![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Admin_mop_question.svg/60px-Admin_mop_question.svg.png) | This is an RfA talk page.
While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.
- Please remain calm and civil in discussions on both pages, avoiding personal attacks and harassment. Uninvolved administrators can still fully intervene in RfAs.
- Discussions should stay on-topic; consider moving or continuing discussions that are going off-topic elsewhere.
- Move discussions not germane to the candidacy here, then link them with
((subst:rfan|dm|name of section header)) , indented to the original vote. Be conservative in using the template; obvious trolls and disruptive participants need not be noticed.
- Otherwise, avoid starting discussions here if they would be of interest to RfA participants and can fit on the main RfA page; generally, discussions should begin at the "General comments" section or as an indented reply to a vote.
|
I have to say, as a general rule I find the Neutrals section mostly unhelpful and a bit useless. This is the first time in memory that there's anything worth reading there, and I've read the whole thing at least twice now. Valereee (talk) 13:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Whereas I often find the neutrals useful from day 2 onwards, but I concur that this is a particular beneficial case. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Redrose64: Not that I particularly care, but the numbered list of supports has 196 entries, which is why I changed the tally to 196. I apologize if there's something that I missed or am otherwise not aware of. — SamX [talk · contribs] 18:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @SamX: This is entry no. 195. It is the last entry in the Support section. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- AJ29 struck their vote, which currently sits between entries 18 and 19 – it doesn't count, so it's 195. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 19:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Weird. It's still rendering as 196 for me, but that's probably because I have Convenient Discussions enabled. It seems to be parsing Serial Number 54129's addendum as another numbered list item, which I overlooked. Sorry about that. — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]