Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
[1] and [2] are nearly identical the User:Mariolis MG has already been indefinitely blocked. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This should have been filed with the named account as master. A clerk should move it. In any event, we don't publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts. The CU request is declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Possible WP:DUCK at List of events named massacres? — Marcus(talk) 03:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Diffs: [5] [6] — Marcus(talk) 08:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Diff: [7]. Looks like a duck to me — Marcus(talk) 09:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
AndresHerutJaim and Dank Chicken: [8], [9].
One of AndresHerutJaim's socks and AmirSurfLera: [10], [11].
AmirSurfLera and Dank Chicken: [12], [13].
Dank Chicken and Willschmut: [14], [15].
AmirSurfLera and Mariolis MG: [16], [17] (see summary).
This also should be merged with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mariolis MG. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Triggerhippie4: Your only "proof" is that me and other editors edited the same articles. This is laughable, I'm seriously considering reporting you for being a sock puppet since you edited the same article as SupremeDeliciousness... [18] [19] Also, why don't you add yourself as a suspect in this investigation? We have both edited this article, that must mean you're a sock puppet as well... LMFAO! :D Dank Chicken (talk) 23:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
This is proposterous. I haven't done anything wrong, please stop slandering me. If you disagree with my edits, then tell me. But don't make up unsubstantiated allegations! Dank Chicken (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
@Bbb23: can you also check Mr. Dodo'sss? (per link given by Onceinawhile above). --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Thank you! Don't close it yet. I guess now we should determine whether AndresHerutJaim and Delotrooladoo are the same. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Based on the checkuser results below, I'm submitting all accounts in the first group plus Mr. Dodo'sss for a global lock. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 03:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
He's already back as IP at Talk:Israel#Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 January 2018. Compare with the latest IPs at Delotrooladoo, Mariolis MG and AndresHerutJaim cases. All from the same internet provider in Argentina. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 21:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
All Confirmed to a past sock. Filing for the record (see note below before closing, though). ~ Rob13Talk 22:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Bbb23: Continues where previous confirmed sock edited yesterday. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 02:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you also protect the template where he sockpuppeting? --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
OK Bbb23, I'm going to have to leave this one to you--which SPI is this supposed to be under anyway? Drmies (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
GABgab 03:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Range blocked. GABgab 03:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The usual restoration of sockpuppet edits ([29] [30]) and rapid dummy edits to user sandbox in order to be autoconfirmed ([31]). Sro23 (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The same topics, the same edits, the same modus operandi. --MehrdadFR (talk) 13:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
New account jumping in to ARBPIA topics. Most of their edits are to articles previously edited by יניב הורון, several of whose socks have recently been blocked. See this interaction analysis: https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=WatchlistSorsor&users=%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%91+%D7%94%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9F&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki RolandR (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Continuing to re-add the improperly sourced content with information from tabloids that the master sockpuppet first reverted, followed by proven socks at Hasan Rouhani. Sharmatish also redid the exact same edit to Abraham of the blocked sock Tochtugarten which I reverted (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abraham&action=history). The master sock has also regularly patrolled that page, making similar minor edits. Also similar are a focus on Middle East, specifically Israel, as well as Jewish history, just like the master sockpuppet. For reference, between the master and one of his proven socks, and these two, they have many dozens of similar edits (https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%91+%D7%94%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9F&users=Nagatori&users=Tochgutartan&users=Sharmatish&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki), and between the recently blocked sock Tochtugarten and Nagatori, there are 10 pages they have both edited. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 05:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed
Possible
Blocked and tagged all of the confirmed accounts.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Documenting here for the record. Mkdw talk 21:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz where I reported Silveter ~12h ago. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
New account's first edits was to revert others on Jewish-related articles. They know how to sign a post and message really fast hence my talk page but complete silence when I mentioned WP:SOCK. Jerm (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed
Blocked and tagged
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
The sock has only been registered since Dec. 22 2019 but already knows how to participate in AfDs, and users edit history seems to focus on Jewish related articles or Israel. In this AfD, the editor seems to know about Wiki policy via this edit which I find impressive for someone who's only been editing for less than a month. Jerm (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Jerm: All you've said is that the user is suspicious because they're new and are took knowledgeable. You must provide comparison diffs showing similarities between the user and the master or socks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
These fairly new accounts had suddenly been participating in an edit war on Alberto Nisman with the same patterns as each other: FerFeluchi, Neutralwatch Behavior resembles the master, who also participated here: [32] [33] —{ CrypticCanadian } 20:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Shortly after the last couple of socks were blocked Aroma Stylish began patrolling the same articles. See Alberto Nisman (FerFerluci, NeutralWatch, followed by Aroma Stylish, and prior to that יניב הורון. Same editing time (AS vs sockmaster, both keeping the Sabbath from Fri night to Sat night. See here for a more comprehensive listing of the intersections, but the breadth of articles the user patrols and reverts is common across past socks. nableezy - 22:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC) 22:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
New user nearly exclusively focused on ARBPIA, immediately reverting edits regarding Iran and Israel-related subjects: 123 and having fourteen pages which Yaniv Horon also edited. : MatryoshkaNL (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I have had 2 emails from this user asking me to revert edits made by other users. Padres Hana (talk) 09:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed and Hajash78 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is
Likely.
Blocked and tagged.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
It seems probable that Lana Ryback is יניב הורון, a repeat sockmaster. Perusal of Lana Ryback's talk page gives the distinct impression of a user who's been around for a while. The Editor Interaction Analyzer shows a 42 article overlap between the two accounts, [34] despite the fact that Lana Ryback has only 66 article edits. Further, the Lana Ryback account was created on 6 September 2020, which is just when יניב הורון's previous sock report was being processed. SPI report filed 5 September. That sock was blocked on the 7th, which is when Lana Ryback started editing. [35] Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Likely plus Mustakhdamin (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).
Blocked and tagged.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I believe these IPs are sockpuppets of the subject because they're quick to reinstate the blanking done by a blocked suspected-sockpuppet of the subject on a relatively obscure article that is not directly related to Israel (Israel only constitutes a very small section of the article). Chain of events: ip1 undoes (my) revision that undid a blanking by a blocked suspected-sockpuppet of the subject Special:Diff/977632347/977874578, then another IP restores said revision, only for an extremely similar IP (ip2) to quickly re-blank it Special:Diff/978545967/978594080. 100.16.5.65 (talk) 06:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar timecard as past socks (focusing on Aroma Stylish and יניב הורון here): WIO, AS, יניב הורון with all not editing between Friday 17:00 to Saturday 16:00. All users generally patrol Israel-related topics making reverts without much in the way of any new content generation. The reverts are at a range of articles that would take some sort of coincidence to occur with some very obscure articles common between them. Full listing here, with peculiar interactions below:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
While I do have a 'very terrible' habit of typing lengthy [non-work] communications, I shall try my Best to keep it concise: this latest IP-edit appears to be a result of socking not just because of my geolocation-investigation of their IP address, but because of days of edit-warring with multiple IP-edits at Israel-Qatar relations through their now-suspended User:Watchlonly for vague reasons like bad English trope followed by its rewording when once warned over their UTP, given their refusal to fix the said "bad" in the English of a clearly constructive-edit (which gives nuance to the background of the subject, to be concise) and when undid yet-again by another, shifted the goalpost in the ES for very same edit to bad geography now. It appears the following undo does appear with a bad English ES, perhaps they were too hurried or some other technical-factor, their words were cut short: Resulting in incomplete-rendering. But frankly.. After seeing that this editor is a devout or shall I be blunt, an obsessive WP:ONLYREVERT vandal, who can only be WP:SNEAKY so many times. Quite admirably in a twisted-way or in a far more level-headed way: Very frustrating and quite infuriating as while their vandalism might be restricted to the topic-areas of ‘Is'rāel’ and ‘World Jewry’, they've committedly set their eyes upon quite a number of low-traffic articles which are sparingly-maintained, if at all. Leaving their sneaky-vandalism repeatedly undetected for long period-of-times, leaving their unstable-revisions intact. Above all, I can't contain my shock that while innumerable editors get banned/blocked merely for discretionary conduct-violations, including those who've seemingly crossed their path, they're still here for past 2+ years: At the very least. And nevertheless, nobody is in a mood to take enough of punitive-measures to get them off their kick of treating Wikipedia like a stereotypical YouTube comments-section. I strongly file for IP-range block from whatever IP they utilise to make their edits from now onwards, if not the pre-existing assortments of IP ranges of addresses banned as results of multiple SIs and counting. Because, frankly: An off-Wiki intervention for them would be the ideal, but this is not one of patrolling-remits of higher-UAL editors, right? As in, not to personally intervene in the lives of 'Wikivandals'. Therefore, IP-range blocks are justified and an inescapable-necessity now, given they aren't anywhere near remotely-close to stopping their sitewide vandalism. 203.192.236.116 (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user registered few days after blocking of previous sock, Watchlonly, and now send me an e-mail asking to restore edits made by that sock. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 05:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Identical mass nonsensical edits (removing empty lines in seemingly random articles). Possibly to quickly raise edit count? Accounts created within a day from each other. BlameRuiner (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
SoaringLL gamed the ARBPIA General Sanctions: "500/30" Rule and did hundreds of space edits to reach the 500 count before he started editing within the A-I conflict: [40]
The Amir Khanas Forever account has done the exact same thing, look at his first 500 edits:[41], 500 edits consisting of only a single space: to reach 500 edits and then starts to edit within the A-I conflict:[42] [43] [44]
The name "Amir Khanas Forever" also resembles another sock: Kenosha Forever (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), so you should also probably check that. Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Edit history consistent with all previous socks of this user: mass removal of empty lines to reach a certain edit count. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Spicy as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
Just like my previous SPI:[45] this account gamed the system and made 500 useless space edits to reach the 500 count and then started editing withing the A-I conflict:[46], please also check this account with all those socks in the previous SPI, Amir Khanas Forever, SoaringLL. Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
It’s so obvious, please block as soon as possible. - GizzyCatBella🍁 07:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Straight forward - Same as previously --> [47] The account makes 500 useless space edits to reach the 500 counts and then commenced reverting to the version of previously blocked sock-puppet -->
Obvious sock-puppetry. GizzyCatBella🍁 22:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same as previously, edit history consistent with previous socks. Registers account and commence making useless removal of empty lines: [58] [59],[60],[61] etc. Then moves for the revert journey and edit war to the articles יניב הורון was previously involved in with familiar edit summary such as - "reverting vandalism", "miss me?", etc.
..and so on, same for every article VIP Alanya edited. Taking under consideration removal of empty lines later reverted substance, choice of the articles and similarities in edits summaries, I have no difficulties identifying this account as another sock-puppet of יניב הורון. GizzyCatBella🍁 11:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
An Israeli IP promptly dives into reverting[87],[88] to the version of recently blocked sock puppet of יניב הורון [89] GizzyCatBella🍁 13:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.
An Israeli IP promptly dives into reverting[90], to the version of recently blocked sock puppet of יניב הורון [91] GizzyCatBella🍁 13:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
PS - There are more instances of sock-puppetry to report but I don’t want to overload you folks. I’ll bring them up later.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.
Same as before, edit history consistent with previous socks. Registers account, begins making fruitless elimination of blank lines and a few months later proceeds to the revert journey.
..and so on. GizzyCatBella🍁 19:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.
@ Tamzin - Before someone archives, here is a continuous instance of likely sock-puppetry. (a good example for practice since such situations occur frequently)
@ Tamzin - excellent tip, thank you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.
:)
-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 18:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Begins by reverting [103] to the blocked sock puppet version [104].
That follows migrating the section to the bottom of the article [105].
Notice the brand new users' awareness of the ARBPIA abbreviation. See edit summary Article is not under ARBPIA..
[106]
Then proceeds to other articles recently edited by the blocked sock puppet to modify the headings:
The above behaviour matches this brand new account (Ajajy Kumar) that also migrates the section to the bottom of the article [110] recently chosen by the blocked sock puppet [111].
Please notice that edits of Ajajy Kumar [112] and OMIR Pandey [113] are 7 minutes apart and that both accounts were created within 3 days from each other.
I'm concluding that the above edits were composed by the same person. - GizzyCatBella🍁 11:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.
A brand new account files an Arbitration Enforcement Request [114]
The clues as to who it might be, include:
1 - Usage of the word vandalism as justification for reverts[115] the same as other blocked sock puppets such as :
I could go on with diff's but will stop here. Please also note that the original account has been banned (among other things) for accusing an editor of vandalism:
2 - Basically, every single article edited by AshiK Jonathan has been previously edited by blocked sockpuppets:
Again, I could go on with diff's and more comparisons but will stop here since I believe this should be enough and that the know-how of Arbitration Enforcement Request filing requires WP:DUCK utilized as well. GizzyCatBella🍁 20:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Check User just confirmed extensive proxy use. Previously blocked sock puppets also used proxies extensively, which is yet additional clue. - GizzyCatBella🍁 21:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I'm satisfied, based on the behavioural evidence and the use of proxies. At the very least this is not a new editor with clean hands and very likely this master. Account blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Same behaviour as allways, useless edits removing blank lines to farm extended confirmed status. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 21:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I'm rather convinced this is Yanniv Horon because of the clear attempt to quickly gain 500/30 status by making useless edits + proxies usage. This behaviour is matching most previous sock puppets. If you folks have still doubts, then wait for him to make their first edit into the Israel/Palestine or Holocaust in Poland area. Then you will know for sure. My prediction is they will now abandon this particular account anyway, blocked or unblocked. - GizzyCatBella🍁 22:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
It is going to resemble something like that --> once 500/30 his reached, they will go from useless edit about Alabama native plants [137] to this [138] - GizzyCatBella🍁 23:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Similar name to FocusinJabotito, a confirmed sock. I would strongly prefer not to provide further evidence, even confidentially to arbcom, as it would out me. Their privacy policy is not particularly encouraging in that respect. That said, I have received an almost identical WP:STEALTH canvassing email from this user and the blocked sock Martal Borman. You can see the suspected sock's talk page history for further confirmation of that. AlexEng(TALK) 01:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Damn. I had hoped that the CU review would be conclusive. Bearing in mind my previous reservations, this is the level of evidence that I am comfortable providing. Please review this screenshot of my mail client. The top two emails are from Focusin Tarambana while the last email is from Martal Borman. If there is a link between MB and the sock master, then I think it stands to reason that there is a link between this account and the same sock master. Please also consider the use of the same terminology to refer to Counterpunch. AlexEng(TALK) 23:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Given the stealth canvassing to the RFC on CounterPunch that Alex brought to light (see User_talk:AlexEng#Yaniv), and another confirmed Yaniv sock reverting over that same topic yesterday (see here) would suggest a check on DoraExp. nableezy - 14:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Added another one as per this edit [139] --Shrike (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Tamzin it just doesnt make any sense to canvass that user off of their WP contribs. 12 edits the day they registered in Sept 2020, 3 more in August, and then the CP RFC 5 months later. Floral suffrage had a similar profile, 6 edits the day they showed up, mostly innocuous simple copy edits, just as DoraExp, though after that dove in to ARBPIA related with Steven Salaita in October 2020 and then doesnt show up until now about CP. There isnt much, given they all have a handful of edits, but looking at the contribs which kinda scream out sleeper sock and the repeated interest in the CP RFCs just strike me as too many coincidences. nableezy - 02:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Adding info that had previously been added by a sock of the user to the article Air battle of Mansoura ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
prev
link next to a timestamp in a page's history, or click the leftmost prev
link in the header when viewing an old revision of a page. See Help:Diff for more information.'Vasyl pal is stale, and I don't recall Yaniv having a history of long-dormant sleepers, so no action there. Blaze, please don't report stale sox unless a master has that kind of history, although it's fine to mention them as reference points for behavioral evidence.Per Blaze' diffs, Michael P. Gamble has restored a Yaniv edit, which is characteristic Yaniv behavior. Created a few hours after Focusin Tarambana was reported here and continues with the stealth canvassing to Israel related discussions, see end of comment here and here. nableezy - 22:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Restoring the same edit over and over again to Iași pogrom, single purpose accounts casualdejekyll 18:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Gakner has only left messages on Israeli Aparthied articles on Tombah and my pages, the IP address has only done this as well. Tombah: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tombah&diff=1084382294&oldid=1083883837&diffmode=visual and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tombah&diff=1085041239&oldid=1084382321&diffmode=visual Me: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr_Reading_Turtle&diff=1085043782&oldid=1084845584&diffmode=visual and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr_Reading_Turtle&diff=1084383813&oldid=1083497696&diffmode=visual. You can see that these are the only contribution here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gakanr and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/175.200.174.215. Both times they have deleted their edits, I belive they are trying to make a false consensus. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 10:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Blocked sock puppet prior edit -->[144] Brand new account reverting to that version -->[145] GizzyCatBella🍁 15:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
April 21/22 blocked sock puppet diff -->[146] New account reverting to the above version -->[147] GizzyCatBella🍁 16:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accounts overlap on Mathahir Mohamad with Emery Stodden and Faes Flores [148]. Same general editing pattern of precocious edits to a wide range of Judaism-related articles (compare [149][150][151][152]). Spicy (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same. New account reverting[153] to the version of the blocked sock-puppet[154]. GizzyCatBella🍁 09:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The first two created within a few minutes of each other, immediately begins reverting at articles shared with past socks, eg:
Added Madalyn Turgoose based on reverting as their first and only edit at an article with multiple Yaniv socks, including LL listed here, the same Pinkwashing article nableezy - 03:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC) 03:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Adding to log for future CUs Guerillero Parlez Moi 08:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self illustrative - diffs below.
1 - Blocked sockpuppet - [156] <--> New sockpuppet [157]
2 - Blocked sockpuppet - [158] <--> New sockpuppet [159]
3 - Blocked sockpuppet - [160] <--> New sockpuppet [161]
4 - Blocked sockpuppet - [162] <--> New sockpuppet fixing their own prior edit - [163]
5 - Blocked sockpuppet - [164] <--> New sockpuppet fixing their own prior edit - [165], [166]
GizzyCatBella🍁 21:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Blocked sockpuppet - [167] <--> Miss Bharadwaj! - [168]
Please also notice the usual behavioural routine - unproductive edits at the account inauguration. GizzyCatBella🍁 16:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same pattern of patrolling articles and reverting on anything related to Israel, in spurts. British_Military_Administration_(Libya) with WatchIOnly, Reprisal_operations_(Israel) with Mike Rothman2. nableezy - 19:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC) 19:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
brand new account reverting on articles previously patrolled by Yaniv socks, eg Hassan Rouhani (new, old), Capital punishment in Iran (new, old, another old), Star of David (new, old), Buchenwald concentration camp (new, old, another old) and others. Nableezy 04:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Similar to past socks, rapid trivial edits to reach 500, then returns to focus on Israel related articles. See nearly all of the contributions prior to 9/29, all minor edits performed at a rapid rate. Immediately upon hitting 500 edits, returns to old hotspots, such as Yom Kippur War (past sock, current), History of Israel (past, current), War of Attrition (past, current) nableezy - 03:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC) 03:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Similar to past Yaniv socks, rapid low character count edits to get to 500 then immediately to EC articles. See for example this series of non-substantive edits, [173], [174], [175], or this and this where he introduces and reverts his own error in short order. Since getting to 500 articles has focused entirely on Israel, with no more 0-10 byte edits. nableezy - 05:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) 05:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Similar to the last check, rapid minor edits, including introducing his own error to revert again, see error introduced, reverted; error, reverted. Then once 500 edits achieved, back to patrolling I/P, eg [176], [177], [178] nableezy - 07:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC) 07:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Per this message from a user who was emailed about an I/P discussion, this user appears to be another in the line of socks attempting to canvass to a number of I/P discussions (see also this about Dur Godiva). Connection in edits as well, see for example past sock, current. nableezy - 18:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 18:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Consistent behavior with many previous socks: editing Israel-related topics + boosting edit count with empty lines removal. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Similar username style. Similar editing interests. The user is likely operating a sockpuppet, as he used another account to revert an edit he was not allowed to make: [179], [180] (similar arguments/wording in the two diffs). Likely has more sockpuppets that I have not yet encountered. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Account created to edit war over same content as master account,[181][182][183][184] because the suspected master account was recently blocked for prolonged edit warring on this page.[185] Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 10:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
"Both of them are similar, especially regarding the Lebanon article. They have the same contributions and style of handling the topic. If you examine the article's historical record, you will find that they made the same contributions." 1 2 3 4 5 Sarah SchneiderCH (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked based on typical behaviour. Filed for the record. Spicy (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Blocked based on typical behaviour. Filed for the record. Spicy (talk) 16:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Exhibits identical behavior with previous socks, with a focus on often obscure Jewish / Israeli / Middle Eastern-related articles, including re-introducing edits made by previous socks (e.g. Gilles Ouaniche (talk · contribs) for one). The account, which was dormant since July, was also suddenly "resurrected" after their non-constructive edits were recently reverted, some of which were first introduced by previous socks of this sockmaster. John Yunshire (talk) 11:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
A bunch of accounts with similar editorial behavior and significant overlaps from previous socks and the sockmaster. John Yunshire (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
In this comment, Orgullomoore says they were email canvassed by GS6. For me, sockpuppet email canvassing in the Israel-Palestine topic area is a big neon arrow pointing at this sockmaster.
G6 has some edit overlap with blocked socks including
See below KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 15:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
New accounts whose only edits are to restore the edits of previous sock account Virief. Given the earlier reports on this user, it's clearly more of the same.
For Machuport, compare: [186], [187], [188]. For Walidmaran, compare: [189], [190], [191]
There's probably others and CU might find more, but these seem like clear WP:DUCK. R Prazeres (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Another new account going straight into contentious editing and restoring edits by previous socks. One such example - Neilgartigan: 1 Anclafina: 2 John Yunshire (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
This one clearly matches Neilgarigen and Fagerbakke, both of which are CU confirmed to Yaniv/AJH. Blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Another WP:DUCK. All four edits so far are reinstating Virief's (sock account's) reverted edits: [192], [193], [194], [195]. R Prazeres (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
As noted in the report above this one, I agree that this is likely to be a sock. --DanielRigal (talk) 02:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Their last two edits look like WP:DUCK behaviour, reinstating edit-warring edits by the previous sock accounts: [196], [197]. (Compare first diff with [198] and [199], and compare second diff with [200] and [201], all made by blocked sock accounts.) They do have a long-ish editing history before this, so it's possible this is an unrelated user, but given AndresHerutJaim's prolific socking it still looks plausible to me. The first diff linked above is especially difficult to explain away as unrelated.
CU can hopefully clear up, or perhaps some of the editors/clerks more familiar with AndresHerutJaim can confirm whether this account's earlier history also looks similar. R Prazeres (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
See below. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 05:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely. In combination with the edits,
Blocked and tagged. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 05:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Restoring edits made by previously blocked socks above. They also include one-off accounts targeting individual articles to revert, but there are also accounts that have made multiple edits but nevertheless in identical behaviors in the Middle Eastern/Israeli/Abrahamic religions topic area. John Yunshire (talk) 06:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Adding User:Ismuchon who has made canvassing attempts similar to AndresHerutJaim. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
CheckUser requested, Given this masters history, they are known to create accounts in the dozens, like above. CU is warranted just given that. Seawolf35 (talk) 22:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
TheDoodbly is often present in the usual articles infested by AHJ/Yaniv Horon's socks (e.g. Bar Kokhba revolt), with an identical behavioral stance. The rest are a bunch of one-off accounts restoring edits made by previous socks. Some are dormant (but Yaniv often returns to dormant accounts after their more recent ones are blocked), and the current active ones are Patraviam, ToaTahuNuva, Dedeborya and Joemb1977. Also notice how some accounts, such as, Patraviam, often engages in nonsensical editing 1, 2, 3 to up their edit count so that the account could edit semi-protected articles and restore sock edits (e.g. Patraviam, Gilles Ouaniche on Who is a Jew?) with their goal being able to disrupt extended-protected articles. John Yunshire (talk) 19:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
I see that there is a long and sordid backstory to this, going back many years. I am new to this particular case but, from looking at the history of Association of German National Jews, I think that I can see a couple more possible socks: User:Gwslibrary and User:Clararudy. I'm not 100% sure but it might be worth checking those? Maybe run a checkuser? Also, I think it would be worth making a LTA case for this so that people know what to look out for. --DanielRigal (talk) 02:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Inclined to leave this unless there's evidence of a connection beyond new accounts editing the same article. For the record, from this list I've blocked:
I don't see a compelling case for any of the others, at least based on what's been presented so far. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Registered at 22:46, 5 November 2023 and in the same minute edits a template here, and again a couple of days later. AHJ has historically had troves of socks to make edits in CT topics that are not extended confirmed, see for example Dedeborya, registered at 03:07, 30 October 2023 and immediately edits in the topic. Nableezy 15:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Looks like a duck to me If someone does edits like that, it's definitely a duck. Waylon111 (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: this needs to be merged into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim. There is a CU request here; I note that there was a CU on this case a few days ago according to the archive. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Accounts such as Mokedbitar and Joemb1977 are definitely not new, with a focus particularly on Genocides in history (1946 to 1999) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and Template:Genocide navbox (1, 2, 3) which is one of the primary topics (Israel-Palestine area) that the sockmaster feels strongly about. It is also suspicious that these accounts would often appear to reinforce and establish a false consensus, as well as to avoid the image of Dovidroth's edit warring, which makes me think they could be some meatpuppetry at play here as well, unless they could very well be all the same person. John Yunshire (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this up. I was going to say something myself, but couldn't write up a sufficient enough request for my own standards. Salmoonlight (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Restoring edits made by previous socks (JohnFroelich, Virief and Amichagoren; Dedeborya and Theadkr). Requesting CU as sockmaster is known to use multiple one-off accounts to restore sock edits in different articles. John Yunshire (talk) 15:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
See Ekron Royal Dedicatory Inscription, Davidic line, Groups claiming affiliation with Israelites, Omrides, Ahiram sarcophagus. 6 out of 7 edits were on pages earlier edited by User:Emolu a suspected sock. Edit summaries are also similar. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 19:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
IP from Buenos Aires who has suddenly appeared to help remove content that goes against their presumably pro-Israel viewpoint on the article for Indigenous peoples. Salmoonlight (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Editor Interaction Analyser Cheezlander vs Silveter.
I have received emails requesting edits on Israel-Palestine topics from this user at the same time as receiving emails from Patraviam and Ismuchon - likely part of this same sockpuppeteer. Apologies for not reporting this earlier as I do not usually use my email for Wikipedia - happy to forward any evidence on if required. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
For the record, David Olpan's edit count is only 28...but
Account apparently created to restore the edit of a previous sock, Cheezlander. This brand-new account also casually mentioned the BLP policy in its first edit summary, which is odd, and that edit summary was phrased somewhat similarly to the edit of the now-blocked sock whose edit it was restoring. I could be wrong, this could just be a random person who agreed with the edit in question, but it looks fairly odd. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Editor Interaction with blocked socks General Blorp, LeMamba and Anclafina. Sean.hoyland (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Putting this on hold for now pending further investigation as I have failed to even convince myself of the evidentiary basis for the report. Sean.hoyland (talk) 03:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Editor Interaction reports with blocked AndresHerutJaim socks.
Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
User7681 is older than Bullvalene (the 0 edit sock). Bullvalene was created yesterday. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 00:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Can I get a quick check to see whether Chairibum is one of AndresHerutJaim's non-extendedconfirmed disposable accounts that they use for canvassing and ban evasion in general, and whether it can be linked to any other accounts.