Shuppiluliuma

Shuppiluliuma (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Report date April 23 2009, 03:48 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Hiberniantears

For background, this is the most helpful of the previous cases to read through: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shuppiluliuma last year.

This time through, I blocked Shiham K as an obvious sock, but requesting a CU for all underlying IP ranges. Currently appears to be editing from 85.153.27.4 and the associated range out of Istanbul. I have previously blocked an IP range out of Milan, Italy, and could greatly benefit from a comprehensive look at this editor's IPs.

Additionally, I blocked User:Hekatonesos as another obvious sock, and suspect that User:Truthspeaks11 is probably him as well. For a little additional background, Shuppiluliuma edits from dynamic IPs, and has created at least dozens of sleeper accounts over the years. I'm looking for multiple IP ranges that can be blocked, and a list of sleeper accounts.

In fairness, whoever this guy is, he makes a fair number of helpful contributions. However, every couple of months he goes off the rails and starts antagonizing other editors at pages generally related to Turkey. This has now been going on for years (in fact, my initial run in with him back in Spring 2007 killed my first attempt at RfA). Lately, I have been giving him space so long as he behaves, and because chasing his socks around is a bit like a dog chasing its tail. In the case of Shiham, I was fairly certain all along that it was Shuppiluliuma from day 1, but let him be until another administrator reached out to me for my opinion on whether it was him or not. When he began an edit war this week over an image of Turkish money, I blocked him, but as you can see from the growing list above, he hasn't really missed a beat. Because of the number of sleeper accounts and IPs from different ranges that Shuppiluliuma uses, it is very difficult to regularly keep an eye out for him as the pages he edits already tend to have many editors of various nationalist POVs. My request for a very thorough CU here is aimed at avoiding mistakenly identifying innocent editors making newbie mistakes, as well as finding a more effective way to create a stable environment around pages like Turkey. Obviously, if we get flagged revisions off the ground, life becomes a lot easier for those of us watching pages that are impacted by editors like Shuppiluliuma... but in the mean time, I would really appreciate a deep look at this by a CU. Hiberniantears (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

 Clerk endorsed to check for potential range blocks and collateral damage Mayalld (talk) 06:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: merged from other case. Mayalld (talk) 06:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
Thanks! For future reference, what was the range for the 78 address? Hiberniantears (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
78.40.192.0/18 — Coren (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

--Tagged confirmed accounts; already blocked. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Okie-dokie. Archiving. — Jake Wartenberg 17:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report date April 30 2010, 19:26 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by User:Athenean
[edit]

User:StanStun appears to be the latest in a long list of socks by the dreadful User:Shuppiluliuma. This case screams WP:DUCK pretty loudly. Specifically:


Comments by accused parties
[edit]
Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]


Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Athenean (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk declined agreeing with Future Perfect with regard to sleepers, as the accounts have been blocked no further need for checkuser. Thanks for the report, and thanks to Future Perfect for dealing with it. Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

23 May 2010
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]
Evidence submitted by User:Athenean
[edit]

Standard Shuppiluliuma sock.

A checkuser is necessary, since the evidence shows this was a sleeper account. He could well have more and uses a wide IP range. The maniacal tenacity of this individual is not to be underestimated. He has created something like 100 socks so far. Something more than a simple block is necessary, otherwise he will be at it again in no time

Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Athenean (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed The submitted evidence makes sense, and I see my own similarities in edit summary style. A CU would be good as a rangeblock was placed in the past, but seems to have expired. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 14:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Blocked all three reported under WP:DUCK, not requesting a CU comment on the IPs. Just looking for a possible rangeblock. (The fact that the IPs were so dramatically different suggests this may not be possible, but if we're lucky maybe it's two small ranges.) --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 14:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A rangeblock is probably not going to happen... J.delanoygabsadds 18:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

31 May 2010
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by User:Athenean
[edit]

Obvious socks of Shuppiluliuma, created as soon as previous socks were blocked, identical reverts (e.g. compare [30] to [31]).


Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

02 July 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Latest of the innumerable socks by user:Shuppluliuma. Primary interests are Turkey and Turkish military articles [32]. There is a simple, foolproof way to detect his socks: Because most of the articles he likes to edit (Turkey, Turkish Air Force, etc...) are semi-protected, he needs to rack up a number of edits on non-semiprotected articles. So the first thing he does after creating the new account is to make a few edits to non-semied articles before editing his favorite articles. Interestingly, these first few edits are always related to the new sock's name, it's as if each of his socks has a "theme". I noticed this with his sock Mokoko 24-7 (talk · contribs), which edited a few Japan related articles, then as soon as he reached 20 edits or so, immediately switched to Turkey and never looked back [33]. The first edits by Ben diyom Angora are to topics related to the Turkish capital Ankara (of which "Angara" is an alternate spelling and "Ben diyom Angara means "I sent him to Ankara"). Then, after those edits, it's back to the Turkish Armed Forces and Turkey. Also, Shuppiluliuma and socks love to make lots of small consecutive edits to articles, endlessly tweaking them, much like Ben dioym Angara. Ben diyom Angora thus fits the pattern perfectly. Athenean (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the checkuser, he has at least two socks that were active until a few days/weeks ago, User:Namuslu and User:Türbanistan, so they can be used for checkuser purposes. His older accounts are of course stale. Athenean (talk) 21:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Please reconsider; recent account Namuslu (talk · contribs) with several other socks (Türbanistan (talk · contribs) etc.) were likely also him. Fut.Perf. 21:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware of the other accounts. Striking my decline and moving back to open CU request for consideration.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 22:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ben diyom Angara, Türbanistan, and Namuslu are  Confirmed. --MuZemike 23:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


22 April 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Block evasion. Identical arguments: Lord of Rivendell diff1, Lord of Rivendell diff2 vs. IP 78.181.138.199.

Examples

More IPs have been involved over the past few days, ex. 2 IPs 88.251.xxx.xx, but this is the latest disruption using IP 78.181.138.199.  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

16 August 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

New account. Username derived using names from Lord of the Rings, exactly as the master, and edits disruptively. The articles the sock edits are, you guessed it, Turkey-related with an emphasis on Turkey.  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 10:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Eldarion of Gondor and Arnor has same altitude with Lord of Rivendell as you can see in the history of Turkey. He removes valuable/cited/GA reviwer recommended edits without any reasonbale in summaries. Also see this elmasmelih 11:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Eldarion blocked as obvious, plus a recent IP 88.251.86.240 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) that was trying to stir up trouble at WP:AN. Fut.Perf. 16:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


24 April 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Although there has been a long time since the last disruption by the socks of Lord of Rivendell, long enough to render a CU check impossible, I open this SPI based on rather loud quacking. I think there is enough evidence to firmly establish the relation between sock and master.  Looks like a duck to me Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence
Edit-warring on Turkey about the same sources and victim numbers of the Armenian Genocide
Very similar locus of articles
Similar top-four articles from edit-count
Lord of Rivendell
  1. 599 edits on Turkey
  2. 52 on Turkish Naval Forces
  3. 44 on New Mosque (Istanbul)
  4. 42 on Istanbul
Superfluous man
  1. 137 edits on Turkey
  2. 61 on Turkish Naval Forces
  3. 35 on Turkish Air Force
  4. 24 on Istanbul
Interest on aircraft articles and the Turkish Air Force
Similar image work on Istanbul
Similar mode of sock insertion
Similar MO of socks once inserted
Similar layout of user pages
Edit-warring is the strongest common thread of all the socks
Sock has violated 3RR again after release from block
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I dont believe that Superflous is a sockpuppet of Rivendell. Rivendel was much more aggresive. kazekagetr 19:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Socks can change some aspects of their behaviour. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 20:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

14 September 2015

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Shuppiluliuma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a banned user and particularly prolific sockmaster, with close to 100 outed socks. He has a penchant for unstoppable edit-warring and extreme incivility that crosses the line into hate speech, particularly in edit summaries. One of his innumerable socks, Pantepoptes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) made the following comment in an edit-summary long ago [34], taunting Armenian users about Armenia's "3 million population" and "11 billion GDP". The account Heimdallr of Æsir (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), which I suspected of being a sock due to the similarity in hate speech, was blocked today for 24 hrs for edit-warring. He was also participating in this talkpage discussion [35]. Immediately after the block, he edited the discussion as an IP, making the following comment [36]. It couldn't quack any louder. CU is desirable to ferret out sleeper accounts. Frankly, considering the magnitude and incredible tenacity of this maniac (he has been socking since 2007), it seems a rangeblock is the only way to put an end to the disruption. All his IP edits are from the 88.251 IP. Athenean (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence:

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

14 September 2015

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


See the discussion at WP:ANI section "WP:BATTLEFIELD threats and constant edit-warring at Turkey" as of right now. The user is aggressively editing on Turkish topics; I blocked him yesterday for edit-warring on Turkey (see recent history), and an IP that's seemingly him has been active on the talk page, advocating the position that Heimdallr was trying to force into the article. Over at WP:ANI, someone adds a note:

Heimdallr of Æsir has a name from Norse mythology. (To see the connection to Lord of the Rings, Google for 'Heimdallr Tolkien'). Based on his choice of user name and his interest in Turkey, this editor is most likely the same person as WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Lord of Rivendell. EdJohnston (talk) 21:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC).

This seems like a convincing argument to me. If you want more evidence, let me know and I'll supply more diffs or other links. Nyttend (talk) 23:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Actually Lord of Rivendell and Heimdallr are both socks of the original sockmaster, Shuppiluliuma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The aggressive POV is the same, the insults to Greek and Armenian users are the same, the "Ethnically themed sock" is the same, the many consecutive minor grammar edits are the same, the consistent use of wikilinks in edit summaries is the same. The smoking gun is this edit summary by one of Shuppiluliuma's socks [41], where he taunts Armenian users about "Armenia's 3 million people and 11 billion GDP". The IP sock of Heimdallr made the same exact taunt at Talk:Turkey a few days ago [42]. They are all the same guy. I've opened an SPI on Heimdallr here [43], I think these should all be merged. Athenean (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • Oh, so "stale" means "you're absolutely unable to get it". I didn't know that: I figured there was a continuum between stale and not-stale, and the checkuser had to determine where a specific case fit. So basically you're allowed to work with whatever data are available, since stuff older than three months is totally unavailable. Thanks for helping me understand. Nyttend (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's generally correct. However, one can look at other CheckUsers' logs that predate the three-month window. I don't look at logs except in unusual circumstances and, even then, they have limited value.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22 December 2015

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
Introduction

In the tradition of the recent sock incarnations of the Lord of Rivendell this new sock makes a few initial token edits on some articles and then starts the edit-warring on his favourite article: Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). But let's start from the beginning. Dr. K. 01:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence
Name
Edit-warring on Turkey
Elaborate edit-summaries
Edit-warring about the GDP of Turkey
Use of wikilinks inside elaborate edit-summaries
Duck probability

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comment by User:Athenean

I also strongly suspect this is a sock of Shuppililiuma/Lord of Rivendell. The last sock was blocked back in September and this would be right around the time this user would create another sock. This new account, created a few days ago knows how to edit-wikipedia and is clearly a sock. What made me suspect it was the latest sock of Shuppiluliuma is

  1. A few token edits to get past the semiprotection on Turkey, and once that is done, almost exclusive focus on Turkey
  2. Incessant edit-warring: this user simple cannot not edit-war. Even though all his previous socks have been blocked for edit-warring, he keeps doing it. He just can't not edit-war.
  3. Meticulous attention to detail, lots of small quality control edits to Turkey in keeping with this individual's obsessive nature.
  4. Long-winded edit-summaries without any typos or grammatical mistakes
  5. Frequent use of wikilinks in the edit-summaries, whenever possible. This is a signature of this user. Athenean (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 December 2015

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Not sure if CheckUser is even needed for this, however the user has went to user pages of other blocked sockpuppets from the master and removed the block notice. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 February 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

As far as I can tell, everyone is  Stale. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


28 February 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


  1. New account created very soon after last Shuppiluliuma sock was blocked
  2. Single-minded focus on Turkey, the usual lots of consecutive small quality-control edits, in keeping with this individual's obsessive nature [44]
  3. The usual Kemalist POV
  4. The usual aggressiveness, hair-trigger edit-warring [45] Khirurg (talk) 05:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

We are tired of him/her. kazekagetr 15:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


25 September 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


  1. Similar grandiose Latin username, same as a previous account Res_Gestæ_Divi_Augusti (talk · contribs)
  2. New account with a few token edits to get past the semiprotection on Turkey, and once that is done, almost exclusive focus on Turkey
  3. Single-minded focus on Turkey, the usual many consecutive small quality-control edits, in keeping with this individual's obsessive nature
  4. The same Turkish nationalist POV (e.g. does not like Kurds [46] [47]) Khirurg (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

31 October 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


A typical "themed" Shuppiluliuma sock, this time named after a street in the city of Thessaloniki (Egnatias avenue). He makes a few edits to Thessaloniki to get around the semi-protection of Turkey, and then edits exclusively Turkey almost exclusively, pushing Turkish nationalist POV [48] and then lots of consecutive small edits to Turkey, as usual. Khirurg (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Khirurg (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Egnatias 406 is  Confirmed to Æternus Prætor Firmitas Semper and others in the archive.  Blocked and tagged.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


30 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Identical in behavior to previous socks:

  1. Makes a few token edits to non-semiprotected articles, to get past the semiprotection at Turkey, and once that is done focuses exclusively on Turkey.
  2. Many small incremental edits to Turkey in quick succession.
  3. Same Turkish nationalist POV (e.g. against Kurds [49]). Khirurg (talk) 16:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Likely  Blocked and tagged.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Classic Shuppiluliuma sock, which makes a few edits related to its username to get around the semi-protection at Turkey, and from then on exclusively makes edits to Turkey. Lots of successive minor incremental edits without edit summaries at Turkey, in keeping with the sockmaster's obsessive nature. When reverted, he just reverts everything without an edit summary and continues. Khirurg (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


24 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Typical "themed" Shuppluliuma sock: Makes a few edits related to its username (in this case related to Scotland) to get past semi-protection at Turkey, then lots of little incremental edits to Turkey and Istanbul. Khirurg (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed,  Blocked and tagged,  No sleepers immediately visible.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


26 April 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


It's been a while since the last Shuppiluliuma sock, so we are due for another one. This one was created in February. After making the usual small edits to get around the page protection, begins to edit Turkey obsessively, as all past other socks.

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Likely also with a fair bit of logged out editing.  Blocked and tagged.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Likely,  Blocked and tagged. Closing.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 00:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


01 June 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


See below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed,  Blocked and tagged.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


10 July 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


like his old socks User:TR34Istanbul and User:Spiritum Sanctum they edit same pages. [61], [62] and [63] + in Turkey He is already 2 weeks banned [64] Shadow4dark (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence After his block of his previous sock he continue edit same paragraph. Here he eddit same paragraph in "Financial Sector" , [[65]] [[66]] It lacks more diffs because he is blocked. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

The giveaway that this is a Shuppluliuma sock is the bizarre habit that this individual has of making edits related to the socks name. A "denarius" is a type of Roman coin, and his first edit was to the article of Constantine the Great, a Roman Emperor. Then, once that's out of the way, he starts editing Turkey (almost exclusively), making lots of small incremental quality control edits without an edit summary. If you look at the archive, every single one of socks follows the same pattern of behavior. This is one of the most prolific sockpuppeteers I have come across; he's been socking since at least 2007. Khirurg (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 December 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

His last sock User:Neolir was blocked 22 november and he created current sock same day. Here he do same edit as his older sock [[67]] and [[68]] he edit same pages as last socks in. Istanbul, Dolmabahçe Palace Grand Bazaar, Istanbul User:Spiritum Sanctum, Ataşehir User:Strabonis Levent User:Neolir and Istanbul Sapphire User:TR34Istanbul Shadow4dark (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More blocked IPs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88.246.76.187 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88.244.95.222 Shadow4dark (talk) 04:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

29 December 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

When i deleted large edits by his older socks he reverted me here [[69]] and when i asked speedy deletion WP:G5 (page created by his older sock) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metropol_Istanbul&diff=997020581&oldid=996740610 he reverted me again and he edit same page as his older socks here [[70]] his sock User:Neolir Shadow4dark (talk) 17:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 January 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Both already blocked but i want add my evidence here. AnatoLion is sock of Martevenere but they are both sock of Shuppiluliuma. Shuppiluliuma will Non-stop edit warring until blocked [71] like his older sock, evidence here [[72]] + he do personal attacks like older socks, look edit summaries of AnatoLion. Main pages of Shuppiluliuma is Istanbul related and or turkey related Shadow4dark (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Shadow4dark (talk) 15:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: New sock User:Smyrneika Shadow4dark (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 March 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Obvious sock, already blocked. CU showed no others. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 April 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

He edits same pages and same section here.

[73]

[74] Shadow4dark (talk) 02:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Look this user edits mostly on Istanbul or turkey related like his older socks. Look here mostly banned socks [[75]][[76]] Shadow4dark (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

03 December 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar with his older socks he editing again mostly istanbul and Turkey, see [[77]] . The main reason why i saw this is his sock is this edit, other editor adding WP:SANDWICH tag because he adding to many pictures but he reverts [[78]] and see this [[79]] and [[80]]. He will never stop reverting until he is blocked like his past socks. Here they edit same section like his past sock (Image gallery) [[81]] Shadow4dark (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[82]Moxy- 12:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 May 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

First there is a overlap with past socks.[[83]]

They fighting edits wars like past socks and has many warnings [[84]], [[85]]. This happend also with his past socks [[86]] and [[87]]

At this page they editing same section as last sock see page history Levent also city as Istanbul has more tall buildings if he is no sock why are they editing same building and why same section?

Further they do mostly small controll edits, editing mostly images and almost never use talkpage for edit wars as past socks Shadow4dark (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar with his past sock mentioned above they do Turkish pov edits and removing genocide details [[88]]they did this similar deletion in 2010! [[89]]Shadow4dark (talk) 07:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

I have also long suspected that Mercresis is a Shuppiluliuma sock. The combination of endless small edits combined with the uncompromising attitude are always a tell. Plus he is the most long-term sockpuppeteer I have ever encountered, and he is due for another sock. Khirurg (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]