< June 25 June 27 >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Futuro Primitivo[edit]

Futuro Primitivo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any third-party reliable sources to confirm the subject's notability per WP:MUSICBIO. The article was tagged for notability at least since 2016. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

K10C: Kids' Ten Commandments[edit]

AfDs for this article:
K10C: Kids' Ten Commandments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(I don’t know why the link is broken. Page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K10C:_Kids%27_Ten_Commandments)

Non-notable series. Besides a near-total lack of potential sources it was already nominated for deletion once before but kept on flimsy grounds amounting to “they tried really hard to source it, so we’ll keep it out of pity”. Dronebogus (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) TheChronium 05:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Hanna[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Craig Hanna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing enough in the article or elsewhere to pass WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. Redirect to Thinkwell Group. Edwardx (talk) 21:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of games with support for high-fidelity image upscaling. czar 23:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of games with FSR support[edit]

List of games with FSR support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how on earth this qualifies to be a wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not a support website. Article fails WP:GNG and probably more than that. Govvy (talk) 20:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


So its the same thing as the page for DLSS support. The page isn't fully complete yet and needs a little work but its an informative article. 7Prefix7 (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree? You logged out of your username to post from your IP raises a red flag if you ask me. Govvy (talk) 22:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grovy you seem to be making a conspiracy theory that person has been making edits without an account. This is also an informative article you seem emotionally invested in trying to get removed for unknown reasons this isn't a support page no one is helping people figure out fixes for things its just a collection of information about a technology similar to the pages I have helped on with DirectX and other technologies. This is also the exact same as the DLSS article which is up. 7Prefix7 (talk) 01:51, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, if pages like List of games with DLSS support and List of games with ray tracing support are to be allowed, then I don't see why this one wouldn't be. Are those similarly "Support articles?" If you would like to delete those (not necessarily deleting the article describing Deep learning super sampling of course) then I suppose I'd tend to agree. Obviously I haven't contributed much or logged in much recently; but I was looking at this article and noticed the deletion request. I think Svetroid has sound logic that would include this, as per their post on the talk page of List of games with DLSS support: "At any rate, I believe this article as well as this this related article deserve to stay up as standalone pages due to the lack of online centralized resources providing this specific information, where Wikipedia is perfect for filling in that gap. Svetroid (talk) 06:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)" Perhaps it's lacking some refinement, but it otherwise feels as valid as the many other lists of games meeting very specific criteria. Silvershot10 (talk) 07:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected a mistake where I linked to the wrong article. Silvershot10 (talk) 07:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, after making my prior post, I thought this might be a better option; or moving both of them to GPUOpen. FSR itself might only be stub worthy at the moment; and it's part of the GPUOpen library. A list of games/software that supports GPUOpen and its different features might be more valuable. Silvershot10 (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My thought was that there are multiple in depth sources covering the technology - both the pieces by the verge and the piece by PC gamer are substantial, reliable, independent coverage - so the technology itself appears to be notable. The list of games, however, is mostly sourced to press releases and promotional material, so it does not appear to satisfy WP:LISTN. If a substantial number of games add support for the technology there may be an argument for a standalone list serving a useful navigational purpose per WP:LISTPURP, but with so few entries I'm not seeing any reason why this couldn't be integrated into the article on the technology for now. I would remove the unsourced table of "developers that have pledged to support FSR" rework the sentence about Microsoft supporting the technology into the lead and refocus the article on the technology, part of which could include a list of games that support it. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 14:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a fair assessment. There is, however, a significant number of articles which are very similar to this one. It'd be quite the undertaking to try to delete all of them. Silvershot10 (talk) 14:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Groovy this list fits the exact same as dozens of other similar lists. Also please stop spreading conspiracy theories against me or I am going to report you to the admins. There is nothing about this list that makes it violate any wikipedia rules and unless you are going to remove all these similar lists like list of games with ray tracing technology, list of games with dlss support and even things like list of unreal engine games etc this list should stand. This is not a support page its an informative standalone list that just mentions the games that support it. You seem very disingenuous in this argument and very emotionally pushed to want this gone for unknown reasons. This is a popular technology where people are constantly googling to figure out what games have support for and wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia of information for various topics to help people in need of information. 7Prefix7 (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


While I agree with the statement above "A list of games/software that supports GPUOpen and its different features might be more valuable." by silvershot it could actually be good to fit it there because of the way other lists are on wikipedia especially considering that we have a page for RTX games and DLSS games separately because they are different. GPU open is a huge suite of tools and as of right now FSR has not been added to GPUOpen its only coming soon. It has already been released as a standalone tech and implemented in 8 games with dozens of studios pledging to support it in new titles. 7Prefix7 (talk) 19:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theories? You can't even spell me name right, that's pretty much a fact! I don't trust you, you've already shown you have violated WP:COPYVIO, you haven't given any wikipedia policy response for keeping the article yet. There is already an ANI post, you can complain there about me, but I doubt anyone would be interested! Govvy (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Helping people is more important than following some rules/policies (depends on the rules/policies that are being broken of course and the people that is being helped). And Govvy, “Complaining about a problem without posing a solution is called whining.” Badhunter0303 (talk) 20:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is fine, informative, and absolutely in line with Wikipedia policies. There are plenty of List pages, from List of Netflix original programming to List of Bethesda Softworks video games and List of compositions by Richard Strauss to probably several hundreds more. All are quite useful, I know I use some of them several times a week. 128.140.142.58 (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not as well-versed with Wikipedia's guidelines as Govvy, but as a technology journalist, I find pages like these to be incredibly helpful when doing research - and isn't research the reason people come to Wikipedia? These are not "support" pages. They are useful to gamers who care about the technologies. --Deathspawner (talk) 23:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it seems the idea for creating this article was suggested in that same community a couple of days before the article itself was shared as a submission. Just something to consider when evaluating the discussion here. --Veikk0.ma 04:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, the technology has only been out for less than a week. It remains to be seen whether FSR will establish itself as the kind of widely known-about and long-term marketed technology in the same way as DLSS has. Because AMD has stated that FSR will be released under an MIT license somewhere around mid-July, it's possible it will become so ubiquituous that making a list of games that use it wouldn't make sense, just like a list of games using MSAA or various other technologies in common use today wouldn't make sense. And since MIT licenses are highly permissive, marketing around the feature, AMD branding, or even the use of the name "FidelityFX Super Resolution" won't be required of the games that use the technology. The current wave of games using FSR are doing so explicitly in partnership with AMD, since the technology isn't yet open-source.
Waiting costs nothing. If a dedicated list article seems appropriate in a few months, the page can be re-created. In the meantime, interested editors can help improve the page List of games with support for high-fidelity image upscaling. --Veikk0.ma 05:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Badhunter0303: That should be a merge or at least redirect rather than delete, this article title is very much a plausible search term.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Viacheslav Vershinin[edit]

Viacheslav Vershinin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally used WP:PROD but it was removed by another editor so I will use this method. This is an insufficiently noteworthy scientist whom fails to meet WP:PROF guidelines, as outlined in the below section

Arguments for Deletion[edit]

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.

I fully agree, but it's worth noting that the "standard" varies with the discipline. For a chemist h = 6 is pretty poor, but would OK (I think) for someone whose publications mainly concerned mediaeval Persian poetry, for example. Athel cb (talk) 13:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2.The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.

3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).

4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.

5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

7. The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.

8. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.

References

  1. ^ Vershinin, Viacheslav. "Viacheslav Vershinin". ResearchGate. ResearchGate. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
  2. ^ Vershinin, Viacheslav. "Viacheslav I. Vershinin". Publons. Publons. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
  3. ^ Vershinin, Viacheslav. "Vyacheslav Isaakovich Vershinin is 75 years old!". Omsk State University. Omsk State University. Retrieved 26 June 2021.

Other Comments[edit]

Of note, this article appears to be a simple direct translation from Russian wiki: ru:Вершинин, Вячеслав Исаакович. It seems to me like he is locally respected, and has some national recognition in Russia particularly due to his longevity in his field and teaching, it doesn't reach far enough to be noteworthy. Further, his research impact seems quite low and failed to reach an international stage. The fact that nearly all sources and information on this individual are in Russian makes it difficult to entirely verify, as well as create a wiki article with sources readers could easily verify for themselves.

These reasons, combined with not meeting the bar for WP:PROF leads me to believe this article should be deleted. If a russian-fluent individual can dispute my findings then this could be kept, but based on my own searching I don't think I am missing anything major that would warrant keeping the article.

Please share your thoughts, thanks.

Tautomers (talk) 20:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Thank you, those results are in agreement with what I found and state in the argument section. I will be making use of Scopus in the future. Tautomers(T C) 02:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Timmins municipal election[edit]

2014 Timmins municipal election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local-level mayoral election fails the WP:LASTING and WP:GEOSCOPE elements of WP:NEVENT. Has been in CAT:NN since 2015, so it's time to get a hearing on it, I guess. Hog Farm Talk 19:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 19:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 19:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 19:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as all votes were for Keep per WP:NACTOR also passed WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sangeita Chauhan[edit]

Sangeita Chauhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It fails GNG and has lack of reliable sources Preetykaur761 (talk) 12:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:NACTOR, main roles in multiple significant films/tv series (Luv U Alia, Ek Shringaar-Swabhiman, and Sharp Shooter (film)) 15:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Qualifies WP:NACTOR for playing main roles in movies and TV series. Jaysonsands (talk) 05:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarada Mitra[edit]

Sarada Mitra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable politician. Being the general secretary of the youth wing of Communist Party of India does not impart any notability. All the references cited in the article are WP:UGC and closely associated with the person. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL Jupitus Smart 18:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Kiernan[edit]

Leslie Kiernan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Both positions this person has held are non-notable. KidAd • SPEAK 18:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete from mainspace/send to draft space for incubation. Discussion only three days old, but policy shows a clear position for this article not being in main space. The article, in its current position, should not be moved back to draft space. It may be improved and moved back in the future (preferably by a veteran editor who has thoroughly reviewed the article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agshin Babaev[edit]

Agshin Babaev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
Draft:Agshin Babaev (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MMABIO. Doesn't have fights in top tier promotions, notable wins, notable accomplishments, and isn't ranked highly by fight matrix or sherdog. HeelPerfection (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. HeelPerfection (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to 2018 California gubernatorial election. And will salt per request. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nickolas Wildstar[edit]

Nickolas Wildstar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced WP:BLP of a person notable only as an unsuccessful candidate for political office. As always, this is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, and candidates qualify for articles only if they can be properly demonstrated as having had preexisting notability in another field of endeavour independently of running for office. The article is also not based on any evidence of reliable source coverage to establish his notability, either: two of the footnotes are his own self-published campaign video on YouTube, one is his campaign website, one is an endorsement on the self-published website of his own political party, and the one that looked on first glance like a real media outlet has a "This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own." disclaimer on top of it, which means it's a user-generated citizen journalism platform rather than notability-building media coverage. Furthermore, there's been editwarring here: this was first created as an article in August 2017, then redirected to the election he was running in at that time in September, then reverted back to a standalone article again in October, then redirected again in January 2018, at which point it stayed a redirect until the past 24 hours, upon which there's been an article-vs-redirect editwar today. Again, candidates do not get articles just for being candidates, and that goes especially for candidates who have to rely on their own self-published campaign literature to source an article with -- if he wins the election in November, then he'll qualify for an article, but he is not entitled to have one just for declaring himself a candidate.
I also wouldn't object to just restoring the redirect, but the edit history should still be deleted first so that there's no old content for anybody to attempt to revert-war over. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I second the salting recommendation. Tautomers(T C) 02:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G7 Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Bryant[edit]

Jenna Bryant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businesswoman. Fails WP:GNG. Founded a non-notable company. Claimed to be an actress, but none of the three (extensive) WP articles mentions her. Promotional, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Tune[edit]

Holy Tune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sorry but this article is an advertisement. All the sources mentioned in the article have same text (slightly altered but line are very similar), all of sources are published at about the same time (in May & June). From the discussion we have here on bnwiki, we came to this conclusion that most likely Holy Tune itself provided the texts to the journalists/publishers/newspapers (self-promotion). Also most of the sources are primary, they directly quote from the owner of this record label (interview type, those aren't significant coverage). Fails WP:ORG, WP:GNG (We speedy deleted the article on bnwiki for above reason and others, see Afd there). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bringelly Road[edit]

Bringelly Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim of notability and provides no sources. I don't see how it would be able to meet WP:NGEO. —FORMALDUDE (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —FORMALDUDE (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think so too. I submitted for A3 and A7. —FORMALDUDE (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Aah, I forgot A7 is topic-restricted. SportingFlyer T·C 22:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Offline Explorer[edit]

Offline Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NSOFTWARE. Only sources I can find are places to download it. ... discospinster talk 14:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 14:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of mayors of Whitehorse. Sandstein 06:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Curtis (politician)[edit]

Dan Curtis (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a small city mayor, not featuring sufficient substance or sourcing to get him over WP:NPOL #2. Although I'm actually the original creator here, I did so at a very different time in Wikipedia history -- once upon a time, mayors of "regionally significant" cities were automatically entitled to keep Wikipedia articles as soon as it was possible to verify that they existed as mayors, without regard to whether the article actually had any meaningful depth or sourcing. But that rule has since been tightened up, and the bar a mayor now has to clear is the ability to write and source a substantive article about his political impact as mayor: specific accomplishments, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects he had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But other than stating that he exists as a mayor, the content here is entirely unsuccessful runs for the territorial legislature and his appearance in a viral video that just makes him a WP:BLP1E -- nobody's ever been arsed to add any substantive content about his mayoralty to make this article useful or valuable, and about all I can find is glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of the failed legislature campaigns and the ribbon-cuttings at new public buildings, rather than anything that would meaningfully bolster his notability. Bearcat (talk) 14:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Scott, Earl of Dalkeith[edit]

Walter Scott, Earl of Dalkeith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Earl but there is no certainty that he will become a Duke and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Mohan[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Dev Mohan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one notable role for the actor so far. Fails NACTOR. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 14:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 14:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 14:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 14:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonal Mathew (talk • contribs)

Please only vote once and please sign your comments. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Dev Mohan selected as final 16 contestants in Peter England Mr. India 2016".
  2. ^ "Profile of Madhu Mohan, the finalist in 2016 Mr India".







Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of the two keep votes above make any reference to any inclusion guideline nor do they have any relevance to any. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Dundas, Earl of Ronaldshay[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Robin Dundas, Earl of Ronaldshay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Earl but there is no certainty that he will become a Marquess and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 14:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Chichester, Earl of Belfast[edit]

James Chichester, Earl of Belfast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Earl but there is no certainty that he will become a Marquess and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

William Stanhope, Viscount Petersham[edit]

William Stanhope, Viscount Petersham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Viscount but there is no certainty that he will become an Earl and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias Finch-Hatton, Viscount Maidstone[edit]

Tobias Finch-Hatton, Viscount Maidstone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy Viscount but there is no certainty that he will become an Earl and we should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he doesn't seem notable (other than for who his father is) and I don't believe he passes WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pattaravut Samutnavee[edit]

Pattaravut Samutnavee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a Thai voice actor. Declined at AFC but moved to draft space, sourced only to YouTube, Muggle and a fan site. Complete lack of in-depth coverage in RIS. There may be other sources in Thai that I can’t find, but unless notability can be clearly shown it should be sent back to draft for further work as it is not ready for mainspace. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Ahsanullah2015 (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shawny Williams[edit]

Shawny Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of the police commissioner of Vallejo, CA. Apparently only locally notable. Does not pass WP:ANYBIO. Mccapra (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M. Jamil Khairi[edit]

M. Jamil Khairi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer with extremely brief career, only managing 7 mins of professional football, which provides a weak and technical passing of WP:NFOOTBALL. Ideally, WP:GNG should be met in such cases but I could find no significant coverage whatsoever in Google searches nor in an Indonesian source search. The best thing that I could find was a trivial mention in a youth football match report. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DXMJ-TV. ✗plicit 09:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DXMC-TV[edit]

DXMC-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a relay station I don’t think this meets WP:BCAST and should be redirected to the main station, but redirects are reverted so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DZEA-TV. ✗plicit 09:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DWLE-TV[edit]

DWLE-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a relay station I don’t think this meets WP:BCAST and should be redirected to the main station, but redirects are reverted so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DZEA-TV. ✗plicit 09:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DWBB-TV[edit]

DWBB-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a relay station I don’t think this meets WP:BCAST and should be redirected to the main station, but redirects are reverted so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 08:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon School and Residential Treatment Center[edit]

Brandon School and Residential Treatment Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODded this without realizing that it had previously been prodded and recreated (in 2009). Anyway, the rationale still stands: "As a private school, has to meet WP:NORG. No reliable independent sources are provided, and I was unable to find any through WP:BEFORE. Minor local awards are not significant." Spicy (talk) 08:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 08:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 08:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed it does. Nowhere in the article is it claimed that this is a non-profit. Ravenswing 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
According to their website they are "an approved private special education program." That's all I was able to find about it. I assume if they were a non-profit they would be a public organization. That said, from what I can tell they aren't really a school in the way the notability guidelines or Wikipedia more generally considers something a school anyway. Just having the word "school" in the name doesn't make it a school. Especially since they don't even call themselves a school. At least not from their webpage or in the material about them that I've read. So they should be treated exactly like every other organization regardless of where their funding comes from. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RTCs are...complicated. It's plausibly worth calling them schools; most don't pass GNG, unlike most schools, so treating them as such doesn't flood you with articles. Having articles like this on them is a terrible idea, though. I note that even our Residential treatment center article is pretty lame, and jarrs around almost randomly in its tone. Vaticidalprophet 03:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty curious, in what instance would it be plausibly worth calling treatment centers schools? I admit there's a thin line between an education establishment more generally and a school, but wouldn't they just be like normal treatment centers, which aren't considered colleges/universities, except that they children instead of adults? Also, Residential treatment center is probably pretty lame because Wikipedia is horrible at handling extremely general topics, because there's to much room for meandering and going on side tangents with topics that aren't extremely specific. As their impossible to summarize in a coherent, succinct manor. Let alone do the camping, revert everything editors on here usually let anyone try to write succinct articles. At least that's been my experience. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ithaka Darin Pappas[edit]

Ithaka Darin Pappas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. G11 on 4 March 2021. scope_creepTalk 09:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Related discussions: 2017-09 AkahtiLândia (closed as merge)
Logs: 2021-05 ✍️ create, 2021-03 ✗ G11
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey Haley[edit]

Lindsey Haley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 00:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 08:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

High Expectations (Concert)[edit]

High Expectations (Concert) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable concert tour, sources only show that it took place, no significant coverage, hence fails WP:GNG / WP:NTOUR. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I previously draftified an earlier, unsourced version of this (presumably same tour), which is now at Draft:High Expectations Tour (2020). If this AfD results in deletion, that one arguably can go as well. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. czar 05:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EspoCRM[edit]

EspoCRM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising or promotion Chief Minister (Talk) 02:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Chief Minister (Talk) 02:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spectrum Culture[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Spectrum Culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This previously consensus-deleted article on a website has been recreated, sourced entirely to its own About section and a couple non-RS blogs (e.g. the waffle recipe blog wafflewindow.com). A WP:BEFORE on Google News fails to find anything more than fleeting references (e.g. mention of the site in a list of writer credits in bylines, etc.) and nothing that passes WP:CORPDEPTH. The site purports to have several notable writers, however, notability is not inherited. Fails WP:GNG. Chetsford (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous discussions: 2009-06 (closed as ✗ delete)
Related discussions: 2019-11 Funland (album) (closed as ✓ keep)
Logs: 2009-06 ✗ deleted
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:55, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mz Orstin[edit]

Mz Orstin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable DJ and Video Jockey. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 18:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peter303x (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CREO[edit]

CREO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertisement of a non notable Indian technology company. Unable to find any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content GermanKity (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fitna[edit]

Fitna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I moved various partial matches to See also, which leaves two legitimate entries. One is the obvious primary topic, so that should be moved here, and a hatnote added for the short. Note that all but two of the entries I demoted are discussed in the main article, and one of the exceptions is listed in that article's See also. (For some reason, the Fifth Fitna isn't mentioned there, but could be.) Clarityfiend (talk) 05:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pateros#Secondary public schools. North America1000 08:12, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor Simplicio Manalo National High School[edit]

Mayor Simplicio Manalo National High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school, virtually unsourced and a search finds nothing beyond the usual directory listings and social media accounts. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aberdeen, Mississippi#History as WP:ATD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Skirmish at Aberdeen[edit]

Skirmish at Aberdeen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm in the process of developing a goal of trying to destub ACW battle stubs. When looking at this one to try to source it, I'm coming to the conclusion that this may well not be notable. The two ELs present in the article are an old book source that just states that a skirmish occurred at Aberdeen, Arkansas on July 9, 1862 and that components of several Indiana units partook in it. The other El is to an Encyclopedia of Arkansas article about the Skirmish at Grand Prairie on July 6 and doesn't mention an action at Aberdeen on July 9. Encyclo. of Ark. lists Grand Prairie as part of the Pea Ridge campaign, but Shea & Hess's book about the Pea Ridge campaign, which is one of the key modern works about the campaign, doesn't have anything in the index for "Aberdeen".

Ed Bearss's article about the White River Expedition, which seems to be the most connected campaign to this fight, mentions Aberdeen in connection with the Grand Prairie fight on July 6, but not an action there on July 9. It's also worth noting that the commanders in the article are wholly unsourced, as the one external link actually mention this battle does not name officers. There were 1862 and 1864 skirmishes at Grand Prairie, and one or both may be notable (finding some encouraging signs there), but all I'm finding for this one are a handful of passing mentions, some references to the various articles listed at Battle of Aberdeen, and some passing mentions to the Skirmish at Aberdeen, Mississippi.

I sincerely hope someone can save this, but I can find no evidence of the sort of coverage that would permit that. Hog Farm Talk 05:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 05:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 05:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 05:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anju Sharma[edit]

Anju Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and non neutral article on a non notable psychiatrist. References cited contains non independent content and passing mentions, and a web search finds mostly sponsored sources. Fails WP:GNG. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Catrinel Dumitrescu[edit]

Catrinel Dumitrescu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject might be notable but no references to justify notability. do not show significant coverage. fails GNG. GermanKity (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leeza Mangaldas[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Leeza Mangaldas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement, self promotion. Vanity publications. References do not show the notability of the subject. fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR GermanKity (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of voting to keep, you should probably just give a response if you disagree with an editor. Seems a bit biased when you vote for your own article. Jcmcc (Talk) 07:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is incorrect. This is a discussion, not a vote, and article contributors are encouraged to contribute to the discussion like everyone else. pburka (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that all of the links you provided in fact fail WP:BASIC. The first few ones that mention her do not provide 'significant coverage' they only mention her on the side while they go into depth on a topic that she happened to be involved in. The links at the end that you provided are all primary sources which 'do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject' according to WP:BASIC. Jcmcc (Talk) 07:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BASIC states, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, and the first three sources are not trivial mentions; per WP:BIO, the sources find her "worthy of notice"[1] or "note"[2]—that is, "remarkable"[2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". The last two sources also include WP:SECONDARY commentary and context, e.g. ABC.au, in addition to the quote from Mangaldas, "reporter Zoe Daniel meets many of the people who hope it will and who are doing their own bit to elevate the plight of women in India," and e.g. The Indian Express, noting the context of her advocacy in addition to her work as an actress:
In Her Honour, Indian Express, 2014, excerpt

In the course of researching for the film, Chopra and Malik spoke to several rape victims and their families. “It was difficult because these young women somehow felt ashamed of themselves. It’s what made me ask: Why should a woman feel ashamed of something that is not her fault?” says the director.

The question was, in fact, also addressed by one of the film’s leading ladies, Mangaldas, in an opinion piece she wrote for a news portal in 2013. “Unfortunately, in India rape is inextricably linked by men— and women — to shame: the ultimate desecration. Many victims are murdered by their rapists or choose to commit suicide. It is also not uncommon for the parents of rape victims to kill themselves. Thus, most victims don’t speak up about what happened to them, lest their families be ostracised, lest they never find a husband or be shunned by their friends,” she wrote in the piece.

And these are only examples of sources that help establish her notability. Beccaynr (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cocos (Keeling) Islands Soccer Association[edit]

Cocos (Keeling) Islands Soccer Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as presented for the deletion of Christmas Island's page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Island Soccer Association

"This article contains no reliable sources and fails WP:GNG (there are no specific notability criteria for sports organizations)."

A search into the entity also turns up nothing, with almost all of the mentions appearing to be transcluded from this page. BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vilagran & Delavy[edit]

Vilagran & Delavy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Lack of reliable references that are independent from the subject. Do not satisfy WP:NMUSIC, WP:GNG GermanKity (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America1000 07:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temístocles López[edit]

Temístocles López (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor and director.

The article has been flagged for sourcing issues since 2009, and continues to lack independent sources on the individual; the only independent sources provided are for a work of his, Chain of Desire, and while they are likely sufficient to make the work notable, notability is not inherited.

A search for additional sources only turns up promotional material and passing mentions; nothing sufficient to pass WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, or WP:FILMMAKER. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanwar Pal Mahour[edit]

Kanwar Pal Mahour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. fails WP:GNG Johnson Wagart (talk) 03:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Johnson Wagart (talk) 03:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Johnson Wagart (talk) 03:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ash Black Bufflo[edit]

Ash Black Bufflo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Within the references, all the mentions to them are trivial, typically mentioning their real name once in a listing of the members of the band being reviewed, or once when mentioning the composer for a movies score.

There is one reference that goes into a little more depth on Ash Black Bufflo/Jay Clarke, but even that reference is focused on an album they released, with the mentions of the musician being in passing - and it is a blog.

The references do support the band Dolorean being notable, but notability is not inherited, so they are not transferred to the individual.

A search for references outside the article turn up nothing, though searching the individual under their real name is made more difficult by the existence of the much more notable tennis player Jay Clarke. BilledMammal (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Cevallos[edit]

Danny Cevallos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noticeable enough. Google News returns no result. Northern Moonlight | ほっこう 02:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TerminalFour[edit]

TerminalFour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Has been PROD'ed several times (most recently by Skyerise) and so likely needs formal AfD to confirm consensus. To my eye, there is no indication that this small (<100 person?) company meets WP:GNG or WP:NORG. In terms of the content, it is overtly promotional, reliant almost entirely on subject's PR materials/website, reads as an extension of that website, and largely expanded by apparent COI/SPA users. In terms of the applicable WP:NCORP criteria, a WP:BEFORE news search returns largely passing mentions and the same routine coverage (funding efforts/etc) we might expect for any other similarly sized/positioned company. Any sources that do exist (and certainly those linked from the article) do not appear to be independent of the subject (being the subject's own website, marketing materials, direct/republished press releases, a website seemingly dedicated to news about CMS companies/products, and some apparent churnalism from a few otherwise "general" news sources). If there are sources to establish notability, I'm not seeing them. This article has been deleted and restored/refurded several times (without community consensus via AfD), so it would be good to confirm consensus one-way-or-the-other and once-and-for-all. Guliolopez (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 01:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey E. Dick[edit]

Jeffrey E. Dick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · E. Dick Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to me WP:PROF guidelines, and is an early-career assistant professor. For each of the points below:

Arguments for Deletion[edit]

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.

2.The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.

3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).

4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.

5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

7. The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.

8. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.

Other comments[edit]

It seems like the article was created by a well-meaning student user:Lrandolph 19. The article is overall well written, but is a bit résumé-like and looks more like a splash page that you'd encounter on a research group website, and is ultimately not entirely at wikipedia standard. Though, quite a lot of professor pages are like this so it is not out of the ordinary.

Jeffrey will likely have a good career, but it is still too early for him to be noteworthy enough to have a wikipage. I would imagine it would be exceptionally rare for there to be an article for an assistant professor unless they had won a major international award or were exceptionally noteworthy outside of that. Prof. Dick does not appear to be this case. Maybe in another 5-10 years after he's gotten tenure and has made a major impact on science and society a page would be meaningful.

Please share your thoughts, thanks.

Tautomers (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Total citations: avg: 6637, med: 1214, Dick: 1303.
Total papers: avg: 123, med: 44, D: 53.
h-index: avg: 29, med: 18, D: 20.
Top citations: 1st: avg: 517, med: 230, D: 129. 2nd: avg: 341, med: 132, D: 102. 3rd: avg: 254, med: 95, D: 90. 4th: avg: 193, med: 86, D: 83. 5th: avg: 168, med: 80, D: 78.
Top first-author: avg: 382, med: 108, D: 102.
JoelleJay (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Cutts[edit]

Owen Cutts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician, fails WP:BIO. A BEFORE doesn’t provide much. WP:TOOSOON maybe? Xclusivzik (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2021-06 ✍️ create
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may re-nominate the article for deletion. ✗plicit 01:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rajat Rawail[edit]

Rajat Rawail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Santosh Shukla[edit]

Santosh Shukla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may re-nominate the article for deletion. ✗plicit 01:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Bhatt[edit]

Rahul Bhatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR, even though he is the son of Mahesh Bhatt he lacks notablity tag Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may re-nominate the article for deletion. ✗plicit 01:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Chaudhary[edit]

Raja Chaudhary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may re-nominate the article for deletion. ✗plicit 01:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashutosh Kaushik[edit]

Ashutosh Kaushik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Danko Jones#2009: B-Sides. (non-admin closure) Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Is Danko Jones[edit]

This Is Danko Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poorly sourced article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then you should try searching "This is Danko Jones" review. This comes up, albeit short. And after that it's a dead end for me as well :) Geschichte (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Huh, guess I didn't go deep enough into google. Nevertheless, that doesn't change the equation, that source is really not even enough to be considered SIGCOV. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More