Remove: Incomplete without the latest entry. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to support addition with Engage promoted. Good save! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@QuicoleJR: Do you think you'll get a chance to work on Engage soon? You said you were interested awhile back, but it's fine if it fell through the cracks. If you don't think you're going to get to it, mind if I take a look at getting the article to GA? SnowFire (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with you giving it a go. I'll try to help a bit, but it's not really my current priority. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hold to give SnowFire a chance. QuicoleJR (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated Engage for GA. We'll see if it passes. SnowFire (talk) 21:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Defer to Engage's GAN. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 04:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Engage passed GA recently; thanks to User:Cukie Gherkin for the review. I've updated the template to include Engage. @Armbrust:. SnowFire (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, all articles under this umbrella are GAs. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fails criterion 3.b as God of War Ragnarök is not a WP:GA, isn't being worked on, and is past the three month grace period (game was released on 9 November 2022)).ArmbrustTheHomunculus 22:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Obviously, this can be renominated if Ragnarök is brought to GA. JOEBRO64 00:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: Incomplete without the latest title. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pausing vote now that the missing title is nominated at GAN. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 23:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw my vote since there is a pending GAN. I will wait for its outcome MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The notion that God of War Ragnarök "isn't being worked on" was false, but with that being said, the article is currently up for GAN. --JDC808♫ 03:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JDC808: Well, at the time this removal candidate started there really wasn't that much editing to the article that would indicate it being worked on. ArmbrustTheHomunculus 17:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until Ragnarök's GAN has run its course. DecafPotato (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hold to let the GA nomination finish. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hold for the GA nomination. It's good to see this being worked on. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hold until the Ragnarök GAN is completed. -- Zoo (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and add Ragnarök now that it has become a GA -- ZooBlazertalk 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Final Fantasy XIII for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
The articles in this topic were slowly but surely built up by myself and PresN, and when I did the previous additional nomination in 2014, I assumed that would be that. But after some initial resistance and questioning from editors (including me), Kung Fu Man has done what I thought was impossible and both created and brought successfully to GA an article for the character Vanille.
Given recent trends in limiting the creation of fictional character articles, it's unlikely there will be any other additions to this topic. I trust this will either be the last addition to this topic, or the last for a long while. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/M.I.A. albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:
Support: Not sure if BrooklynVegan and Hypebeast are reliable sources. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MarioSoulTruthFan: - I moved the above comment here as it was inadvertantly placed on the main FTC page itself. I need to log off now but will respond to it tomorrow -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MarioSoulTruthFan: - Hypebeast replaced. Per this, BrooklynVegan has a multi-person editorial staff so seems OK as a source to me.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but wondering why this process is necessary. Aren't these articles self-evidently part of the same topic as the others? — Amakuru (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as a straightforward addition of the latest entries. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:19, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I also echo Amakuru's thoughts. Not sure this is necessary given they're obviously part of the topic, and this will need to be repeated every year the final is played. NapHit (talk) 19:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, if the letter of the process says that a discussion is always needed, then I feel like some extra clause would be useful saying that for WP:Sky is blue type situations, where new articles come along that are GA/FA and also indisputably part of the series, such that nobody would ever think otherwise, then they are simluy added directly without discussion. — Amakuru (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 20 January 2023 a new champion, Rocky Romero, was crowned. As it's already a GA, it can be added to the topic immediately. Regards, ArmbrustTheHomunculus 18:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Add: Looks like a straightforward addition of the latest title holder. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]