The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a publicity photo. I suspect this was taken from elsewhere without permission. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a scan from a book and therefore a derivative work. From the title, I am guessing the book is from 1941 which means there is no evidence of public domain. The image illustrates a medical condition, so could be replaced by an image of someone with the actual medical condition, therefore fair use not applicable. Wknight94 talk 12:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot see any reason to believe this image is under a Creative Commons license. J Milburn (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks to be a scan of an older sketch. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this work. J Milburn (talk) 13:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Web resolution, no meta-data, hosted in at least one other place on the 'net. I doubt the uploader owns the right to this image. J Milburn (talk) 14:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image appears to be of a much older sketch. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a publicity photo. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this file. J Milburn (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like an old sketch. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 15:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Images from Google Earth are not in the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like an old sketch. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by YellowMonkey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this old looking file, source website contains no copyright details. J Milburn (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source website says "The author intended not to use any copyrighted material for the publication or, if not possible, to indicate the copyright of the respective object. The copyright for any material created by the author is reserved. Any duplication or use of such diagrams, sounds or texts in other electronic or printed publications is not permitted without the author's agreement." I see no reason to believe this image is PD. J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a publicity photo. Uploader of this version claimed "all rights reserved" in an edit summary, but left the earlier (clearly false) claim of GFDL/CCbySA-self. J Milburn (talk) 22:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The watermarking on the image is making me suspect the "self-made" claim is dubious. J Milburn (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Source website is all rights reserved, not CC. J Milburn (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason to consider this image free. Source website is all rights reserved. J Milburn (talk) 23:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept w/ PD-pre78 template updated. Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Film dates to the late thirties, therefore the PD tag cannot be legitimate. J Milburn (talk) 23:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]