The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unirea-shopping-center.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User's other uploads reflect a clear misunderstanding of image copyright, and most have been deleted as copyright violations. This image looks like most of the rest (which were sourced to various users on Flickr), but is claimed to be uploader's own work, which seems unlikely. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JIna1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a crop from a photograph of a TV screen, which would not be releasable by the uploader. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Womanpoloshirt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a photo of a TV screen or something else which is not the uploader's own creation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Additionally, file has been replaced with the image placeholder, as suggested by Snigbrook. — ξ^xplicit 01:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:This.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licensed as Wikipedia screenshot, but contains part of non-free image File:Ffxmap.jpg. snigbrook (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  Whether it is kept or deleted, the current filename should probably be replaced with the placeholder image from Template:Protected generic image name and protected. snigbrook (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 01:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DOFWorldMap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a screen shot of a game without claim of fair use. Eeekster (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obviously copyrighted  fetchcomms☛ 21:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  It might be copyrighted, but it seems to have a valid FUR and meets our NFCC. Where does it fail (perhaps I'm missing something?) — BQZip01 — ^talk 22:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but scale down. It has an appropriate FUR. — BQZip01 — ^talk 22:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm sorry - new here. But I believe its revised copyright notice should do? Thanks for the help. SerendipityNine (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 11:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DoFLogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Confirm this is nothing but text and therefore ((pd-textlogo)) and ((trademark)) apply instead of the existing ((Non-free logo)) tag. — BQZip01 — ^talk 22:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Indeed, Delete Sir Robert "Brightgalrs" Schultz de Plainsboro (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Any particular reason? — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.