The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winmark Homes

[edit]

Orphaned non-notable company, deleted before as WP:CSD#G11. I don't think it meets WP:CORP. User who edited it has just attempted to spam some Georgia articles with it. Hús ö nd 22:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~Company isn't notable (minor industry awards, low size rankings), and article is probably in violation of WP:COI given related edits. --Thetrick (talk) 23:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found some unfavorable news about the company. See this article about a lawsuit the company lost and this Google News archive search. --Eastmain (talk) 23:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only one third party reference which only indicates size, if the previous negative citations were added and multiple independent citations added as well, it might meet wp:n. As is the references don't establish notability. Faradayplank (talk) 22:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Shameless self-promotional page. -16:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Delete Continued promotion of company by User:JES2008‎. Qqqqqq (talk) 23:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.