The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - obvious copy vio. Okiefromokla (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

File:Greenwoodtulsa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Okiefromokla (notify | contribs).

• User:Dsjeffries has made a claim that this image was falsely labeled as "PD-self" when in fact it was created by him and posted to Flicker here. Since I don't know whether this is correct I am submitting the file for deletion so the copyright claim can be evaluated. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete based on information found here when compared to the EXIF info here. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 07:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I must have uploaded this before truly understanding image copyright tags and marked it as "own work" to avoid the hassle, though I'm a little confused why I didn't provide a URL as I actually didn't get it from flickr. In any case, I'll delete it myself and review everything I uploaded prior to last summer to make sure everything's in order. My apologies to Dsjeffries. Okiefromokla ^questions? 23:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harriman Nelson Ribbons.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Dr. Stantz (notify | contribs).

• single use image, redundant to templated individual ribbons. See this edit for the superior way to display awards: using a table to present each individual ribbon, and Template:ribbon devices to display devices. This allows the ribbon rack to be altered much easier if a change is required, and using existing images takes up less space than if every single biography had its own image for ribbons. Since I've already replaced the image with a ribbon rack, the image is useless. bahamut0013^words_deeds 16:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harm's Medals.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Neovu79 (notify | contribs).

• Same argument as above: single use image, redundant to templated individual ribbons. See this edit for the superior way to display awards: using a table to present each individual ribbon, and Template:ribbon devices to display devices. This allows the ribbon rack to be altered much easier if a change is required, and using existing images takes up less space than if every single biography had its own image for ribbons. Since I've already replaced the image with a ribbon rack, the image is useless. bahamut0013^words_deeds 17:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mason medals.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Xerocs (notify | contribs).

• Same argument as above: single use image, redundant to templated individual ribbons. See this edit for the superior way to display awards: using a table to present each individual ribbon, and Template:ribbon devices to display devices. This allows the ribbon rack to be altered much easier if a change is required, and using existing images takes up less space than if every single biography had its own image for ribbons. Since I've already replaced the image with a ribbon rack, the image is useless. Used on the user page for a user who has been inactive in quite some time. bahamut0013^words_deeds 17:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAT rappeling.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ominae (notify | contribs).

• Licence is "Non-free television screenshot", but image is not used "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents", but instead in an article about a police unit. Also low quality. DavidDCM (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herald.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Idleguy (notify | contribs).

• Fails WP:NFCC#8. Using the image does not increase reader understand above the text of the caption. —teb728 t c 23:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fair use rationale is not valid. Image doesn't foreseeable meet NFCC. It's current use in the one article is not appropriate. The image is not iconic in relation to the topic, nor is there critical commentary on the image. Magazine covers aren't to be used like this.(comment copied from now closed PUI) -Andrew c ^[talk] 23:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See my nomination at WP:NFCR#File:Herald.jpg. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As discussed at WP:NFCR#File:Herald.jpg. Faraz (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.