The result was delete all. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] List of Air Cadet squadrons in Canada[edit]
This list echos the information at the cadet unit directory maintained by the organization itself. None of the individual units are notable themselves (or at least none that have had articles created and have been deleted through the AfD process for being non-notable sub-units of a national organization), so these will likely never be links to articles in Wikipedia. The previous AfD was not informed by the presence of this external link. Sancho 23:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason (see the equivalent for sea cadets and for army cadets):
|
The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. From the discussion below, it is clear that the community is divided over this, and that there is not consensus on whether or not to delete the article. Proponents of both sides make valid arguments, and both the "delete" and "don't delete" opinions enjoy wide support. Cheers, everyone. lifebaka++ 23:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Discussion resumed per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 August 1. Please add 14 hours to the discussion length. Thanks, IronGargoyle (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable nor could it be established as notable based on searches for confirmation. Only one source provided discusses it, and it has very little reliability and is unprofessional (see: "bitchslap" in title). Wikipedia is not news, nor is it a collection of random poorly sourced information that speculates on possible legal events, especially from non-experts to provide reliable sources for said speculation. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Section break 1[edit]I am starting to get confused by his applications of policy here, but his attempt to use WP:BLP here as an excuse, is fundamentally flawed. It only says in the lead "This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages." It does not say "This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages, and any other material on such pages." I am starting to think about potential crystalballery with this article even with the sourcing. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
State of play at 31 July/1 August[edit]The current situation is a bit confusing so here is a summary as I understand it. To comment on the situation please use this section. To add further !votes, please use the next section titled "Further !votes". Thanks - Pointillist (talk) 00:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC) I've removed the tally of !votes I created earlier—it was only to assess whether SNOW was valid, and is no longer relevant, if it ever was. - Pointillist (talk) 15:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC) [reply] Current situation (is this correct?)[edit]
|
The result was delete. While only two people contributed to the discussion, a search on Yahoo turned up a grand total of 10 hits for this particular person, none of which are very good. Blueboy96 17:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Armen Vartanian[edit]
Non-notable athlete. Per WP:V / WP:RS, I am unable to confirm the "professional triathlete" claim or any of the other claims for that matter. Per WP:N / WP:NSPORT, the claims made do not necessarily equate to notability. It is entirely possible that the companies listed may have at one time or another provided something in the form of equipment or travel expenses but there is nothing on their websites claiming he is a sponsored athlete. The results listed are simply a rehash of what Athlinks has on file. These indicate that he has placed well only in what are generally local events. Best results from notable events appear to be a 33rd in Boston and a 3rd in his age group at Ironman California way back in 2001. Location (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is very unclear, an undefined style of furniture. "References" are to makers of furniture. An internet search did not suggest this is a viable topic. Delete. Drmies (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Notability is not inherited so the notability for this institution has to come from reliable detailed third party sources. In weiging the discussion I need to measure the consensus against policy and the notability policy does not appear to be met here. Therefore the delete side have the better policy based arguments Spartaz Humbug! 06:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Canbourne University[edit]AfDs for this article:
Based on some web research, it seems very clear this is a diploma mill. The question is, is it a notable diploma mill. I haven't found any reliable sources that say it is, except for the reference in the article that shows a US Congressman claims to have "graduated" from here. I don't think that alone makes it notable, but I'm open to convincing on this point. All other references are to the Canbourne website iteself, or to websites that we're using because the lack of a mention shows it isn't a real University; fine, if the article is kept, but not anything we can base notability on. We aren't the Better Business Bureau; if this is truly a non-notable diploma mill (there are lots of them out there), we shouldn't keep it just to protect potential victims of a scam. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was no consensus. Or, more precisely, no consensus on what to do with the article. There is a clear consensus not to delete. Whether or not to redirect can be dealt with in the ordinary editorial way. Stifle (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet the general notability guideline. Enough information already present at Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience#Soundtrack, so a delete or a redirect is most likely the best solution. Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 21:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JForget 23:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Calder Walton END[edit]
I don't think this individual passes WP:PROF. Most of the information in this article seems to be from here, and there are barely any other Google hits that do more than simply mention his name in passing. Moreover, almost all his supposed published works violate WP:CRYSTAL (and if they haven't even been released yet, how are they published works?). THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This individual does definitely pass WP:PROF. There is a full list of his published works, and forthcoming works, in the peer reviewed internationally renowed journal 'Intelligence and National Security', vol. 23 no. 4 (August 2008), pp. 435-462 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Intelligence history (talk • contribs) 07:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Yes, it is true that most of the citations come from here here, but seeing that this is an official website of Cambridge Univerity, one of the world's most renowned universities, they are reliable. Moreover, I have checked in the journal journal 'Intelligence and National Security', vol. 23 no. 4 (August 2008), pp. 435-462 and this does indeed give a full printed description of the individual's career and publications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trymalchio (talk • contribs) 07:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC) — Trymalchio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nonexistent book, unsourced article. Prior AfD in 2006 was keep, but the announced publication date (contained at the end of the 8th Captain Underpants book) has come and gone, and there is no evidence from either author or publisher's website that this book is under development, let alone scheduled for publication anytime soon. EngineerScotty (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] People TV (Atlanta)[edit]
Contested Prod. Non-notable local television station. No reliable sources support notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was no consensus. I think the only issue that is clear here is that nonone wants to delete the content from wikipedia. whether it should be s astandlone article or merged is an editing decision thatd oes not require an admin to enforce and I'm not seeing any clear outcome from this discussion. Spartaz Humbug! 06:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The useful content of this article can be easily merged into the main article. Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not "A complete exposition of all possible details." and not for News reports - saying who else was at a press conference and quoting everyone's opinions (Iowa Congressman Steve King?) is unencyclopedic. The coverage is not in proportion - she announced her resignation, gave her reasons and did it. That can be summarized well in the main article. Hekerui (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Brainstorms (show)[edit]
Contested Prod. Non-notable local television program. No reliable sources support notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. JForget 00:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] AfDs for this article:
Delete. I am in pure shock. How on earth did such a trivial article get to grow on Wikipedia for so long? It's hard to pinpoint exactly what is wrong with the article, simply because nothing is right with it. I see there are a few reliable sources with non-trivial mentions of the issue, but I seriously doubt that if a few journalists wrote some articles on the Heights of Blue Peter presenters that it would be included. It's clear that we need to apply some WP:COMMONSENSE. DJ 22:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to The Apprentice (UK TV series). There are two possible outcomes here: delete or redirect. Seeing as it's likely to happen in another year, this page will be a likely search target, and can be recreated once it's confirmed. (X! · talk) · @922 · 21:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. This programme won't be airing, if at all, for another year and no infomation will come out about the programme until just before transmission. The article is based upon pure speculation and this is unlikely to change. Precedent has been that such articles are not created until a start date is announced. A simple sentence or 2 in The Apprentice (UK) will suffice until then. DJ 22:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @923 · 21:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not cite any source, the Tony Yayo article claims it is yet untitled, there is no confirmed release date or a track listing. To my mind, there is to less information available, so it's best to delete the article. Fails WP:NAlbum DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to Emacs. (X! · talk) · @923 · 21:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JForget 23:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Georgia Open Meeting Act[edit]
This is not an accurate description of the state title; it appears that the writer is using this to advance his own agenda in violation of WP:POINT mhking (talk) 21:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @923 · 21:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Desktop bot[edit]
Delete. Neologism. All of the described technologies exist but they are not referred to collectively as "Desktop Bots". AlistairMcMillan (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to Tom and Jerry. JForget 23:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-sourced; violates WP:CRYSTAL mhking (talk) 21:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
blatant spam, speedy removed by obvious sockpuppet of author WuhWuzDat 21:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Integration Point[edit]
Article does not appear to meet WP:CORP. I and other editors have tagged this article multiple times, but Jmiles1107 (talk · contribs) keeps removing the tags without addressing the issues, so I'm bringing it to a much larger audience. You can see a review I did of the sources used in the article here. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JForget 23:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficiently notable subject. City council member that does not meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO#Basic criteria or WP:BIO#Politicians. PROD contested, so comes here for deletion. — Satori Son 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @923 · 21:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Hot Dish (application)[edit]
detele nn application Amocool (talk) 20:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] José Antonio Gali[edit]
Contested prod. Footballer who has yet to make a professional debut, fails WP:ATHLETE Jezhotwells (talk) 20:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was merge to Electricity on Shabbat. Once we strip away the original research its clear that there are not the sources for a substantial article and a section elsewhere would be better Spartaz Humbug! 06:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A Shabbat Clock is nothing more than a timer that's plugged into an outlet. (See these images) It just so happens that these timers are used for the purposes described in the article, and in fact may be colloquially referred to as "Shabbat Clocks," but there is no evidence that such a product exists per se. Neologism perhaps? -shirulashem(talk) 20:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was merge to Air Gear. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This just contains two track listings, which are not generally kept or merged into anime articles, so it doesn't need to exist. TTN (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was withdrawn by nominator Thryduulf (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Footballer fails WP:ATH as he hasn't played at a fully-professional level yet. Also fails WP:N and specifically WP:GNG due to a lack of significant independent coverage in the media. Only a secondary source about a possible move and a name check in about a call up to an international youth squad. --Jimbo[online] 18:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|}
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 23:46, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not meet a single criteria of WP:BAND. SPA created vanity article. Chuthya (talk) 11:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of Liverpool F.C. players. Black Kite 22:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural. I recreated the article which had previously been deleted by AfD. The AfD concerns, as I understand them, were:
I have hopefully addressed those issues - the list has been removed, is warned against with a hidden comment and can be removed if replaced. And I've added five references. I thought doing this would be easier than going through DRV to discuss a notional improved article, but if I've got it wrong, my apologies and I'll speedy it, close this AfD and head there. Dweller (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. I remain neutral. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Speedy Delete per G11 by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising; not notable Airplaneman talk 17:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Thomas Bollier[edit]
Hoax. Lots of Google hits for this name, but all of them are from wikis or sites with user-generated content, and they all repeat pretty much the same biography. No listing for a physician with this name. No publications. No media coverage of brain surgery on a boat, which seems incredibly unlikely. Private clinics are very rare in Nova Scotia; he doesn't turn up at any of those, either. Hairhorn (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to 78violet. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Track listing and release date haven't been confirmed, a violation of WP:NALBUM. Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 16:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Product with no claim or evidence of notability. -shirulashem(talk) 16:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was speedy keep: withdrawal of the nomination with no other editors favoring deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 19:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No sources seem to be available except things published by this person. This appears to be an advert for a cult and about a non-notable topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irbisgreif (talk • contribs) 16:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Last AfD closed merely 12 days ago. If you disagreed with that decision, WP:DRV is the venue. Re-nominating is pointy and disruptive. Smashvilletalk 19:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I re-nominated for deletion because I felt the previous AfD was judged based on the number of “keep”. It did not express the views of people who said “delete”. Once again, schools are notable only if secondary sources are available. I did research on google but I found no secondary sources. The only one I found was the school's website which is a primary source. First see WP:CRYSTAL which rejects claims that it will be important in the future as a reason to keep the article. Second, are there any schools which are not "notable in the school community?????" My point is not all schools in the school community meet the Wikipedia's notability guidelines to have an article. Hagadol (talk) 16:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable blog editor; cited links are from blogs, social networking sites and message boards; Conflict of interest. If anything, this violates WP:SPAM as well. mhking (talk) 15:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. BLP1E applies. will redirecty to american idol when deleted Spartaz Humbug! 06:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a case of recent news-itis. Alexis' death got some coverage from major news sources, but is that really enough for an entire article? The general rule has always been that auditioners do not get articles unless they attain sourcable notability. William Hung is the best example of this. In this case, all of the sources are regarding Alexis' death. The article describes the "viral" nature of her first video but there is no source stating that. And really, most "bad" Idol auditions gets lots of YouTube views. That doesn't mean they deserve articles. Also, I have a problem with having this article when actual finalists like Alexis Grace do not (per AfD). We need a high standard with Idol and I don't think this reaches it. User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 15:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @924 · 21:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Jason Molloy (footballer)[edit]
Footballer fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at fully-professional level of football. Lack of non-trivial significant third-party sources means he also fails the general notability guidelines at WP:GNG. Only independent source is a stats page which doesn't confirm he passes WP:ATH or give us any significant coverage of this person. --Jimbo[online] 15:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @924 · 21:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Long Z. Liu[edit]
A prod tag was removed without apparent improvement. See also the tangentially-related AfD for FOB (movie). No reliable sources denoting notability, which is asserted but apparently not present, strong conflict of interest problems (see creator's username), significant possibility of advertising. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to Welcome to Eltingville. (X! · talk) · @924 · 21:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
per WP:PLOT. Page is a plot summary for the sole episode of the series. Could be made into a redirect to main series where a brief synopsis is already presented. Bringing to AfD because merge tag was deleted with a note that began "there is not really a need for the pilot to have its own page...". Ost (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the Welcome to Eltingville artical. --Pedro thy master (talk) 01:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Keep - nominator has withdrawn the AfD. Pastor Theo (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The deletion history for this article is as follows: two requests for Speedy Deletion were placed on this page (21:57, 26 April and 07:45, 27 April), but the creator of the article User:Haroldcoxly994 (User talk:Haroldcoxly994) just deleted the tags with no explanation. A merger with the main article was suggested, but this tag was also deleted by the creator. A PROD was issued, but again the creator just deleted the tag. Now this is being AfD'd, as I see no other way to deal with this, as the creator will just delete any tags. Postscript: The creator's alternative ID User:Haroldcoxly has removed the AfD tag. I have undone his edit. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 15:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Logan Waller Clements[edit]
Page history makes it clear that this is an autobiography; if it is speedied, it will just keep coming back, so let's go through the full discussion process. Looks like a non-notable individual, despite having a few published articles; no indication of any coverage by independent sources. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was merge to 1632 (novel). Spartaz Humbug! 06:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable, unsourced heap of plot from an alternate universe. Delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] 1632 institutions[edit]
non-notable, unsourced heap of plot from an alternate universe; fictional committees, high schools, leagues, nations, and newspapers (do see them;). Delete. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. notabilty requires detailed sources that discuss the subject in depth,. Consensus is measured against polciy not headcolunt and the delete arguments are policy based Spartaz Humbug! 06:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod of a non-notable game. Removing user claims the article is "notible [sic] enough to deserve the debate" of AfD, but both a Google and Google News search mostly point to a baseball term of the same name. Xenon54 (talk) 13:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Speedy Delete G3 - Vandalism/Blatant hoax. Resolute 14:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:HOAX Player never existed and is not listed in any of the major hockey databases. It claims he played for NHL teams, yet the NHL has no list of him as ever having played in their league. Djsasso (talk) 12:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Only claims to fame are winning national spelling bee and yearly role providing commentary on the spelling bee Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Only claims to fame are winning national spelling bee and hosting a local quiz show. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 12:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] List of airliners by seat capacity[edit]
Unreferenced article that adds no value. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate facts. Has POV issues by not being a complete list of every airliner with more than 12 seats but that would make it even worse. Prod contested prod for being a long standing article.MilborneOne (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] S Varghese[edit]
Non-notable per WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC, unreferenced. Per Ardua (talk) 11:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] DarkStar (Rock band)[edit]
Declined speedy due to (unreferenced) claims of notability. Non-notable band, Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Some Google news hits on "Dark Star Orchestra", though that doesn't appear to be the band that is the subject of this article. RadioFan (talk) 11:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. BLP1E is specific that subjects of nios must be notable for more then one event,. In judging consensus I must balance the arguments against policy. BLP1E is policy and BIO and N are guidelines so BLP takes precedence. I wil redirect them all to [edit]List of Scripps National Spelling Bee champions after deletion Spartaz Humbug! 06:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Notable only for a single event, winning the 2003 National Spelling Bee. No other claims of notability. RadioFan (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] I am also nominating the following pages of other spelling bee winners because they also are notable for only this single event. They are listed on List of Scripps National Spelling Bee champions which is sufficient:
|
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Alison & Allie[edit]AfDs for this article:
Contested PROD so this is a procedural nomination, no real opinion on the outcome. PROD reason was "There are no sources which says this show is in production." treelo radda 10:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Withdrawing nomination in light of substantial improvement to article. LibStar (talk) 02:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
although the 2 countries have embassies, there is a distinct lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations, mainly multilateral and sport [29]. yes they've signed a climate change agreement and a heavy water incident in 1988 but not much else. Various sporting results [30], [31] and a Romanian hacker causing disruption in Oslo do not advance notability although I know at least 1 editor who would think so. LibStar (talk) 09:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Association Footballer who has never played in a fully professional league, failing WP:ATHLETE Dancarney (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A similar situtation has arisen with Anton Peterlin (soccer), both players trialled at Everton at the same time and agreed to join the club from US PDL club sides.—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBigJagielka (talk • contribs) 18:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was - Brehznitching's 15 minutes is over, obvious delete - Peripitus (Talk) 12:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable argot that was recently invented and has little chance of being documented by reliable sources. This is an encyclopedia and as such is not for things made up at school one day.
This is a contested PROD, no reason for contesting given Mattinbgn\talk 09:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
haha. you guys are all a bunch of losers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickysavage (talk • contribs) 08:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW; there's already a strong consensus against deletion here. Non-admin closure.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 21:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Israel and Lebanon never had any bilateral relations, and Lebanon does not recognize the State of Israel. It could possibly do that pending the Arab Peace Initiative or similar future developments, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Having a 'bilateral relations' article on this topic is factually incorrect. Some material of the article might be transferred to Israeli–Lebanese conflict. Soman (talk) 08:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @925 · 21:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:CRYSTAL, only sources are to IMDB and Spanish equivalent, and even IMDB admits that pre-production hasn't started yet, thus failing WP:NFF. Note, writer removed a prod Spartaz Humbug! 08:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Battle of Bir-el Harmat[edit]
Article is unreferenced throughout, non-neutral, and almost certainly a fictional event. A number of issues with the articles can be seen in Talk:Battle of Bir-el Harmat, most notably that the Jewish Brigade did not exist before 1944. Searches for "Bir-el Harmat" returns five results in this book, which makes no mention of the battle in question. Page 70 of the book states that German forces broke through the minefield at Bir-el Harmat and overran the joint headquarters of two allied divisions on June 5, (date on p.69) a fact that clearly contradicts the article Sherif9282 (talk) 08:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @925 · 21:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Shane O'Connor (soccer)[edit]
Procedural listing after prod removed. Fails WP:ATHLETE. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. POV is a problem that can be fixed by normal editing. The neutrality of this article is an issue for the article's talk page, not AFD. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article is very non-neutral and thus non-encyclopedic in tone. It would require a fairly significant rewrite to be neutral IMHO, if it could even be done. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JForget 00:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The whole article is a joke, because most of that what the article claims to be "serbian only" isn't really serbian alone. The whole article has a great pro-serbian-bias! Cantabo07 (talk) 05:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We have a consensus, then? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 15:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. notability requuires multiple detailed sources to be provided. they havent been so the delete side wins Spartaz Humbug! 06:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Friends of the Birth Centre, Canberra[edit]
fails WP:ORG, nothing in google news [47]. mainly directory listings in google search. article only has 2 reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 04:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LibStar (talk) 09:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 00:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:ORG, nothing in google news search [://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Science+Fiction+and+Fantasy+Association+of+New+Zealand%22&cf=all] LibStar (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. There are sufficient references to establish notability. Malinaccier (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mormon author with some books published on a tiny Mormon-only press, so tiny that Amazon.com and other booksellers do not carry any of its titles. No independent reliable sources demonstrating any notability. The awards this author created also has demonstrated no notability, and has given out two "lifetime achievement awards", one to Orson Scott Card (the only prominent Mormon author) and one to someone also published through this tuiny press nobody has heard of and who, oddly, is also on the award committee. DreamGuy (talk) 03:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @037 · 23:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A rather useless list. A category could accomplish the same purpose. From spot checking, a lot of entries on this list go to dab pages or to unrelated people, so it hinders navigation more than it helps it. B (talk) 03:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Award given to Mormons, created by a Mormon author whose work is published by a tiny Mormon-only press. No notability established, just links to its own website. DreamGuy (talk) 03:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Writer who has no notability established. Books published by a tiny press called "covenant" apparently only for Mormons, and which is so ruinky dink that its books are not even carried on Amazon.com. Obnly possible claim to fame was that article had claimed she won a "lifetime achievement award" from a group that only gives them to Mormon authors and which she is listed as a member of the award committee and that was created by another author nobody ever heard of who also is published by "Covenant". DreamGuy (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to 1632 (novel). Spartaz Humbug! 06:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No real-world notability. Most of these authors are notable largely because of their assistance in this fan fiction. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to consist entirely of original research by synthesis. All the sources cited are primary sources; there are no third-party sources that tie these together under a common theme of "anti-Semitism in patristics." Unless such sources can be found, the article should be deleted. *** Crotalus *** 19:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Raymundo Del Rosario[edit]
contested prod. original reason: fails the politician notability guideline (WP:POLITICIAN), no significant coverage in reliable sources. Bluemask (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Tony Petrarca[edit]
contested prod. Non-notable local weatherman. Lacks coverage in 3rd party sources. Only references are primary sources. RadioFan (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bg02445 (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JForget 00:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Red Referrals[edit]
Large claims for an organization that was created in the Summer of 2009. Limited GHits and NO GNews. Appears to fails WP:COMPANY ttonyb1 (talk) 01:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Keep. Consensus is that coverage is sufficient at this time, and that it should be classified as "in-production" given the lengthy cycles of animated films. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Completely fails WP:NFF. Not in production, no significant coverage in reliable sources, nothing but a "pending" note on ComingSoon. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] List of songs in Metalocalypse[edit]
Half of the songs in this article appear in The Dethalbum article, while most of the latter songs use unofficial titles. The unofficial titles are not sourced. The final section of the lists "Songs performed by other artists or bands", which are all fictional characters from the show - not actual bands. These songs are not notable enough yet to have their own list. StarScream1007 ►Talk 19:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable record company. Don't let the blue links fool you. Only Black Boned Angel could conceivably be considered a notable band, and I'm not sure about them. I'm thinking about nominating them for deletion, too, if reliable sources can be provided. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete Jclemens (talk) 02:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CSD#G4 candidate; page deleted per WP:CRYSTALBALL recreated again. Recommend salting until WP:RS references can be provided. See also history of Full House (2009 TV series), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ang Pinakamagandang Hayop sa Balat ng Lupa, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Name Is Kim Sam Soon (Phlippine TV Remake)) Tassedethe (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE: Please do not delete the article Full House (Philippine TV series). The show has been conformed by GMA. GMA already showed a Full House Teaser / Commercial as seen in this links, [52] and [53]. Those links should prove that the article should not be deleted. Thank You. GMA Fan 22 July 2009 4:07PM (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to establish a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While this is a lengthy article, there is actually no notable material here. Just a guy who blogs and attends conferences. LeilaniLad (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Newschoolpolitics (talk) 04:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)This is a guy with a book coming out, a leading young Republican, and a leading Black man in America that is not in the Democratic Party. He is a leading blogger in the country and is a leading young Republican with a growing following. Here is just one article of several that was done on him http://www.charlottemagazine.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7506[reply] Also he appears regularly on XM Radio and other media outlets. Just again on Anderson Cooper 360 Thursday. He is speaking out on race with the Republican Party more than the rest. This guy is legit. I will put notations in here starting tomorrow. This article should not be deleted though, so please do not delete it.
|
The result was Delete and redirect to Halo (series) Marasmusine (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Halo series is notable. The engine powering the games? Not so much. Most of the content is covered in the respective video games articles, and the rest is minutiae. There's no secondary sources to my knowledge or a couple of searches that focuses specifically on the engine itself, aside from some first-party slideshows from Bungie themselves; fails to meet WP:GNG. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 17:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep and move to Unification Church antisemitism controversy Improvements by Dufour seem to meet WP:RS. Cheers, I'mperator 18:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article is entirely WP:Original research. No reliable secondary sources are cited to show that this is even a notable topic. Primary sources are cited but not in a way that meets WP's standards. Borock (talk) 00:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Arguments for keeping: Sourced (IMDb is not reliable), WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:USEFUL. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Athelston Williams[edit]
Non-notable actor, famous only for an injoke. No reliable sources cited, I doubt any exist. J Milburn (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The show itself is surley a source in its own right being a primary source of informtaion beyond reasonable doubt, as is the book. As he appears in a book as a charcter in a fictional sense, you can justify this article in the same sense as an article about any fictional charcter. If there exsists primary sources of informtion that you can direct people to if they are intrested you do not need to reference to secondary sources that may be dubious. Surley cast lists or pages from the book can be obtained from some source (BBC?) if nesacary to provide online reference. I just found this page today and found it relavent, maybe it should be intergrated into the main article, but as he made an apperance outside Never Mind the Buzzcocks it should be seperate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.222.126.183 (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Egypt-IBM Nanotechnology Research Center[edit]
Article consists of two long quotes from external web sites, and one line of location information. While not exactly plagiarized (the sources are clearly referenced) there is not much else in the article. I'm not entirely sure about such an article, that's why I list it here. Pgallert (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've given the article a few days to develop. There's nothing there right now. I can't find any obvious reference to the language outside of very specific gnome programing environments. No coverage outside of these sources. Non notable. Shadowjams (talk) 07:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 16:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to establish a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly appears to fail WP:NOTE: Unclear listings outside of travel blogs and travel directories: Google search — Google news search — Google Scholar search - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This student government is not notable. I searched by a variety of permutations of the name to be certain. The page is beginning to resemble a Facebook account. Abductive (talk) 06:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a minor academic and local politician (who hasn't achieved any particular office). I don't think this person is notable enough for an article. A couple of news links to a failed election campaign and a published book does not seemingly add up to "significant coverage in reliable sources". Trxi (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable Xatanix death metal (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Andrea Edwards[edit]
All that I can is trivial mentions. Her only roles are one supporting role and a minor role. Joe Chill (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable division of Punjab Police. Article has much unencyclopedic information and irrelevant details more applicable to the Pubjab Police as a whole. Nominated since Wikipedia is not a directory nor is it a collection of indiscrimimnate information. Astronaut (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for such a tout in the one-line unsourced bio one would expect throngs of reliable sources, hoards of kudos, accolades by the gazillion. But a google search turns up many Colin Gilbert, none obviously this guy - of course we don't have much to go on other than he's had a long career of trying to make Scots laugh. Anyway, notability is a bit thin and the flattery thick. Fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy. No reference on Google associating that name with the name Thalians. All I could find with the name Tony Lee Scott alone are sites stating that she was a friend of James Dean, which is not enough of a notability assertion. Notability is not inherited. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 12:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough comments to establish a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] This article really seems like a vanity puff piece with little if any outside reliable articles backing up any of its information. Due to Grant's dubious accomplishments and tenuous, at best claims to having accomplished them, it should be deleted. The lack of neutral, verifiable sources is disconcerting at best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregDraves (talk • contribs) 2009-07-04 02:10:59 — GregDraves (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
|
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Now, Discover your strengths[edit]
Possible G12, questionable notability. LeilaniLad (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was delete. JamieS93 21:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Kahodai[edit]
Delete this has been tagged since 2008 as unref'd and a google search turns up nothing by way of reliable sources of even the existence of this tribe much less its notability and any of the details about apparently living people supposedly belonging to this tribe. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to Wrasse Records. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found. All this label does is reissue MCA and Mercury albums. Doesn't even seem to warrant a merge to Wrasse Records. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Cheers, I'mperator 18:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] DiskView[edit]
This is not notable enough to be included on an wikipedia. I can't find much reference to it outside of download sites and the company website. There are no third party sources that discuss it. Rcurtis5 (talk) 23:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was redirect to MLL Collegiate Draft. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Article already completely exists within MLL Collegiate Draft. Also, an article should not be created for only one of the years without creating the rest. Yarnalgo talk to me 03:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|