The result was Delete and merge back into Aaron Sorkin. NawlinWiki 20:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary fork from Aaron Sorkin#Awards and honors - the important ones are already listed there. The "honours and awards of Aaron Sorkin" are not so notable or significant in themselves that they also deserve their own article. Masaruemoto 00:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh goody!, more lists of awards. Look what I found: List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip awards. Who wants to be the first to put that up for deletion?-BillDeanCarter 01:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-26 13:46Z
non notable as a band and reads like an advertisement, doesn't meet wp:music Aerno 18:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Walton Need some help? 16:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable person. This artist bio does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Special cases -->Creative professionals - no independent 3rd party reference / no significant or well-known work, or collective body of work / no permanent collection in a significant gallery or museum of more than local significance. Other claims by editor and others do not show notablility other than ordinary notability for this class of profesional. Fountains of Bryn Mawr 17:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable company. I can not find any third party items, but it appears to be in partnership with many companies/organisations, and/or the central company in a group. It was created by what amounts to a single purpose account- creating lots of articles related to this company, and with no real editing outside of it. Delete, unless sources can be found. J Milburn 18:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Technicalnote 00:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC) This company has worked with many big companies and is affiliated with notable organizations. I used to work for a Circuit City store in the San Fernando Valley and I remember iGem Productions doing some internal marketing work for them as well. I feel they are as notable as other agencies such as Saatchi and Saatchi or Ogilvy & Mathers.— Technicalnote (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
--Macaddictguy 00:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC) I included iGem Productions in wikipedia because of their charitable contributions to education, educators, and for creating an non-profit organization promoting educational reform. I work for the LAUSD and was impressed at how much this company cares about charities and education. Most companies donate money to charity for the tax incentives, whereas this company offers real services to schools for free, and does not even ask for documentation to write it off. They help schools because they genuinely care about education and our youth. As a gift they created a distribution system for a Community Outreach program which enabled thousands of under-privileged families in Los Angeles to be effectively fed. They did not even publicize doing this, which I felt was incredibly humble and notable, thus meriting inclusion in Wikipedia.[reply]
Result was Keep. - Caknuck 01:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity page. This person's main claim to fame is booing a respected and eminent composer (Birtwistle). Seneca_2007 18:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would much prefer this page to be deleted if it is only going to refer to bad reviews of my music. There are plenty of other good reviews of my pieces that could appear on this site, though alas, not many of them are on the internet. These are reviews in mainstream national publications, so if you would like to have them, I could send them. However, if I were to add those to the site, then it really would be a vanity page! I did not choose to have an article about me in widipedia, and simply expanded the information to include the factual stuff that is already there. The user who constantly wishes to link the information to views that are heavily one-sided of my work clearly has his own agenda. Frederick Stocken.
At the request of the person who made the last-but-one comment, here are some press quotes about my music for what they are worth - most comments critics write, both good and bad, are usually just journalistic gunk anyway:
“At last a young English composer has chosen to write accessible, beautiful music which is unashamedly passionate and melodic.” The Evening Standard
“…it is music which makes me believe that a new Sibelius or a new Elgar has been born.” The Spectator
“… one of the most promising talents of his generation….it is refreshing to find a composer who is producing music which is clear, profound, free-flowing and superbly composed.” The Sunday Telegraph.
“Stocken is forging his own language.” Nottingham Evening Post.
“Stocken’s work will also prove popular with players for he has written very much a showpiece for the violin.” The Strad.
“The Agnus Dei of his Mass was beautiful and quite striking with ladders of woodwind rising against the sound of the solo singers, soon to be shattered by the sound of war (as in, but not like, Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis.)” The Tablet.
“Stocken has managed to create something like a ‘symphony of the city’ that is suitable for our time, which makes you breathless and sometimes invites you to rest.” Wetzlauer Neue Zeitung
“Frederick Stocken has written a surprisingly melodic score especially for this entertaining spectacle, reminiscent of the late romantics.” Giessener Anzeiger.
Although by and large I try to stay out of musical controversy now, it is true that I was fairly vocal in the mid 1990s with criticisms about the 'new music establishment.' I think a lot of the points I made way back then were, and still are, valid, but for many years I have just wanted to get on with my own composition, and other musical activities, and that whole period in my life is (and seems)a long time ago. Frankly, being in the front-line - and firing line - proved to be a very harrowing experience on a personal and creative level. Since then I have been very fortunate to have had a number of commissions and performances. However, in the age of the internet, my past as an 'enfant terrible' - or whatever you like to call it - keeps coming back to haunt me, and there are quite a few people, who still seem to take considerable exception to me. What's especially annoying about this in the case of my being included in Wikipedia is that, even if you decide to keep this article about me, and just to make it a factual page - which is what I attempted to make it - what is there to stop someone coming along and changing it back to what is currently there, ie making it an article that only contains references to bad reviews of my work? There is someone out there who seems intent on making it like this, and has been fairly persistent. Frederick Stocken
Please forgive me for interjecting again, but IF this article is kept on Wikipedia - and I know it may not - please could one of the editors ensure that there is something to counter-balance the one very negative opinion of my work that has been inserted as a link. That this might be possible has already been suggested by someone earlier in this discussion, but I would really hate to see the article kept, and only have this real stinker of a review listed. I think that the very first article about me on Wikipedia, which, needless to say, I had absolutely nothing to do with, didn't have this link. This Wikipedia article is the first thing that comes up about me in Google at the moment and I have already had several remarks in the real world from people who have read the Wiki article and have sympathised about the bad reception of my music. However, this is only a very one-sided representation of the critical response to my music. As I said originally, if there cannot be any counterbalance to this negative review cited, I would much rather not have any article about me at all. Do I have any rights in this matter? Frederick Stocken
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe because it's so technical and lacking in context, but I can't figure out what makes this product notable. Prod removed by creator. FisherQueen (Talk) 19:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete and move to Wikisource, here. NawlinWiki 18:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This articles content is minimal- it is basically a reprint of the poem (which is what Wikisource is for) some background details, some talk of a metaphor at the start, and a list of themes. I don't think there really is much that can be said on the subject. Despite the fact it is the only one of her poems mentioned on Charlotte Brontë's article, it doesn't appear to be one of the more notable- it doesn't get mentioned much. I am not going to say it doesn't exist, there are a few web references, but not many. Delete. J Milburn 18:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NN celeb kid. Ckessler 21:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thats pretty harsh considering the kid will eventually be able to read this. You should be deleted YechielMan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.2.20.147 (talk) 07:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A list of fictitious, mostly one-off company examples used by Microsoft, with no apparent encyclopedic value. No assertion given on why any of these fictitious company examples are notable. Krimpet (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.211.143.149 (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOR because the article is attempting to equate an instance of a well-known television phrase being referenced in a newspaper headline with that phrase "entering the English-language lexicon". It's not that straightfoward. There will always be TV shows that spawn popular catchphrases, that doesn't mean they are part of the Enlish language though. The only genuine example that has actually become part of language is D'oh!, because it was added to the Oxford English Dictionary. Masaruemoto 00:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus and therefore default to Keep. NawlinWiki 18:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright and plagiarism concerns. Article is nothing but a copy of the first listed reference with minimal rewording. -- Diletante 00:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, affirmatively asserts nonnotability, no sources, see WP:NOR and WP:NFT. NawlinWiki 19:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged by User:John Cross; I'm completing the nomination. This is a philosophical idea invented by a high school student, that according to the article "is not a well known theory, and has not yet been discovered by many people nor websites, thus making it fairly hard to track down". Clearly, any article about it could only be original research. —Celithemis 00:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete by Majorly in line with the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services. WjBscribe 16:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
Nom - fails notability. See also what Wikipedia is not. Rklawton 01:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete by Majorly in line with the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services. WjBscribe 16:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
Nom - fails notability. See also what Wikipedia is not. Rklawton 01:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete by Majorly in line with the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services. WjBscribe 16:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
Nom - fails notability. See also what Wikipedia is not. Rklawton 01:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DGG 04:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a list of actors chosen for a TV show, was tagged for lack of sources 2 months ago but still has none. Fails WP:ATT, WP:V, WP:RS. Not that notable either. (And possibly a copyright violation - have Channel 4 given us permission to reproduce their list?) Masaruemoto 01:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 16:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT#DIRECTORY - Directory listings, including full addresses and links to websites. Masaruemoto 01:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gameguide material written in an in-universe style that consists of a few sentences about the "sects" in the game and then a list of redlinks with a description of each "sect." No sources cited, no indication that these are in any way relevant outside the game (little assertion of why they're relevant in the game as well). Better suited for a gaming wiki with a mention in the main game article here. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT Indiscriminate information; "any movie, any television (show), any play, any book, any game, and any other works of fiction" that features a character in the title. This takes "Indiscriminate information" to a new level. Masaruemoto 01:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable one man band, no contract, no record label, no google hits aside form WP and band's Myspace page, no references killing sparrows 06:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy and PROD, so brought here. No evidence from WP:RS that this person meets WP:BIO or the correlary for pornographic actors. Delete. --Kinu t/c 06:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable web-based fantasy game league. No independent reliable sources attesting to the notability of this game. Otto4711 06:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod of mine. Since prod one published article has been added - but I've searched google, Ingenta and Blackwell Synergy and I can't find anything that brings this guy anywhere close to meeting WP:BIO or WP:PROF for notability. CTO of a university spin-out company with no other real evidence of notability is just not enough in my book. Madmedea 13:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While Mr. Ryan is a legitimate actor, according to IMDB his credits are limited to "Pace" on a single episode of The Tudors and "Junkie 2" in Layer Cake (film). I don't see any notability at this time. IrishGuy talk 17:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nom. Possible WP:HOAX nominated for speedy deletion. Sending to AfD because per WP:HOAX hoaxes do not meet WP:CSD and on off chance this might be for real --Shirahadasha 02:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Result was Keep. - Caknuck 01:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is no assertion of notability and the text of the article is all taken from http://www.hornsociety.org/PEOPLE/Honor/Hess.html without any assertion of permission. Theredhouse7 02:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Something the author of the article made up one day, crediting himself in artcle. No online mentions besides this article. 2005 02:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy redirect -- RHaworth 02:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is a copy of BCS Sports Trivia. Dreamy 02:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Forthcoming movie. OK it has been previewed at festivals but can we say it is notable before the general cinema-going public have given their verdict? -- RHaworth 02:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Silly and Redundant article. Any thing related with any of the UW campuses has a "University of Wisconsin" in its name (e.g.University of Wisconsin-Parkside School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Student union, etc.). It is pointless to list parts of these universities. There is no need for this article. It can be replaced with University of Wisconsin System, which includes all the University of Wisconsin campuses and former institutions. (This is a nomination for deletion of a redundant article) Miaers 02:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Miaers is now editing the page in a manner which contradicts what I believe to be the guidelines for dab pages, to an extent that I believe constitutes disruptive editing. Could some other editors see whether I am over-reacting? If not, is it time for concerted action? --Orange Mike 23:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable instant messaging game. The article consists entirely of directions on how to play the game. "BCS Sports Trivia" gets 0 Google hits. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 02:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-published manga article created by serial vanity spammer Kira99er (talk · contribs). Manga was created by ATB Productions, which has already been speedy deleted. The character articles were tagged for speedy deletion by myself for not putting themselves in context. This is not a speedy, but it's obviously not notable and needs to go. JuJube 02:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | This is an archive of a closed deletion discussion for the article Matthew Kent. Please do not modify it. The result was delete. The actual discussion is hidden from view for privacy reasons. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. |
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion, as this syndrome does not have an reliable or secondary sources to confirm it's establishment and existence (see WP:NOTE).
The result was Redirected to Donegal South West (Dáil Éireann constituency); the candidate already has his own article. NawlinWiki 19:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy nom was disputed. Questions of notability seemed most appropriate to be discussed here. Feeeshboy 04:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 19:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No notability stated, no sources Fcsuper 04:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Preston Holder is notable for his archeological studies. I have searched and added references. Mosura 13:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. NawlinWiki 19:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This song is not notable. Also this article will never be more than a stub. And it doesn't source any of it's claims. And if google is anyy indication (it may not be) its claims are unverifiable as no reliable secondary works seem to be about it. So it fails our core policies: verifiability, no original research, and notability. Theredhouse7 04:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC) I would like to withdraw the nomination. The article has been edited enough to deserve a place on Wikipedia, and notability has been asserted. Thank you Nick mallory - Theredhouse7 15:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 08:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A Google search yielded only 51 results, and several do not refer to the subject of the article (and one is to this Wikipedia article). None of the webpages that came up in the result were from reliable sources. I have to conclude that the subject lacks sufficient notability. I suggest that the page be redirected to Ralph Nader. Pablothegreat85 04:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 23:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A book. No assertion of notability. -- RHaworth 05:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Shirahadasha
So far, I've counted problems with: Conflict of Interest (COI), Small business/organization (ORG), Use of self-published sources (SPS), and a general verifiability challenge (V). It might or might not be SNOW, I'll leave that to others to decide. Ronabop 05:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page is an extremely long summary of an online story related to this deletion discussion. It appears no more worthy for inclusion than those deleted pages. Nyttend 05:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per author request. --Coredesat 04:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect this article is a WP:HOAX, or more correctly, a scam. A google search for "Century High School of Santa Monica" returns nothing [9], yet a search for "Century High School" "Santa Monica" [10] returns the top link [11], a site promising diplomas in one week or less. My feeling is that the reputation of schools such as Century High School (Santa Ana, California) is being exploited to make money, and that this article was created as part of this. Indeed, a link to the Santa Ana school website was placed on the page [12]. nadav 05:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I'm sorry i don't know how to use the wikipedia program well. Im not a scammer im a student there Heres my myspace www.myspace.com/masterlevon . My schools a small Christian school not alot of people know about it it dosent even have a thing to myspace. Neither did my other school Mekhitarist fathers armenian school of tujunga ca. Alot of people say where the hell is that when i tell them where i go. I cant find a link to the site in not sure if it has one. Ow and that one week diploma thing is a scam thats the thing that i wrote on my page.
Gevo227 2-25-07
I only made the article so people would know what school i go to instead of saying Where the hell is that. This is my first article i tryed to make and im sorry if anyone was offended. Id just like people to know more about my school. If it does become an article on wikipedia i am going to hand it over to the school so they can add the classes and all that stuff. As far as a web site goes Father Argustis always tells me a computers the devils way of corrupting innocent people looking for answers. Yeah i know extremely crazy but hes a nice guy. Gevo2267 4/25/07 11:21
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 23:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite a blatent ad IMO, so not a speedy. But no particular notability evident, and all listed sources are either PR releases from the firm itself, or simple directory listings that varify nothing more than its existance, and are probably based on content provided by the firm. Even based on thso sources, the firm started actual oiperations less than a year ago. Not notable. Fails WP:CORP DES (talk) 03:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 16:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sergio Pinheiro Lopes's follow-up (AfD here). Fails WP:BIO. Húsönd 22:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep Sr13 (T|C) 03:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The band in Question only released one LP. Outside the debate over a speedy delete, this article has not been edited. The only two articles that link to it are lists of Bands, therefore not one article on Wikipedia feels a link to this article would be necessary Black Harry 22:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jargon definition. WP:NOT#DICT —Ketil Trout (<><!) 22:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge into Web Design. --Shirahadasha 03:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not establish the notability of this term. And there is already an article which discusses liquid layouts. —Remember the dot (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 19:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
fails to assert notability Nekohakase 09:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Athangjain talk 12:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient notability - lacks mutliple independant sources to allow information to be verified. The first google hit is another UK band using the same name who play pubs and I couldn't find anything else about it. Spartaz Humbug! 21:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[18]. cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 06:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Citing Allmusic bio and discography: https://www.allmusic.com/artist/braxton-hicks-mn0000261198 and Amazon CD in stock: https://www.amazon.com/Modesty-Explicit-Braxton-Hicks/dp/B000CA9UKE Rod (talk) 21:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Rod Whisner[reply]
The band has reformed, is recording and playing live gigs. Pulling bios for members and notable articles from past. Thx!Rod (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Rod Whisner[reply]
The result was withdrawn by nom. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 02:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prods, without improvement. Unsourced articles about a group of malls, which appear to fail WP:N. Most are pathetic stubs, and some articles refer to dead or nearly dead malls. Wikipedia is not a directory of defunct or near-defunct shopping malls. Ohconfucius 06:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Withdrawn Ohconfucius 01:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 09:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Original research. The term mathematical landscape is used in a news item of the American Institute of Mathematics in an attempt to explain the story. This use of the term is not common. I think that the article's use of the term extrapolates from the uncommon meaning in the AIM news item. The article goes on to list several interesting mathematical objects with little common ground. It ends with something called the "mathematical landscape conjecture", which very roughly reflects the beliefs of theoretical physicists like Edward Witten but its description is very vague, no references are given, and again, the name is a neologism as far as I can see.
This page was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive 24#Strange article. The conclusion was that the page as it stands contains too much original research. I waited more than two weeks to give the author the opportunity to work on it, but not much has happened. So I now propose the article be deleted. Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Notability not asserted. Could not find reliable sources to establish notability on a google search. Article written like a promotional piece. soum (0_o) 10:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted. Sam Blacketer 09:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
16-year old schoolkid who wants to be a drummer. Contested speedy. cab 07:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Ragnarok Online. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-27 11:08Z
Wikipedia is not a game guide. This content would be better if were moved to the StrategyWiki. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 20:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another social networking website with no claim to notability, no sources, and a member count self-admittedly in the low hundreds.
By the way, if you disable Javascript when loading their front page you can see the full extent of their "features" or lack thereof which is highly amusing. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 22:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable independent filmmaker. His sole claim to fame is that one of his films (also nominated) appeared in a film festival held by the IDA (which itself doesn't even have a Wikipedia page yet). While perhaps winning an IDA award might be a valid indicator of notability, simply being shown (like hundreds of other films shown by other organizations) is no more than a proof of existence. There are 0 reviews or other critical reaction to report on, seemingly.
He's also a self-published poet. That's nice, but not even close to notable in the field. Lastly, there are major conflict of interest problems everywhere here, along with a style of writing reminiscent of advertising - the article was originally created by a User:Writermo1, and the IP address which removed the prod claimed to be Mr. Abersheid on the talk page. SnowFire 22:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable artist. No sources, few Ghits. Tikiwont 08:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical article. Nekohakase 08:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep/nomination withdrawn. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. So-called references are links to general sites. The three links within the article don't mention any so-called "the bench" organization. nadav 08:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a legitimate article with sources cited. It has precidents set by the list of Big-12 student rooting sections for basketball games. I do not understand why it would be put up for deletion. Furthermore, please refer to outside link number one. That is the official University Athletics site acknowleding the existence of The Bench. Also, since the citations are from rival school's newspapers, it is not surprising that they do not acknowledge the offical name for The Bench. Do not be so quick to jump to conclusions just because you are not familiar with a situation. Thanks.
I also just added yet another external link quoting students who were members of The Bench as well as the University physically moving the seats that The Bench use at games. More irrefutable evidence that it exists. Maybe you should check on Big 12 basketball student sections that cite no sources and are simply single sentences instead of this legitimate article.
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 16:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources, notability not asserted. bogdan 09:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested merge/redirect candidate. I do not believe that this mall, which serves a town with a population of 52,000, to be notable (15 Ghits, most of which directory listings or property ads), and merged it to Pine Bluff, but was reverted without explanation or improvement. Furthermore, the article has been a stub since November 2006, and is unsourced. Ohconfucius 09:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Walton Need some help? 16:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ill-defined and superfluous list: The mentioned Hip-Hop albums already list their producers and the producers articles list the album credits. Tikiwont 10:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was remove. - Mailer Diablo 09:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Previously prodded. [27] I was the creator of the article who, in some sense, do not want the article to be deleted. However, being in such conflict of interest, I think it's best to bring the article here for greater scrutiny. --Deryck C. 12:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to The Opening of Misty Beethoven. —dgiestc 03:03, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 11:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Walton Need some help? 16:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod with no comment as to notability from an editor who is the subject of the article. This article is a biography where the only claim to notability is an inherited title, Baronet. The title, should not be confused with the title of Baron and it 'is not a peerage and has never entitled the holder to a seat in the House of Lords' unlike a Baron. Therefore title has no claim to notability and has no input to the British Parliamentary or legal systems.
The first/original holder of the title may have a claim to notability, a 1st Baronet may be notable based on the reasons that he was given the title for some deed or notability but subsequent family members that who simple inherit a title that is essential not notable and has no real power is not. As we know 'notability cannot gained from relationship' and 'Wikipedia is not a genealogical database'. As the article offers no other claims to notability the subject fails WP:N and WP:BIO and even the defunct proposal of WP:NOBLE. There will be editors who will vote on a WP:ILIKEIT bases and simple stating that Baronets are notable but when these editor are questioned as to why they are notable they are (especially in the light that it is a ceremonial title carrying no Parlimentary or legal powers) there will be limited response.
Additionally the sources provided have dubious reliability per WP:RS as the information provided within Who's Who and Debretts give no "depth of coverage" like a telephone directory are merely a genealogy listings and also they are to some large degree self published works WP:SPS as they are compiled from questionnaires that are sent out to the entrants and rely on this information for their own entries.
Furthermore I have checked the internet and written press for any other claims to notability other than being the son of someone that was given a Baronetcy and could find nothing. Therefore this page should deleted or merged to Arbuthnot Baronets as this is not a genealogical database. Therefore my !vote is -
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
nvassing ring with the subject of this article (Kittybrewster) and other editors that have voted to keep including David Lauder and Major Bonkers would come on here and vote on a WP:ILIKEIT basis - see here for further details--Vintagekits 16:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
<remove indent>Even though you now know that a Baronet doesnt carry the "powers" or "importance" that you thought it did until I explained to you on my talk page what a Baronet was!!! OK, lets assume that you do - why do you think that title of Baronet conveys notablity per wiki policy?--Vintagekits 23:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
— Logan2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment: Of approximately 215 comments on this page, 65 are by User:Vintagekits - 65:150 is quite a ratio - especially for someone who has several times said they'd stop commenting! BastunBaStun not BaTsun 21:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On the positive side, User:BrownHairedGirl has initiated a very helpful discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Independent.2Bnon_trivial.3F_Debretts.2C_Whos_Who_etc And User:Choess has sketched out a constructive way forward for Baronets in general at Dashwood Baronets of West Wycombe. Also we seem constructively, de facto, to be forming policy on the hoof regarding the notability of Baronets in general. - Kittybrewster (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable person. Whilst Hillsborough was tragic the only notable person is Tony Bland due to the change of laws in the UK. Either delete or merge into Hillsborough Disaster or Kevin Baron. Quentin X 12:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Big Tex prodded this ten days ago with the following comment:
I am also nominating the following related page because it also fails WP:CRYSTAL:
Pablothegreat85 23:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think he's right. YechielMan 22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) YechielMan 22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of the subject of the article does not meet WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 01:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by Alphachimp (Per CSD A7 - Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD. Serpent's Choice 05:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that this man even exists. The article carries a distinctive air of silly vandalism. Aurochs (Talk | Block) 06:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability, uses the magic words "up and coming". NawlinWiki 19:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, crystal-ball-ism "He is expected to have an EP out Summer '07." Nekohakase 08:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Higham Lane School. WjBscribe 04:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merged relevant article information into main article King Edward VI College, Nuneaton, rest of the article is not notable enough for its own article WP:CORP and doesn't meet the WP:NPOV standards Rob89 10:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable as a collegiate athletic group. The article talks about spring training for a season that has not yet occurred, and does not cite external sources to bolster notability. YechielMan 16:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Somaliland. Walton Need some help? 16:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Definition of new term and therefore unverifiable and against NOR policy. Delete. Béka 19:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem that it is notable at all or that it is different from beer pong to an extent that it needs it's own article. The author is the only one who is defending the page, and he keeps removing tags. - hmwithtalk 19:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no relevant references and appears to represent original research. WWGB 03:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD G11, obvious spam: also no context and no claims for notability made. They were a business "focusing on creating client value in their local markets." The first part of this sentence said that they were in real estate. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 19:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contains noting but a plot intro and an infobox, and so violates WP:FICT. The "intro" reads like a publisher's blurb. Moreover, multiple online searches have found no evidence that this book, or any book with the stated ISBN, or any book by the stated author, has actually been published. This is totally unsourced, and the original creation said "My book". This article had only one substantive editor, the creator, and that editor appears to be in violation of WP:COI. This is not quite technically a speedy, but ther is no reason for this article. DES (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete for copyright infringement. howcheng {chat} 22:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable school choir. Couldn't find any evidence of their performance as claimed in the article. Contested prod. MER-C 12:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Walton Need some help? 16:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable toy car (by itself). At least there isn't a whole walled garden of these, but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breeana (Bratz character) still applies. Fails WP:CORP/WP:FICT. Contested prod. MER-C 12:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What do you guys think about this one? I think it fails notability and no original research. Theredhouse7 12:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 16:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completing a nom. Original reasoning for deletion follows. Tizio 12:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikipedia:Deletion policy, I nominate this article for deletion on the following grounds:
--DavidTheLion 23:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Result was Keep. - Caknuck 03:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Near-orphan article on an author of one book. Has been tagged as orphan since Nov 06 and unreferenced since Jan 07. I took the editorial decision to redirect to the currently-in-the-news Lucie Blackman; this was reverted. I am now presenting the article here for community consideration. --kingboyk 12:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sources failing to recognize facilitated communication as a psusoscience are not reliable. May fail WP:RS if more sources cannot be found. --Wikiman2718 (talk) 20:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Daniel Bryant 06:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comic without an assertion of notability or reliable sources; the latter appear unlikely to be found. Google search shows nothing but forums or pages related to the comic's author. Huon 12:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Deleted (author requested deletion). kingboyk 13:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are no reliable sources cited, and google does not seem to support the claim to notability in Sweden. Prod removed by creator. FisherQueen (Talk) 12:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to assert notability, appears to be a fairly unremarkable website. No evidence of passing WP:WEB. Survived a previous afd, because nobody voted, hence not a speedy. MER-C 13:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed PROD. Fewer than 5-Google hits. No references provided for claims. Whilst apparently a promising soprano, she does not yet seem to meet WP:Notability or WP:BIO Perhaps in a few years time. Gillyweed 13:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 03:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Allegedly an opera by Bizet, no one can find any evidence that this isn't terminally obscure or just doesn't exist. Checking standard reference works, such as the Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians and the Viking Opera Guide, returns nothing, when these books are meant to cover pretty much everything, and certainly everything by such a major composer. Google returns only Wikipedia, mirrors, and other-language wikis. Per discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Numa (opera), it has been suggested that someone became confused somewhere along the line: Bizet once set a text with a similar name. Either non-notable or a mistake. Moreschi Talk 13:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another possibility is locating the programs at the Opera Library in Paris, where the Opera Comique archives are kept. They must have a copy of the program there.Gretab 16:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The friends of Georges Bizet have a website and an email address. I'm going to write to them and I will let you know what they say. Could we perhaps wait until they give me a response before this article is deleted?Gretab 21:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. NawlinWiki 21:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity page for a non notable person. The_stuart 13:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Cbrown1023 talk 03:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A collection of quotations. I propose that this be transwikied to Wikiquote (if they want it) and deleted as not encyclopedic. kingboyk 13:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy talkify. -- RHaworth 14:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was All already deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatlinburg Public Services. NawlinWiki 21:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles created by this editor and nominated for deletion include:
Nom - fails notability - the article doesn't even attempt to claim notability. Rklawton 14:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 21:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Questionable notability. Google doesn't help much. kingboyk 14:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my. Charitable view: An unreferenced list of artists, many of whom aren't notable. Uncharitable view: A collection of red-linked real life vandals. Previous nom. kingboyk 14:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep but radically prune to those whose notability we can verify. We have lists for other kinds of artists and genres. We also have lists for various kinds of Criminals. I tried an attempt at such pruning.--T. Anthony 04:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Claims notability but is unreferenced. kingboyk 15:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Deleted. (No credible claims of notability, = CSD A7. Failing that, WP:SNOW. Failing that, WP:ROUGE). kingboyk 17:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious hoax, no sources. Unfortunately hoaxes don't qualify as patent nonsense for CSD G1, and it asserts notability (though obviously wrongfully). Contested prod, so here we are. Huon 15:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
blatant advertising, unsourced WilyD 15:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g1, nonsense/hoax, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki 21:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Probably hoax. The "sources" given don't mention the conflict. Google search turns up nothing concerning a 1957 conflict between Japan and the USSR. Prod contested by original author. Huon 15:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, the category it fits is g1, patent nonsense. Darn, I forgot to eat bats on April 2 to celebrate. NawlinWiki 20:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Patent hoax; maybe it should fit a CSD criteria, but I'm not really sure which. Delete Neigel von Teighen 15:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no, we really heard about this, it just needs a little help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The result was Speedy delete g7, admitted hoax (see below), author blanked article. NawlinWiki 20:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the speedy delete tag because there is, albeit totally unsourced, an assertion of notability. This is a procedural AfD on which I therefore abstain. TerriersFan 15:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Cbrown1023 talk 03:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kittybrewster is a fine fellow and a Knight of the Realm, but not every member of his family needs a Wikipedia article, and we can't in any case use the family archives as sources Guy (Help!) 16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. Majorly (hot!) 23:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable demos. Deserve mention in band page, not own article. Joltman 16:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are similar non-notable demos by the same band:
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a personal essay, full of original research. It would be very difficult to verify this, and there is not one reference. On the talk page the author said that she wrote this page when new to Wikipedia, and admits that it has its weaknesses. It could potentially be an encyclopedic topic, but as I have said it fails WP:A to the extreme. If this article goes down the plughole, then I'll consider nominating popular girl as another apparent attempt to expand a dictionary definition.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 16:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem notable. The first page of Google does not turn up him, and appearing in a few gay porn films doesn't make someone notable. Also, is it me, or is this article really, really emphasing the "gay" and the "porn" to seem real...? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g3, I consider this kind of repeat hoaxery to be vandalism. NawlinWiki 20:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No sources. Probable hoax. Search for "Josh Collett" football doesn't bring up any promising leads. The official website of Gillingham F.C. (free registration required), where he supposedly plays, doesn't list him on the roster. --OnoremDil 16:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Krimpet (talk) 15:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Per WP:NUMBER, articles on numbers over 1000 are discouraged unless they have three interesting properties, which are also fairly rare. We do not, for example, have articles on every prime; we have a list of primes.
Delete Four properties are claimed here.
The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 03:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiography of a pianist. Has been twice deleted as spam. Is he notable. -- RHaworth 17:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Annual amateur ice hockey tournament played between churches in a small remote town? I don't think this passes WP:N. BoojiBoy 18:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep following the addition of sources. This is a non-admin closure. Black Falcon (Talk) 04:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced/referenced, the link provided is irrelevant - the existence of this page is entirely based on speculation Oo7565 18:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Alex Turner in an interview with MTV said the single was likely to be released next. He went on to say the promo will be filmed this week - promos are rarley filmed for a non-released single. 1 Jonwood1 17:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and create again when it has been confirmed if and when it will be released as a single James P Twomey 19:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 23:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Second nomination: first result was 'no consensus'. The main editor of this page, User: Dewarw, has told me here that he is a pupil of this man (whose main job is teaching economics at a secondary school), who I propose is a non-notable composer. Investigating him, I have found that there has been one CD recording of his music, and one collection of his music published, both by 'Enigma Publications', which I can find no details of on the internet and which is clearly not a major label. All the references are reviews of this one CD. He does not meet any of the criteria for notable composers and most of the people in the previous discussion seemed to agree that this man was not notable, excepting vociferous support from User: Dewarw, the originator of the page. Clavecin 18:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
17 year old "professional gamer" whose best finish at any event seems to have been 15th place. NawlinWiki 19:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g1, nonsense/hoax. NawlinWiki 20:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As with Peaceful Anarchism, this seems to be another hoax article based on a totally non-existent book. Similar in spirit to the page created by User:I AM BORED, also nominated by me for deletion, above. Shawn in Montreal 19:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. I'm closing a half day earlier to save someone else the trouble. Non-admin closure per deletion policy: unambiguous keep. YechielMan 02:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Original Research, Unsourced, Unverifiable Sources again doing this for someone else who does know how to afd Oo7565 19:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BAND. Claims notability, but cites no sources to show it. No substantial media coverage evident on official site. Bumped from speedy. Sandstein 19:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 23:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
unreferenced, OR, nothing more than a dicdef and a link to movies that involve human hunting ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 20:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: Nomination withdrawn. - Caknuck 01:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a non-notable R&D worker which seems to have survived WP:SPEEDY. May be vanity; the article's writer is called User:CarlyleHarmon. Fishal 20:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable university and community college professor. Apparently has no published works. Majority of article describes classes she currently teaches. Fishal 20:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
The result was Delete Fails Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. — Scientizzle 23:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability and encylopedic-ness (?). One season of a non-major college athletic team. Further, WP:WWIN -- Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information -- this is merely a roster and schedule. Dylan 20:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic ad for a product, which is not important to mention Svetovid 20:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. howcheng {chat} 22:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional and probable text dump from somewhere; speedy deletion contested by e-mail. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 21:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 23:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete nomination by 76.215.147.16 (talk · contribs). Reason: Article is a hoax. Completing now. Procedural nomination only Salahx 21:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Furthermore, I have access to Plain Dealer archives and I have found out that all referenced articles do mention this event happening, but I don't think any one article calls it "Beat Up a White Kid Day," though I haven't yet made a thorough search. Those interested in improving this article may contact me for clarifications regarding the statements in this article via e-mail or via my talk page. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
None of the supposed "references" in this article acually point to any online pages which use this term. And lookups on Google seem to all point to white power and right wing websites. I can find no reliable evidence that there is any such "day", except in the minds of the people writing the forum, blog and columns. Corvus cornix 21:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
this ref appears to be a real story. WilyD 22:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. WjBscribe 10:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable website, does not meet WP:WEB. Alexa rank 151,667. Leuko 21:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax. Googling "Joon nam" gets hits for unrelated Gi-Joon Nam, and Googling '"Joon namm" movie' gets nothing. Prod removed by author stating "Person is in existence". JuJube 21:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete, WP:CSD#G11. Sandstein 21:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC; no reliable references; page reads like a press release bio; all content added by one user (whose user name is Adam Schwartz spelled backwards) who has only edited the Adam Schwartz page. Even if the user is not Schwartz himself (and I would guess it is) it's most likely still WP:COI (like a publicist or family). Closenplay 21:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Someone has volunteered to improve this article. --Tony Sidaway 07:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of several completely unsourced articles about band members of Three Days Grace. I suggest that it and the other unsourced articles be redirected to the article about the band or deleted, or else properly sourced if possible, according to the Biographies of living persons policy. --Tony Sidaway 22:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus.Even when I weigh up strength of arguments, there is still no consensus here; I don't discriminate against new editors/IP's, but rather the strength of their argument. Daniel Bryant 07:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is an amateur side, consisting of supporters of Sydney FC, that plays in a local Sydney league. Delete. BlueValour 22:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep: What makes this page different from AFC Wimbledon or FC United is only the amount of money that was put into the English clubs. Football in Australia is smaller thus the teams will start from smaller and more humble begginings. Higdawg 16:09 27 April 2007 (AEST)
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable organ player. No assertion of notability, and a "small acting role in a BBC Play For Today" doesn't seem like enough that we need an article about him. Guinnog 22:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The man was a legend in Morecambe. I have already appealed for further info on Harold Graham on the discussion page. Give me some time to get information together Paul210 23:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as the article doesn't assert the notability of its subject. A list of names with no supporting verifiable and sourced information is not notable. (aeropagitica) 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local pageant in the Miss California/Miss America system. General consensus seems to be that only state-level pageants or above are notable. Google News search and the like can be misleading as it also turns up instances when the term "Miss San Francisco" is interpreted as "miss (as a verb) San Francisco". I prodded the article but the prod was deleted with the comment "of course it's a notable pageant". PageantUpdater User Talk Review me! 23:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable beauty queen who has held only local titles and has no other claim to fame. PageantUpdater User Talk Review me! 23:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Personal family tree of little known family, I would have added db-bio but I am unsure. Can anybody please explain what this family is known for ? Jackaranga 23:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as an unsourced and non-notable novel. (aeropagitica) 23:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable book -- JediLofty User | Talk 23:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Majorly (hot!) 16:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]