Good topic candidates: view - edit - history

United States presidential election, 1880

[edit]

Contributor(s): Coemgenus

This collection of fifteen featured articles and three good articles covers the major events and people involved in the 1880 U.S. presdiential election. The first column lists the presidential and vice-presidential candidates from the two major parties and the two minor parties that received at least 0.1% of the popular vote. The middle column includes the significant political conventions that year. The third column lists "also-rans," men who sought their party's nomination and had the votes of at least 10% of their convention's delegates. --Coemgenus (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend reorder this template with Reps on left, Dems on middle, and everything else on right.
- Sure, that makes sense. I've rearranged it that way. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me try again: left: RNC, winner, VP, other Reps; center: DNC, winner, VO, other Dems; right: GNC, others. Nergaal (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Done. --Coemgenus (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering if John W. Phelps should be included too, but I would be fine with or without it. Ah, an the blurb should mention most of the linked articles. Nergaal (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- I left out Phelps because he only won about a thousand votes across the country, and I thought we had to draw a line somewhere. Thanks for the support and the suggestions on formatting, etc. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I agree with drawing a line somewhere or the topic could get unwieldy. MPJ-DK 00:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jclemens (talk) 08:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aoba47 (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mattximus (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Featured Topic.--十八 20:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Field marshal (India)

[edit]

Field marshal (India)

3 articles

Sam Manekshaw

Kodandera M. Cariappa

Contributor(s): Krishna Chaitanya Velaga

All the three articles are good articles, so I think this meets the GT criteria --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. It's a complete group, meets all the criteria. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support A complete set, there have only been two FMs of India. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support was surprised it was such a small topic until I read that the position is largly ceremonial and there really are not that many Field Marshals. That also makes for a very stable topic as well, even if there is another Field Marshall announced it's unlikely to be more than one per decade. MPJ-DK 00:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jclemens (talk) 08:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 09:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64 21:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unorthodox Jukebox

[edit]

Unorthodox Jukebox

8 articles

"Locked Out of Heaven"

"When I Was Your Man"

"Treasure"

"Gorilla"

"Young Girls"

"Moonshine"

Moonshine Jungle Tour

Contributor(s): MarioSoulTruthFan

All of this articles met GA criteria, reviewed over the time but without a huge gape between them. They have not suffered drastic modifications since their nominations. Any modifications that can improve their quality can be made as I'm always available to such suggestions. I included the album, singles, the only promotional single and the tour. --MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- 1989 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support; thanks for working on the articles. – FrB.TG (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - looks like quality work. MPJ-DK 00:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - good to know I may need a tour article GA for a certain album if it has an article! I see nothing in specific violation of the GA criteria, but the album article should have its release history double checked to see if the citations actually support each individual type of release. I thought I saw at least one with misrepresentation in there. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 15:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which one is? I found sanity do you have other? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have fixed them all, full support restored. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 14:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Jclemens (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work with this and everything looks to be in order to me. Aoba47 (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. --十八 19:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]