Stephen Crane

[edit]
Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm hoping to nominate this article for FAC in a month's time. Since the last review (closed August 11), I have added several new images (all free) and I have completed the "Fiction and poetry" section. Several other changes have taken place in the lead and "Legacy" section. I am interested in knowing if the article is comprehensive, well written, and (of course) FA material. All comments and suggestions are welcome and would be much appreciated. Thanks! María (habla conmigo) 19:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Ruhrfisch comments: This looks really good, but here are some nit picky suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.

  • Reworded both.
  • Yeah, it's a bit much. Changed to "important".
  • Oo, good catch; reworded to make it clear that it is indeed a quote from Crane.
  • Changed.

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpful comments! If you notice anything else, don't hesitate mentioning it. The more eyes the better. :) María (habla conmigo) 15:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awadewit comments - Sorry it has taken me so long to get to this! It was a pleasure to read, however. I just here, drinking my Dr. Pepper, going "why didn't I have my class read Maggie"? :) Next semester, I think! Then I refer them to this wonderful article!

Ahh! The pressure! :) María (habla conmigo) 13:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added "the older author would later serve as an influential adviser and mentor".
  • Agreed; changed to: "Crane's work is often thematically driven by Naturalistic and Realistic concerns, including ideals versus realities, spiritual crises and fear. These themes are particularly evident in Crane's first three novels, Maggie: A Girl of the Streets The Red Badge of Courage and George's Mother."
  • Nice, like it; changed (with fixed typos :)
  • Changed to "apparent".
  • Added example of allegory in Red Badge.
  • Fleshed out, added information about collections, recognition or lack thereof, etc. Hope that covers it...
  • Nooo! Okay, changed to "in that his work contains".
  • I asked the original uploader, and received no response; tried to be sneaky, and failed. That's it! Scanned and uploaded the (much cleaner) version from Davis' book, citing her as a source.
  • I emailed the Stephen Crane Society with the hopes that they will have an answer. Until then, I've replaced it with a fine battle-esque image that Crane would have approved of (from the battle that supposedly influenced Red Badge): Image:Battle of Chancellorsville.png

I'd say after a few improvements to the "Short fiction" section and some image detective work, this will sail right on through FAC. Accolades will rain down on you! Awadewit (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much to the second power, Awadewit! I think I'm nearly done... María (habla conmigo) 15:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]