The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:180px-Arlene 2005 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned map image, no source for underling map Skier Dude (talk) 01:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:180px-Bret 2005 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned map image, no source for base image Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:180px-Zeta 2005 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, target use/article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:180px-Epsilon 2005 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, target use/article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Head-still.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, target use/article unclear Skier Dude (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:150px-1872 Atlantic ts 1 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned map image, target article/encyc use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 02:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:150px-1-L 1992 track.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 12george1 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned map image, target article/encyc use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 02:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evstafiev-bosnia-serbs-boy-gun-to-head.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evstafiev (notify | contribs).

• Unencyclopedic, persons on the photo have no apparent or aserted notability, photo reflects negative perception and defames the entire group of people claiming unproven and questionable source

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - fails WP:NFCC#1 - replaceable with a free alternate (text) - Peripitus (Talk) 05:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamucha FlyJ.PG.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SSJ 5 (notify | contribs).

• Non-free image used to show that a character can fly, which can be adequately explained with (free) text. Jay32183 (talk) 10:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Agreed, this is unnecessary. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 11:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Ok, if you can explain it in text go ahead. Otherwise leave the image be. There is bunch of screenshots on wiki, so I don't really see any reason for deletition. Going by that logic we could erase the screenshots from games and other media and we would be left with plain text. I really don't see why would this be deleted. If not flying it can demonstrate Yamcha taking Goku away from the battlefield and his role as a supporting fighter. SSJ 5 (talk) 11:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • That can also be explained by text. Please read WP:NFCC#1. We don't use non-free content when free content is available. This logic could lead to other images being deleted, and they should be. Jay32183 (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • The thing is ... I don't see any being deleted ... SSJ 5 (talk) 12:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • This isn't an all or nothing situation. We can delete this image now, and others later. Others have been deleted previously; you can check the deletion logs. Jay32183 (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • I know how the things are, but the consensus was reached on the Yamcha talk page that the image is necessary. SSJ 5 (talk) 00:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • There's absolutely nothing in that image that can't be expressed with text. The discussion on the talk page doesn't include any mention of WP:NFCC, so there can't be a consensus that the image meets it. Jay32183 (talk) 07:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • I agree, as per Wikipedia's guidelines it's better to use free content than that which isn't within the public domain. Besides, even if there was a consensus in the talk page, it doesn't make it a binding decision, and can still be overturned. Rucha58 01:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rucha58 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable fair use - Peripitus (Talk) 05:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glenn_Rosewal_lon_CNBC_Asia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ansonrosew (notify | contribs).

• Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 13:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It provides context of who Glenn is. When you say "Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding" how does any image of a person add to a readers understanding? Images of people in different situations simply allow someone to come to terms with what the individual looks like and the types of environments he/she is associated with.

• • If the image is being used to depict a living person, then it would be deemed a replaceable fair use image - have a look at the Non-free policy. PhilKnight (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerhart Hauptmann.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ktsquare (notify | contribs).

• Deprecated by higher-res img at Commons Papa November (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desoto-hernando.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kingturtle (notify | contribs).

• Low-res version of commons img Papa November (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by WilyD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SimpsonJimmi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kichaa (notify | contribs).

• This is nto self-made. This is copied from some website. Damiens.rf 20:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagged as speedy. Mike R (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Deleted and the three moved to commons tagged for eventual deletion - Peripitus (Talk) 05:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- uploaded by Ian Fortuno (notify | contribs).

• mutiple images with issues sockpupet of previous user with issues see Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_May_15#All_uploads_by_User:HeatherRoseF Geni 22:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.