The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Reliable sources exist, please integrate into article. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Youth in Asia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this a sufficiently notable band? I don't think so. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable band. Keb25 (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I found zero significant coverage. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 23:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The band has five pages devoted to them in Ian Glasper's book The Day the Country Died. They are also covered to some extent in the books Visual Vitriol: The Street Art and Subcultures of the Punk and Hardcore Generation and The Story of Crass.--Michig (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – per Michig's sources. We wouldn't expect to find online sources for a band whose coverage primarily would have been in the early 1980s. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.