The result was redirect to Aethon. —Angr 21:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete nomination by User:Ifnkovhg. This is an unsourced article about the eagle who ate Prometheus' liver, but according to Ifnkovhg at Talk:Ethon no ancient source gives him the name "Ethon" (or any other name). Doubt has also been expressed about the other information in the article, such as the eagle's parentage. My recommendation is to delete redirect to Aethon, since even apart from the lack of sourcing I doubt there's anything to say about the eagle that can't be treated at Prometheus. EALacey 15:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC) [Addendum: Hyginus possibly gives the name as "Aethon"; see below. EALacey 10:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)][reply]
“ | Ethon, a giant eagle, continually feasts upon his liver, believed to be the seat of passion.[2] Prometheus remains there for thirty thousand years, until Heracles, the greatest of Zeus’s sons, performs the act of rescue which Prometheus has foreseen; Heracles kills Ethon and then shatters the chains that have bound Prometheus to the rock.[3] | ” |
That isin mentem mihi veni, Hyginum forsan ... deceptum fuisse Graeco epitheto αἴθων, quo ἀετὸν ornant Poetae, ut Homer. Iliad. O. 685. putasse, inquam, proprium esse nomen, cum adjectivum esset τὸ αἴθων in Graeco scriptore, ubi hanc fabulam invenit.
it occurs to me that maybe Hyginus was deceived by the greek adjective aithon, with which the poets decorate the aeton, as at Homer Iliad 15, 685 [690 in current editions]. I mean that he thought it was a name, althought the word aithon in the Greek writer where he found this story was actually an adjective.
This seems plausible to me. The latest editor of Hyginus (Marshall) treats it as an adjective, but other good editions treat it as a name; and you would not expect Hyginus to have added a Greek adjective if he recognised it as such (you wouldn't expect any merely ornamental adj., and Latin has its own fulvus for this). If it was an error, it was most likely made by Hyginus or by someone before him. The other standard work for this subject, Roschers Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie has a brief entry s.v. Aithon 7. ‘Der Adler, der den Prometheus quälte,: Hyg. f. 31. Vgl. Il. 15, 690.’ --Nigel Holmes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.133 (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to George Clinton (funk musician) — Caknuck 02:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Nubian Nut" is a 25-year-old, non-notable song by George Clinton. The "substance" of the article, a single sentence, has not changed since the article was created a year ago. It is extremely unlikely that anything in the future will make "Nubian Nut" notable. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 23:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete artist's art already attribs this song to him anyways... Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable porn actress. No coverage in reliable sources, thus no verifiability. Has not won any awards. Despite the 6 award nominations listed in the article, she has only been nominated for an award once ("Best Solo Sex Scene"). Fails WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO. Valrith 23:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Neil ム 09:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
Non-notable comics stories, consisting of two or four issues of a regular series with no particular wider coverage in the media, industry and arts in general, unlike, say Watchmen, The Dark Knight Returns, or Maus. ThuranX 22:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also - to suggest that stories must be longer the 4 issues to be notable is laughable - and frankly a misnomer to today's generation. In the past for a story to be longer than 4 issues was almost unheared of. In today's market stories like 'Batman Meets the Monk' or whatever requires a 6 part mini-series. The original version of that story was told in one issue of the rgular publication. Furthermore, in the 1980s it was not common practice to create 'mini-series' to tell Batman stories. So to suggest that just because these stories fall within a regular publication they are not notable is also not true.
To suggest that only stories over 4 issues and outside a regular run of Batman comics should get an article fails provide reasonable coverage for stories which were shorter than 4 issues and were published inside regular runs. I direct you to the Doctor Who articles - where every single stoyline gets just about equal coverage - as I believe they should.
Moreover, both the Dumpster Killings and Double Image storylines contain key moments within the development of the Robin character. Until these articles were created the events which happened in these stories were not mention in the Jason Todd article. Furthermore Double Image was the last Batman story written for regular publication by Mike W. Barr - and was the final appearance by Paul Sloane before his post-zero-hour retconn. These are notable pieces of information that can be added if these articles are not deleted.
BTW: The original editor has not steadfastly refused to wikify the article to meet minimal standards. I considered it to be wikified. And indeed made several changes in order to appease my fellow editors. If you do not feel it is wikified please provide greater detail as to what could be changed - or indeed chage it yourself. OO7Samurai 09:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do wonder why all the articles created by oo7samurai are up for deletion and not, say Broken City, Batman: Face the Face, Batman: The Man Who Falls, Batman: Nine Lives (in fact all the Elseworld stories which are mentioned - Elseworlds/Batman/Aliens are notable, but that doesn't make every etc. etc. 81.106.192.55 14:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regards other sources of information, I think it must be noted that during the 1980s there were significantly less trade publications, and no Internet. Very few people discussed comics. Should we delete all articles about Batman stories from the 70s and 80s because there was no TGN or Wizzard?
In fact, I would like to draw your attention to the Batman Storylines category. how many stories do you see from the 1970s? None I don't think. How many from the 1980s - about 4 or 5? for the 90's it goes up a bit and the 2000s pretty much loads.
The problem we seem to have here is that people mistake recent for relevant - and consider old to be irrelevant. I assue you, that at the time of publication these stories were as relevtnat as 'Hush', 'Broken City' 'Batman and Son' etc. Wikipedia is supposed to be timeless. We write eveything in the present tense - that which happened in 1987 is as important as that which happens in 2007.
These articles which are proposed for deletion are intended to shift some of the weighted bias that is apparent within this category. They are also intended to provide wikipedians with knowledge of that which went before. to delete them would be to support the practice of only positioning 'new' within this category - which surely can not be right?81.106.192.55 14:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Cotta Vaz uses an extract from Batman #414 to demonstrate that the Batman of the 1980s (to quoute) "is no longer the grinning crime buster who wisecracked while landing haymaker punches". Below the extract Cotta Vaz writes; "In the inferno of Gotham, each tragedy is more than a statistic to Batman". This is published in 'Tales of The Dark Knight' (http://www.trademe.co.nz/Books/Nonfiction/Movies-TV/auction-116403301.htm) I can fully reference this with more time. 81.106.192.55 18:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would just like to make people aware as to changes that have been made to two of these articles. Ten Nights of The Beast and The Dumpster Killings now have 'Critical Interpretation' sections detailing how Mark Cotta Vaz viewed these stories within his book (Tales of The Dark Night - check it on Amazon). Also I have added just a brief note about Mike Zecks covers to the Beast story arc. And also that the Dumpster Killings marked Jim Starlin's inaugural storytline. Also a couple of external links for TNOTB. Plus a readership resonse section.
I'm pretty sure if left up for a short time longer more people would be able to add more extranal sources verifying that these storylines as worth recording. Certainly Mark Cotta Vaz considered them significant enough to make direct reference to them in his works & I'm sure some people out there must have more sources than I. Yes they are not a widely discussed as DitF, but let not the light from that story blind us to the existance and importance of others.81.106.192.55 19:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BTW - Added reference to Bob Ingersoll's 'The Law is an Ass' article in the Dumpster Killer article. Ingersoll devoted the whole of installment #158 to this story lines and the legal issues dealt within. [1] I've also added a reference to this story arc made by Durwin S. Talon in his book on sequential art. [2]I hope everybody can see that these articles can be (and are being) expanded (and yes 'improved' - love the sarcastic speech marks :). They discuss significant story lines which have been discussed at some length in books and in journalistic articles, and that given time such references can be found and added. Just because 'you' might not already aware of their importance does not make them unimportant - the truth is out there (so let me put it on here).
I move the TNOTB and the Dumpster Killings articles be removed from this proposal for deletion. Through recent changes to these articles it has been shown the that events, themes, and the art of these story arcs are all of publishable noteriety. These story arcs are referenced in multiple publications - journalistic and scholarly - and on multiple Internet sources. Several external sources have been added to these articles in order to verify this. The claim that these are 'Non-notable comics stories' has thusly be proven to be incorrect.
I've only just begun digging up references for the third article proposed for deletion. so far I've only found one recent (2006) blog reference to the story arc. However, more should be forthcoming. Already though, the story is found to be of some note to people. Still, until I can dig up more check this >[3]
One last point - The Batman Storylines category was set up as part of the 'WikiProject Comics' which is (quote) "a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia". When I last checked a dictionary (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law - no less) I found 'comprehensive' to mean "covering completely or broadly", thats c-o-m-p-l-e-t-e-l-y (or broadly)81.106.192.55 22:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So that is now a weak delete for DK from you. The way I read the above MorganaFiolett ultimately gave a weak don't delete on the grounds that these are new articles and should be given time to prove themselves (a slow - but clearly active process) - certainly for DK and DI. Only one out and out delete by Cogswobble. And one out and out don't delete from myself. So far I'd say its at best a 'weak call to delete'.
Anyhoo. I honestly find it amazing that people don't consider TNOTB to be notable. I have no sources to back me up here, but when this came out it sold out in seconds. I collected at the time and couldn't find a copy of any part anywhere in the UK - eventually I bought the complete collection for about £30 - which was a lot of money for 4 comics in the early 1990s. It was, at the time, (and in terms of when it was originally published in the comics)the first (earliest) Batman story set in 'present day' (i.e. not Years One and Two) to become a TPB (I guess Strange Apperitions now takes that gong). Due to popular demand it became a TPB some 6 years after it originally ran in Batman - Reagan was no longer president, but the themes of the story still resonated with consumers. It dealt with real political issues of the time, Star Wars, etc. and actually featured the then president (notably Reagan had also recently appeared in DKR - coincidence?) It introduced a new major villain. Spawned a direct sequel in the NKVDemon story arc. It ended with the strong suggestiong that Batman had finally killed a man in cold blood. It was an EVENT. I don't have many books about batman, and I never read industry magazines at the time. But i will be damned if there is not a wealth of notable writings about this story somewhere. Maybe I won't be able to add them in the next few days or weeks. But eventually somebody will. Unless the article is deleted ofcourse. 81.106.192.55 19:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List that consists of only one blue link, and does not have any other helpful information, non-encyclopedic. Tiptoety 22:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 08:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious advertisement, but not so blatant as to meet speedy deletion. I removed the speedy delete tag, and am posting here. Maintenance tags removed by others. Velocity Rewards has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the program or company running the program to develop an attributable article on the topic. -- Jreferee (Talk) 22:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete While this entry would need plenty of work to remove the advertising feel, nonetheless this frequent flyer program is the second major program in Australia behind Qantas program. However, agree with previous comments that the subject is best handled within the main article of the airline (as is the case with Qantas). Murtoa 09:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MastCell Talk 19:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has no notability or reliable sources, so it has no out of universe information, so its just a game guide to all the creatures from the game, and should be transwikied pronto. Judgesurreal777 22:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 08:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hopeless cruft, which occassionally reads like an eassy and is full of origincal research and unverfied claims. Without out-of-universe commentary, only serves to reiterate plot. David Fuchs (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 04:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest deletion per WP:NOT#NEWS this is little more than tabloid rubbish and is not fit for an encyclopedia. The "article" is also problematic under WP:BLP as much of the facts surrounding this case are not fully known. This warrants little more than a footnote under the main Simpson article. Burntsauce 21:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus--JForget 23:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Totally non-notable video game made by the chapman brothers at homestar runner. Great site, but does a video game they made up in one of their emails deserve its own article? No. Judgesurreal777 21:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Wizardman 19:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, non-existent topic. Unsourced since June 2006. No evidence of coverage in WP:RS, no evidence of notability. Valrith 21:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Gp75motorsports 11:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Gp75motorsports[reply]
The result was Keep. Maxim(talk) 14:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - prod removed by anon, stating s/he needs the article for a paper s/he's writing. Unfortunately, the article does not pass notability on its own and the notability of Monty Python is not inherited by the sketch. It also fails WP:PLOT as it is a plot description. The sketch is available for viewing on YouTube and the transcript is available from many sites including this one so our anonymous student will still have access to the information. Otto4711 21:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 18:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable record label. Few claims of notability, trivial references (based on their press releases). Company website has no Alexa rank; while there's a fair amount of Google hits for "Moshpit Tragedy Records", only 79 unique ones among the first 1000 (Google never displays more than 1000 search results). Delete, unless notability is independently established. - Mike Rosoft 07:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Page has been updated and now contains scanned review of label's release from magazine, mp3 link in which radio show host speaks about label and free downloads for 36 second segment, entire show and segment are both linked as well as urls. Also quotes from third parties, interview snippets, bands which are recognized by wikipedia and mention the label on their pages, references, etc have all been included. Do you know how long it will take to have the deletion tag removed? Has notability been proven enough? If anything is done improperly please just let me know here. Thank you. Moshpit tragedy 21:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Huon, there are two links from the radio show. One is a smaller snippet, please have a listen to that one. It will help, as the host says the label is giving away free music and how people can get it. I haven't included any of the label's press releases as an actual reference, only as an outside article for more info for readers. I am just a fan of the label but have done too much work to let it go. The Extinction of Mankind release is high profile, and so was the Eyehategod cancellation, thats why it is noted, it was a talked widely about among metal and punk fans. If it is decided more is still needed please let me know, I know it can be proven because the label's stance on the current record industry and their actions are at the forefront in terms of direction for small labels.Moshpit tragedy 21:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have begun an article on co-founder Rayny Forster who is a notable singer and was written about in many magazines and other sources. Included there is a link to his old band's label's (Cargo Music) site about the band which mentions him and also a review which mentions his singing style in Heckler magazine which is another reliable source. I am determined to find enough info for this as it is out there. Will add more magazine ads and expand on the founder and his other notable projects. Thanks. Moshpit tragedy 22:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I understand. I have been in touch and have received word that there is such news coverage being published very soon and I will link that up immediately. Thanks for your patience with the newbie. Moshpit tragedy 23:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just added another reference which has a short writeup for a magazine's website and not a press release. It contains the founders names, and has some of the bands listed here. Also Extinction of Mankind are very well known, they had a split record with Doom, who sold 15,000 copies of one EP ("Police Bastard" number one selling crust record of all time). I am also going to add some more scans from magazine coverage. Moshpit tragedy 15:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Have added over 12 reviews of the label's releases from reliable independent news sources. There is more coming. Can we take the deletion notice off?Moshpit tragedy 17:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added new Review link, its in Dutch I believe, and roughly translated says something pleasurable about the label for putting out the release. Probably still not enough for you but there is more coming if I can get it up in time. If not I will recreate the account if that is allowed when there is something even more concrete if all this is not enough for you, and I'll leave out all the small link stuff if its of no use anyhow. Thanks to everyone for their time.MetalPunk013 15:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Added section about the label's ridiculously limited edition T-shirt for the band Fuck The Facts, a very well known working band on a large label, Relapse Records. Includes quote from bands website and reference. http://ftf.electrocutionerdz.com/index2.htm It is about three quarters of the way down their news section, Dated Jan 1. Also in their links section they call Moshpit Tragedy a "Punk Grind label from Windsor ON" These shirts were of special interest because of the groups status and the fact that only 20 were made. MetalPunk013 14:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This goes against WP:NOT, it is a loose list of aircraft seen at Kishinev Airport, an aircraft spotters guide which squarely belongs on any other site, just not WP. Russavia 20:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - prod removed without comment. The sketch is not independently notable as there are not reliable sources that are substantially about the sketch. The notability of Monty Python is not inherited by every segment of every episode or film. Also fails WP:PLOT as it is nothing but a description of the sketch itself. Otto4711 20:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 20:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Twice speedily deleted as advertising and as no assertion of notability; it doesn't seem yet to have any notability Nyttend 20:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Maxim(talk) 14:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Waladil Surewood (not a username) 7:35 PM 21 September 2007 (UTC)
The result was Redirect and Keep Not a deletion debate. Shyamal 13:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page has been moved to International E-mail Derekalexanderwilliams 20:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Haemo 05:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No references; no relevent Google hits. Probable hoax. Delete —Salmar (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect example of a crystal ball, which violates WP:NOT, who knows if a ballpark is going to be built, info already mentioned in the Marlins article, wikipedia isn't news nither, prod removed for no reason Delete Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 19:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 14:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nom; I've deprodded this since - as it has at least one significant reference (from Media Week) and was owned by the decidedly notable Time, Inc and not a two-guys-in-a-basement operation, this may warrant keeping; however I'm not certain we really need to keep articles on defunct websites, even those run by major corporations. Procedural nom so I abstain — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 14:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unnessary list, info can be found most other places in the web, it's already 32 KB and only about ten years out of more than 50 is listed, Wikipedia isn't a list of stats, which I consider this to be, also fall under WP:LISTCRUFT, and no prose really can't be formed out of this list, prod removed Delete Jaranda wat's sup Sports! 18:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Given that the reasons cited in the nomination are therefore invalid, it should be kept. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 19:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - the keeps all seem to be coming from SPAs; the consensus among non-SPAs seems to be a delete. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regional DJ, not syndicated, no independent sources to establish notability. Cap'n Walker 18:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows. Suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) , suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) , accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) |
KEEP: Cap'n Walker seems to have a personal vendetta against anyone associated with KLLI. Wikipedia is about information. There are a lot of people/things listed on Wikipedia that wouldn't fall under the "notable" guidelines. When you delete all of those, then you can justify this - until then, it's a vendetta. Are you really Kraddick in disguise? The fact of the matter is - if it's information for the public - and Wiki isn't getting complaints from the subject (and yes, Dan KNOWS about his Wiki entry) - then get off your high horse and go do something useful. If you delete Russ and Dan et al, I expect all these to be deleted as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Radio_people_stubs - Tara — Prettypetal 07 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
KEEP-Dan O'Malley is an important part of the Russ Martin Listeners Foundation for Fallen Police and Firefighters. He is also a co-host of a popular weekend radio show and a co-producer of the higest rated radio show in DFW, a top five market in the nation. Dan O'Malley deserves to be on here as he is a public figure and active in the community through his association with the charity. Captain Walker seems to have some type of problem with people from KLLI and has attacked other shows and personalities from the same station. KEEP Dan O'Malley on here!!!!....David. — 71.158.162.162 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
KEEP- Dan O'Malley is a public figure on 105.3 Klli Radio station. He is involved with the Russ Martin show and with the Hero's Parade. He is well known to people in the Dallas/Ft Worth metroplex and even more. There are less known people than him still on wikipedia, aim for them rather than Dan. He DESERVES to be on here. Next time use your time better than aiming for people who deserve to be on here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikurik (talk • contribs) 04:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC) — User:Rikurik (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
DELETE - Dan is not nearly as notable as Russ is. Just because he is somewhat famous from a radio show does not mean he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Do not get me wrong, I enjoy listening to him on the show and I think he makes it better than without him, but he just is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donwilson (talk • contribs) 07:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete; per discussion, article lacks sufficient sourcing to establish notability. I will userfy the article on request if an editor wants to work further on acquiring such sources, but even so, the final product would need to be based on reliable, independent secondary sources and thus would require a major rewrite. MastCell Talk 20:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All of the references used in the article were published by the subject, so the article seems to be unverifiable since there hasn't been significant coverage from secondary sources. I've added the ((primary sources)) template twice; both times it was removed by Smithgiant without explanation. 17Drew 18:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Smithgiant 23:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Melsaran (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not noteable. Google search only comes up with her personal webpage. Endless Dan 18:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rumors. No known title, rumored tracks, and from the beginning sentence it appears she doesn't even have a record deal. And no sources. Corvus cornix 18:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. CitiCat ♫ 18:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNot noteable Endless Dan 18:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are more websites relating to the artist Nora Blansett than there are Kylie InGold, who has less credible information regarding her life and work. If artists such as Amy Brown and Nora Blansett are to be removed, with far more credits to their names (including winning prestigious awards such as the Froudian Art Awards), then should there not be a complete overhaul of current, living fantasy artists? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frivilousity (talk • contribs) 18:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is still my opinion that while these particular artists are of no interest to you, it does not mean that their life and accomplishments which are highly acclaimed are not of interest to others. These are in fact notable, esteemed artists in their field of fantasy illustration and each have been published with documented awards by other noted artists and organizations. Their validity should not be determined by whether or not someone who's response is "As for the other crap exists argument"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frivilousity (talk • contribs) 21:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, her award is only mentioned on the Brian Froud site along with other award winners. If you need information regarding the validity of her Froudian Award, the information is here, straight from the World of Froud website: http://www.worldoffroud.com/www/froudians/frdart/aug2006.cfm
I would also like to state that ones notoriety on the world wide web shouldn't be a factor in determining their notability. This artist's website clearly states that they have only been on the web since July of last year. Given that she has only had one year to press her work on the internet and already has 11,600 hits for Google, I'd say that her notability has skyrocketed and will easily be one of the more well known fantasy artists on the internet. I hate sounding argumentative -- but I feel that there are often artists that are very popular, but only in certain circles. There are millions of people who have no idea who Brian Froud is, and yet he's the most well known of all fantasy artists worldwide. Five years ago, you would have found *nothing* on the internet about him. I'd like to think that opportunities should be made to make information available about artists of quality that aren't painting poppies on a mountainside. We should be supporting the arts -- and including an artist that has gone from zero to 11,600 in a years time is certainly not a waste of time. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frivilousity (talk • contribs) 21:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. CitiCat ♫ 18:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:N. There seems to be only one implementation of this protocol, and no sources independent of this one implementation have been given. An expert review request to WikiProject Computer networking also did not turn up more sources. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You started a comment with "If in fact you ran a BBS", which is pretty obvious. Look, vote how you want, express your experience how you want. Insulting or questioning my integrity or questioning the honesty in my statement is not conducive to a proper debate, and this is exactly what you did. Just because my experiences are different than yours doesn't make it proper to make a comment questioning my honesty in a debate. period. Pharmboy 20:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Carioca 06:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As per WP:NPOV, WP:RS --Endless Dan 18:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely non-notable village cricket club, playing at the very bottom level on the league ladder, with no over-riding claims to notability fchd 17:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archive of a closed deletion discussion for the article Mzoli's Meats. Please do not modify it. The result of this discussion was "keep". The actual discussion is hidden from view for privacy reasons, but can still be accessed through the page history. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. |
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Being a spokesperson for a transportation utility is not notability. Corvus cornix 17:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. 17Drew 20:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know this is going to be very contraversial... but this article has been totally unsourced since June 2006; it therefore fails WP:NOTE by not asserting its notability, plus WP:VER and WP:RS. It's got to go. There've been nearly 16 months for somebody to deal with it, and they're clearly not planning to. Rambutan (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, AfD is not cleanup. Article tagged for references, which is all it needs. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Has been totally unsourced since June 2006; it therefore fails WP:NOTE, WP:VER and WP:RS. It's got to go. Rambutan (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, "unsourced" doesn't mean "should be deleted". Article simply needs cleanup. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Has been totally unsourced since June 2006; it therefore doesn't pass WP:NOTE, WP:VER and WP:RS. It's got to go, basically. Rambutan (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. No sources can be found for "Ryan Senshi Sole" or "Senshi Sole" or even Senshi+Kunkanti. The article for Kunkanti, the settlement he supposedly founded, has already been deleted as a hoax. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 16:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity, not notable. No WP:RS Endless Dan 16:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Long list, very "in-universey", and debateable as to the notablility of the listed fictional conflicts (there are many other "conflicts" that, withing the GW universe, should be included on this list) Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 16:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete & salt — Caknuck 04:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although the lead paragraph makes this sound like an impressive organisation, on closer inspection none of these projects actually seem to exist. The magazine has yet to publish a single issue, while I'm unable to locate a single release of any kind on the record label; assuming those fall down, all that's left is a COI piece (written by User:Timbouckley about his own organisation) about a student art club, plus an unsourced statement that the group "plays an important and active role in London's arts and cultural scene". While the un-Googlable name means there could be sources out there I'm missing, there's certainly not anything I can find to suggest that this group has had any coverage in reliable sources whatsoever - the sole "reference" is merely to a collection of photos of an exhibition in Area 10 Project Space (itself long deleted as a non-notable venue) and — while I'm well aware this is unscientific — I would expect to be aware of any organisation of any note operating in this field in London, and I have never heard of this group. Bringing it to AfD instead of prodding, in order to give more people who might be able to find reasons to save it a chance to rescue it — iridescent (talk to me!) 15:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: Speedily deleted. Articles are about MMORPG player characters, so I am deleting them due to a lack of a claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft 21:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Two non-notable characters in a non-notable RPG called Eon (not to be confused with Eon (role-playing game)). Eirra + eon returns ~70 ghits (link) (the majority of which are someone's user name on deviantart, sheezyart, and a proboards forum); "darius dracia" returns even fewer hits (mostly wikimirrors and, again, deviantart user pages). Precious Roy 14:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy closed after merge & redirect. Non-admin close. KTC 21:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of this event not established by cited references, seems like recentism. Ronnotel 14:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Maxim(talk) 14:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article fails to cite sources, the subject fails WP:BIO. No proof she's an actual royal, and even if she is, she's still not notable. Delete GreenJoe 14:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to verify any of this article's claims via Google. Accurizer 14:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Maxim(talk) 14:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
fails to meet WP:CORP Rtphokie 14:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why does this matter? NE2 13:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources to demonstrate notability. 3 google hits for "Shotgun democracy" "Adam Champ" not indicative of significant notability. — Swpbtalk|edits 13:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, local company has only been in operation for a year, article offers no useful info and reads like an advertisement. carlb 13:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity, not notable. No 3rd party sources. --Endless Dan 13:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Property transfers, births, and letters to the editor are the only information I could find. While he, himself, has produced published material, no third party has reported on such events or on his life. Seems in need of a good publicity agent. Until then, it appears that Douglas Soesbe has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Douglas Soesbe to develop an attributable article on the topic. -- Jreferee (Talk) 17:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Autobiography of n.n. academic - no 3rd party bio identified on the web - "DIO" website appears to be self-published fringe journal Cutler 12:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep--JForget 22:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable Servicenetbest 17:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing fishy going on here. It is true that I am new to Wikipedia, I was not aware that being a new prevented me from suggesting an artcile be deleted. If I have overstepped my bounds then I apologize. My belief is that the subject, while somewhat notorious in Utah, is not noteworthy enough to warrant a Wikipedia entry. He is primarily known for childish stunts, run-ins with the police and a failed business venture. You might as well let every teenager in the land create an entry about themselves. Servicenetbest 20:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)— Servicenetbest (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was closed delete per WP:SNOW, WP:NOT a crystal ball. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 16:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No content, therefor no context. WP:CSD#A1 was contested, so this is a procedural nomination. — Edokter • Talk • 11:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Arachnocampa — Caknuck 04:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article cites no sources, has no references, and furthermore, the glowworm page in existence more than suffices for this topic. DigitalCatalyst 14:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 04:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about a living person notable for only one event. As discussed in WP:BLP this is unlikely to warrant an article. Itsmejudith 21:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 04:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. A mention in Sharon Abbott would suffice. Kogsquinge 06:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD a7. Non-admin closure.--JForget 00:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOR, WP:VERIFIABLE, WP:NPOV, and probably WP:AUTO or similar. Questionable notability and the content of the article at the moment is mostly nonsense. The article does, however, assert notability and Google does turn up hits for a young squash player named Dylan murray. I considered tagging the article for improvement, but as it stands no article is better than this article hanging around. Markdsgraham 18:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Character was a guest who stayed on the show for about a month. Not nearly notable. Kogsquinge 06:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus; therefore keep. Most of the comments were made prior to Noroton's additions, or it might have been a clearer consensus.--Kubigula (talk) 02:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article provides no notability for the subject. Rjd0060 23:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 04:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This character is never seen and rarely mentioned. Kogsquinge 06:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IMDB lists only one role in some b-movie --Philip Laurence 11:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 02:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think he's notable. No record of him having played for Derby using NeilBrown site and nothing else came up on quick Google search WikiGull 11:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, never played professionally WikiGull 10:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to List of GURPS books. Will be kept as a redirect (though not deleted) until reliable sources to notability are produced. CitiCat ♫ 18:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is long on plot summary and character description which reads like original research, but has no independent sources demonstating notability. --Gavin Collins 10:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 04:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-admitted WP:NFT nonsense. All associated images need to be deleted as well, as they apply to nothing but this dorm room game invented a few months ago. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 08:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 19:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've brought this here to get a community consensus for this article. This gets complicated, so bear with me ;)
Flo Jalin was the subject of a previous AfD last year, and was deleted as a result. It has since been recreated. Yesterday I tagged it as Speedy (G4), the creator added a 'hangon' tag, and an admin passed by and Speedy-deleted as a copyvio. The article was promptly recreated a third time (initially as Flo jalin, which was then redirected to Flo Jalin). It was tagged again within minutes as Speedy (G4), but an uninvolved editor removed the tags asserting notability. I pointed out the copyvio to the creator, and most of the offending material was rewritten. Checking back today, I notice that all the copyvio stuff is back (see here for source). Even leaving aside the persistent copyvio, personally I'm not convinced that IGN interviews and a few swimsuit contest wins is enough to establish notability. Does this one need salting in future? EyeSereneTALK 08:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. CitiCat ♫ 04:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The opening line of this article almost declares itself to be a POV fork from Star Trek. What follows is a lot of non-notable original research best described as fancruft. --Gavin Collins 08:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No concise definition, nor anything much more than OR. Jmlk17 08:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NN & unsourced, likely written by her daughter. Does not meet the standard laid out at WP:BIO. Eusebeus 07:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Monique, an undergrad at Penn State, (or someone very close to her) popped by to write up an aggrandising biography of her mother, (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlette Rosalinda Silva) and figured, while she was at it, she would write one of herself. Apparently, she is familiar enough with the standards laid out at WP:BIO, since she asserts that she is a dancer, a singer, an actress, a model, & "a professed non-denominational Pentecostal minister with an understanding of the spiritual gifts of the Holy Ghost." nary a source in site, however, to substantiate any of this. Delete per WP:BIO & WP:COI. Eusebeus 07:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 22:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Baron wrote one episode of a television show 20 years ago. There are a number of Michael Baron's that come up in a google search and I don't see anything about this one being discussed in third-party sources. Subject fails our notability guidelines at WP:BIO. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 07:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Faculty member at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, who fails WP:PROF. gidonb 07:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Related AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The First Birobidzhan International Summer Program for Yiddish Language and Culture gidonb 11:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No Evidence this term actually exists. No Ghits & no sources provided. Eusebeus 07:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. CitiCat ♫ 04:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fashion event in Singapore which, despite assertions of importance, provides no evidence of such. Delete. Eusebeus 07:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Eusebeus 07:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In this instance the article title says it all - this man's only claim to notability is that he was the father of a well-known comedian, and notability is not inherited. Other than that he worked in a factory and played football (soccer) at a non-professional level. ChrisTheDude 07:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Carioca 07:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
deleteSeems non notable, and I observe the creator, or editors, are largely former students from this school. As such, it appears to exist largely as a effort at reflected glory from the editors former schools alumni. I have clicked on the links, and there seems nothing notable about the bodies, any more than a thousand other self appointed volunteer groups with their own webpage. I'd support the Oak foundation having a page, but for this guy to have one purely based on the fact he is a member of this nonentity body is pretty obviously fake. Some of the stuff is token in the extreme as a desperate attempt to create notability... he carried the Olympic Torch? Him and about 1000 other people in Australia Jembot99 07:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Software extension without any Web coverage except related extension repositories; Wikipedia is not a software manual repository -- Kl4m Talk Contrib 02:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unmaintainable; arbitrary and incomplete; should be an external link in main article to the list which it is using as reference. No precedent for other distros as far as I'm aware. -- Kl4m Talk Contrib 06:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 14:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article on this self-styled Nostradamus has persisted since 2004, largely the consequence of a migrating notability policy that, until recently, conflated any reference in the media with notability. The discussion last time around was close (probably should have been deleted), but some editors still were being swayed by the ridiculously unimportant media "references" adduced, despite there being no indication that the individual meets the standard elucidated at WP:BIO. Self-published Sollog may believe that he is "THE LORD GOD ALMIGHTY", but he doesn't belong here. This is an encyclopedia. Eusebeus 06:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The previous nomination last December resulted in keep, based on the then unreferenced claim of being the first sea cadet corps in Canada. It's been 9 months with no reference being added. I've looked pretty hard to find a reference, but couldn't find one. The national organization Royal Canadian Sea Cadets has an article, but local sub-units of national organizations are not generally notable on their own and this article doesn't appear to establish its subject's individual notability. Sancho 06:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable preacher/rapper/record producer who has constructed an autobiography article. This is one of several non-notable profile articles that the same user has created, most of which contained copyvio from a bible study web page that he appears to be connected with. No reliable sources. OfficeGirl 05:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 21:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After significant time with a notability tag and multiple Afd's, Mr. Stolz's notability has still not been determined. While clearly an active artist, Mr. Stolz fails to meet the criteria for musicians at WP:Notability and therefore his article should be deleted. SingCal 05:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable artist who clearly fails WP:BAND. No releases/tours, only signed to a self-started label. Claim to notability is through voice instructor, being an extra in Spiderman 3 & a music video, and through issuing demo taps. No notable non-myspace ghits. Bfigura (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consenus. CitiCat ♫ 04:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be just an essay TravelingCat 04:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep- this is the first draft of this article, and it refers to a real theory of postmodernism, as the first links installed demonstrate. The whole point of wikipedia is to provide info, and this clearly qualifies. Leave it for a few weeks, then see how it is built on by environmentalists and philosophers, since I don't have time to do all the edits now.Jembot99 04:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment- how to you propose to let it be edited appropriately if it is deleted? Perhaps you can post calls for it to be edited first? I have made some edits whih hopefully clean it upJembot99 05:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No sources, WP:CRYSTAL Caldorwards4 04:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect all to Justice Leagues. Merge would have seemed appropriate, but each of these articles appears to have the same content as the respective section of the main article - plus a brief intro and infobox. Thus, no merge appears necessary at this time, though any editor is free to merge any content that is not already there.--Kubigula (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No claim of notabilty. I am also nominating the following related pages for the same lack of notability:
BlankHole 04:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete. No assertion of notability. CitiCat ♫ 04:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Genealogy cruft: WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. Fails to assert notability per WP:BIO Gordonofcartoon 03:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unmaintainable list. New shampoos and conditioners come out all the time, so this list would never be finished. Also, is it about current shampoos? Historical shampoos? Finally, it is a redlink farm, and I'm not sure there is much interest in making all of those links turn blue. Delete. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 14:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't fit into a speedy category, but just an absolute waste of electrons Kww 02:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability issues here Marlith T/C 02:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fictional TV series. Neither has received significant coverage from secondary sources, so they fail Wikipedia:Verifiability. 17Drew 02:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy redirect, nothing to discuss. Will tag for history merge. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 03:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Giuliana DePandi[edit]
Giuliana Rancic. Enough said. --Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 02:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. I'll leave the history intact since a merge may be necessary. Wizardman 17:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Saya Otonashi[edit]She's apparently the main character in a series called Blood+. It cties no references or sources and was at first in the article Characters of Blood+. I do not think an article is neccesary. Not to mention the author was indef. blocked for copyright violations, so this could be infringment as well. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirected. Nothing more to see here. CitiCat ♫ 04:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Big Brother 8 (US)/America's Player[edit]
This article is just a duplicate of information that is located on the main Big Brother 8 page. This page has absolutely no chance of expansion past September 18 (the shows finale). Everything on this page is in its own section on Big Brother 8 (US). Rjd0060 02:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge into Preston, Idaho. CitiCat ♫ 20:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Napoleon Dynamite Festival[edit]
Article about a smalltown festival with no assertion of notability and no independent, reliable sources other than the local chamber of commerce Nyttend 17:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 14:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sidewalk Sam[edit]There is no significant claim to notability for this person. Murderbike 18:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, if this information is not available here then where? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.71.253 (talk) 18:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 14:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery[edit]
Non notable law firm. Being listed on LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell and "IP Today" does not establish notability. Martindale-Hubbell is basically a business directory while "IP Today" lists no less than 300 specialized law firms. The remaining is self-published, especially the claim that the law firm is the oldest in Chicago. A reliable, independent source offering a substantial depth of (independent) coverage would be necessary to establish notability. Also, serving as counsel in a case law decision "Arrhythmia v. Corazonix" does not establish notability. The case may be notable (although this is not established), this however does not make the firm itself notable. Edcolins 22:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In law school, I was up for Socratic questioning on this case. I still remember the facts. I think serving successfully as counsel at the Fed Circuit on a case that is in patent law case books (Westlaw) is significant enough to leave the article up. I also agree that this may be notable at least for its Chicago business history connection. The founding section is weak and should have more citations. I would leave the self-published sources flag up but remove it from the Articles for deletion list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.30.99 (talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 17:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] The I Scream Man[edit]
A not-yet-in-production horror film sourced exclusively to an unconfirmed IMDB page. The film is said to have a notable cast, again sourced only to IMDB, but a non-notable rookie director/producers. Even the poster appears to be a quick photoshop mock-up made by an amateur. Crystal ballery at its most dubious. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. Maxim(talk) 19:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Derek Webster[edit]
Seems to fail WP:BIO Jeepday (talk) 01:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete G1 as nonsense, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Durbish[edit]Hoax article. No hits from Google at all. GlassCobra 01:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 02:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] West Wyalong Airport[edit]
Non-notable place with little content Marlith T/C 01:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 02:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] La Rosière[edit]A non-notable place with very little content. Marlith T/C 01:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Close and move to MFD, non admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] User:Tyler Warren/Userboxes[edit]AfDs for this article:
My userbox page, I dont need it, as I have Userbox things on my userpage now. Please delete! Tyler Warren 00:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete & recreate as a redirect to Kanye West — Caknuck 02:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Universecity[edit]This is an obvious "Wikipedia is not a crystall ball" candidate. On the official Kanye West website, it hints towards an album by saying "Welcome to UniverseCity" and that's pretty much it. It should be recreated when more information comes out. Possibly even speedy delete for having little context? Spellcast 00:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Webceleb[edit]I prodded this originally, but following a short discussion on User:WebCeleb, I decided to give the author a chance to prove to the community that this is an encyclopedic term. As is, fails WP:DICTDEF and WP:NEO, but author has promised sources to counteract that. I have suggested that a transwiki Wiktionary is in order here, and I stick by that. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 00:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Baby Boy (Britney Spears song)[edit]
Sources provided do not confirm the song as the second single. I suggest either changing this into a song article or simply delete it. Bull Borgnine 00:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) 19:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Irmo Middle School[edit]
The article has been tagged for notability concerns since February 2007. Checking at the article, other then their Basket and Football teams being state champs, there is no real indication of notability from this school. Delete JForget 00:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Irmo Elementary School[edit]
The article is about the typical local school that does not seem to have any notability whatsoever. Delete JForget 00:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 02:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Marcus Dixon[edit]Not Notable DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 00:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Arey, Norman. "Teenager's Appeal to High Court to Attack Sentencing Guidelines." The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 20 January 2004 (p. B1). Arey, Norman. "Ex-Star Athlete Guilty in Sex Case." The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 16 May 2003 (p. C4). Dadigan, Marc. "Dixon Suit Settled for $130,000." Rome News-Tribune. 14 June 2005. Edelman, Marian Wright. "Old South Lingers in a Legal Lynching." Los Angeles Times. 22 January 2004 (p. B17). Gregory, Lauren. "Accuser Gets Settlement from System." Rome News-Tribune. 11 June 2005. Gregory, Lauren. "Marcus Dixon Movie Possible." Rome News-Tribune. 11 June 2005. Jacobs, Andrew. "Student Sex Case in Georgia Stirs Claims of Old South Justice." The New York Times. 22 January 2004 (p. A14). Milloy, Courtland. "Marcus Dixon Doesn't Belong In Ga. Prison." The Washington Post. 25 January 2004 (p. C1). Wooten, Jim. "Home Life, Not Racism, the Problem." The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 27 January 2004 (p. A9). Associated Press. "Floyd County Schools Ask Federal Court to Throw Out Lawsuit in School Statutory Rape Case." 12 September 2003. Associated Press. "Georgia High Court Overturns Teen's Sentence for Having Sex with Minor." CNN.com 3 May 2004.
--Dhartung | Talk 03:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was REDIRECT to 50 Cent per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] No Mercy, No Fear[edit]
Fails WP:MUSIC#Albums. The mixtape is not covered by in-depth sources and has no potential to expand. Even if it was notable, all the relevant info is already mentioned in 50 Cent. The infobox review is merely 1 sentence long and is hardly enough to justify an article. I'm nominating 50 Cent Is the Future for the same reason. Spellcast 00:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Pazaz[edit]Non-notable corporation. Additionally, as it was created by User:PazazMike, conflict of interest/vanity. • Lawrence Cohen 23:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Mick Del Rosario[edit]
Appears to be a not-yet-notable actor. Not even listed on IMDB. • Lawrence Cohen 23:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Maxim(talk) 14:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Right-libertarianism[edit]
This whole article is terrible. It provides not even a definition of its own subject. It just provides vague associations with other ideas and just gives links to a bunch of other stuff. Seth Goldin 02:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 02:14, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Federal Correctional Institution, Edgefield[edit]
This institution is completely non-notable and the article appears to have been created as a coat rack to talk about Kent Hovind's incarceration. Ursasapien (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep — Caknuck 02:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dead Air Fresheners[edit]
Keep: In short, the basis on which I think it qualifies is the other bands members have played in and in being such a mainstay of the Olympia Festival of Experimental Musics but I'm having a hellish time documenting either. - Jmabel | Talk 06:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Also copied from talk page
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Joshuah Michael[edit]
A google search returns less 300 hits most of which are simple links to various myspace and IMDB pages. Can not find any idependant articles writen about him. Ridernyc 16:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently working with B1atv and he is helping me to bring this article to the standards this site requires for inclusion. Please bare with us through this process until we are complete. Thank you for your time and consideration! Cleanzed 22:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 23:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Tfnn[edit]Non notable web forum. Unsourced and clearly original reearch. Undoubtedly fails WP:WEB Spartaz Humbug! 18:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please Do not delete TFNN! TFNN is a web site that helps banned members from the anandtech forums get unbanned, and is an all around cool site. TFNN is like any other forum, It provides info on photography, computer hardware/software and gaming, you can even ask the great one, Cthulhu anything and he might answer you. Despite what a few anandtech mods say about TFNN. (and are probably the people behind this push to have a TFNN removed of the wiki) TFNN provides many services to many people, current Anandtech members and people who have been blessed to never visit the anandtech forums. Thank You. There is no reason to delete TFNN from Wiki. Wiki is to deliver information. This entry is information about a forum. Please do not delete it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.225.90.5 (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC) — 24.225.90.5 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC).[reply] If TFNN is deleted it will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. Wallydraigle 22:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)— Wallydraigle (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC) (UTC).[reply]
Do not delete, TFNN is an offshoot of the largest tech forums on the internet Anandtech forums, it serves as a place to comment on AT Forums without fear of reprisal from the moderators. Pliablemoose — Pliablemoose (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
TFNN is indeed an offshoot of Anandtech. As the notable section says it was created as a hideout of sorts for those that were banned from Anandtech for often time dubious reasons. Due to the existence of TFNN and its use as a sounding board for those who was banned from Anandtech many of the so called permabanned at Anandtech were allowed back on those forums. Related to that is the fact that due to discussions that took place on TFNN there were sweeping changes made to the way Anandtech is moderated. How can you say a site is not notable if it was able to affect such monumental changes on one of the largest tech sites on the Internet? Were TFNN as insignificant as you claim those changes would have never occurred. 204.97.214.245 00:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC) shinerburke[reply]
If you want independent verification of how important TFNN is then I suggest you go ask the people at Anandtech who are only there because TFNN allowed them to have a voice when they were wrongly banned from Anandtech. Better yet ask the site admin over at Anandtech about them changing their moderation rules to be more open and fair. Those changes were in large part due to TFNN's influence. 204.97.214.245 00:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC) shinerburke[reply]
|