- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Union of Law Scientists[edit]
- Union of Law Scientists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV. Non-goverment, non public. Private org. Fails sigcov. scope_creepTalk 16:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Unable to find significant, independent, reliable coverage of the organization in the existing en.wp article, the Georgian Wiki article, or via newspaper searches including Georgian sources. —Ganesha811 (talk) 06:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.