January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153 Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020! Online events: New: Activists / Public domain / Geofocus: Central America / Year-long campaign: Sports! Continuing: 2019 deaths / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chartered_Institute_for_the_Management_of_Sport_and_Physical_Activity

Thank you for flagging the copyright violation. I agree with the removal. However, there was other content that was removed that did not come from the website you flagged. This included infobox additions, a new section, and other text in the introduction not related to the vision/mission paragraphs.

I have reintroduced these elements onto the page. I will leave mission/vision absent.

COI on my profile. Happy to add elsewhere if needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reece_at_CIMSPA

While it may not seem like the right thing to do, it is convention, when identifying a copyright issue, to do a rollback, which sometimes picks up other copyright issues and sometimes picks up inrelated,a nd non-problematic issues. You are always welcome to restore the non-copyright issue edits.

"May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ..Merry Christmas.. and a ..Happy New Year.., whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you ..warm greetings.. for Christmas and New Year 2021."

Happy editing,
User:245CMR

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Administrator changes Spicy Ale jrb Dbachmann DGG (deceased) Jimbo Wales

CheckUser changes Jimbo Wales Oversighter changes Jimbo Wales

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.

Arbitration

• The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.

Miscellaneous

• The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.

Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 2001:D08:2900:657:1075:C376:3717:505D (talk) 06:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

• New partner:
  • Perlego
• Library access tips and tricks
• Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273 Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y & Z | LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green: June 2023 GA Editathon event page Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 global campaign The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's currently at MFD, and a large cleanup project is underway to repair the citations damaged by the script. I and several other users have !voted that the script be deleted or disabled, and I wouldn't recommend using it at all unless you thoroughly check every reference it modifies against the previous revision. If you're interested in a more detailed explanation of the script's issues, Folly Mox has provided an excellent summary at the MFD. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, the information I placed in Joey (1985 film) regarding its production does not belong to http://centropoholics.com/films/Joey/index.html, it is information from the book Roland Emmerich: The Official Biography by Jo Muller which both I and the website you refer to cited it. I also cited the same book they did. Please restore the production section for the movie. Thank you and have a good day. User:BrianRothJr.

I don't have access to that book, but freely licensed books are extremely rare. Do you have evidence that this book is freely licensed so that its text can be used? S Philbrick(Talk) 16:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Administrator changes Ingenuity Ddstretch Prodego Resolute

CheckUser changes Courcelles

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
• As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

• Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

• Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

Novem Linguae

• Deckiller
• Electionworld
• MBisanz
• Penwhale
• Raul654
• Roadrunner
• Viridae
• Yannismarou

Bureaucrat changes

MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

• Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.

Technical news

• Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.

Arbitration

• Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

I've rewritten the section to address your concerns (20 April 2023‎ Sphilbrick talk contribs‎ 7,185 bytes −1,371‎ Reverted good faith edits by GreyStar456 (talk): Copyright issue re https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/digital-banking-trends-of-2020/). Best wishes, GreyStar456 (talk) 11:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks S Philbrick(Talk) 19:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sphilbrick,

Thank you for creating The Imaginarium Studios.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add sources in order to prove the notability of this company.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Wikieditor019)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 19:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE IGNORE THIS - The reviewer tool marked you as creator. Sorry. Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 19:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess technically I was, but as you have realized, not really. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

• Suggestion improvements
• Favorite collections tips
• Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

Firefangledfeathers

• AlisonW
• Amberrock
• Closedmouth
• Scottywong

Interface administrator changes

Novem Linguae

Technical news

• The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
• Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)

Arbitration

• The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
• The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Administrator changes Pppery Theleekycauldron Dwheeler G.A.S Royalbroil Ssd

CheckUser changes Bradv Oversighter changes Bradv

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
• A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

• Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)

Arbitration

• The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

• Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

will solv

for the reminder - always good to see the response - appreciated. JarrahTree 13:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks also for the truck stop issue - wow getting a head around the fit/misfit issues -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truck_stop

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filling_station

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roadhouse_(premises)

I think I will sign off for the night... JarrahTree 13:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on the article Melody (2023 film) to add details as it has been selected to be in 2024 Oscars, I have added Screen Daily as a source to try to use credible sources. However my edits just gone puff! I cannot even see them even if there was a copyright violation (which was/is not my intention) please let me understand it better and create an edit that just point to the source and not use the wording used in the article. Just want to somehow see my edits that I have spent around 30mins to finalize and improve them or remove the parts that might infringe any respected copyrights.

Please help me learn how can I use the news material in Wikipedia? Farshad (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some reports are close calls but not this one. Your added text comprised:

98.68% of edit https://www.screendaily.com/news/tajikistan-enters-melody-as-third-ever-submission-in-international-oscar-race/5184811.article S Philbrick(Talk) 16:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be blunt but an overlap percentage in the 50s or above is pretty clear-cut. Get down around 20 to 30% and there might be an argument for cleaning it up and doing a paraphrase but 98.7% is a slamdunk S Philbrick(Talk) 16:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

• New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
• Tech tip: Filters
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Women in STEM | Geofocus: Sub-Saharan Africa Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon Tip of the month: When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello,

I see that you have reverted some changes I made to the article on Tenterfield Terriers and have cited the reason as "Copyright issue re https://www.tenterfieldterrieraust.com/natural-bob-tails ". As someone who is relatively new to editing on Wikipedia, I just wanted to confirm whether this is because my additions to the page are too similar to the article I used as a source, or if it is for some other reason. Just so I know for the future. Thank you for helping me out with this!

Cheers,

Citronnel Citronnel (talk) 13:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S Philbrick(Talk) 13:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by this? Citronnel (talk) 00:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not sure what happened.

The answer is yes, your edit was too close to the copyrighted original. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you for your response! Citronnel (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said:

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

In one of my first edits, I indicated material added was translated text from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elea-Velia, and this applies to most of it. I did not put the comment on the same edit as I pushed the button too soon. Rjdeadly (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did miss the edit summary identifying the source as an article in the Italian Wikipedia.

However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

Our copyright tool identified this page as a possible source. It seems plausible that whoever wrote that borrowed from and translated the article in the Italian Wikipedia without properly acknowledging the source. I reverted my removal. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Administrator changes Hey man im josh Alex Bakharev CorbieVreccan Cyphoidbomb Davodd Hog Farm JamesR KnightLago Mark Ironie Nosebagbear (deceased) Rschen7754 Tamzin TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes DatGuy Ferret RickinBaltimore TonyBallioni Worm That Turned Oversighter changes RickinBaltimore TonyBallioni Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

• Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

• Remedy 9 ("MarioProtIV topic ban") of the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones case has been rescinded.

Miscellaneous

• The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
• Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.

I see you've nominated Draft:Maximo Group Network for deletion as a hoax. Have you taken at a look at the creator, User:Jhingur Mahan Chand's other contributions? Personally, I'd have to suggest that amongst the inconsequential padding, there is something that looks very much like paid editing going on. And I suspect there may be multiple accounts involved. Chand edited the Aditya Dey article, seven minutes after User:Sumashaikh created it. Sumashaikh in turn created the Atiul islam article, which was very shortly after edited by User:Musenene farahat, who is now blocked as a sockpuppet of User:KibangaWiki. Given the multiple accounts possibly involved, it might take a checkuser to figure this all out. Any thoughts? AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I confess my detective skills are very rusty. While I am moderately active, almost all my edits are copyright related. Am aware that some well-known industrial names are sometimes owned by a holding company not as well-known I did some brief dating and didn't see any sign that Maximo group which appears to be in the music business owns the major German firm. It didn't ring true it also doesn't sound like a classic hoax. What's the point? Look briefly at some of the other edits something seems off but I haven't put my fingers on it. I'm not a check user but perhaps that's the next step. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also this thread on User:Jhingur Mahan Chand at User talk:Bbb23. [1]. I'm beginning to suspect that User:Mrjoegoldberg may be involved in this too: Chand created Rajkumar Patra at 16:28 today, Mrjoegoldberg edited the article at 17:51. Mrjoegoldberg had also edited Tez Tarrar, six minutes after Chand created it. There may be further connections not visible to non-admins like me, since I can't see the history of deleted articles etc. Unless someone else gets around to it first, I'll start an SPI, but I'd prefer to get a better picture of what is going on before I do. It's all a bit confusing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a report at WP:ANI [2] AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Back in February 2023, I created the article "List of Trichloroethylene related incidents" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_trichloroethylene-related_incidents&action=edit&redlink=1) by copying and moving text from the article for trichloroethylene to keep the main article focused on trichloroethylene. You have deleted it on 28 February 2023 for "copyright infringement" from a site that was mirroring the text from Wikipedia and, therefore claimed that I copy-pasted material from a random site that copied material from Wikipedia.

I believe that mirror sites cannot be used as a reason for "copyright infringement" deletion since their material is taken from Wikipedia, which "copyright infringement" wouldn't apply sitewide. Saint concrete (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that it is permissible to copy material from one Wikipedia article into another. However, that action must be properly attributed.

Proper attribution serves two purposes. First and foremost, it is required by the terms of the license. This applies to re-use of material both within and outside of Wikipedia.

A secondary purpose is that it helps avoid false positives when searching for copyright violations. Many thousands of sites copy the content of Wikipedia. When our copyright detection tool examines a new edit, to determine whether the text existed elsewhere before being added to the specific Wikipedia article, it is not uncommon that the search tool will uncover a site with the text, which happened to have been taken from a Wikipedia article. This edit will be flagged as a potential copyright issue. These potential violations are largely viewed by humans, who will check to see if proper attribution has been given. Thankfully, many editors are aware of the need for attribution, and will provide some indication that this is material from an existing Wikipedia article. The best practices are outlined at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

I run across dozens of examples of this every week. In some cases editors fully comply with best practices, and those reports can be handled simply by identifying them with "no action needed" in the system. In many instances, an editor will not be familiar with the best practices but will provide an edit summary strongly suggesting that the added text came from another Wikipedia article. While that is technically a copyright violation, it is my practice to simply point the editor to the editing guideline, and either ask them to add the necessary attribution or do it myself. If the editor fails to provide either the best practices attribution wording, or a clear indication that the material did come from an existing article, it's likely that the edit will be reverted or the article removed depending on the circumstances.

I have restored the article and added the required attribution. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Saint concrete (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, You completely deleted all my edits on the Gautrain article for supposed copyright issues. I respectfully disagree. There is certainly absolutely no justification to delete everything I wrote and other changes I made. You not only deleated EVERYTHING I wrote but even deleted the reorganisation of the article, which certainly cannot represent a copyright issue. What exactly do you consider a copyright issue, please? Can you please restore and let me amend what you consider problematic? thank you Fmjwiki (talk) 15:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When an editor encounters a copyright violation, it is standard practice to perform what is called a rollback, which is in undoing of all consecutive edits by the same editor. While this action is understandably viewed as a possible overreaction, experience shows that when a single edit is a copyright violation, simply undoing that specific edit might damage the article, as the edits before and after the problematic edit are often related, and it is best to remove all of the edits and start over.

If you want to contest the copyright violation I will be happy to discuss it with you to determine whether it was valid. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Call me Khutso My real name isnt really important And I would like to talk to you about Battle of Akhalkalaki, Firstly, The words that I have wrote were Deleted even Though, I had source. Secondly, You Don't have to Delete the submittion, I would have gotten More sources. And it was 4 Months away or more for them to see it. I dont really wanna say more stuff because I am not talking about my Article, I just wanna say that u dont have to delete the submittion. (User:Imakewikipedianpages) (User talk:Imakewikipedianpages|talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't responded to the issue which is the use of copyrighted text. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your recent edit to Mario Bunge. The section you added struck me as WP:UNDUE weight on a very minor part of Bunge's work and also as undesirable WP:Content forking of the article from which you copied it (Protoscience). Instead of copying a whole section like that and thereby spawning a content fork, it's best wherever possible to transclude the section (for example: Scientific method § Invariant explanation) or, if the whole section isn't required, as I think is true in this case, simply link to the section in the other article. I replaced the copied section with a sentence and a link, which is more appropriate weight for this topic in relation to the whole of Bunge's work.

One very positive side effect of your edit was that I checked the original section in Protoscience and noticed that all the references in it were incorrect, so I was able to correct that! Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 03:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Sphilbrick, I just noticed that it wasn't you who copied the section, it was Cerebrality. I will leave a note on their talk page. Biogeographist (talk) 03:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]