusing statement saying he was a contributor to the source website (as the website owner's student), but has not offered an explanation why the exif data explicitly names not him but the other person (see image talkpage). OTRS ticket appears to be merely a restatement of the uploader's claim, but not a confirmation from the source website itself. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:25, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the OTRS agent who reviewed the claim, I now view it as insufficient. I thank Future Perfect at Sunrise for drawing my attention to the exif data. Had I noticed that at the time, I would not have approved the permission. I recommend deletion, until such time as uploader can provide adequate evidence explaining the conflicting information.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Moissi in 1900.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The license might not apply: There is no proof that the (unknown) author died more than 70 years ago. Leyo 14:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:16th Indianapolis 1937 MPO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File created in 1937, says author is unknown, then says the author died 100 years ago? Either needs to be licensed correctly, or this needs to be deleted. Nathan2055^talk 15:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1824 laver coral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can't find this file at the mentioned link, so I am unsure if this is really PD. Nathan2055^talk 15:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Updated source link is http://www.fashion-era.com/fashion_plates_old/0012_mixed_c19th_plates.htm (image http://www.fashion-era.com/images/1800_1900_laver/1824_laver_coral.jpg). The image was published in the magazine La Belle Assemblée in 1824 and is clearly public domain. - PKM (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Leaving as is - Moving to Commons per updated source. --Nathan2055^talk 19:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dddan evil small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obviously not a 100-year-old photo. Was simply uploaded as part of a hoax page. West Eddy (talk) 16:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete' - OTRS has been pending for two months now with no response, and I can't find it in OTRS; my guess is the email was either not sent or it wasn't sent with enough information to identify the file. Please resend with the relevant information. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:26, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not self-taken, no confirmed OTRS. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 19:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now - OTRS pending, and there is a fair queue last time I looked. It will change categories once 30 days has expired  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about the category change? When I look at Category:Items pending OTRS confirmation of permission, I find lots of files which were tagged with ((OTRS pending)) more than 30 days, for example this. Claims to be in the 30 days old category at the bottom of the file information page but appears in the file list on the normal category page instead. The 30 days old category mainly seems to have files pending OTRS confirmation since February or March, so maybe the 30 day delay has been mistakenly set to something greater than 30 days? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.