The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia scots guards

[edit]

Musical group founded just this year. No claim in article of meeting WP:Notability or WP:MUSIC; gsearch only comes up with band's own web site. Contested prod. Fabrictramp (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - in the current state the article fails to show notability. Pundit|utter 17:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Weak delete. I do see some possible (very) minor notability (WP:MUSIC, see 6 7.), but definitely unverified and unreferenced. Also, in obvious breach of WP:COI. ~~Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)~~ Peasantwarrior (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think this type of band would have great difficulty in meeting WP:BAND because it's not likely that they would get a recording contract or do a national tour, but I can't think that there's much notability here. I agree with Peasantwarrior that there is the possibility of minor notability as s/he referenced, but nothing palpable. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 20:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete apparently fails WP:MUSIC (even if it meets criterion #7, it still isn't verified) -FrankTobia (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.