MOS matters[edit]

  • @SandyGeorgia: Maybe this wasn't meant to sound passive aggressive, but it really did come across that way. You presumably did not note that during my open source review above, I stated: "Consistently use xxx–yyy for page ranges, per MOS:NUMRANGE. At the moment, a mix of xxx–yyy and xxx–yy are used." Harrias (he/him) • talk 21:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS, it seems I caused the HarvRef errors; sorry (iPad editing, as usual). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would you strike through the comment about HarvRef errors then, please?
I changed % to percent.
For page range errors, I assume you mean something like "151–53" (sic) instead of "151–153". I see that you fixed one error, thanks! Do you see others? I looked fairly carefully, and I did not see any.
Finally, your script seems to have fixed any MOSDATE errors... thanks! § Lingzhi (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but caused another error at the same time. As there is nothing of significance in this section now, I will move it to talk once I am not iPad editing from a hotspot. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done All resolved; this was a very abbreviated look at MOS matters-- I didn't have time for more. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]