The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator, I misread some of the sources and have found they are more then meet WP:POET (non-admin closure) CodeLyoko^buzz 14:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zodwa Nyoni

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:POET and the only really convincing source is the BBC article, the rest are passing mentions or published by Zodwa herself CodeLyoko^buzz 17:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CodeLyoko^buzz 17:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. CodeLyoko^buzz 17:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CodeLyoko^buzz 17:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ... and the Times and the Guardian and in Zimbabwe and ... Victuallers (talk) 11:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question @Victuallers: You mention a Times source, but I don't see one in the article? Agree that the Guardian and New Zimbabwe sources are good, as well as the BBC News. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep Sources are more than sufficient. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.