The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:OpenWire editor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I trust that Delphi is non-free. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 00:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find nothing which states that Delphi 7 is free. The claim of the uploader is a reasonable misunderstanding, but still, the image has to go as other, better quality images with FURs exist for this product. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This is not image of Delphi. This is image of OpenWire in Delphi. OpenWire is free open source library and the image is captured by me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmitov (talk • contribs) 07:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  "in Delphi"... that is the problem. it's not JUST openwire. It is openwire in Delphi. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Is it possible to cut out the parts that are Delphi? As in is this a plug in where the view is drastically changed from the normal Delphi? — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The other files weren't nominated for deletion nor tagged, so those won't be touched in this nomination. — ξ^xplicit 20:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrying On, by Janet Zweig & Edward del Rosario-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is possibly non-free since the artist Janet Zweig is still alive. Until then, doesn't the copyright of image rest with the artist? See also File:Carrying On, by Janet Zweig & Edward del Rosario-2.jpg and File:Carrying On, by Janet Zweig & Edward del Rosario-3.jpg. Gryffindor (talk) 02:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all and redirects Copyrighted images not used in WP and without FURs. Keep only if they become used on WP and with viable FURs. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justin Tranter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Eeekster (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Copyvio take your pick on the source of living individual=replaceable=delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree that this is suspicious, but a quick search didn't find this photo in the same or higher resolution elsewhere. It does appear at [1], though in a lower resolution. However, unless the uploader can provide some evidence of authorship, I think we should play it safe and delete this image—we have a free photo of Justin Tranter already on the Commons (commons:File:Justin Tranter 2009 Tribeca portrait.jpg). —Bkell (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triforium.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged ((Attribution)), but from the quoted e-mail it is not clear that the copyright holder has indeed released this image to be used for any purpose—the e-mail refers only to use in a specific Wikipedia article. —Bkell (talk) 12:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Is the subject of an article in WP and its absence would be detrimental to the article. A proper FUR needs to be added and labeled as copyrighted. I would recommend that the uploader contact the owner of the work for an acceptable license. If no one fixes this in a few days, let me know on my talk page and I'll fix it. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FREE use picture in public domain official public Campaign photo of Candidate Darrin E McGillis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: Media kit images are not usually in the public domain and there is no evidence of this being the case. There is no proof the image falls within the Florida State exemption (see: US state works. ww2censor (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless clear evidence can be provided that the image is indeed PD. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:77thLenoxHill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Piece of art created in 2004, this image is non-free Gryffindor (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Freedom of Panorama does not apply, neither does de minimus. ww2censor (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:50thStreetAlice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Created in 1994, this image is non-free. Please see also these File:MosaicMusée.JPG, File:W Houston IRT SB platform jeh.JPG, File:W116 Lenox IRT plat jeh.JPG. Gryffindor (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kochi FishingNet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image summary states it was taken by someone other than the uploader (who uses his name on other uploads). Camera metadata doesn't match other PD-self contribs from this user. User has history of uploading copyright violations and claiming them as his own work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Most recent/new images are generally copyrighted unless otherwise proven. As the uploader clearly isn't the person who took the photo (and doesn't claim to be so), he doesn't have the right to give away this image. As the image is purely decorative, it needs to go. A FUR even with a copyright notice would not save this image. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:International Youth Fellowship logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is a logo; unlikely that the uploader holds the rights. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Image is nothing but letters and two crescents. Label ((pd-textlogo)) and ((trademark)). Even if you disagree, it certainly has a use within Wikipedia and should be given a FUR. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IYF World Camp Map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image looks professional, and is connected to a logo that the uploader also uploader that is Possibly Unfree. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete copyrighted+Replaceable=delete. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.