The result was keep. John254 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as G3. Magioladitis (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to include this in CSD A9. It schould be included there. ON TOPIC: Hoax, no results on google. Or if not hoax, totaly non notable. The Rolling Camel (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete (G3) by Thingg. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Made up nonsense, created by single contribution account. Google returns a whole 25 hits, nothing but Facebook and Youtube. Maybe should be speedy? Camillus 23:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a mere directory listing entry for an apparently non-notable company. Of the two references provided, one is self-referential, and the other is a trivial mention. Aside from lacking any encyclopedic content, this article provides no assertion that the subject is notable enough for inclusion. Of the six google news hits that come up for "calvo fish", only one is about the subject of this article, and it is a trivial piece by an armed forces supplier trade periodical. If this article is to exist, then the name should be changed to "Grupo Calvo", the proper name for the company. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 23:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, no real assertion of notability. Google searches only show vague hits, nothing considered reliable. Possible hoax or "autobiography". Tan | 39 22:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Claim to fame consists of
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability and as far as I can tell the only references to the term online are on mirrors of the Wikipedia article. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was WP:SNOW keep (non-admin closure). Pcap ping 13:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixing b0rked nom for User:DreamGuy. Contested prod Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is that lists of footballers from nation X playing in nation Y are not-notable - see this AfD for a recent example. The relevant categories contained within ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Expatriate footballers by nationality should suffice. GiantSnowman 21:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GiantSnowman 22:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW applies here. Protonk (talk) 00:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod (with misleading edit summary); the title alone makes it clear this fails Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS. Ros0709 (talk) 21:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity article with no real assertion of notability. faithless (speak) 21:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoponpop69 (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, after a very impressive salvage job by UncleG. Good work. DS (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable and in violation of WP:NEO and WP:NAD. Lacks inline and verifiable references and is never likely to grow beyond stub status. Not in general use. More suitable for something like Urban Dictionary than wikipedia.FrFintonStack (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural AfD. After reading the sources on this article, I found a marginal level of notability. Enough that I was not comfortable speedy deleting it, but not enough that makes me satisfied as to its notability. Trusilver 21:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Exact re-creation of previously speedied article... previous version was speedied by Gwen Gale as "G11: Blatant advertising: COI advocacy, no encyclopedic content here"... is also almost a copyvio of the organization's website found here... creating user seems to be dead-set on creating new articles which are nothing more than copy&paste jobs with a couple words changed... see other article here... Adolphus79 (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable mixtape with little media coverage of substance. Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. Prod removed as "nonsense". —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 20:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no administrator tools necessary. Any editor can revert, and all editors have the tools to do so. As a demonstration of that, I have just hit the "edit this page" button and reverted, without touching any of my administrator tools. Uncle G (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable and unreferenced team in unknown league. Articles being created on players are receiving Speedy deletes. Paste (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing on Google apart from the article itself... original research TeapotgeorgeTalk 20:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Principia Discordia. MBisanz talk 09:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A discordian deity with no indication of notability outside the primary sources where it is mentioned. Pcap ping 20:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A brief fragment from Principia_Discordia does not seem to warrant its own article. Pcap ping 20:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moving for discussion on article deletion. The article does not sufficiently establish notability of the product to have its own article. Merge is a possibility Nja247 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 18:28, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An article for a fictional character with no real world information. Not even the actor's name is mentioned. No references, no media coverage. No sign of notability outside (not even inside) the show. Magioladitis (talk) 16:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Chicago_Cubs#Music. MBisanz talk 09:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Many sports teams come out with compilation CDs like this. I don't see what makes this album in particular notable. No independent sources that I could find, just those that sell the CD. Wolfer68 (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 09:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable band that has released only one album and has had no substantial media coverage. The article is based mostly on original research with very few statements sourced. The article has been tagged in the past to cite resources but the tag has been removed by the author with little to no improvements. DonelleDer (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This fictional species does not establish notability independent of Disgaea (series) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and everything relevant is already covered within the setting section of the main article. TTN (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable company, with little more than trivial coverage in the media. Also, the entire article is almost a copy-vio of the company's website, save a couple changed words here and there. Fails WP:V and WP:CORP... Adolphus79 (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is, essentially, the exact same article as List of characters in Sabrina the Teenage Witch (TV series) and Sabrina,_the_Teenage_Witch_(TV_series)#Cast. The only difference between them is that this is separated by seasons (though seasons are still clarified in the other articles) and this is far more repetitive (the same actors play the same characters throughout the series, they don't up and start playing different characters and it seems to be unnecessary). Considering this is nearly identical to the other articles, I think this should be deleted or, at the very least, redirected to List of characters in Sabrina the Teenage Witch (TV series) or Sabrina,_the_Teenage_Witch_(TV_series)#Cast. Thanks. 132 19:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure), as per the consensus of the discussion. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Original research based almost exclusively on primary sources and without so much as a secondary source establishing notability for this (supposed) sub-topic of Scientology. A tag was placed in January to improve the sourcing but no improvement seen. Justallofthem (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: Perhaps I was trying to be too succinct in my nom as I have in the past gone very much the other way. If you examine the article you will see that my premise is not specious; the only (possibly) on-topic bits of the article that are sourced from reliable secondary material is the little bit about Quentin Hubbard possible being gay (how is that on-topic?) and that Scientology considers marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Perhaps deserving of mention in other articles, but not having its own. Cirt's analysis notwithstanding, this article is not well-sourced in RS secondary materials. It is mainly sourced from primary materials and is original research. I am asking reviewers to look a little deeper. --Justallofthem (talk) 14:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The consensus that emerged seems to support the idea that the added sources are enough to justify this article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 06:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Original research based almost exclusively on primary sources and without so much as a secondary source establishing notability for this (supposed) sub-topic of Scientology. Justallofthem (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: Perhaps I was trying to be too succinct in my nom as I have in the past gone very much the other way. As I mention below: If you examine the article you will see that my premise is not specious; the only on-topic bit of the article that is sourced from reliable secondary material is the little bit where Hubbard said he recommends no sex during pregnancy. Perhaps deserving of mention in another article, but not having its own. Cirt's analysis notwithstanding, this article is not well-sourced in RS secondary materials. Other than the bit I mention above the other non-CofS sources are either non-notable and non-reliable POV pieces or are related to tangential material. It is simple to provide the appearance of RS secondary sourcing by referencing material not central to the theme of the article. For example, I could characterize Scientology as "controversial" and Hubbard as a "science fiction writer" and source both of those well. That would add two more reliable sources to the article but in actual fact I would have simply padded the reference list. I am not saying that the tangential references were included to pad the list, I am simply asking reviewers to look a little deeper. --Justallofthem (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable software with no significant coverage in reliable sources, nothing ground breaking about it. Article is nothing more than a short advertisement for it. Failed PROD with prod removed by article creator whose only edits have been to this article. Probable creator or associated with product. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is list of extremely minor characters within a series of unconnected video games. Each game features its own set of characters, which is generally just a very minor part of the game, allowing for the characters to easily be covered within the main game articles if necessary. TTN (talk) 19:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 06:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources to establish notability; more seriously, WP:NOT a sports rulebook, and WP:NFT. KurtRaschke (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ESSAY. Title in English: "Living conditions of the Kyrgyz minority in foothills of the Pamir ". Seems a little too particular and time-sensitive to be an encyclopedia article. Besides, one of the first things the article says is, "must not be forgotten that alone because of the climatic conditions only a few people lead such a life." Perhaps merge into Kyrgyz people after translation? —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This list consits of terms that are either common to many anime/manga series - and Japanese culture in general - or are (or should be) already better covered in individual character articles, the character list, etc. The previous deletion discussion closed as keep largely because this list was the only place to find the definition for some of the series-specific terms, but that should be a largely moot point in light of all the recent merging and deletion of articles related to the InuYasha cleanup. —Dinoguy1000 18:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
nn production company that has made one film shown at a college campus and a few festivals. Tagged speedy G11 by me, removed by another editor without comment. gnfnrf (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not Wikipedia notable. There does not seem to be more to say about the title than it was created for Sir William Edge. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL doesn't bring up anything. After giving a sentence about the title, the article goes into BLP issues about Edge. A tell in the article is that the 1990 reference cited in the article was published before the 2007 BLP information in the article. In sum, there does not appear to be enough reliable, secondary published sources independent of the subject and with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy to maintain an independent article on this topic. -- Suntag ☼ 17:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is based on the Chilean chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS. Since the chart has been deemed non-notable and unreliable, it doesn't make sense to have an article dedicated to it. —Kww(talk) 17:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable book by non notable author who wrote this vanity page. Has also created page on himself which was speedy deleted. Paste (talk) 17:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Super Robot Wars Judgement. MBisanz talk 09:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but there are still some things from Super Robot coming: This elements of the Super Robot Wars series do not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden and more. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles. Magioladitis (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was disambiguate. MBisanz talk 09:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The one-sentence article has no sources —Chris Capoccia T⁄C 17:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Since there are several schools with this name, I have created a disambiguation page with links to the relevant district articles. -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:51, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Unsourced future events in the life of Jennifer Lopez.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 09:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails all criteria of WP:MUSIC. I recently prod'd the article, but it was removed with no edits being made towards making it pass any of this criteria. SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 23:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Sister Abhaya murder case. The usual response to this kind of case is a redirect to the article discussing the case. There is suffucuent support here for this to be the result Spartaz Humbug! 18:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Subject appears to come under WP:BLP1E. Also, has only just been arrested. There is no indication when this might come to trial. Subject is already mentioned in the main article Sister Abhaya murder case. I therefore ask that this article is deleted. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons as above:
The result was redirect to Federico García Lorca. MBisanz talk 09:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable play and article that seems only to serve as an advert. Paste (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No coverage in third-party reliable sources to demonstrate notability. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 15:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This bio of a nonnotable "young scientist" has been tagged as lacking notability and references since August 2008. Evb-wiki (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ESSAY. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was A9 by Gwen Gale, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:36, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Album alleged to still be at least 18 months away from release but curiously with full tracklist available (right down to the length of the songs) by artist so staggeringly non-notable (if he even exists) that Googling his name produces only 2 hits other than wikis and Bebo. ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet elected. No sign of considerable local notability in article per WP:POLITICIAN. Dweller (talk) 13:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, everyone sing along: "Everybody was kung fu fighting...those cats were fast as lightning..." All seriousness aside, what we have here is another indiscriminate trivial list lacking proper referencing. Sorry, guys. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. Protonk (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable references, does not assert it's notability. Not every "sleepy village" deserves an article on wiki. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Deleted under WP:CSD#A3 Pedro : Chat 15:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Empty page, contains only infobox, hasn't been touched since creation on 27 October. Can be recreated with actual content at some point. roux 12:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Okay, folks, move on, this race is over. (Non-admin closure) Ecoleetage (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Originally a prod: "Completely unreferenced (WP:V),with no assertion of notability (WP:N).Token directory entry at mobygames, which states that there have been no press reviews of this game." Prod was contested with the rationale: "This article needs to be cleaned up, but if you search Google, there are several reviews of this game. It was probably the first ever online racing game." I have looked through the google hits, and can see no reviews from an independent, reliable source. IGN, Mobygames, etc all have a token directory entry with the publisher's description, but nothing to suggest this meets our WP:GNG, or basic verifiability. Marasmusine (talk) 12:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:32, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Article that has been listed for translation without being touched for more than two weeks. Possible spam for something called www.saipaonline.com. roleplayer 11:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Already speedied. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Someone tagged it for speedy deletion, but it was contested so i take it here for discussion. The Rolling Camel (talk) 10:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as for endorsement deals, SWR (also owned by Fender USA) searchable on the SWR website (bass player’s real name: Jason Roberts (AKA Billy-Ray J) listed playing for Toe Head). OCDP website (drummer’s real name: Pat Leon listed for Toe Head), etc. All “verifiable”. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.104.146 (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsigned band, the members aged 19-20. Does not meet any criteria in WP:MUSIC. Punkmorten (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Small-time businessman, also WP:COI. Punkmorten (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical article authored by completely un-noteworthy person. "Sources" at the bottom of the article appear to have little if anything to do with him personally. Soothing Vapors (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for the moment. I'm still not convinced by your arguments, Shoessss. The notability criterion you mention works very well for Rex Reed, a critic who is cited by his peers and whose own article has third party references. This isn't intended to be a "What about X?" argument as discussed under WP:WAX, it's just an example of how I think the standard should be applied. There are many professional writers whose work is widely distributed but who are not notable (including myself); therefore, I do not find myself swayed simply by proof that the man's work is published. On the other hand, the publications Windman is published in are notable, which certainly doesn't prove his notability in and of itself, but leads me to suspect that there are better references out there. In a nutshell: I haven't been convinced that we don't need third-party sources to establish notability in this case, but I believe that they are likely out there.--otherlleftNo, really, other way . . . 03:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I am definitely not convinced that the citations establish notability, and the whole thing really strikes me as an autobiographical vanity article.Realitycookie (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that this player has ever played professionally, therefore he fails WP:ATHLETE test (there was a Chris Moore who was with Dagenham & Redbridge c.2003 and went on to play professionally, but that was this guy) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article based completely on original research; orphaned; does not seem to be notable of inclusion and lacks sufficient content to identify it as encyclopedic. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 07:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as failing WP:V. I have been unable to establish that this institution exists, either. Universities are notable, and recreation is in order if sources can be found in the future. TerriersFan (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently unremarkable or non-existent. No sources available to assert notability. Contested prod. BradV 06:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this article to be deleted, without perjudice, until official information has been released. There are no sources to back up any information that is listed in the article, including the speculated title and venues. The page should be recreate once there is an official statement released by Knowles Management, her record label and/or tour promoter. Until then, the article appears to be wishful thinking/fan speculation. KM*hearts*MC (talk) 06:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to SD Gundam G Generation. The arguments relating to OR an Notability concerns (among others) outweigh the concerns of the procedural validity of the AFD. MBisanz talk 09:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In-universe fancruft. Largely unverifiable. Non-notable. Contested prod. BradV 06:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was G3 by Gwen Gale, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Per A9, song by not notable artist. If this is not true, (as it says "...by Jamahl Seden, Janet Jackson, James Harris III, etc.), then perhaps a move, or clarify? Otherwise, falls under A9. American Eagle (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Must be a hoax by a guy who doesn't even have a article here and the date's been changed. Otherwise, Delete --Numyht (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 09:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N. This article is based upon a odd video on YouTube that is possibly a Alternate Reality Game. I say "possibly" because this thing started last Tuesday. The people playing this game have created their own private Wiki, so this is article is not needed. dposse (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC) (talk) 20:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was A7 by Texas Android, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of passing either WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. A band player in a band of another singer. No references, no independent notability and in fact no significant coverage of any kind that I could find by googling. Nsk92 (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are some potential claims of notability here but real issues with verifiability especially in that no reliable sources back up the VoA claim and Levine's own site calls him a faculty member and not an assistant dean which I'm not sure would confer notability. Also utter lack of reliable sources other then mentions of performancs. No apparent reviews of his work. Thoughts? StarM 04:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep - per WP:SNOW and rewrite/rename. -Djsasso (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy nomination. Original speedy deletion rationale was, "There is no Namibian ice hockey team, only inline hockey is played there." If the speedy request is to be believed, this is potentially a hoax article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Magioladitis (talk) 01:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a non-notable mixtape, though the artist appears notable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. , default to keep. At least it has sources, which is more than I can say for a lot of articles that come through here. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 05:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a yard, a grassy area, within the confines of Dudy Noble Field, Polk-DeMent Stadium at Mississippi State University and as such, should be included in the very same Dudy Noble Field, Polk-DeMent Stadium article, but not one of its own. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 03:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, I can get past your personal rivalry issues. I have given information and references demonstrating that the Left Field Lounge is notable as its own entry and will give more if necessary. Its unique history, its unique attributes, the sheer magnitude of attendance/capacity/use relative to the rest of the entire college baseball world, an article by a noted author and independent regional and national journalists, and "awards" such as "best place to watch college baseball" and "100 things to do before you graduate" by national sports publications should be enough for the Left Field Lounge to stand on its own.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined PROD; Wikipedia is not a dictionary. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you still have some objections to this article , please denote them more precisely !!!!! and set another 5 day trial , so the authors / editors have a reasonable amount of time for further improvements and dealing with a problems that You've announced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monikapelc (talk • contribs) 13:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Procedural close. The AFD debate for the article this redirects to is here. In the event that article gets deleted this redirect can be deleted under CSD R1. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined prod. Wikipedia is not a how-to, nor is it a repository for documentation. It's possible that a brief discussion of this topic belongs in a larger article on C++, but it doesn't seem to work by itself. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not even an indication of notability. WP:Notability (buildings), as regarding what it says about individual hotels. Speedy was denied on the grounds that this article has been here long enough that controversy is likely, but I think it makes more sense the other way around: if it's been around this long and still no one has added anything indicating notability, that speaks for itself. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This guy is not notable (fails the four-pronged test). He has only a couple of minutes of screentime in the film and maybe is the focus of half of chapter in the book and doesn't even have a name. Now Middle-Earth is one of those subject matters where you can find a lot of information about practically anything you want, so fluffing up this article was not hard to do. But if you actually consider the real world impact it has, it's pretty much zero. Belongs on the LOTR Wiki, not here. Remurmur (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No notability from any independent sources. Ghits reveal Wikipedia mirror pages and ballot listings, nothing more Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 04:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable non-single without enough coverage in reliable sources. Almax999 (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Good Omens. I too saw no reason to delete prior to redirecting; we'll just keep an eye on it. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 05:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable by itself, and completely unsourced article on character from the book Good Omens. Cirt (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Good Omens. I didn't add in the material because Aziraphale already is mentioned at the target, and nothing here was sourced; it's all here in the history if needed. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 05:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable by itself, and completely unsourced article on character from the book Good Omens. Cirt (talk) 00:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is a article that is primarily un-sourced original research βcommand 08:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Animated film/TV writer. Has writing credit on a dozen or so films and series, but nobody has written about him, so no WP:GNG, and his work isn't significant enough to qualify for WP:CREATIVE. Article also suffers from apparent WP:COI/WP:AUTO issues. gnfnrf (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable unreleased album with little or no substantial media coverage. Sourced mostly from interviews and sources of dubious reliabilty. Previously deleted via AFD, speedy deletion was declined. Still fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 18:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BOLLOCKS. No WP:RS. No WP:GNG. Not even WP:FRINGE-worthy. ScienceApologist (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No notability outside the show. No references, no media coverage, no real world information, tagged for notability since September 2008. A google search show that "Rod Calloway" can be a common name and having a redirect may cause confusion problems. Magioladitis (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. After padding with RAF information was removed, commenters were nearly unaninmous in the idea that individual scout troups are not notable. Mgm|(talk) 09:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy. Another article on a local branch of the Air Training Corp (youth movement like the Boy Scouts for those outside the UK). No notability, although there has been attempt to pad the article with the history of the RAF 114 Squadron. Nuttah (talk) 22:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article exists to promote a neologism that does not appear to have become notable outside of the website that invented it. The article appears to exist primarily to promote a particular website, and is of no value to an encyclopedia. Richard Cavell (talk) 23:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 02:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable news correspondant. Little third party sources exist for him and fails WP:V at the moment. Tavix (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]