The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pazaz[edit]

Non-notable corporation. Additionally, as it was created by User:PazazMike, conflict of interest/vanity. • Lawrence Cohen 23:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Could be speedy as the article does not appear to assert notability.--Markdsgraham 01:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Oxymoron⁸³ 02:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reads like ad. Phgao 16:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Vanity article. GlassCobra 23:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as aricle is just a platform to companies own website. --Gavin Collins 09:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 09:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 10:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.