The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. As poined out, was a redirect to passive smoking; as such it reslly was an improbable search term--Eptalon (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke[change source]

Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sjö has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Newly created very implausible search term Sjö (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is intended as the article title for reasons given, not as a search term Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke" is FK 55.9 ‎"Passive smoking" is 35.6 indicates a simpler meaning at 55.6. Readers of simple.wikipedia won't necessarily search for the idiom, more common "passive smoking" as they perhaps won't know the term and would instead locate the article by an internal link at an article. The idiomatic version is a complication of the simpler 55.9 which explains the actual occurence. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC) https://goodcalculators.com/flesch-kincaid-calculator/ was used by copypaste for scores as shown in the previous "20:01" 20:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Delete - that is what I am leaning toward.--That phrase, used as a title (or redirect) seems to be an explanation, not one of the names, used about the topic.--Would it help keep this discussion short, short, short, if i suggest: Go to talk page, and ask which (possible) Redirects, might be a good idea.--On the other hand, this Delete discussion might become a thousand-words per-person, per day, thingy.--Do i however think that there might be a resonable redirect, that is an explanation? Possibly, but i expect that bad alternatives (and little else), is as far as we will get, until this discussion closes.--(I am willing to be surprised, in a positive way. But i ain't holding my breath.) 46.15.114.252 (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Clear Delete. Editor has been blocked for disruptive editing, which this is a prime example of. --Gotanda (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nobody uses this name. Also, again, the Flesch-Kincaid score is not the only thing to think about. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is now just a redirect Rathfelder (talk) 10:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it is now a redirect, still an unlikely search query IMO. So, Delete --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 03:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.