The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 78violet. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

78violet (album)[edit]

Track listing and release date haven't been confirmed, a violation of WP:NALBUM. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 16:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article is better referenced than most -- would it not be counter-productive to delete a well-referenced article on a confirmed album, for it to be later replaced by a basic directory-type entry? The JPS ^{talk to me} 16:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As an alternate solution, we could redirect the page to 78violet, and then dig up the history once more information is released. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 17:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Everything that's here (in the article in question) right now is at the artist's article already. Cliff smith ^talk 17:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Future album, already delayed, without sufficient details. Not yet notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 78violet, per Pokerdance. Not yet notable. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 18:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - there's nothing here that warrants a seperate article... almost all the given info is already on their main artist page, too. CloversMallRat (talk) 07:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.