The result was Delete as original research. Contact me if you want to merge it, or transwiki it. --Haemo 01:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest to delete because this article is synthesized original research focused on an in-universe perspective. The content fails our Wikipedia:No original research policy and would be better suited for Memory Alpha or somewhere else. Burntsauce 23:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I'll provide a copy to anyone who wants to make this a category - leave me a note on my talk page. Daniel 01:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This list provides no context and would be best served through categories. My motion is to delete and categorize those that can be reliably sourced. Burntsauce 23:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Daniel 01:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N. No non-trivial, third party reliable sources can be found which establishes notability for this small 1 x 4 seat aircraft general aviation operator Russavia 09:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Carlossuarez46 01:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting to delete this article because Wikipedia is WP:NOT a game guide, and this article is little more than a dictionary definition that lacks reliable sources. Burntsauce 23:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has a non-neutral point of view, is unreferenced, and contradicts the Hyper-calvinism page on Wikipedia. StAnselm 23:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep a proposal for deletion is not the appropriate response to an article which is simply badly written. --S.dedalus 01:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: speedily deleted by admin after being tagged. Non-admin closure of AfD. Thomjakobsen 00:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it considered for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theenvisionv3 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 28 September 2007
The result was Delete. It's a feel good story, but ultimately not encyclopedic - many rescues get similar coverage but BLP1E really applies to this, perhaps more so because the LP is a minor whose situtation was not entirely of his own making. Carlossuarez46 01:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a young boy who had the misfortune of beeing swept to sea and then resceued. This makes a great news storry, but Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Apart from a very public resceue there is nothing particularly notable about his life, and per WP:BLP1E we should not have this kind of article. I'd say that goes double when the victim is a young child. Sherool (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 01:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This football competition is not even at the official proposal stage and is merely a discussion point for the media. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. In addition, the lack of citations for claims made and sentences such as "It is expected a side from the Gold Coast and possibly Geelong may be given a go, while a Northern Queensland bid and a Western Sydney/Wollongong bid are likely to be given access straight to the A-League 1st Division" make it look suspiciously like original research. Mattinbgn\ talk 21:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I feel there would be much better grounds for keeping this article if some reliable sources could be provided as references, the Australian football association for example. If there are real verifiable plans to set this league up, rather than just pure speculation the article should be kept. King of the North East (T/C) 11:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 02:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fantasy football league. — Anarchivist | (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no references. It does not assert notability. The topic seems to be discussed on things like message boards, but it does not seem to be the subject of multiple reliable secondary sources. As such, the whole article is original research. Croctotheface 21:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 01:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A toy, with no sources, no evidence of actual significance, no sales figures, no sign that it made any of the Disney cartoons, and 50% of the information is openly speculative. Cruftbane 21:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable sources found in searching. The only results appear to be eBay type listings for Disney collectibles. But there doesn't appear to be any articles about this toy. -- Whpq 21:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not significant. ScarianTalk 21:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable "event"...actually reads more like a compilation of articles about one of the University's student organizations. --- Tito Pao 21:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. While the delete !votes seem to hinge on the poor state of the article, enough editors believe that the subject is notable and therefore the list satisfies our inclusion standards (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 01:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sad. Only one bluelink, and there only ever has been one. Not a useful "to-do" because, for example, the "Greyfriars Holiday Annual" is much more likely to be covered under Billy Bunter. Trivia fans: I used to live next door but one to the son of the man who drew Billy Bunter. Cruftbane 21:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not particularly notable. That one blue link does nothing to save it! ScarianTalk 21:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 19:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article was merged to Universe of the Metroid series because of its lack of individual notability. The conversation went on for a month, and after that it was merged. Now, someone has unilaterally re-created the article, and there is no expectation that it will be any more notable than before. It is just a regurgitation of the plot of the Metroid games as told in an unencyclopedic in universe perspective, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 20:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is about a perceived effect of a "synchronistic phenomenon perceived to take place between the 1972 Russian film Solaris and The Lightning Bug Situation's 2007 CD... ", mainly posted on MySpacepages, by some fans of the band. The band itself could possibly warrant an article, but no-one has written this (as I can see.) If they had an article, this effect could be a section there, but being a perceived effect shouldn't warrant an article by itself. The creators claim since a similar effect for Pink Floyd (Dark Side of the Rainbow)warrant an article their bands similar effect should warrant an article too, but this is faulty logic- Pink Floyd is a mega-band. My first instinct was db- |hoax/sillyness to promote NN or near-NN -band here, but I guess it's not clear-cut enough for a speedy delete. Greswik 20:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Brian Miller (the front man of The Lightning Bug Situation and partly the subject of this article) co-wrote two songs on Jolie Holland's last album, wrote the music for one of the songs on her first album, and appears on all three of her albums. To me, if Jolie Holland qualifies for Wiki, then so does this article. Mint Seawalls 20:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A Google of "Yeats is Greats," Brian Miller's last album, shows that it "Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network," as per the Wiki Notability guidelines. Also, a Google of both "Yeats is Greats" and "A Leaf; A Stream" separately shows that they were both "frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture" as per Wiki Notability guidelines as well.
If I have to write a dang Lightning Bug Situation article I will! But this, to me, was a much more interesting phenomenon than some write up about a band.
Mint Seawalls 21:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here are two appearances in the San Francisco Chronicle: here and here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mint Seawalls (talk • contribs) 22:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dang! I was just trying to show noteworthy-ness. Wow. I had never written an article for Wiki before (though have used it countless times)--and I thought I had written a pretty cool article--but I had no idea the wrath that was going to come down! Mint Seawalls 22:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC) -- please dont think of it as wrath, just read WP:FIRST and try on something more substantial. DGG (talk) 04:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mint Seawalls 22:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This probably has nothing to do with Wikipedia, but the whole reason I wrote this article at all was because I actually tried the "Solaris Bug Situation" effect--playing "A Leaf; A Stream" while watching Solaris with the sound off--and it actually worked! Really well! But alas unfortunately I'm not a reliable source... Mint Seawalls 02:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Carlossuarez46 03:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Journal with no claims of notability. There is no article for the society whose journal this is. As usual, my db tag was removed by User:DGG Corvus cornix 20:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jreferee t/c 05:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article was merged to Universe of the Metroid series because of its lack of individual notability. The conversation went on for a month, and after that it was merged. Now, someone has unilaterally re-created the article, and there is no expectation that it will be any more notable than before. It is just a regurgitation of the plot of the Metroid Prime games as told in an unencyclopedic in universe perspective, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 20:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Carlossuarez46 03:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An article about a journal with no claims of notability. There isn't even an article about the organization whose journal this is. My speedy tag was removed. Corvus cornix 20:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per the current sources and indirect indications of notability. --Tikiwont 10:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was bundled with its twin, Champlain Centre North, in a previous AfD. For some reason, North got deleted, but this one stayed, even though the consensus was to delete both. This one was kept because it had been listed twice before in other bundle AfDs (one keep, one no consensus). The sources on this article aren't that good, and a Google search turns up almost nothing, so I think the page should be deleted; the mall obviously fails WP:RS and WP:N. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Martial BACQUET 11:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Although this mentions some media coverage, I can't find any coverage other than on blogs & fansites. As this article has been up for some months — and is a long and reasonably well written article — it doesn't seem appropriate either to prod it as non-notable or speedy it as an advert (which it does read like). However, despite all the effort that's gone into it I can't see anything that stops this article being a puff-piece for a non-notable club, albeit a far better quality one than most; the sole mention I can find on anything approaching a reliable source is nothing but a Youtube clip with no text. — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update - Two comments containing possibly valuable links had been moved to the talk page. AFD closer should be aware these were identified as SPA's. Now reverted since potentially useful. Sorry 'bout the messy refactor user:FT2:
|
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very short article on a dead mall in Pennsylvania. Fails WP:RS, WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 23:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another indiscriminate list of information waiting to happen. "Controversial" is such a vague (and inherently POV) term that I don't see how this could ever be encyclopaedic. — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also nominating
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable actor. Completely unreferenced. Some of the article seems like a hoax. Davnel03 19:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sourced article, but the name explains it all, car accidents are very common and hundreds of thousands are killed every year,Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Delete Secret 19:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thomjakobsen 21:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is essentially a mirror of the World Tourism Rankings published by the World Tourism Organisation. It is, of course, not authoritative, as Wikipedia is not the publisher. The article contains no analysis of the rankings or how they are compiled, only the information, so I believe this article fails Wikipedia is not a random collection of information. I would suggest that it be deleted, a redirect placed pointing to World Tourism Organisation, and we then wait to see if that article ever contains an encyclopaedic coverage of the rankings sufficient to split out again. And we should of course link to the rankings in the main article. Cruftbane 18:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Cookshow. Brand new site this year, only references are self ref's. Hu12 18:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Finishing unfinished nom by an IP, who claims that this article was already deleted before. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability, a1 empty when you remove the unsourced material. NawlinWiki 18:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, no good A7 criteria for speedy (fail to assert for film would cut down on AfD) superβεεcat 18:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable hack of a hack. No reliable sources. Most of the google hits seem to be places to download it. Smashville 18:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Jreferee t/c 13:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The list contains biographies of many unsourced star wars characters who at best appeared in the Knights of the Old Republic games and it is written mainly inuniverse, its style nor its content warrants inclusion on Wikipedia Sherzo 18:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Previous AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ancient Jedi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryan Derksen (talk • contribs) 08:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It seems like people are using the what would Britannica do criteria for an articles notability. This isn't Britannica. The resources are greater, and the number of users is larger. It's factual information that is useful as a reference for people watching the movies or reading the books. Sorry if I offend your sensibilities, but ones snobbish opinion of what is or isn't "encyclopedic" doesn't play a part in it. If you really want to do something useful, break the article into subs for each Jedi, and keep the list linking to the article. As to the "sources, yes, but sources that are verifiable" comment, I'm sure I don't know, understand, or care to know what your bureaucratic definition of verifiable is, but I'm sure you could go and look at the original sources, as in the books, that they were referenced in, and verify the information. —Slipgrid 18:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability, repeatedly deleted under this and other titles. NawlinWiki 18:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've declined a speedy request on this as it seems to make a vague assertion of notability, but don't believe it warrants keeping. Zero Ghits and veers close to the blurry line that separates "legitimate belief system" from "patent nonsense". — iridescent (talk to me!) 18:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep/merge. Wizardman 01:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I nominate articles about this author, a book he wrote, and a film he made. Only one independent source is cited in these articles: Another book on the topic, where he seems to be quoted. But I'm not convinced that this is enough to establish notability. A merger has been proposed long ago, but also the merged pages would not be notable, I think.
As said, I also nominate the following related articles:
-- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. The group's article was deleted in the cited afd, and no other notability was asserted. Carlossuarez46 03:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Full album released by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Super Insurgent Group of Intemperance Talent (link to the group's own AfD discussion). No evidence that the album ever charted or was released by a notable label. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sister EP to Self Titled (Australia) Article admits only 1,500 cassette copies sold. That's pretty non-notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable EP by a musical group that is itself up for AfD. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 23:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The current article (and its accompanying image) reeks of a hoax. There are eight different versions of this article in the history; however, the only valid version I can find is a two-year-old, two-sentence sub-stub. A Google search shows that he does exist, but I can't see anything other than blogs & wikis from which to expand it. — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable TV presenter. Has appeared on a number of very obscure satellite-channel shows. Claims to have been in some notable films, but they would appear to be as an uncredited extra as this IMDB.com entry would be listing them if otherwise. Thomjakobsen 16:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This magazine does not seem to be notable. Many organizations publish in-house newsletters. This seems to be nothing more than that. There are no secondary sources cited that mention it. Steve Dufour 16:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable DJ, sources given are not independent of the subject, talk page says he was recognized as "the most important DJ in Costa Rica by thedjlist.com" but that site appears to be an unreliable directory site to which over 170,000 DJs have submitted profiles. Thomjakobsen 16:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just information about a non-notable computer virus. Couldn't find any mention of it on google or yahoo either. ARendedWinter 16:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know I have not followed the Verifiability guideline, but I had didn't know this virus existed until two or three variants of it showed up on my computer a few weeks ago. I run AVG Anti-Virus and McAfee on my machine (it's Windows XP), and neither of them even found any of them. I was unable to find any help on the Internet. I finally tracked it down and got rid of it by brute force, in the process discovering the information which I put in this article. I hope that this info will help other people with the same problem. However, I understand that violating the Verifiability rule makes it subject to deletion, and if it does get deleted, I fully understand. Tolkien fan 16:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable software, few Google hits, conflict of interest. Mushroom (Talk) 15:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g6, inadvertently created. NawlinWiki 15:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a salt if possible. Fourth article with exact same content. All have been speedied. ARendedWinter 15:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Classic Vacations. Hu12 14:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. The controversy is notable, which is really the subject of the article. Whether the article should be retitled to something other than her name is not a AFD. The BLP issues raised are not persuasive: the contentious claims are all sourced, and she has projected herself into the controversy rather than being a non-participant swept up in events beyond her control. Carlossuarez46 03:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is a WP:COATRACK created about this person only after an article in the New York Times questioned the veracity of many claims she had made about being a survivor of the 9/11 attack. This article seems contrary to WP:BLP, but I leave it to the Wikipedia community to discuss it and decide. She did not seem to have encyclopedic notability before the expose. Per WP:NOT#NEWS, not everyone who is in the newspapers needs an encyclopedia article. Edison 14:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No sources to verify the content. Google gives less than 30 uniwue hits, including Wikipedia mirrors, none look like a good source. It has a short mention in the Goodna, Queensland article, and that's all we should have unless we have sources. (The "other businesses" section should be removed in any case per WP:NOT#DIR, but that's an editing issue, not a deletion issue.) Huon 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The shopping centre's actual name is St Ives Shopping Centre. Orderinchaos 01:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear notable to me, IMHO. Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. TexasAndroid 13:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 04:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to me to meet WP:MUSIC requirements. AFD instead of Speedy in case I'm missing something, but as it is he just does not appear notable to me. TexasAndroid 13:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to me to meet WP:MUSIC requirements. AFD instead of Speedy in case I'm missing something, but as it is she just does not appear notable to me. TexasAndroid 13:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 19:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that content was cut from the early storyboards of Half-Life 2 is probably notable enough for inclusion in that article, but what we have here is a level of detail vastly in excess of what is appropriate to a general encyclopaedia. A very long article describing in minute detail by reference to essentially a single source the elements which are not in a game? I think that's the stuff of game websites and blogs, not for an encyclopaedia. Cruftbane 13:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 19:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was originally nominated for speedy deletion, and I felt uncomfortable doing so. Appears to be fully original research and lacking in notability, considering this line from the text: "This is a first-hand eyewitness account and there are few, if any, corroborating sources that still exist today." SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bebopnjazz 16:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 03:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This list is redundant, as all notable seiyū should be in the Category:Japanese voice actors. The reasons for keeping this during the previous nomination are a bit weak: adding red links to non-notable voice actors is against WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. I don't think the list is very usefull, as it doesn't seem to be maintained: the history shows mostly Ip users adding and removing seiyū without giving any reasons. Ninja neko 13:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The only assert of notability is that the artist worked in a short period with Three 6 Mafia. The artists is not even signed to a major labe. Tasc0 00:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). — Gordonofcartoon 13:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are no sources to confirm notability. I looked, but couldn't find any sources in English. There's an article on another Wiki, but it doesn't appear to have sources verifying notability either. FisherQueen (Talk) 12:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it. Burcu Gunes is very popular even here in Australia. Eregli bob 12:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 18:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
unofficial day started my non-notable group/movement. Sfacets 12:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete -- non-notable. --Haemo 01:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article previously deleted [14] at AFD so bringing it here rather than prodding. Unable to find proof of praise in article (although music video apparently did feature in DVD extras, the song was on a "from and inspired by" soundtrack and did not appear in the film ([15]). Notability is not inherited. All I have found are very brief (one word) passing reviews when discussing DVD extras of [Crash (2004 film)]]. Kateshortforbob 12:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC) (ETA: I moved this article to removed quotation marks before nominating it. Original title "If I...". Kateshortforbob 12:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a defunct team in a non-notable league, and the article provides no assertion of notability. Lou.weird 11:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability. Defunct shopping mall. Nothing asserting notability in Google news archives. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 10:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability. Nothing asserting notability in Google news archives. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 10:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 10:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A fictional siege in a minor British TV series, of no provable independent significance, written in-universe, completely unreferenced. I believe this fails the guidelines for fictional subjects. Cruftbane 10:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced since creation, also tagged as lacking evidence of significance, episodes of a minor British TV series and there is sufficient information about the episode in the main article to satisfy the encyclopaedic purpose of documenting the series. Cruftbane 09:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. Redirecting doesn't require an AFD W.marsh 19:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article about two Amazing Race contestants as a team.
Not worthy of a separate article, if these people were so notable they would surely deserve their own separate entry for each person. All of the information on the page is already covered in The Amazing Race 5 contestants, and as there is no significantly new information on their page, Charla and Mirna are not worthy of their own article.
The article has been nominated for deletion before, but the entire discussion basically consisted of WP:ITSNOTABLE without any reason or elaboration. I suggest this be redirected to The Amazing Race 5 contestants. Hoogiman 09:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete through WP:IAR. A hoax this obvious deserves no more attention. Fram 11:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a hoax. No Google hits for "Mikah Yasthabon" and no relevant Google hits for "Jon H"+"Greek Orthodox Church". Nothing for "Jon H 3:16" either. BencherliteTalk 09:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the topic lacks significant coverage to meet WP:N. Jreferee t/c 07:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Non notable new festival with 375 visitors. I haven't found one reliable independent source reporting on the festival (a newspaper or some such). Fram 08:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete by User:Philippe. Non-admin closure. ~Eliz81(C) 20:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It does not follow the WP:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles guidlines. The band has not released an album, no sources are cited in the article except for a self made myspace page. Gh5046 07:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This unreferenced (and liberally ((fact)) tagged) article appears to be a fork of Summary of Christian eschatological differences and rapture, both of which cover the debate more than adequately.
As a substantial and unreferenced article, it reads as a personal essay. It is essentially as monograph. Cruftbane 07:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Demo album, unreleased and abandoned. NN per WP:MUSIC#Albums "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs and promo-only records are in general not notable." Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 07:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I feel its notable because of whos career it is. Beckham only officially released one CD and whether or not she is doing music is a big part of her career which is wikipedia worthy. This particular unreleased album has been the source of much speculation and news by the media and fans around her. I pretty much spelled it out in the article. Its not merely a bootleg or demo (there is mixes of booth in there) but its actually about 2 and a half cancelled albums that have leaked or been involved in her career. She even released 2 singles from these cancelled albums and released another 4 songs from them. So there is some notability there. There's a lot of disinformation floating out on the net about it; I think it would help if there was a place that was legit and had the legit history of it. Im not sure why it wouldnt be worthy by that; as its an intergral part of her career. However I guess thats an editors decision to make. --Thegingerone 07:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G1 Pedro : Chat 08:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails both WP:HOAX and WP:NOTE. Note zero G-hits for both "Johnny Angles Oakley" and ["Johnny Oakley" +Angles]. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 07:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted per author request. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 11:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] The Dark Hills Divide (film)[edit]
The user who created this article would like to have it deleted, as explained by him on my talk page. ||| antiuser 05:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Prison Mike[edit]The subject matter (but not the actual content, which is poorly written) of this article has been merged to the parent article, The Convict, with consensus of three editors opposed by the original author. There are no GFDL issues. The character "Prison Mike" has only ever appeared in one episode of one show, and at this stage it does not seem likely that the character (actually merely a persona adopted by the main character) will appear in any other episodes. I suggest that we discuss this article with a view to deleting and restoring as redirect, rather than accept the protracted attempts of the original author to remove the link to the merged article. Tony Sidaway 05:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Stefan Guteklint[edit]AfDs for this article:
This musician is not notable; fails WP:MUSIC. The band in which he played bass for 1 year is notable, but he has not inherited that, as a quick google search confirms. Any useful content that could go in the article in the future could be merged. As it stands, there is no useful content. Markdsgraham 04:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Need It Feat. Dane[edit]
Delete nn single from nn album by red-linked (and nn) group, fails WP:MUSIC Carlossuarez46 04:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dane Farwell[edit]Delete basically sub-stub BLP of nn stuntman and actor, fails WP:BIO with those red flags of non-notability of modern-day bios: we don't know where or when he was born Carlossuarez46 04:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] CryptArchiver[edit]
Software article with no reliable third-party sources attesting to notability. A search turns up download sites, but not the kind of coverage required. Thomjakobsen 03:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep or at least, there's clearly no consensus to delete all of these. W.marsh 16:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] My Mirror Image[edit]
I've packaged in all the articles in the sixth season of Scrubs except for My Musical. Wikipedia:Notability states that articles should have "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." These episodes haven't received much, or in most cases nearly any, coverage from secondary sources and consist of plot summaries, trivia, songs used, and other primary information. 17Drew 03:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Speedy Keep. They just need more sources. Like any other TV show or movie, primary information is going to dominate the article, as it should. In this case, it's Scrubs which I don't even need Google to know it's notable. And may I ask, why just season 6? All the other seasons still have their episodes. - Rocket000 03:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 19:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dedication 2[edit]Deleted in a group nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da Drought 3 despite arguments for keeping this individual article. That deletion was overturned by deletion review, with consensus to relist individually. Some sourcing can be found in the AFD, the DRV, and in the infobox of the article. Is it notable? GRBerry 03:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that there is not enough reliable source material to expand the existing material into a neutral and unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts. -- Jreferee t/c 07:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Ida Frabboni-Saletta[edit]
Does not pass WP:BIO. The only English source for her existence is grg.org and of the 21 Ghits, many are mirrors and none contain any substantial coverage of or information on the subject of the article. Thus it has little potential for expansion and contains no information aside from what is present in List of living supercentenarians. She may be the oldest Italian one day, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Cheers, CP 02:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Clarification: My basic problem with this article is that there is little, if any, information out there that could be added to this article aside from what is already present at the list of living supercentenarians. Cheers, CP 04:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Rafael Acosta[edit]
Not notable person DimaG 02:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] FTPEditor[edit]Software article with no sources attesting to notability. A search only turns up the usual download sites. Thomjakobsen 03:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was early close as keep, no chance of this ending in anything else. See WP:SNOW. Neil ム 10:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Wikitruth[edit]AfDs for this article:
That is right, I am nominating the Wikitruth article for deletion. Here's why. All the attention this website got was a brief spurt of "Hey, look at this!" Since then, no one outside of the Wikipedia and Wikitruth communities have given non-negligible attention to it. If I remember correctly, things that get their fifteen minutes of fame on the Internet from Slashdot and then are not heard of again do not constitute notable subjects. MessedRocker (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(resetting indent) - Ok I'm not a fan of arguing but my first comment was that it put Mr. Wales on the defensive (calling it hoax) not because he rewarded it with his glorious presence or something. I think something is very wrong with this Afd since it is already the 5th time and most of them is based on WP:IDONTLIKEIT and a Google screwup.--Lenticel (talk) 07:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Big Box Storage[edit]
Non-notable business. Only third-party source is a local fluff-piece when the company was starting out, which isn't a reliable indicator of notability. Thomjakobsen 02:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Doctor Krupov[edit]
Non-notable villain of Our Man Flint. Clarityfiend 02:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] I am also nominating the following related pages because they are his equally unnotable cohorts:
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Virgil W. Magee[edit]AfDs for this article:
Fails WP:BIO - no non-trivial coverage of subject in WP:RS. Leuko 01:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Chick Bowen 22:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Matthew Moretz[edit]
Non-notable biography. Not covered by secondary sources aside from one archive linked article, which requires registration & payment. Main claim for notability is a youtube page, which doesn't have high view or subscription numbers by youtube standards. All other links/references are by publications which appear to be related to or affiliated with the subject. I tagged this article just over a monh ago for lack of references or notability, references provided so far don't support notability. Optigan13 02:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] I am also nominating the following related pages because [Redirect page to nominated page] See also two additional pages linked to main article from its what link here:
The result was Delete. Good article criteria requires an article to stay focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details. Consensus is that this content fork is an inappropriate spinout whose subject matter could be covered in the National Civilian Community Corps if that article stayed focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details. -- Jreferee t/c 07:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] NCCC accomplishments[edit]
A copy of National Civilian Community Corps, full of personal quotes, as well as advertising for the Corps itself. Unnecessary in the end. Jmlk17 00:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete.--JForget 00:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] List Of North Carolina Gay Bars[edit]
Per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. I don't see any way a list like this can be either complete, or kept up to date (bars change ownership/target market all the time). It also sets a precedent for some truly sprawling indiscriminate collections of information — List of California gay bars, anyone? — iridescent (talk to me!) 00:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, nomination withdrawn with unanimous keep votes. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Les Munro[edit]Does not meet WP:BIO, speedy tag has been removed so i thought it would be a better idea to discuss it here.
The result was delete. If there's somewhere specific to merge this, I will make the content available. W.marsh 19:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Revo Arka Giri Soekatno[edit]
Founder of Indonesian Wikipedia. Article has two refs, one of which is his Indonesian wiki-userpage. The other is a deadlink. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Grunk[edit]Original Research. "The first grunk track (In Da Buildin) was produced by G-Red and Deca." An article "G red" by the same main author was speedily deleted on notability grounds (User_talk:Shotmillions#Notability of G red). a.bit 09:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Bob Innes[edit]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the topic does not meet the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 06:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Chris Yandek[edit]The only claim to notability appears to be that he has interviewed some notable people, but an interviewer does not become notable by association. In the criteria at WP:BIO, the most relevant category seems to be "creative professionals", and I don't see any evidence that he meets the criteria listed there - he does not appear to be regarded as an "important figure" as far as I can tell. Additionally, it appears that this may be a vanity entry - the only contributions have come from User:Miami18, who has no other edits, and three anonymous addresses. Dsreyn 16:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-admin closure. Page has been Speedy deleted due to author blanking page. Woodym555 22:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sebastian Nieć[edit]
This footballer seems to be a fake one.He doesn't appear in his team roster [21], has no references, no matches in google... The article is also about future events which doesn't meet WP:Crystal.--Latouffedisco 18:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. The topic obviously is one which could have a Wikipedia article. There was no consensus that the topic could not meet WP:N. The original research concerns raised were legitimate, but there were sufficient efforts during this AfD to at least move the consensus into a no consensus position. This seems a legitimate spinout article from Star_Wars#Legacy. There was no consensus that this article should be merged back into Star Wars. Jreferee t/c 06:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Cultural impact of Star Wars[edit]
Stub, unsourced, US bias, and more than adequately covered in the main article. Just put it out of its misery. - Sikon 18:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 19:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] ActionAid Recycling[edit]
Reads like an advert. Unsourced. Computerjoe's talk 21:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|