The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chick Bowen 22:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Moretz[edit]

Matthew Moretz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable biography. Not covered by secondary sources aside from one archive linked article, which requires registration & payment. Main claim for notability is a youtube page, which doesn't have high view or subscription numbers by youtube standards. All other links/references are by publications which appear to be related to or affiliated with the subject. I tagged this article just over a monh ago for lack of references or notability, references provided so far don't support notability. Optigan13 02:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because [Redirect page to nominated page] See also two additional pages linked to main article from its what link here:

Rev. Matthew Moretz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chick Bowen 01:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If appropriate third-party sources can be found to support the site, I think it should stay, but as it is it doesn't meet Wiki standards. Renee 02:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. low notability for encyclopedic inclusion Jodes534 02:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete I don't see sufficient secondry sources documenting a notable impact. Pete.Hurd 03:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable. A YouTube video and some web-sites do not assert notability. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If he's notable, I see no evidence of it - that's what proper sources are for. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Sorry God, but delete. ;) NN. Spawn Man 12:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN Tiptopper 16:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.