The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Was prepared to AGF, but looking at tlak page make meskeptical of PD-self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:59, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept and tagged properly. Stifle (talk) 10:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Postcard - Skeptical Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader has a long history of claiming images found online as his/her own work. Low resolution and missing metadata leads me to believe this is another. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Same as above; I can't find the original but user's history, image resolution, and lack of metadata doesn't look good. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And another of the same. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
appears to have been copied from http://www.dlareg-arts.com/pics/Mai_250020_1.jpg and http://www.dlareg-arts.com/ does not include any statements about cc licensing. —Chris Capoccia T⁄C 07:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Source says = "Copyright @ 2008 All Rights Reserved St. Joseph's Ex-Student Association" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Claimed as self , but skeptical given map quality Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now-FASTILY (TALK) 01:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Celarly not a PD-self claim , Lacks rationale Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like proffesionaly staged shot, no source Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept per WP:AGF in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Image doesn't show up on tineye. Stifle (talk) 10:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PD Self claim- but concert image - Skeptical Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Watermarked image - "(C) 2007 erodeinfo.com" - Other images from same uploader might need review. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sketpical as to CC-BY-SA , based on other contribs of user Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept per IronGargoyle. It may not be PD in the UK, but as the design of the medal was published before 1923, it's PD in the US, which is good enough for Wikipedia. +Angr 10:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
British Artist died in 1965 - Can't be PD self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is a photograph of a memorial plaque that I own. If I take a photograph of an object that I own, then the copyright for that image belongs to me. Where is the copyright violation ? (A. Carty (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly dervied work... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by YellowMonkey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If source given - Can't be pd-self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept questioned revisions deleted. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Product/Textile design ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Source site says - "Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Shawn McHorse." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: orphaned image found by tineye and used for an album cover, so highly unlikely to be copyright of the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 16:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Inconclusive; transferred to FFD. Stifle (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Caligraphic design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete, F9 by B. Uploader also blocked for copyright violations and sockpuppetry. Blueboy96 20:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No indication source listed is 'free' licence Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a derived work from the URL given on the file page Rai•me 20:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a derived work from the URL given on the file page. Rai•me 20:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a derived work from the URL given on the file page. Note that the image is tagged with ((PD-self)), but the uploader gives credit to another user. Rai•me 20:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A composite image of obviously commercial images, uploader does not hold copyright of these images. Polly (Parrot) 21:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image almost certainly sourced from a website, uploader very unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 21:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY (TALK) 01:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Logo of various educational institutions, uploader extremely unlikely to be the copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 21:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Copyright notice on the image rather says it all, no evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 22:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Promo image of an actor, small size and lack of meta data makes it likely the uploader does not hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 22:04, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like an obvious screenshot, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 22:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept; PD as created by the US government. Stifle (talk) 10:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No proof this image is public domain. Polly (Parrot) 23:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]