The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VAG-COM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline because VCDS software, or VAG-COM, has not been the primary subject of any significant coverage in any independent sources. There is passing mention of the existence of this product in a few product roundup lists, e.g. PC-Welt but that's it. The most extensive coverage is a total of four paragraphs in the book Water-Cooled VW Performance Handbook: 3rd Edition If Ross-Tech LLC were notable, it could be merged per WP:PRODUCT into that, but the company itself has also only received passing mention. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They were also in PC mag and European Car according to Talk:VAG-COM#Ross-Tech along with with some scans of the articles. 96.54.57.109 (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 19:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 21:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.