Kuntan

Kuntan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Report date April 18 2009, 17:30 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Radhakrishnansk (talk)

Notice the pattern of attack on SUCI, related pages and editors; abusive language being used against other editors User:Sekharlk, User:Soman, User:Suciindia, User:Bctcanji and this user. SPI necessary to do a range block as indicated by admin User:LessHeard vanU in the notice board.--Radhakrishnansk (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence: User:C K Luckose is abusing the picture of Shibdas Ghosh in his page by creating a GIF. Similar behaviour could be found in User:Kuntan and User:Kundan After Sundown--Radhakrishnansk (talk) 06:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Even more evidence; Here I add another IP to the list. And do note that one of the SPI report filed against me was delisted by admins because it was confirmed that the one who listed it was a puppet of banned User:Kuntan. This puppet who filed the case was User:Uzhuthiran; here is the SPI and the admin's decision on it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Suciindia/Archive. THis confirms that User:Uzhuthiran is a puppet of User:Kuntan. Appropriate action is necessary in this regards.--Radhakrishnansk (talk) 14:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
More evidence; see User talk:59.91.254.32 where the IP has accepted himself to be the banned User:Kuntan and that he is socking. I have added this IP too to the list--Radhakrishnansk (talk) 09:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

The user who made this allaegation against me is just being paranoid. I have not made any "attack" on SUCI; I am not against SUCI ; I am not associated with SUCI.I have not used any abusive language nor do I intend to use it.C K Luckose (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

How does User:Radhakrishnansk know that User:C K Luckose is an impostor account? His summary here (Deleted a fake page in the name of the State Secretary of SUCI...this editor is a puppet of User:Kuntan) suggests that he is an insider of the party despite his frequent claims to the contrary. If you note his language you will see that either there are multiple persons behind the account or he is taking his cue in the form of feeds from someone else behind the scenes. The difference in his level of English generally displayed (here for example) and the the level displayed here (read the comment beginning with "I am surprised that...") makes this clear.59.91.254.40 (talk) 01:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: I've generated a report for this cased. What you see is a cross reference of any account confirmed as Kuntan, with the only non blocked account listed as suspected. Synergy 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Not much in the way of evidence has been presented to support a connection between Kuntan and C K Luckose. More is needed for anyone to take any action. This case will be closed, probably within 6-8 hours, if no more evidence is forthcoming (case has been open for 6 days). Nathan T (formerly Avruch) 21:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


More