This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quilter Laboratories · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Chrisparks, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chrisparks (talk) 21:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

@Chrisparks: There were two separate histories, one in AFC space and one in draft space. I have merged them together at Draft:Quilter Laboratories. The current revision looks rather sparse, but back in the history you will find revisions more fleshed out with references. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• Ali Jawad (Journalist) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

A well-known Iraqi journalist who has an article on Arabic Wikipedia]]https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A_%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF_(%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%81%D9%8A). I do not find a reason to delete this article —IamIRAQI (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@IamIRAQI: It doesn't matter what exists on other Wikipedias. We have processes for making editorial decisions about what to keep and delete. Therefore:

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Jawad (Journalist), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Shahad Alshemari · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Iraqi TV host, Poet and media person. —IamIRAQI (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@IamIRAQI: Did you read the box at the top of this page, where it says in boldface text: Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page. See my reply above for guidance. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Rafeef Al Yasiri · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Doctor from Iraq.It has many sources and many works —IamIRAQI (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

 Not done. See the two replies above. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Nour Al Zain · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Singer & Songwriter from Iraq who has an article on Arabic Wikipedia.https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%8A%D9%86 —IamIRAQI (talk) 02:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

 Not done, see above. What exists on the Arabic or any other Wikipedia is irrelevant to the English Wikipedia. Each Wikipedia is independent, with their own rules. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• 3E Accounting · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The page is fullfill all wikipedia guideline and should not be deleted —Aiaccount (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. The other deletion is an A7 and likewise ineligible for restoration. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Tritype · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Raa18123 (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

This topic is a valid topic under the subject of the Enneagram and there was no discussion of its deletion or any noted issues prior to the random and sudden deletion.

Please restore this page so that those interested in the topic like myself may contribute and find this information.

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Sphilbrick, I'd like to know why my user page, kimkuhlman, was deleted. I was not hosting anything on Wikipedia and I simply gave my qualifications and stated my conflicts of interest. —Kimkuhlman (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Done Page restored, there was no violation of the userpage policy here. Yunshui ^雲_水 17:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Ellis (sigil) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

(no text provided) 2600:1700:65C0:8CE0:4449:ED2C:964A:6FDB (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Kingsway Communications · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was marked for redirection/deletion back in September, to the David C Cook page because Kingsway was “owned by a company with an article” and because its “notability [was] questionable.” However Kingsway was a well known Christian music company in the UK, and it’s successor Integrity Music (owned by David C Cook) still has its own page. Please consider reinstating the page as it was useful to refer to, eg as a historic reference to a former company. Ma595 (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Not done This page has not been deleted, although it was redirected in the course of a proposed deletion. You may want to discuss the reduction to a redirect with GB fan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who can point you to the correct place for discussion on whether to spin this back off as a stand-alone article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Talk:List of billionaires · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

There are a number of discussions, such as this one and this one, surrounding a question of whether Forbes billionnaire lists can be published here, concluding that the full lists can't be, but they point to a discussion at Talk:List of billionaires#Fair use limitations as the determining decision, and that page is no longer there. Is a copy of it some place where it can be referenced in discussion related to a new batch of pages? —Largoplazo (talk) 23:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Have you checked Deletionpedia to see if it might be there, or do you think it would be better to undelete the page and histmerge it with Talk:The World's Billionaires? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

It isn't at Deletionpedia. I think it should be here as it will be pivotal each time a conversation like the one currently at Talk:The World's Billionaires 2009 arises. Your histmerge suggestion makes sense if it's feasible. Largoplazo (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• All the deleted entries of this are redirects. So there is nothing to restore and merge. The talk pages have been moved at different times to Talk:The World's Billionaires, Talk:Forbes list of billionaires (2009), and Talk:Forbes list of billionaires (2005). Also it has redirected to Talk:The World's Billionaires 2011, Talk:List of the 100 wealthiest people, Talk:Lists of billionaires and double redirect to Talk:Billionaire, Talk:Lists of people by net worth. The move history is very complex, and I cannot see a section with the name "Fair use limitations". If you know at which time the link was created you could look at the different talk pages and move log(s) to see where it went. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• List of Sony flashes for Multi Interface Shoe · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Also applies to List of Sony flashes for Auto-lock Accessory Shoe.

Hi, I just saw that the above mentioned two list articles were deleted recently, but without proper deletion discussion. I am therefore asking for undeletion.

• Per our established process I would normally have contacted the closing admin, but a hatnote on his talk page explicitly advises against contacting him for this, that's why I am here instead.
• Per our established process (WP:AFDLIST) the creator and main contributors of an article should be informed of deletion nominations. I am the creator and main contributor and have not been informed. Since I do not normally monitor AfDs I didn't see the nominations and consequently could not provide a rationale for the existance of these list articles.
• There were very few participants in the discussion and the "Delete" votes incorrectly stated that the information could be found elsewere. However, they did not realize, that this only held true for as long as the list articles existed - because the lists were transcluded into these articles. Now, that the lists have been deleted, the articles (iISO flash shoe, Multi Interface Shoe, Sony α and possibly more) also lack this information. It is ironical that both lists have been created in order to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability. Previously, the information about flashes had to be maintained in three independent articles, that's why the information was combined and moved into the two list articles, which in turn were transcluded back into those articles, so that the information could be maintained in one place and all articles were kept up to date automatically.
• Both list articles had a multitude of redirects linking into them (IIRC dozens), which all have been deleted as well now (also without informing me). Instead, those redirects should have been redirected to the other corresponding articles.
• All in all, both list articles and the corresponding redirects were a vital part of the infrastructure explaining the otherwise difficult to understand Sony flash system (because of the consequences of the change of the flash shoe). The articles were accurate, complete and up to date, well maintained including properly categorized (and IIRC also well sourced), and what is left now is several articles lacking vital information.

Since the nominations were not carried out properly and consequently the outcome of the discussion was different from what it would have been if I would have participated and if the other participants would have been informed about the purpose of the lists and the far-reaching consequences of their deletion, I would like to ask for undeletion of both list articles. An alternative to these list articles is to reincorporate the information into the related articles, however, it will only make it more difficult to maintain the information - and it would cost me weeks to research and recreate the information from scratch again.

Thanks. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sony flashes for Multi Interface Shoe, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Chronic Airway-Digestive Inflammatory Disease (CAID) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is important as this was the first time in medicine that anyone connected all of these disease processes. Since this time the medical community has gone research and have verified CAID —אלעד רביב (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• 3D Builder · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

the reason for deletion was flawed. The editors did not refer to the sources in the original content. the application is an important free tool for the 3d printing community. It is available in the Windows Store (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/p/3d-builder/9wzdncrfj3t6). —Krisiv (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/3D_Builder, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Killiondude (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Uni Baggage Logo.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Image was deleted under F5 (unused image file), Thanks, —–Davey2010^Talk 21:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done @Davey2010: please use it or change it to pd-simple. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks Graeme will do, –Davey2010^Talk 01:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Fénix Awards · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Lunaliu (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• The page actually exists at Draft:Fénix Awards. Early revisions were hidden as they were copied from http://premiosfenix.com/en/, http://www.indiewire.com/2014/06/latinobuzz-fenix-iberoamerican-cinema-awards-are-announced-by-cinema23-168551/ . You can continue to improve the draft, but not by copying other web sites. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Hi Hi Hi by Wings pink label A-side 1972 UK vinyl.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Same reason as #File:C Moon by Wings pink label UK vinyl.jpg, i.e. the file should be reverted back to previous bigger version. —George Ho (talk) 11:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

• Hi User:George Ho, I will let you know why I have ignored this request: I do not agree that this is free of copyright, and the current reduction is just legible, so it can be used. However I cannot speak for others that do undeletion here. They are free to do something if they wish. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Antelope Valley Transit Authority · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page survived its most recent deletion discussion and then was subsequently speedy-deleted. It was speedy deleted for the same criteria that was reviewed in the deletion discussion (WP:PROMO).
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antelope Valley Transit Authority for the deletion discussion. —¢Spender1983 (talk) 05:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@PennySpender1938: Please talk to the deleting administrator Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). Generally articles that survive AFD (particularly ones with unanimous consensus) don't qualify for speedy deletion. There was a copyright violation problem, also, but as far as I can tell, that might have been weak. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Lit · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This can serve as a redirect to Template:Literal translation, considering how long that template is, and it only renders "lit." when used. —--Kailash29792 (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This page is not for requesting a title be unprotected; it's only for undeleting certain types of articles that were deleted without discussion. Try WP:Requests for page protection instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Glass Garden · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Page was deleted without any form of discussion. Also, section with supposed copyright infringement could be blanked instead of deleting the Entire article. —182.253.83.58 (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

• RHaworth, are you OK with restoring the page sans copyrighted material? It looks like it is notable, per reviews here and here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 22:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
• Restored to draft:Glass Garden. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
• Thank you! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Cats (film) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The draft is of a film that's presently under development. The purpose of it being in the draftspace is so that whenever there's information to be added during the pre-production phase I can add it there. Then when filming begins I can just move it from the draftspace. The deletion I feel wasn't warranted, and furthermore I dislike immensely not being informed of it's deletion. I was aware it was being considered but I thought I only had to make a new edit to it to keep it in place. Which I did, and it was still deleted. —Rusted AutoParts 17:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The deletion looks valid to me, the only edits between April 2017 and December 2017 were by a bot. You're correct that any edits to the draft will disqualify it from deletion but it still needs to be edited at least once in every six months. Hut 8.5 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Pam Kijoran · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Whatis98765 (talk) 00:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

No copyrights and was deleted

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. Whether or not you own the copyright to the pages copy-pasted/closely paraphrased from is irrelevant; we cannot accept it as it is under full copyright by virtue of having been published on those websites without the copyright licence specified. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

If you want the content of that article, go to http://www.knsclassical.com/artist/pam-kijoran/ and http://chiangmai-imf.com/2017/06/27/junior-award-winners-concert/ - those sites are where the content was copied from. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Robert Lyons (photographer) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bgammwiki, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bgammwiki (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Warwick Evans · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Humorlinks, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Warwick Evans (talk) 04:56, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Bruce-rosen-2016.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Permission recieved from copyright holder for images release under the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. As mentioned in OTRS ticket 2017120510011184. —Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done Clarkcj12 Please add correct OTRS template, and attribution for the -BY- part of the license. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Jash · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I believe this page was feted by someone who is now asking for money to re-establish the page. This company exists and is actively making shows, employing people and thriving. —2606:6000:E6C4:9100:FCB7:DCE4:7D75:B7CE (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page is a redirect and always has been, and the last time the page it points to was deleted was almost 5 years ago. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

There was a small amount of old deleted revisions in the history, from 2013 and earlier. I just restored them, for what it's worth. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Mickey Meyer · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I believe this page was deleted by someone who is now trying to ask for money for a new page to be created. I am the person the article describes and the information that existed was valid and often referenced by those writing about me, or interviewing me. —2606:6000:E6C4:9100:FCB7:DCE4:7D75:B7CE (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.

And, I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey Meyer. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Daniel Sweeney · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —65.93.187.58 (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Current page is a redirect to a different person of the same name. Requestor is presuambly referring to a previous iteration of the article which was deleted per this AfD. --Finngall ^talk 03:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

 Not done. Correct, we can't restore it by request, since it was deleted via AFD. The deleted version wasn't anywhere near ready for main space anyway, it was more like some notes someone threw together. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Twink.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Permission from rightsholder had been fwded to OTRS which seemed to find non-credible. Discussion had been reopened, and I responded, suggesting that further authentication could be done, if required. No response - just deletion. Bad process. —Wwwhatsup (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

 Not done, the OTRS ticket 2017062010002373 is indeed not credible, because the ticket consists of a request TO the copyright holder to confirm permission under an acceptable free license, and no reply was ever received. Therefore, the image has no permission, and was correctly deleted. There have been four separate unrelated images uploaded to that same file name. You uploaded the most recent one naming http://www.kosmikradiation.com/2007.02.07.htm as the source, so the burden is on you to obtain the correct permission from wherever or whoever you got that image, and have that permission sent to OTRS. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:European Beat Studies Network · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | mfd ) · [revisions]

I, Cowmanonemanband, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cowmanonemanband (talk) 04:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Esther Eden · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Amberferns (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@RHaworth: You just deleted a page that had just been restored. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• You can blame that on Anachronist for failing to remove the speedy tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

  Argh. That wouldn't be the first time, either. Thanks for fixing it. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Danny Boockvar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 1heyheymikey, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 1heyheymikey (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Blind? · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Alexandar381, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alexandar381 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Dr_A_N_Srivatsan · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I lost the content that I had uploaded and would like to get the same back —denzy 14:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done Userfied to User:Denzy/Dr A N Sreevatsan. Please don't move it back to article space without addressing the concern which led to its deletion, it will just be deleted again. Hut 8.5 18:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Indian_fish_names · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

After considerable research I had put together the English & Indian fish names - however it was found to be unsuitable for wikipedia purpose hence deleted - would any of you admin be kind and save a copy of the page in my user area so that I can find the rightful place for this content elsewhere on the internet if not on wikipedia —denzy 14:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done userfied to User:Denzy/Indian fish names. Hut 8.5 18:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Neter · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Andres51534 (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done – this page is a copyright violation. Text mostly taken from [1] or some similar promotional material. Hut 8.5 18:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• John Lennon Songwriting Contest · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This got deleted back in December when I wasn't paying attention. I don't disagree that it needed more sourcing, but a while back I'd done a fair amount of work on a small portion of it much earlier as part of desultory effort to make it better and am sorry to see the article deleted rather than fixed. Could you be so kind as to restore it to a scratch page for me so that I can give improving it a shot-- I don't want to start from nothing. Thanks! —Crypticfirefly (talk) 04:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

I forgot to mention, I think I probably can establish notability for this as among the most famous of songwriting contests, e.g. it is so identified in "The Indie Band Survival Guide: The Complete Manual for the Do-It-Yourself Musician" by Randy Chertkow and ‎Jason Feehan, Billboard magazine has written about it (says it is the most famous contest) and the folks on its judging panel from time to time, etc. Crypticfirefly (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lennon Songwriting Contest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• • I've sent a message as you suggest. Hopefully my request to get this undeleted to some sort of scratch page can somehow be granted. Thanks. Crypticfirefly (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

• Dennis Nagpal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please reconsider my appeal for undeletion of the page. and Draft by Draft:Dennis Nagpal This article is not for advertising or promotional matter. Its about a casting director and executive producer who started working with some of the best production houses like endemol and colessum media in very less age. He was recently in news for controversy created by bigboss 11 contestant. I assure you that previous concerns are no longer a problem. Can you please fix the issue. The article which i need to create will be of proper referencing and will no longer have concerns in denying of article. Thanks in advance. Will be very grateful.Hbunnylife (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunyylife —Hbunnylife (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• Hbunnylife, it looks like there's quite a kerfuffle surrounding this article, so I'm going to ping Athaenara and RHaworth about this. This page is really only for the restoration of uncontroversial articles for the most part, so this is something you would have to talk to them about restoring. One of the biggest recommendations I can give you is that you should disclose your conflict of interest (ie, are you Nagpal or someone hired to write about him) and give examples of sourcing that you would use. Also, be careful about controversies as far as coverage and notability goes - not all of these are the type of things that Wikipedia tends to cover. From what I can tell, this looks to be relationship drama, which is not the type of thing that Wikipedia tends to consider encyclopedic enough to include or count as notability-giving. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• Hbunnylife, please give up trying to promote this guy. Be grateful I have not blocked you as a sock of Smartpants0 (talk · contribs) and Dennisnagpal (talk · contribs). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• RHaworth, RHaworth , RHaworth (talk · contribs) Hi RHaworth, I am grateful to you for that. But i would request you to kindly allow me to edit the article and undelete it. I have already mentioned in my user that how am i connected to the person. I am gonna provide whatever detail, it will be with validated references. And will mention the resources accordingly. Will try to work on the article in the criteria of Wikipedia. And, sir i need to tell that i am not writing about the person to promote him. I just want make a article in which i do mention his work and how he made it to the position with all available references. So please i will request you to undelete it and give me a chance to improve the article. Hbunnylife (talk) 15:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife

• User Hbunnylife is the 4th (so far) account promoting Nagpal. – Athaenara ✉ 22:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

• Athaenara- HiAthaenara , I am not here promoting nagpal, i want to resolve the issues which looks like a promotion. Kindly look into it . and, requesting you to please allow me to edit and modify the article so as it doesn't violate the terms of wikipedia. Kindly, allow me. it will be worthy of you.I assure you that previous concerns are no longer a problem. Can you please fix the issue.And, yes there will be no similarity in previous uploaded content and language. Kindly sir please look into it.@ RHaworth& Athaenara. Hbunnylife (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife

• No, you are promoting Nagpal and we're not going to help you do it. If you continue as you have, you'll end up blocked like the rest of this fleet of single-purpose accounts. – Athaenara ✉ 07:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Athaenara RHaworth Hi, I assure you that the article will not be in any relation of his promotion. I am just asking a chance to improve it. and, put some originality in the article. If anything comes under promotion or advertising without any legal references. i will be responsible of that. Kindly, please grant me permission to improve it. and assurity is that there will be no previous concerns in the article. Please. I am just writing this article to show his work in the Television industry which he started in very less age and his inspiration.He is known Casting director and non fiction television producer. Kindly, Athaenara Please allow me. Please restore as because i intend to work on it. and, I am willing to improve the articles in wikipedia within its terms. I want to be honest that this article was my first experience on wikipedia. and, i am still trying to improve in it and learn the guideliness to edit and update the article .This is the reason i am continuosly working on this particular article. as i have managed to get infos of the person Dennis Nagpal.So please, admin kindly allow me to improve it. and, provide something to the community. i assure you that will continue to improve different articles in the wikipedia community. I am new and wasn't in real aware of guidelines. Thanking you. It will be assistful from your side to let me learn over to write and modify articles. and, yes i tried editing this article by the name Dennis Nagpal, by making different user accounts because my other accounts were blocked and i wasn't aware of guidelines. And, the reason for continuously writing about the same user is that he is well known director and producer in television industry and there were no articles present here on wikipedia. so i thought of starting on wikipedia with his page. So, i worked on for months to collect the real data of him. so kindly please admin allow me to finish it. it will be grateful from your side.and,in future i will try to get the subject verified within my draft so as it doesn't violate the criteria.Hbunnylife (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife
•  Checkuser note: I just blocked Hbunnylife as a  Confirmed sock of Dennisnagpal at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dennisnagpal.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

  @Hbunnylife: The correct way to approach this would have been for you to get your original account unblocked and properly declared COI, not for you to evade the block with multiple other accounts. You have just made your problems worse. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Anachronist , admin i was not aware of the guideliness that if i make multiple accounts i'll get all blocked. I thought if my one account is blocked i can make other accounts, and i have already stated COI on my user page. Kindly, review. 196.207.127.190 (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Hbunnylife

You are evading your block right now. When you are blocked, the only thing you can do is try to get yourself unblocked. Pick an account and get yourself unblocked. Communicate only on your talk page. You have just made your problems worse, again. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow it. Do not post messages anywhere else but at the talk page of the account you want unblocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Geniusmisra (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• There is no such page as DanTDM2017, and a page you edited: DanTDM is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Neter · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Andres51534, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Andres51534 (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done and will not be done. Copyright violations. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Mike Dubois · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Designlab1008, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Designlab1008 (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox4 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use. —SteveStrummer (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done Hut 8.5 21:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Universidad ESAN · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is the Spanish name for ESAN University, a Spanish-speaking university, so it ought to redirect there. [I'd undelete it myself, but I'm away from my own computer.] Please note the history of ESAN University (its first edit included cleanup tags from three months before the page was created), so this might be a complex situation that warrants a history merge or some other not-so-basic action. —Nyttend backup (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

This one was only ever a redirect to itself, or an invalid redirect to a website, so no loss by deletion. I have make it redirect to ESAN University. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Jad Bou Karam · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 212.98.147.66, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 212.98.147.66 (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Kim Ou-joon · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This deleted under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ou-joon. Please restore the page to Draft:Kim Ou-joon or User:Sawol/Kim Ou-joon as I intend to work on it. Thanks. —Sawol (talk) 03:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draftified – the page has been restored to the draftspace at Draft:Kim Ou-joon. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Riordan Clinic · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Our page was deleted by a user named Fastily, we use the Wikipedia page to help new patients get informed about our clinic which has been apart of Wichita's history since the 1970s. We are unaware of why the page was deleted but would like it undeleted. it is our hope that even if it is unable to become undeleted that we are given the chance to talk to an administrator about avoiding this in the future. —RiordanClinic (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Not done This page was deleted as a result of this discussion. If you want to page to be undeleted I suggest you go to deletion review as it doesn't qualify for restoration through this process. You should also read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, and you don't in any sense own a Wikipedia page about your organisation. Hut 8.5 21:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

  @RiordanClinic: You are talking to administrators. Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity purposes. If you get yourself unblocked, you may try creating an article in draft space or your sandbox, and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Don't try to create it in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Robert Lyons (photographer) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bgammwiki, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bgammwiki (talk) 17:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Not done It was recently deleted as unambiguously promotional, and furthermore we absolutely will not reinstate copyright violations, as this was copied from https://www.lensculture.com/robert-lyons — please start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Template talk:Line 2 (Guangzhou Metro) RDT · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

See User talk:RHaworth#Guangzhou Metro. The template talk page should also be undeleted. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Nesrine.khelifi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Nesrine.khelifi: I restored this for you last year but nothing at all happened. What do you plan to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Jon Claytor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Geneticmagnetic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geneticmagnetic (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Mount Eden Vineyards · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Radicaldreamer29, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Radicaldreamer29 (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• VAG-COM · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

deleted and needs to be restored —72.73.76.155 (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• User:Nate 2169/sandbox/User:Nate 2169 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to re-edit it to where it meets Wikipedia's standards. —Nate 2169 (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This is never going to be an article, but if you remove the afc temp-late it may be something on your user page! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Ajabde · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Please don't delete this page. This page need moderation. —103.89.254.2 (talk) 09:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajabde and argue your case there, the page is not deleted yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• The page is now a redirect. Still there's nothing to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Dune (upcoming film) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Tammydemo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tammydemo (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Already done by Anachronist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Helen and Frank-TortugaMcKinley copy.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Frank-Shades.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Helen-Camera.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Ushuaia wsign.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• File:Helen and Frank-Greece.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS Permission confirmed license release under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL under ticket number 2017101810012662 —Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done @Clarkcj12: Can you confirm that File:Helen and Frank-Greece.jpeg and File:Helen-Camera.jpeg are covered as they are not taken by Helen? Also as you can see some information is missing such as the date. Lastly can you add the correct OTRS templates? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes everything is in order and will do. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 17:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Slam Allen · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 67.243.85.202, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 67.243.85.202 (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Bruce Nathan · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to work on it. Seems relevant since he is a declared Replublican candidate for 2018 Florida governor —2600:1700:3880:EB40:D0D9:2E51:DAAD:1DFD (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC) --Archadrian (talk) 18:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Adam Johnson (wrestler) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I have been researching and working on this my first wiki page. I did due diligence to research source articles and links to support my subject, and mirrored other such subjects to create page. Yet I have been blasted for not being objective. I am not sure why??? —JWise70 (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You have not been "blasted". Instead you will need to rewrite the draft with less WP:Peacock terms. You can read the comment, or also ask Robert McClenon for further help. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Template:Main section · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'd like to have the content of this template userfied to User:Seppi333/Main section for personal reference; I don't intend to recreate this template from the userfied version. Alternatively, if an admin can copy/paste the text that was displayed in this hatnote template either on my talk page or here (and ((ping)) me if copy/pasted here), that would also be fine. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 20:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Done pasted on talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Raymond Smith (ballet) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Volcanohunter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volcanohunter (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Schuylar · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This draft was not vandalism. It should therefore be undeleted. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done It was not submitted to AFC either, so I have gone to an earlier version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Mohammad Taqi Pessian · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The reason for deletion was "falsification", while the career of this notable person is documented by the Encyclopedia Iranica source mentioned in the article. Please undelete it so I can prove it. —Pahlevun (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh C. Kline · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jaschwa1969, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaschwa1969 (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

• Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Draft:Krishna kaanth · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Roophika Tiwari (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Done history restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)