The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Melsaran (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Brown[edit]

Amy Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete. Not noteable. Google search only comes up with her personal webpage. Endless Dan 18:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I understand the ref, Dan. That link refers to the (wrong) argument that other wikipedia articles exist, so this one should. Not the point I'm trying to make. I provided an external web site in another country (in a cyber sense *grin*)that uses her artwork. Since it is commercial site it may not be reliable but I'm thinking she may be notable if we can find the source. If you mean something else, sorry I dont understand your comment. And dare I say WP:GHITS? Obina 19:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Endless Dan, I'm not sure what google search you did, but searching for '"amy brown" fairies' came up with 420,000 hits [2]. Not that I think that google is a good test of notability, but lets at least show an accurate count. Murderbike 20:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Google search '"Amy Brown" faeries -fairies' came up with another 72,500 hits.[3] Her artwork seems to be sufficiently widespread and, as Obina has already mentioned, sold internationally. Since the notability is as a fairy (or faery) artist, most of the Google hits are fairy/fantasy merchants, but the artwork is also available at various merchants who specialise in other goods and services. One example is Herbalmusings.[4] Another website outside her home country is Australian Native T-shirts and Gifts.[5] I have the impression that she is notable.Coyets 20:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.